Chelsea are bracing for a potentially delicate situation ahead of the January transfer window as one member of their squad seeks an exit in search of regular playing time, while the club weighs the broader implications of allowing him to leave.
Since the change in ownership at Stamford Bridge, Chelsea have adopted a markedly different recruitment philosophy, shifting away from established stars toward an aggressive strategy focused on young and emerging talents.
The approach has reshaped the club’s identity, with heavy investment in players viewed as long-term projects rather than immediate solutions.
Supporters of the new model point to several success stories that suggest the strategy is beginning to bear fruit.
Players such as Cole Palmer and Moises Caicedo have become central figures in the team, while highly rated prospects like Estevao are expected to play significant roles in the future.
Chelsea are also preparing to welcome additional young talents, including Geovany Quenda, Mike Penders, and Dastan Satpaev, further reinforcing the club’s commitment to youth development.
However, not everyone is convinced that the policy is delivering the desired balance between potential and performance.
Critics argue that Chelsea’s transfer dealings have created an overcrowded squad lacking experienced leaders, leaving the first team short of proven quality in key areas.
They cite recent moves, including the widely debated swap involving Noni Madueke and Jamie Gittens, as an example of transactions that failed to represent a clear upgrade in quality.
Within this environment, competition for places has intensified, prompting some squad members to consider opportunities elsewhere to secure consistent first-team football.
One such player is Filip Jorgensen, who is reportedly eager to leave Chelsea during the January window in order to gain regular minutes.
Sources suggest Jorgensen believes a move would accelerate his development and help him establish himself at club and international level.
Chelsea, however, are understood to be reluctant to sanction his departure midway through the season.
The club values the depth he provides and is wary of weakening the squad at a time when injuries, fatigue, and fixture congestion can quickly expose a lack of options.
There are also lingering doubts within the club about Jorgensen’s readiness to become a dependable starter in the Premier League.
Concerns have reportedly been raised about his ability to cope with the physical demands of English football, particularly in aerial duels and high-pressure situations.
These factors complicate the prospect of finding a suitable replacement during the winter window, where options are often limited and expensive.
As a result, Chelsea may prefer to delay any decision until the summer, when a more permanent and carefully planned solution could be implemented.
The possible return or promotion of a more experienced option like Penders next season could provide Chelsea with additional stability, while opening the door for Jorgensen to move on under clearer circumstances.
While such an approach may align with the club’s long-term planning, it risks frustrating the player, whose ambitions extend beyond club football.
Regular playing time is often crucial for international recognition, and prolonged spells on the bench could damage Jorgensen’s hopes of featuring in major tournaments such as the World Cup.
The unfolding situation highlights the ongoing tension at Chelsea between individual career aspirations and the club’s broader strategic vision.
As January approaches, the club faces a familiar challenge of balancing squad harmony, development goals, and competitive demands in an increasingly scrutinised rebuilding phase.
(DDM) – Arsenal supporters are bracing for a decisive stretch in the Premier League as the club prepares for its next five matches, a run that could significantly shape the title race and the balance of power among England’s top teams.
With the festive congestion easing, attention has turned to how Arsenal’s schedule compares with those of fellow contenders Manchester City, Liverpool, and Chelsea, all of whom face demanding tests in the opening weeks of 2026.
Arsenal begin this crucial sequence at the Emirates Stadium on December 30, 2025, with a home fixture against Aston Villa, one of the season’s most impressive overachievers.
Villa have emerged as a serious threat this campaign, combining tactical discipline with attacking flair, and their form has already unsettled several established clubs.
For Mikel Arteta’s side, the Villa encounter represents an immediate challenge, as dropped points at home could weaken Arsenal’s title ambitions at a critical moment.
The Gunners then travel south to face AFC Bournemouth on January 3, 2026, a match that appears favourable on paper but carries familiar Premier League risks.
Bournemouth’s ability to frustrate bigger teams at home means Arsenal must maintain focus and intensity to avoid a costly setback.
Arsenal’s most high-profile test in this sequence arrives on January 8, 2026, when they host Liverpool in a blockbuster showdown expected to have major implications for the title race.
The clash with Liverpool is widely viewed as a momentum-defining fixture, testing Arsenal’s defensive organisation, midfield control, and mental strength against one of Europe’s most experienced sides.
In contrast, Manchester City face a similarly challenging schedule that demands squad depth and tactical flexibility.
Pep Guardiola’s team travel to Sunderland on January 1, 2026, before hosting Chelsea on January 4 in a match that could influence the upper reaches of the table.
City then welcome Brighton on January 7, a fixture that historically requires patience and precision against a well-drilled opponent.
Liverpool’s own run mirrors the intensity faced by their rivals, beginning with a home game against Leeds United on January 1.
Jurgen Klopp’s side then head to Wolverhampton Wanderers on January 3, before making the trip to Arsenal on January 8.
The tight turnaround and travel demands are expected to test Liverpool’s squad depth, especially with commitments across multiple competitions.
Chelsea, meanwhile, confront a mixed but potentially defining set of fixtures that could clarify their position in the top-four conversation.
The Blues host Bournemouth on December 30 before travelling to face Manchester City on January 4, a daunting assignment that could expose lingering defensive inconsistencies.
Chelsea then visit Fulham on January 7, a London derby where local rivalry often overrides league positions.
Collectively, these fixtures underline how narrow the margins are likely to be in the title race, with Arsenal’s run standing out for its blend of opportunity and danger.
Football analysts suggest that Arsenal’s ability to take maximum points from their home matches, particularly against Villa and Liverpool, may determine whether they sustain genuine title momentum.
As the Premier League enters this pivotal phase, the contrasting schedules of Arsenal, City, Liverpool, and Chelsea highlight a defining period where form, fitness, and focus could decide the direction of the season.
No fewer than seven people have been confirmed dead following an improvised explosive device (IED) explosion along the Magami–Dansadau highway in Maru Local Government Area of Zamfara State, north-west Nigeria.
The explosion occurred on Saturday afternoon near the Yar-gada community, sending shockwaves through the area and triggering panic among residents and road users.
Eyewitnesses said the blast affected a trailer conveying passengers and farm produce, as well as several motorcyclists travelling along the busy route.
A resident of Dansadau, Abubakar Dansadau, told Channels Television that the explosion killed five passengers inside the truck and four motorcycle riders. One of the injured victims later died from injuries sustained in the incident.
Confirming the attack, the Senior Special Assistant to the Zamfara State Governor on Broadcast Media and Public Affairs, Mustapha Jafaru Kaura, said preliminary investigations indicated that the explosion was caused by an IED allegedly planted by fleeing bandits loyal to the notorious bandit leader, Dogo Gide.
According to Kaura, troops had earlier engaged the armed group in the area, neutralising several fighters.
However, security forces were unaware that explosive devices had been planted along the route between Yar-gada and Mai-hayahaya villages as the bandits retreated.
“As of Saturday evening, seven deaths have been officially confirmed,” Kaura said, adding that security agencies have since cordoned off the affected area to prevent further casualties.
The incident was also confirmed by the spokesperson of the Joint Task Force, North-West Operation Fansan Yamma, Captain David Adewusi. He clarified that the explosion was not linked to any foreign or aerial military operation.
“This was not an airstrike. It was an improvised explosive device planted by terrorists,” Adewusi stated, stressing that troops are intensifying clearance operations along major routes in the axis.
The attack comes just days after Zamfara State Governor, Dauda Lawal, visited several communities along the Dansadau axis as part of renewed efforts to tackle insecurity.
The visit marked the first time a sitting governor had visited the area since 2011.
Governor Lawal’s visit was aimed at reassuring residents of the government’s commitment to restoring peace and strengthening security operations in the long-troubled region.
Security agencies have urged residents and travellers to remain vigilant and report suspicious objects or movements, as investigations into the incident continue.
(DDM) – The Super Eagles of Nigeria have announced their starting lineup for the crucial AFCON 2025 clash against Tunisia, with striker Victor Osimhen set to spearhead the attack.
DDM gathered that Head Coach Emmanuel Chelle unveiled the lineup ahead of the match, highlighting a blend of experienced internationals and promising young talents.
Osimhen, who has been in scintillating form for both club and country, is expected to carry Nigeria’s goal-scoring hopes and lead the forward line with pace and precision.
The lineup features a balanced midfield designed to control possession and supply Osimhen and other attackers with creative opportunities.
Defensively, Chelle has opted for a resilient backline to counter Tunisia’s tactical threats, while the goalkeeper slot is secured by one of Nigeria’s most reliable shot-stoppers.
Fans and pundits have reacted swiftly to the lineup announcement, praising the inclusion of key veterans while expressing curiosity over some surprising selections.
Analysts note that Chelle’s approach reflects a desire to combine experience with youthful energy, aiming to maximize Nigeria’s chances of progressing deep into the tournament.
Osimhen’s leadership on the field will be critical, as Nigeria faces a technically sound Tunisian side known for disciplined defense and rapid counterattacks.
The Super Eagles’ supporters have rallied online, expressing optimism that the selected squad can deliver a victory and maintain Nigeria’s strong AFCON pedigree.
Preparations for the match have intensified, with training sessions focused on tactical cohesion, set-piece execution, and team chemistry.
Chelle emphasized the importance of discipline and collective effort, urging players to stay focused and execute the game plan meticulously.
The AFCON 2025 encounter is expected to draw massive viewership both in Nigeria and internationally, reflecting the continent’s passion for football and national pride.
Observers suggest that a strong performance against Tunisia could set the tone for Nigeria’s campaign, providing confidence and momentum for the group stages.
Fans are particularly keen to see Osimhen in action, hoping he can replicate his club form and inspire Nigeria to victory.
The match promises to be a high-stakes affair, with both teams vying for early dominance and crucial points in the tournament.
With the lineup officially announced, attention now shifts to the pitch, where Osimhen and his teammates will seek to deliver a performance worthy of Nigerian football fans’ expectations.
Lawmakers of the Rivers State House of Assembly have captured national attention after presenting a brand-new 2025 Toyota Corolla to the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory, Nyesom Wike, as a Christmas gift.
DDM gathered that the vehicle presentation took place at the House of Assembly complex in Port Harcourt, in the presence of top political figures, party stakeholders, and supporters.
The gesture, described by political observers as a symbolic appreciation, was intended to recognise Wike’s leadership style, political influence, and impact on Rivers State and national politics.
Supporters hailed the lawmakers for demonstrating loyalty and acknowledging Wike’s role in shaping political discourse and strategic alignments in the South-South region.
Critics, however, raised concerns about the optics of the gift, questioning the appropriateness of such a high-value present amid Nigeria’s ongoing economic challenges and calls for frugality in public spending.
The development has since sparked nationwide debates over governance, accountability, and the boundaries between public service and personal recognition.
Political analysts note that Wike has long been regarded as a dominant political figure in Rivers State, with influence extending across the South-South and within the ruling circles at the federal level.
Observers suggest that the gift could strengthen Wike’s political leverage ahead of future elections, signalling loyalty from state lawmakers and reinforcing alliances within the political elite.
Supporters argue that such gestures encourage political dedication, reward consistent leadership, and highlight the importance of recognizing service that shapes policy and governance outcomes.
Opponents, however, contend that public perception matters and that lavish gifts from lawmakers to political figures can exacerbate distrust in government institutions.
The presentation of the Toyota Corolla coincided with the festive season, symbolizing both celebration and political messaging, as leaders balance personal loyalty with public accountability.
Political commentators say the incident reflects broader tensions in Nigerian politics, where symbolic acts of recognition often generate debates over ethics, transparency, and societal expectations.
The Rivers State House of Assembly’s action has drawn media attention beyond the region, with discussions trending on social media platforms, reflecting contrasting viewpoints on political culture and personal loyalty.
As the discourse continues, analysts note that Wike’s stature and strategic influence remain significant, with gestures like these potentially reinforcing his centrality in both state and national political calculations.
The event concluded with Wike expressing gratitude to the lawmakers and reiterating his commitment to policies promoting development, unity, and strategic governance across Rivers State and Nigeria.
The gift, while symbolic, underscores the complex interplay between political loyalty, leadership recognition, and public scrutiny in contemporary Nigerian politics.
(DDM) – The Minister of the Federal Capital Territory, Nyesom Wike, has declared that no Nigerian politician attracts more insults, attacks, and political hostility than him, except President Bola Ahmed Tinubu.
DDM gathered that Wike made the statement at a thanksgiving service held at Ochigba community in Ahoada East Local Government Area of Rivers State.
The event took place at the country home of the Chairman of the South-South Development Commission, Chibudom Nwuche.
The minister addressed political leaders, party stakeholders, and supporters from across Rivers State during the gathering.
Wike said persistent verbal attacks against him stem from his refusal to abandon political agreements or shift positions for convenience.
He insisted that consistency, not betrayal, defines his political career.
Wike argued that many of his critics feel threatened by his influence and capacity to shape national political outcomes.
He stated that after President Tinubu, no other Nigerian politician endures the level of abuse he faces in public discourse.
Wike linked the attacks to his unwavering support for Tinubu before, during, and after the 2023 presidential election.
He noted that many individuals who now parade loyalty to the President were absent when political risks were highest.
Wike stressed that true loyalty is proven during difficult moments, not after victory is secured.
He reminded the audience that his political decisions during the 2023 elections significantly altered Nigeria’s political landscape.
Wike said he believes strongly in political agreements and insists they must be implemented once reached.
He added that failure to honour agreements fuels instability and distrust in Nigerian politics.
According to him, politicians who value integrity often attract hostility from opportunists.
Wike maintained that insults would not distract him from supporting the Tinubu administration.
He reaffirmed his commitment to policies aimed at national stability, infrastructure development, and governance reforms.
Speaking at the event, SSDC Chairman Chibudom Nwuche publicly pledged continued support for Wike.
Nwuche said Rivers State political leaders would not abandon Wike despite pressure from opposing interests.
He described Wike as a strategic political force whose relevance extends beyond Rivers State.
Nwuche credited Wike with strengthening Rivers State’s political bargaining power at the national level.
The thanksgiving ceremony also served as a convergence point for South-South political leaders.
Speakers at the event called for unity, discipline, and strategic cooperation ahead of future elections.
Observers noted that the gathering highlighted Wike’s enduring grassroots strength and elite support base.
Political analysts say Wike’s comments reflect deeper tensions within Nigeria’s ruling political class.
They argue that his blunt political style continues to polarize opinion nationwide.
The event ended with prayers for peace, national unity, and sustained political stability.
Political watchers believe Wike’s remarks signal his determination to remain central to Nigeria’s power dynamics for years to come.
(DDM) – Arsenal kept their Premier League title push firmly on track after a hard-fought 2-1 victory over Brighton, responding in style to mounting pressure from defending champions Manchester City to reclaim top spot on the table.
The Gunners went into the evening fixture knowing that City had temporarily moved above them following a narrow 2-1 win away to Nottingham Forest in the lunchtime kick-off, a result that underlined Pep Guardiola’s side’s growing momentum in the title race.
At the City Ground, Manchester City were inspired by a commanding display that saw them grind out another crucial away win, extending their strong recent form and briefly placing them at the summit of the league standings.
City’s victory increased the pressure on Arsenal, who were fully aware that any slip-up against Brighton would hand Guardiola’s men a psychological advantage in the title battle.
However, Mikel Arteta’s side showed composure and resilience at the Emirates, producing a disciplined performance to overcome a Brighton team known for their tactical organisation and attacking intent.
Arsenal took control early, moving the ball with confidence and pressing aggressively, before converting their dominance into goals that ultimately proved decisive.
Brighton responded with intensity and pulled one back to set up a tense finale, but Arsenal’s defence held firm under sustained pressure to secure all three points and return to the top of the Premier League table.
Elsewhere, Liverpool also claimed a vital 2-1 win over Wolves at Anfield in an emotionally charged encounter that marked the first meeting between Diogo Jota’s former clubs since his passing.
The match carried added significance for Liverpool supporters, and the players responded with a spirited display that balanced emotion with attacking purpose.
Florian Wirtz was the standout figure for the Reds, scoring his first goal for the club to finally break his Liverpool duck and draw loud celebrations from the Anfield crowd.
His goal proved crucial in maintaining Liverpool’s push near the top end of the table, as Wolves fought back bravely and tested the home side’s resolve.
The results across the league further tightened the title race, with Arsenal, Manchester City and Liverpool all maintaining pressure at the summit as the season heads into a decisive phase.
With momentum swinging weekly and little margin for error, the Premier League title race continues to deliver drama, intensity and high-stakes football at every turn.
President Bola Tinubu has revealed that Nigeria is seeking military assistance from Turkey to tackle the country’s insecurity challenges.
This comes as the country awaits the delivery of four attack helicopters ordered from the United States, which is taking some time to arrive.
Tinubu made this disclosure while meeting with the Christian Association of Nigeria (CAN) at his Lagos residence, urging them to collaborate with his administration to achieve national goals.
He assured that security agencies are committed to protecting lives and property, despite facing challenges.
“The mood of the nation is peaceful, although our ungoverned spaces are so large. The challenge is real, but we will surmount it. We are very religious. We are prayer warriors. We need your focus, vigilance, and cooperation.
“Community and State Police will be a reality once the National Assembly completes the required legislative inputs; Military hardware is difficult to replace. It is expensive and not available off the shelf.
“Our orders for four attack helicopters from the United States of America will take some time to arrive. We have approached Turkey for assistance.”
Meanwhile, this comes amid military cooperation between Nigeria and the United States in the fight against insecurity and insurgency.
On Thursday, US President Donald Trump announced that American forces had carried out airstrikes in North-West Nigeria, resulting in the killing of several terrorists.
The Nigerian government subsequently confirmed that the strikes were conducted in collaboration with the United States.
A suspected bomb explosion has rocked the Yar’Tasha-Dansadau road in Zamfara State, leaving many travelers feared dead.
The incident occurred on Saturday, with an unspecified number of commuters caught in the blast.
Zamfara police command spokesman, Yazid Abubakar, confirmed the incident, stating that details are still emerging.
“I can confirm that there was a blast in that area but the incident just happened. I can’t tell you details yet. I will update you later,” Abubakar was quoted as saying.
Videos circulating on social media show travelers fleeing the scene in panic, while users on X are calling for swift action from security agencies to prevent further harm and bring perpetrators to justice.
Some speculate the blast was caused by an improvised explosive device (IED) planted by bandits.
Meanwhile, residents of Offa, Kwara State, were thrown into panic after loud explosions destroyed residential buildings, but it’s unclear if this was related to recent US airstrikes targeting ISIS positions in Nigeria.
(DDM) – The reality television world has been thrown into deep mourning following the death of former Big Brother contestant, Mickey Lee, who passed away on Christmas Day, December 25, sending shockwaves across the entertainment industry and social media.
Mickey Lee’s family confirmed the tragic development through an official statement released on her Instagram page, drawing an overwhelming wave of grief, condolences, and tributes from fans, former housemates, and industry colleagues across the globe.
While the family did not immediately disclose the precise cause of death, multiple reports indicated that the reality star had been battling severe flu-related complications, which allegedly resulted in a series of cardiac arrests that ultimately claimed her life.
The sudden nature of her passing has heightened public sorrow, especially given the festive season, a time traditionally associated with joy, togetherness, and celebration.
In their statement, the family reflected on Mickey’s vibrant personality and the positive energy she brought into every space she occupied, both on television and in her private life.
They noted that her time on Big Brother Season 27 allowed millions of viewers to see her authenticity, warmth, and ability to form sincere relationships under intense public scrutiny.
According to the family, Mickey was deeply loved by those who knew her personally and admired by countless fans who connected with her journey on the reality show.
“She will be remembered for the joy she brought into the lives of so many and for the genuine connections she formed both on and off screen,” the family stated.
Following the announcement, social media platforms were flooded with emotional tributes, as fans revisited memorable moments from her time in the Big Brother house and praised her courage, openness, and resilience.
Several former housemates also paid tribute, describing her as kind-hearted, supportive, and always willing to stand up for others, even in moments of tension.
Beyond reality television, Mickey Lee had begun carving a path as a media personality, leveraging her platform to engage audiences on lifestyle topics, mental health awareness, and personal growth.
Her growing influence and relatability made her a recognizable figure beyond the Big Brother franchise, earning her admiration from younger audiences in particular.
In expressing gratitude for the public’s support, the family acknowledged the prayers, messages, and gestures of kindness received since the announcement of her death.
However, they also appealed for privacy as they navigate the painful process of mourning such a profound loss.
“The family extends their deepest gratitude to those who have offered prayers, love and support during this incredibly difficult time,” the statement read.
“As the family mourns this tremendous loss, they respectfully request privacy during this critical time of bereavement.”
Born on May 7, 1991, Mickey Lee rose to prominence after her appearance on Big Brother, where her authenticity and emotional intelligence distinguished her among fellow contestants.
Her death has once again sparked conversations around health awareness, especially concerning complications arising from common illnesses such as influenza.
As tributes continue to pour in, fans and colleagues alike remember Mickey Lee not just as a reality TV star, but as a vibrant individual whose life, though cut short, left a lasting impression on many.
A police inspector and his girlfriend have been detained in connection with the disappearance of a service rifle along the Wukari-Jootar Federal Highway in Taraba State.
The firearm, a Type 06 assault rifle loaded with 25 rounds of live ammunition, belongs to Insp. J. Charles, 45, attached to the Safer Highway Patrol team.
The incident occurred on December 25 when Charles left his duty post for Wukari town, leaving three colleagues on patrol.
His girlfriend, Ruth Alphan, claimed to have seen an unidentified person breaking out of the house upon her return.
Charles reportedly discovered the rifle missing upon his return, allegedly in a drunken state.
Security operatives are working to recover the missing weapon and identify those responsible, with collaborative efforts involving local residents and hunters ongoing.
The inspector and his girlfriend are currently in detention to aid investigation.
President Donald Trump of the United States versus President Bola Ahmed Tinubu of Nigeria
An All Progressives Congress (APC) chieftain in Kogi State, Chief Ben Adaji, has urged President Bola Ahmed Tinubu to take a tougher position against individuals and groups publicly criticising recent United States airstrikes on terrorist targets in Nigeria.
Adaji made the call on Saturday in Jalingo, Taraba State, while reacting to condemnations by some Islamic clerics and commentators following the reported US military operation against terrorist enclaves in parts of north-west Nigeria.
According to him, opposition to the airstrikes undermines national efforts to combat terrorism and could amount to indirect sympathy for armed groups responsible for years of violence across the country.
“Nigerians have endured immense suffering due to the activities of terrorists,” Adaji said. “The loss of lives, destruction of property and damage to Nigeria’s international image have been enormous and cannot be quantified.”
The APC chieftain, who previously contested for the House of Representatives seat for Ankpa Federal Constituency, said he was alarmed that any Nigerian would openly criticise an operation he described as a decisive step against terrorism.
“It is difficult to understand why anyone would sympathise with groups that have killed innocent citizens for years, except there is some form of complicity,” he said, adding that he listened with “deep concern” to clerics who publicly condemned the US action.
Adaji called on President Tinubu to take a firm stance against what he described as attempts to politicise insecurity, arguing that critics of the airstrikes may be sponsors or beneficiaries of terrorist activities. He also urged the Federal Government to end negotiations with armed groups and instead adopt what he termed a more decisive military approach.
In addition, he appealed to the United States to sustain its counterterrorism support and expand military assistance to other regions affected by insecurity, including areas plagued by banditry and attacks by armed groups.
“This is the time to bring an end to the violence that has held the country hostage,” Adaji said, expressing confidence that sustained international cooperation could significantly weaken terrorist networks operating in Nigeria.
Describing himself as a security and counterterrorism expert, Adaji further called on the President and the National Security Adviser to ensure that individuals identified as supporters or collaborators of terrorist groups are investigated and prosecuted in line with the law.
“Insecurity has affected Nigerians across religious and ethnic lines,” he said.
“No one should hide under religion or political influence to undermine national security. Both Christians and Muslims have suffered from these attacks.”
While commending Nigerian security agencies for their efforts, Adaji urged the Federal Government to provide them with full backing and to cooperate with what he described as genuine international interventions aimed at restoring peace and safeguarding Nigeria’s sovereignty.
Troops of Operation Hadin Kai, alongside other security agencies, have successfully repelled an attack by suspected Boko Haram terrorists in Mayo Ladde village, Adamawa State.
The incident occurred around 9pm on Friday, with the terrorists attempting to attack the border settlement connecting Askira/Uba Local Government Area and Sambisa Forest in Borno State.
Thanks to swift action by troops and the Civilian Joint Task Force (CJTF), the attackers were decisively engaged and forced to retreat.
No casualties were reported, as residents had evacuated the area beforehand.
Meanwhile, security forces have increased patrols and surveillance to prevent future attacks and restrict terrorist movement.
However, Operation Hadin Kai reiterated its commitment to protecting lives and property in the North-East region through sustained offensive operations against Boko Haram and ISWAP fighters.
Asari Dokubo, a former Niger Delta militant leader, has questioned the effectiveness of the US airstrikes in Sokoto State, claiming they didn’t harm any bandits or terrorists.
He alleged the missiles were dropped on vacant land, putting innocent lives at risk, and suggests the operation was staged, involving drones rather than decisive air power.
Dokubo in a statement on X, challenged the Nigerian government to provide evidence of at least one terrorist killed in the operation.
He emphasized Nigeria’s sovereignty, arguing that the US can’t deploy ground troops without collaboration.
He also expressed no fear of US President Donald Trump.
He said: “The US army strike in Sokoto did not harm any bandits. They only dropped bombs in an open field, endangering the lives of innocent people. Do you think I’m afraid of President Donald Trump?
The US military’s Africa Command reported the strike was carried out in coordination with Nigerian authorities, targeting ISIS militants.
However, the effectiveness of such strikes in hindering Islamist militants is unclear, according to security experts.
What began as a routine legislative reform of the Nigerian tax system by the Bola Tinubu administration has transmogrified and metastasized into an allegation of unexampled transmutation of a duly passed law to an illegality.
It’s by now well known that a law passed by the National Assembly and assented to by the president may have been materially altered after assent and then presented to the public as binding law. If this allegation is established beyond all shadows of doubt, Nigeria would be confronting the specter of an illegality fraudulently constituted as law.
Interestingly, the discovery wasn’t brought to public notice by secretive, conscientious whistleblowers in the bureaucracy or from eagle-eyed civil society audits. It came from within the legislature itself.
A member of the House of Representatives, Abdulsammad Dasuki, raised a point of privilege after personally comparing the harmonized bill passed by both chambers with the version of the tax laws published in the official gazette. He found that the documents did not match.
His discovery was the product of days of rigorous, studious and painstaking examination of Votes and Proceedings, committee harmonization records and the gazetted text. He realized that he voted for one thing, but the country was being governed by another.
That intervention sparked a chain reaction. Other lawmakers requested certified true copies of the assented bill to verify whether the president had signed the same text that was now in circulation. According to multiple reports, those requests were denied.
The refusal to release certified copies deepened suspicion and transformed what could have been dismissed as a clerical misunderstanding into a full-blown institutional crisis.
When legislators are blocked from seeing the law that they passed and that the president signed, the issue verges on criminal constitutional transgression that must not be swept under the carpet.
While full official disclosure is still pending, several discrepancies have been repeatedly cited by lawmakers, journalists and civil society groups. These include expansions of the discretionary powers of tax authorities beyond what the National Assembly approved, alterations to reporting and oversight obligations, changes in enforcement thresholds, and adjustments that potentially increase executive control over revenue administration.
These are not innocent, unintentional clerical slips. They go to the meaning, scope and intent of the law. In short, they change who has power to tax Nigerians, how that power is exercised and to whom it is accountable.
The distinction matters. All legislative systems experience clerical errors. A misplaced word or a misnumbered section does not invalidate a statute. But when alterations confer new powers, remove safeguards, or shift institutional balance, they cross from error into illegality.
A gazette cannot lawfully create what the legislature did not enact or what the president did not assent to. Publication is supposed to merely provide evidence of the existence of the law. It can invent a law that hasn’t been passed.
The official responses so far have been evasive and contradictory. Government representatives initially insisted that there was only one authentic version of the law and that claims of alteration were partisan, ill-natured rumors. But that posture is difficult to reconcile with subsequent developments.
For example, a December 26, 2025, press statement signed by Akin Rotimi, House Spokesman and Chairman of the House Committee on Media and Public Affairs, said the National Assembly has now constituted an ad hoc committee to investigate the sequence of events from harmonization to assent to gazetting.
More tellingly, Rotimi said, the leadership of the legislature has directed that the tax laws be re-gazetted and that certified true copies of the versions duly passed by both chambers be issued.
Re-gazetting is not a neutral act. It is an implicit admission that the existing gazette cannot be confidently treated as an accurate record of legislative intent. If nothing were amiss, there would be nothing to authenticate. The attempt to frame this as a routine administrative clarification rings hollow. Laws are not re-gazetted in the absence of doubt about their authenticity.
Supporters of the government have urged the public to trust the president’s integrity and to avoid speculation. The issue, however, is not whether the president is personally trustworthy but whether the law now being enforced is the law he signed. No amount of rhetorical reassurance can substitute for producing the signed text and allowing a side-by-side comparison with the gazetted version.
There is no precedent in the world that I have found for this kind of illegality. In the United States, the much-cited Deficit Reduction Act controversy of 2006 involved a discrepancy between House and Senate versions due to a clerical transmission error. The president signed the enrolled bill that was presented to him.
Courts upheld it under the enrolled bill doctrine, which treats the signed text as conclusive. Crucially, there was no claim that the law was altered after presidential assent.
In the Philippines, in 1964, there was a case where the wrong version of a bill was signed by the president. Legislative leaders later disowned the enrolled copy and treated the signature as invalid. Again, the error occurred before or at assent, not after. Once discovered, it was confronted as a mistake. It wasn’t normalized.
Nigeria’s case, if the allegations are borne out, is more disturbing. Here, the claim is that the president signed the correct bill but that the authoritative law published afterward materially departs from it.
Comparative constitutional practice offers no comfort here. Stable legal systems do not recognize post-assent textual mutation as valid law. Where gazetting errors occur, they are corrected. They do not become the basis for enforcement.
This raises an unavoidable question: why would anyone alter a law after it has been passed and signed? Motives can only be inferred from circumstantial evidence, but the inferences are troubling.
Expanding the powers of tax authorities in a period of fiscal stress creates incentives for bureaucratic overreach. Removing or weakening legislative-oversight provisions reduces accountability. Centralizing discretion in the executive arm simplifies revenue extraction while insulating decision makers from scrutiny. These are not abstract possibilities. They align closely with the specific alterations that have been alleged.
There is an even more unsettling implication. If a major tax reform law can be altered after assent without immediate detection, what confidence can citizens have in the integrity of other statutes? Nigeria has passed hundreds of laws over the years, many of them technical, complex and rarely scrutinized line by line after gazetting. The discovery of this discrepancy raises the chilling possibility that post-assent alterations may not be unprecedented in practice.
That possibility should alarm every Nigerian regardless of political affiliation. Law is the foundation of collective life. If the text of the law is unstable, if it can be surreptitiously modified after constitutional procedures have been completed, then legality itself becomes provisional. Governance slides from rule of law to rule by document manipulation.
The seriousness of this violation cannot be overstated. If officials altered the tax law knowingly, they did not merely breach administrative rules. They subverted the Constitution. Such conduct would amount to forgery, abuse of office and an assault on democratic sovereignty. It would mean that Nigerians are being taxed under provisions that were never lawfully enacted.
This is why a thorough, transparent investigation is not optional. It must establish a clear documentary chain: the harmonized bill passed by both chambers, the exact text transmitted for assent, the document signed by the president and the version published in the gazette. Any divergence must be accounted for, step by step, with named responsibility. Institutional reviews that end in vague recommendations will not suffice.
If culpability is established, punishment must be severe. Anything less would invite repetition. As I always say, there is no greater enabler of habitual relapses into the same crime than the absence of consequences for committing the crimes.
The alteration of law after assent is not a victimless bureaucratic shortcut. It is a constitutional crime with nationwide consequences. Deterrence requires more than quiet corrections. It requires accountability that is visible, proportionate and unmistakable.
This episode can either be buried under procedural language and political loyalty, or it can become a moment of constitutional self-correction. A tax law that is an illegality cannot be the foundation of fiscal reform. The integrity of the lawmaking process is itself a public good. Without it, no reform, however well intentioned, can claim legitimacy.
The Sokoto State Government has confirmed a joint military operation between Nigerian forces and the US targeted terrorist enclaves in Tangaza Local Government Area.
It said no civilian casualties were recorded, and investigations are ongoing.
The clarification was contained in a statement issued on Friday by the Director-General of Media and Publicity, Government House, Sokoto, Abubakar Bawa, and made available to journalists in the state capital.
He said the airstrikes were carried out on Wednesday, with security agencies still awaiting detailed assessment reports from the Joint Operations.
“The impact of the airstrike could not be immediately determined as assessment reports from the Joint Operations are still being awaited,” the statement said.
The state government also addressed public concerns surrounding the discovery of suspicious objects near Jabo town in Tambuwal Local Government Area, noting that investigations into the matter remain inconclusive.
“The circumstances surrounding the objects found in a location near Jabo town could not be immediately explained, as the outcome of analysis by Nigeria–US military authorities is being awaited,” Bawa stated.
He stressed that despite ongoing investigations in both Tangaza and Jabo communities, no civilian casualties were recorded in either location.
“Sokoto State welcomes any collaboration between Nigeria and all relevant global stakeholders aimed at curbing the menace of terrorism and cross-border crimes in the state,” the statement noted.
The government reiterated its commitment to supporting security agencies and appealed to residents to cooperate with investigations
“The Sokoto State government has consistently supported security agencies in the fight against banditry and terrorism by providing necessary equipment to enhance safety across the state.
“The government calls on residents to continue to pray to Almighty Allah to assist our security agencies to defeat criminals in the state and the country at large,” the statement concluded.
The operation is part of efforts to dismantle terrorist and bandit networks in the state.
Kemisola Mustapha, a mother of three battling cancer, has publicly made a passionate appeal for a second wife for her husband, explaining that her illness has left him sexually deprived.
According to PUNCH, Mustapha, a trader, made the request in a video shared on her TikTok page.
She explained that her health condition, which began in 2024 following a cancer diagnosis, had taken a toll on her family life and her ability to fulfil some marital duties.
According to her, the illness has prevented her from meeting certain needs of her husband, particularly sexually, prompting her decision to seek a co-wife who would help “restore happiness” in the home.
Mustapha disclosed that she had been searching for a suitable co-wife for more than nine months, adding that she was looking for someone of good character who would be loving, faithful and peaceful.
She described her husband as caring and supportive, revealing that he had sold almost all his properties to finance her cancer treatment.
“This request is from the bottom of my heart. My mind is totally open to it.
“My husband is a very good man. He has really tried for me, and I don’t want to be a selfish soul. I am looking for a second wife for my husband. He has tried for me physically, financially, and emotionally.
“Sexually, I am depriving my husband of a lot of things. There are a lot of things I cannot do again because of my health. I want my husband to be happy again. Right now, I need a co-wife for my husband. I want someone who is understanding, faithful, and someone who will love my husband the way I love him. I love my husband so much, and he loves me dearly. I want someone who will love my children and me,” she said.
She also revealed that she had earlier suspended the search after receiving advice from another woman who warned that a new wife might exploit her illness and plot her death.
However, Mustapha said she later resumed the search, insisting that her decision was not motivated by fear of dying.
“A woman called me and advised that this is not the time to find a wife for my husband, that I should fight the battle. Then, I gave up because I am no longer fighting due to the financial aspect.
“The woman also told me that if I later died and I had married a wife for my husband, most of the ladies out there would believe I would soon die, and that they should marry my husband. The wife would be plotting my death so that she could be enjoying my husband. I stopped because of this advice last time.
“Now, I am not dying. I am not giving up anytime soon. I am not making this request because I have been told that I will die. I am not dying. I am doing this due to the love I have for my husband and children. I want the kind of happiness that we used to have in my home.”
She added that while her husband initially opposed the idea, he later agreed after she continued to plead with him, noting that the decision was formalised through a legal undertaking.
The mother of three further outlined the qualities she desired in a wife for her husband.
“These are some of the requirements: the person must be loving. You have to love my husband the way I love him; I gave my husband peace of mind. The person has to come from a good home. Education is another requirement,” Mustapha said
Fresh revelations have emerged from the aftermath of recent United States airstrikes on suspected ISIS-linked targets in Nigeria, as at least three Tomahawk cruise missiles reportedly failed to detonate and fell short of their intended targets, leaving behind unexploded warheads and scattered missile debris. The discovery, confirmed by local accounts and first highlighted by military-focused platform Militarnyi, has opened a new chapter of concern surrounding the operation—one that goes beyond counterterrorism success claims to include civilian safety, intelligence accuracy, and the long-term risks posed by unexploded advanced weaponry on Nigerian soil.
According to information obtained by DDM NEWS, the unexploded missiles were discovered by local residents in the early hours following the airstrikes, which were carried out as part of a U.S.-led military action against alleged ISIS elements operating in parts of northern Nigeria. While official details of the operation remain limited, the presence of intact or partially intact Tomahawk missile components on the ground has sparked alarm among security experts, humanitarian actors, and affected communities.
What Locals Found After the Strikes
Residents in areas close to the reported strike zones described waking up to scenes of twisted metal, scorched earth, and large cylindrical debris scattered across farmland and open spaces. In several locations, what appeared to be unexploded warheads were found embedded in the ground or lying exposed, prompting fear and confusion among villagers who initially did not understand the nature or danger of what they were seeing.
Photographs circulating online, reviewed by DDM NEWS, show missile fragments consistent with components of U.S. Tomahawk cruise missiles—long-range precision weapons designed to strike hardened targets with high accuracy. The images include what appear to be guidance sections, fuselage fragments, and intact explosive components that did not detonate on impact.
Local sources told reporters that some residents initially approached the debris out of curiosity, unaware of the lethal danger posed by unexploded ordnance. It was only after word spread that the objects could explode at any moment that communities began to cordon off the areas informally and alert local authorities.
A Rare but Dangerous Failure
Tomahawk missiles are among the most sophisticated weapons in the U.S. military arsenal, boasting advanced navigation systems, terrain-following capabilities, and a long record of operational reliability. However, military experts note that no weapons system is immune to failure. Mechanical faults, navigation errors, electronic interference, or environmental factors can all contribute to a missile missing its target or failing to detonate.
Still, the failure of at least three missiles in a single operation is considered significant, especially in a region populated by civilians and lacking extensive explosive ordnance disposal (EOD) infrastructure.
Security analysts consulted by DDM NEWS warn that unexploded Tomahawk warheads pose extreme danger. Unlike smaller munitions, these missiles carry powerful high-explosive payloads capable of causing massive destruction if accidentally triggered. Vibrations from farming equipment, fire exposure, or tampering by curious individuals could result in catastrophic explosions.
Civilian Safety Concerns Mount
The discovery has intensified concerns about civilian safety in the affected areas. Many of the communities near the reported impact sites are rural, agricultural settlements where residents rely on daily access to farmland for survival. The presence of unexploded missiles effectively turns these areas into potential death traps.
Humanitarian workers fear a repeat of past tragedies seen in conflict zones around the world, where unexploded ordnance has killed or maimed civilians—often children—long after military operations have ended.
“This is not just a military issue; it is a humanitarian emergency,” a regional security analyst told DDM NEWS. “If these warheads are not secured and safely removed, they could kill people months or even years from now.”
Questions About Targeting and Intelligence
Beyond safety concerns, the missile failures have reignited questions about the intelligence underpinning the U.S. airstrikes. Critics argue that if missiles are falling short of targets and landing in civilian-accessible areas, it suggests either targeting miscalculations or operational errors.
This development comes amid growing debate over the effectiveness of foreign military intervention in Nigeria’s complex security landscape. Several analysts have already questioned whether the targeted areas actually housed ISIS or ISWAP elements, particularly in regions where banditry—rather than ideologically driven terrorism—has historically been the dominant threat.
DDM NEWS investigations reveal that some of the locations where debris was found have no publicly documented history of ISIS activity, further complicating official narratives surrounding the strikes.
Official Silence and Limited Information
As of the time of filing this report, neither the United States military nor the Nigerian government has publicly acknowledged the failed missiles or issued guidance to affected communities. There has been no official confirmation of recovery operations, safety advisories, or joint efforts to secure the unexploded ordnance.
This silence has fueled speculation and anxiety, with residents unsure whether it is safe to return to their farms or homes near the debris sites. Local authorities, often under-resourced and ill-equipped to handle advanced military explosives, face immense pressure to respond without clear direction.
Strategic and Diplomatic Implications
The incident also carries diplomatic and strategic implications. Unexploded U.S. missiles on Nigerian soil raise sensitive questions about sovereignty, accountability, and responsibility for post-strike cleanup. International humanitarian law places obligations on parties conducting military operations to minimize harm to civilians and address the dangers posed by unexploded weapons.
Failure to do so could strain cooperation between Nigeria and its international partners, particularly if civilian casualties occur as a result of abandoned ordnance.
A Lingering Danger
For now, the twisted metal lying in fields and open land stands as a stark reminder that modern warfare leaves behind consequences that extend far beyond the initial blast. While airstrikes may be over in minutes, their risks can persist for years if not properly managed.
Labour Party (LP) presidential candidate, Mr. Peter Obi
Labour Party presidential candidate Peter Obi has called on Nigerians and leaders at all levels to embrace compassion, humility, and service, as he acknowledged the severe economic hardship facing the country in his Christmas message.
In a statement released on Wednesday to mark the Christmas celebration, Obi extended warm greetings to Nigerians, urging them to reflect on the core values of love, sacrifice, humility, and hope exemplified by the birth of Jesus Christ.
He noted that the 2025 Christmas season comes at a particularly difficult time for many Nigerians, with families struggling to meet basic needs and unable to celebrate the season as they once did.
Describing the situation as deeply painful, Obi said he was troubled by the daily realities of citizens who find it increasingly difficult to put food on the table.
Despite the challenges, Obi emphasized that the message of Christmas remains one of hope, reminding Nigerians that light can still emerge even in the darkest circumstances, and that renewal is always possible.
Addressing citizens who feel abandoned by those in authority, Obi assured them that they are seen and heard.
He stressed that true leadership should not be measured by economic indicators such as skyscrapers or stock market growth, but by how a nation treats its most vulnerable citizens.
He pledged his continued commitment to a future Nigeria where dignity is a right rather than a privilege, where opportunities reach both rural and urban communities, and where no child goes to bed hungry in a country endowed with abundant resources.
Obi further highlighted solidarity as the true spirit of Christmas, pointing to acts of kindness among neighbours and communities who share what little they have to ensure that no one is left behind.
Calling for national renewal, he urged Nigerians to recommit themselves to building a country anchored on service-driven leadership, prudent management of public resources, and universal access to quality education, healthcare, and a dignified life.
He emphasized the need for leadership focused on lifting citizens out of poverty.
Obi concluded by wishing Nigerians a joyful Christmas and a New Year filled with hope, good health, and renewed determination to build a better Nigeria.
As Nigerians prepare to cross into a new calendar year, a subtle but far-reaching financial change is quietly unfolding across the country’s digital banking landscape. Beginning January 1, a new ₦50 stamp duty charge on electronic transfers above ₦10,000 is set to take effect, according to preliminary system updates already observed on several banking platforms. Though small in isolation, the charge represents yet another layer of cost in an economy where millions of households are already stretched to the brink, and its quiet introduction has raised serious questions about transparency, timing, and the cumulative weight of hidden financial pressures on ordinary citizens.
DDM NEWS findings indicate that the new charge is not a replacement for existing bank transfer fees but an addition to them. In effect, Nigerians making qualifying electronic transfers will now pay both the standard bank transaction fee and an extra ₦50 government-imposed levy. This additional charge is classified as a stamp duty, separate from charges collected by banks for providing transfer services. While stamp duties are not new to Nigeria’s financial system, the structure, implementation, and burden-sharing model of this particular charge mark a notable shift.
One of the most significant changes introduced under the new arrangement is who bears the cost of the ₦50 levy. Previously, the stamp duty on qualifying electronic transfers was deducted from the receiver’s account. Under the new structure, that responsibility shifts entirely to the sender. Every individual initiating a transfer above ₦10,000 will now shoulder the full cost of the levy, in addition to the usual bank fees that apply to such transactions. For users who make frequent transfers—sometimes several times a day—the financial implications quickly add up.
The new levy applies strictly on a per-transaction basis and only to transfers exceeding ₦10,000. Transactions below that threshold remain exempt, as do transfers between accounts owned by the same individual within the same bank. On paper, these exemptions appear to protect low-income users. In practice, however, DDM NEWS analysis suggests that the reality is more complex. While many transfers in Nigeria are small in value, a significant proportion still cross the ₦10,000 threshold, particularly for rent payments, school fees, cooperative contributions, small business settlements, and family support. With over 70 percent of electronic transfers reportedly falling below ₦20,000, a large share of everyday transactions now sit squarely within the range affected by the new levy.
For millions of Nigerians, digital transfers are not a convenience but a necessity. In a cash-constrained economy where electronic payments dominate informal trade, personal remittances, and emergency support, the average citizen depends heavily on frequent, small-value transfers rather than occasional large payments. Market traders receive payments in instalments, artisans collect service fees digitally, families send money home weekly or even daily, and cooperative societies rely on regular electronic contributions from members. In this context, a ₦50 charge applied repeatedly across dozens of transactions in a month can translate into a substantial additional expense.
What has amplified public concern, however, is not only the cost itself but the manner in which it is being introduced. The implementation appears to be taking place quietly, with no widespread public announcement, no coordinated sensitization campaign, and no clear explanation from relevant authorities. Many users first became aware of the change not through official communication but through subtle system prompts, backend updates, or informal discussions on social media and messaging platforms. For a policy that directly affects daily financial activity, the absence of clear and proactive communication has fueled suspicion and frustration.
January is traditionally one of the most financially demanding months for Nigerian households. It is a period marked by the convergence of school fees, rent renewals, post-holiday debt, transportation costs, and rising food prices. For many families, January is already a month of financial recovery and adjustment. Introducing a new government charge at the very start of the year, without adequate notice or public explanation, has intensified anxiety among consumers who feel they are being asked to absorb yet another cost at a time when resilience is already low.
DDM NEWS investigations reveal that the new levy fits into a broader pattern of incremental increases in transaction-related charges that have steadily accumulated over time. Individually, each fee or levy may appear minor. Collectively, they represent a growing drain on household income, particularly for low- and middle-income earners. From ATM withdrawal charges and SMS alert fees to transfer costs and service levies, Nigerians increasingly find themselves paying for basic access to their own money. The addition of a government stamp duty on everyday transfers reinforces the perception that financial participation itself is becoming more expensive.
Beyond households, small businesses are also expected to feel the impact. Many micro and small enterprises rely on high-volume, low-margin transactions to stay afloat. For such businesses, digital transfers are integral to daily operations, whether for paying suppliers, receiving customer payments, or settling logistics costs. The introduction of an additional per-transaction charge increases operating expenses and may ultimately be passed on to consumers through higher prices, further fueling inflationary pressures.
The quiet rollout has also sparked deeper concerns about governance and accountability. Why was such a significant change not accompanied by a clear public announcement? Why were consumers not given adequate time to adjust or plan for the additional cost? And what other policy shifts might be in the pipeline that Nigerians are yet to be informed about? These questions have become more urgent against the backdrop of broader economic reforms that have already placed considerable strain on the population.
Critics argue that while governments have the right to generate revenue, especially in challenging fiscal environments, the process must be transparent, consultative, and sensitive to economic realities on the ground. Introducing new charges through silent system updates risks eroding trust in financial institutions and public authorities alike. It also reinforces the perception that policy decisions affecting everyday life are being made without sufficient regard for their cumulative impact on ordinary citizens.
Supporters of the levy, however, may argue that stamp duties are a globally recognized form of revenue generation and that exemptions for transfers below ₦10,000 demonstrate an attempt to protect the most vulnerable. Yet DDM NEWS analysis suggests that such arguments overlook the lived reality of Nigerians whose financial lives are defined not by single large transactions but by repeated modest transfers. For these users, the line between exempt and taxable transactions is crossed frequently, making the levy an unavoidable burden rather than an occasional one.
The shift of the levy from receivers to senders also carries behavioral implications. In many informal arrangements, senders and receivers are part of tightly knit economic networks where costs are implicitly shared. By placing the full burden on senders, the new structure may alter how people transfer money, potentially encouraging workarounds such as splitting transfers into smaller amounts or reverting to cash-based alternatives, which could undermine broader financial inclusion goals.
As January 1 approaches, uncertainty continues to loom. Many Nigerians are still unsure how consistently the charge will be applied across banks, how clearly it will be itemized on transaction receipts, and whether additional adjustments could follow in the coming months. The lack of detailed guidance has left users anxious and suspicious, bracing for what they fear could be the beginning of a series of cost-heavy policy changes in 2026 and beyond.
For DDM NEWS, the unfolding situation highlights a critical issue facing Nigeria’s digital economy: the growing gap between policy decisions and public communication. In an era where digital transactions are central to survival, even minor changes can have outsized effects. Transparency, timely information, and genuine engagement with citizens are no longer optional—they are essential to maintaining trust and stability.
As households count down to the new year, many are doing so with a sense of unease, calculating not just their budgets but the hidden costs embedded in everyday transactions. In an economy where every naira already feels stretched beyond its limit, the introduction of a new ₦50 transfer charge—quietly, and at the start of a financially demanding month—has become a powerful symbol of the broader pressures facing Nigerians. Whether authorities respond with clearer communication or allow the uncertainty to linger will shape public perception long after January 1 has passed.
If any Nigerians took lightly American President Donald Trump’s threat in November to deploy U.S. military ‘guns-a-blazing’ to Nigeria, over alleged mass killing of Christians by Islamic jihadists, the Senate President Godswill Akpabio, the nation’s number-three citizen, was not one of them.
Speaking in the red chambers of the National Assembly in Abuja recently, Akpabio warned his fellow lawmakers against the lenient “bow-and-go treatment” of ministerial nominees, because Trump is on our neck.”
However, even he must have been so surprised that Trump would direct the American Department of War airstrikes in Nigeria’s north-western Sokoto state so soon, as an unusual “Christmas present.”
Villagers in Jabo, on the outskirts of the ancient city of Sokoto, were woken by unusual sounds and devastation from the American bombs on the evening of 25th December, while the unsavoury news of the strikes greeted other Nigerians on the morning of Boxing Day.
Writing on his Truth Social platform, Trump said that under his direction, the U.S. launched a “powerful and deadly” strike against forces of the ISIS group in Nigeria, after accusing the Nigerian government of failing to stop the targeting of Christians.
In a statement later, Nigeria’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs said it was a joint/collaborative operation, involving “exchange of intelligence and strategic coordination in ways consistent with international law, mutual respect for sovereignty and shared commitments to regional and global security.”
“The Federal Government continues to work with its partners through established diplomatic and security channels to weaken terrorist networks, disrupt their financing and logistics, and prevent cross-border threats, while strengthening Nigeria’s own security institutions and intelligence capabilities,” the statement added.
Nigeria has been fighting multiple armed groups, including those affiliated with ISIS, such as Boko Haram, the Islamic State West Africa Province (ISWAP) and the lesser-known Lakurawa group, operating in the north-western states.
Trump said the airstrikes were launched against IS militants “who have been targeting and viciously killing, primarily, innocent Christians.”
In November, he reinstated Nigeria on the list of Countries of Particular Concern CPC, and also ordered the Pentagon to begin planning for potential military action to curb “Christian persecution” in the country.
The State Department also recently announced it would restrict visas for Nigerians and their family members involved in killing Christians.
Like Trump’s threat in November, the airstrikes have elicited mixed reactions among Nigerians, with Sheikh Ahmad Gumi, a controversial Islamic scholar and a former soldier, urging Nigeria to “immediately halt military cooperation with the United States” because of the military operation, arguing that America’s involvement could escalate Nigeria’s security crisis and deepen religious divisions.
On his Facebook page, he questioned America’s “moral authority,” warning that Nigeria should not be turned into a “theatre of war” for foreign powers.
Gumi argued that “US involvement under the guise of protecting Christians could polarize Nigeria,” adding that airstrikes “alone cannot defeat terrorism.”
He insisted that Africa’s most populous nation of more than 220 million people has enough personnel to handle its security challenges if properly organized, or instead, seek military assistance from China, Turkey, or Pakistan. Gumi, himself, has come under criticism for preferring dialogue with terrorists.
For his part, former President Olusegun Obasanjo, in a recent viral video, dismissed calls for dialogue with terrorists, insisting that “Nigeria must adopt decisive measures and seek international assistance to confront worsening insecurity.”
Meanwhile, the opposition Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), has expressed concern that “Nigerians were notified of the American strike on terrorists… through …social media pages of President Trump and other American officials before the spokesperson of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs issued a vague statement many hours later, offering a passive confirmation of the knowledge and cooperation of the Nigerian Government in the operation.”
“This inverted communication approach does not help the Federal Government or Nigerians in any way, especially when taken against the background that the US military has been reported to have previously entered and operated in Nigeria successfully without the permission and knowledge of the government,” the party said.
It urged “the Federal Government to ensure that the defence agreement with the United States …includes joint operations, which will ultimately result in knowledge-sharing and experiential learning to help Nigeria sustainably combat insecurity, rather than full, externally-led ‘precision attacks.’”
When Trump threatened military action in Nigeria in November, some commentators pandering to patriotic sentiments raised the issue of national sovereignty. But that is now diluted by Nigeria’s recent military operation in neighbouring Benin to help foil an attempted military coup.
Like Gumi, but perhaps for different reasons, many would argue that Nigeria has what it takes, militarily, to defeat Boko Haram and other terrorist armed groups.
However, successive governments have failed since 2009, not for want of trying, but because of a combination of reasons, including religious and ethnic division, lack of political will, insincerity, corruption and sabotage.
In 2012, former President Goodluck Jonathan disclosed that Boko Haram sympathizers were in his government. This was corroborated by former Foreign Minister Bolaji Akinyemi, who recently narrated how a US-assisted rescue plan for Chibok Girls was aborted in 2014 due to an information leak.
“When the Chibok girls (more than 200 of them) were picked up by Boko Haram, the Americans came in quietly at the invitation of the Jonathan administration, and in collaboration with the Nigerian troops. They discovered the camp where the girls were being kept. And they said, all right, we will throw gas into those camps, and while everybody is sleeping, including the Boko Haram militants, we’ll go in with the Nigerian troops and take out the girls,” the former Minister said.
However, he revealed: “When the Americans sent the reconnaissance aircraft over the camp, what did they find? Boko Haram militia were wearing (gas) masks, which means somebody within the Nigerian army had leaked to Boko Haram what the plan was.”
Similar fifth-columnist betrayal could be blamed in the recent case of a Nigerian Army Gen. Musa Uba, reportedly killed after an ambush by ISWAP terrorists, who intercepted communication between him and his colleagues in North-east Borno state.
No casualty figures have been made public, but there are concerns about possible civilian collateral damage in the type of airstrikes carried out against the reported Lakurawa group in Sokoto, which has become increasingly lethal in the region, often targeting remote communities and security forces.
Many had thought that Sambisa Forest in Borno State, regarded as the epicentre of terrorists in northern Nigeria, would be a priority target. But security experts have explained that the Americans must have relied on actionable intelligence gathered after weeks of surveillance in picking their targets, indicating that Sokoto could be a key supply line for the terrorists.
Still, Nigerian authorities have some explaining to do. For instance, what was the country’s input into the planning of the Christmas operation? If it was based on shared intelligence, how come Nigeria was rather reactive, given the time-lag between Trump’s tweet and the Nigerian Foreign Ministry’s statement on the airstrikes? And what is in it for the Americans, given that Trump is a self-processed deal-maker or transactional in his dealings?
Nigeria and some other African countries have rejected U.S. requests to host America’s African Military High-Command (AFRICOM). Has Nigeria finally given in to this request?
The perennial ineffective communication was again a major failure by the Nigerian government on the Christmas airstrikes, which many Nigerians learned about through foreign media. Television interviews by Minister Yusuf Tuggar and subsequent explanatory statements by the Armed Forces and the Ministry of Information followed the statement by the Foreign Ministry.
If the operation was coordinated, the initiative for public information should have come from Nigeria, the target of the airstrikes.
With American Congressman Riley Moore saying on his X handle that the Christmas strikes were “just the first step to ending the slaughter of Christians and the security crisis affecting all Nigerians,” there is a need for better coordination and communication from both sides to clear all possible doubts and avoid unintended casualties.
Additionally, if Nigeria is concerned about its national sovereignty, the government must prioritise the country’s security as part of its governance deliverable, beyond the laser focus on politicking and the next elections.
The argument that terrorists also kill people of other faiths and not only Christians rings hollow. Under the Constitution, no Nigerian citizen deserves to die needlessly; be made a refugee, or forced into Internally Displaced Persons (IDP) camps, on account of his/her religion, ethnicity, creed, social status or political persuasion.
The security of life, property, and citizens’ well-being are the primary responsibilities of any government.
Nature abhors a vacuum, and an African proverb translates to “when a man leaves his farmland uncultivated for too long, other men can farm or appropriate it!”
Paul Ejime is a Media/Communications Specialist and Global Affairs Analyst.
Nigeria and the United States carried out a joint counterterrorism operation in Sokoto State, deploying 16 GPS-guided precision munitions to strike Islamic State (ISIS) terrorist camps, the Federal Government has confirmed.
In a statement on Friday, the Minister of Information and National Orientation, Mohammed Idris, said the operation was authorised by President Bola Ahmed Tinubu and executed under Nigeria’s established military command-and-control framework, with the full involvement of the Armed Forces of Nigeria.
According to Idris, the strikes were conducted between 12:12 a.m. and 1:30 a.m. on Friday, December 26, using MQ-9 Reaper unmanned aerial platforms.
The targets were two major ISIS assembly and staging grounds located within the Bauni forest axis of Tangaza Local Government Area, Sokoto State.
He said intelligence assessments confirmed the camps were being used by foreign ISIS fighters working with local affiliates to plan large-scale attacks within Nigeria, particularly along the Sahel infiltration corridor.
“The precision strikes neutralised ISIS elements attempting to penetrate Nigeria from the Sahel region,” Idris said, adding that the operation followed extensive intelligence gathering, reconnaissance and operational planning.
The minister disclosed that the munitions were launched from maritime platforms in the Gulf of Guinea.
He also confirmed that debris from expended weapons fell in Jabo area of Tambuwal Local Government Area, Sokoto State, and in Offa, Kwara State, near a hotel.
“No civilian casualties were recorded, and security agencies immediately secured the affected locations,” he said.
Reaffirming the government’s position, Idris stressed that Nigeria remains firmly in control of its national security architecture and is committed to eliminating terrorist threats.
“The Federal Government reiterates its unwavering resolve to confront, degrade and eliminate terrorist networks, particularly transnational extremist groups seeking to undermine Nigeria’s sovereignty and security,” he stated.
Earlier, the Minister of Foreign Affairs, Yusuf Tuggar, confirmed that Nigeria provided intelligence support for the operation and formally approved the strikes, insisting they did not violate the country’s sovereignty.
“It was Nigeria that provided the intelligence,” Tuggar said, noting that the action was strictly a counterterrorism operation and not targeted at any religious group.
He added that he personally sought and obtained President Tinubu’s approval following consultations with United States officials.
US President Donald Trump later confirmed authorising the strikes against ISIS camps in north-west Nigeria, with the US military reporting that bases near the Niger border were hit and initial assessments indicating multiple fatalities.
US Secretary of War Pete Hegseth praised Nigeria’s cooperation and suggested further actions could follow, describing the operation as a response to extremist violence.
Nigeria reiterated its commitment to working with strategic partners to ensure lasting peace, border security and regional stability, while urging citizens to remain calm and vigilant as security operations continue.
The controversy ignited by the United States’ Christmas Day airstrikes in parts of Sokoto State has rapidly evolved from a security and diplomatic issue into a fierce moral, political, and ideological confrontation that now threatens to further polarise Nigeria’s already fragile national cohesion. At the centre of this storm is the outspoken Islamic cleric, Sheikh Ahmad Gumi, whose reaction to the American military action has provoked outrage from religious leaders, security analysts, and international observers, culminating in a dramatic call by a prominent Catholic author and cleric, Deacon Nick Donnelly, for Gumi’s immediate arrest and prosecution for what he describes as crimes against humanity. DDM NEWS reports that the unfolding saga has exposed deep fault lines in Nigeria’s handling of terrorism, religious violence, and accountability, while placing President Bola Ahmed Tinubu under mounting pressure to publicly distance himself from rhetoric perceived as sympathetic to extremist violence.
The spark for the controversy was the announcement by the United States that it had conducted targeted airstrikes against suspected terrorist elements operating in parts of northwestern Nigeria, including areas of Sokoto State. The strikes, which reportedly occurred on Christmas Day, were presented by US officials as part of a broader counterterrorism effort aimed at degrading the operational capacity of extremist groups accused of orchestrating mass killings, kidnappings, and attacks on civilian populations. Although details of the operation remained limited, the timing of the strikes, coinciding with Christmas, and the justification offered by American officials, including references to protecting vulnerable communities, particularly Christians, immediately drew intense reactions across Nigeria.
While some Nigerians cautiously welcomed the intervention as a sign that the international community was finally taking decisive action against armed groups that have terrorised vast swathes of the country for years, others expressed concern about sovereignty, civilian casualties, and the long-term implications of foreign military involvement. However, it was Sheikh Ahmad Gumi’s response that transformed the debate into a national and international controversy. In a statement reported by DAILY POST and widely circulated on social media, Gumi urged the Federal Government of Nigeria to immediately halt any form of collaboration with the United States in targeting those responsible for what has been described by some international actors as a genocide against Christians in parts of the country.
Gumi’s intervention was not merely a call for caution; it was framed in language that many critics interpreted as sympathetic to the very groups accused of mass atrocities. His remarks, coming in the wake of US airstrikes aimed at insurgents linked to extremist ideologies, were seen by opponents as undermining counterterrorism efforts and legitimising violence under the guise of communal defence. DDM NEWS understands that this perception was reinforced by Gumi’s history of controversial engagements with armed groups, including past comments in which he appeared to rationalise or contextualise the actions of bandits and insurgents, often framing them as victims of state neglect rather than perpetrators of crimes.
It was against this backdrop that Deacon Nick Donnelly, a renowned Catholic author and outspoken advocate for persecuted Christians, entered the fray with a searing condemnation of Sheikh Gumi. In a series of posts on X, formerly Twitter, Donnelly did not mince words, accusing the Islamic cleric of effectively endorsing the actions of what he described as “bestial Islamist terrorists” and calling for his immediate arrest and prosecution. Donnelly’s intervention has since reverberated far beyond social media, drawing attention from international religious freedom advocates, human rights groups, and political commentators.
“Sheikh Gumi protests President Trump’s Christmas military strikes against the bestial Islamist terrorists,” Donnelly wrote. “Calling the terrorists conducting the genocide against Christians ‘our warriors’. Gumi must be arrested and put on trial for crimes against humanity. Tinubu must publicly condemn Gumi or else he is declaring his complicity in his crimes.” The language was stark, accusatory, and deliberately provocative, reflecting the depth of anger felt by many who believe that Nigeria’s failure to confront extremist violence decisively has emboldened perpetrators and their apologists.
DDM NEWS analysis shows that Donnelly’s call is significant not only because of its content but also because of who is making it. As a Catholic cleric with an international audience and a track record of advocacy on issues of religious persecution, Donnelly’s words carry weight beyond Nigeria’s borders. His framing of the issue as one involving potential crimes against humanity elevates the debate from domestic politics to the realm of international law and moral responsibility. Crimes against humanity, under international legal frameworks, encompass acts such as murder, extermination, persecution, and other inhumane acts committed as part of a widespread or systematic attack against civilian populations. By invoking this language, Donnelly is effectively arguing that rhetoric which appears to defend or justify such acts should itself be subject to legal scrutiny.
Supporters of Donnelly’s position argue that Sheikh Gumi’s comments, when viewed in the context of Nigeria’s prolonged crisis of violence, amount to more than mere free speech. They contend that public figures who describe armed groups accused of massacres as “our warriors” risk inciting further violence, legitimising atrocities, and obstructing efforts to hold perpetrators accountable. From this perspective, the call for arrest is framed not as an attack on religious freedom but as a necessary step to uphold the rule of law and protect vulnerable communities.
However, defenders of Gumi argue that his remarks have been misinterpreted or deliberately taken out of context. They claim that the cleric’s long-standing engagement with armed groups has been motivated by a desire to promote dialogue and reduce violence, rather than to endorse terrorism. According to this view, Gumi’s opposition to foreign military intervention reflects concerns about civilian casualties, sovereignty, and the risk of exacerbating conflicts rather than any sympathy for extremist ideology. These defenders warn that calls for his arrest risk inflaming religious tensions and could be perceived as targeting a Muslim cleric for expressing dissenting views.
Yet, as DDM NEWS has observed, the debate cannot be divorced from Nigeria’s grim realities. Over the past decade, the country has witnessed thousands of deaths attributed to insurgency, banditry, and communal violence, with entire communities displaced and livelihoods destroyed. While the violence has affected Nigerians of all faiths, numerous reports by local and international organisations have documented targeted attacks on Christian communities in parts of the Middle Belt and northern regions, including church burnings, mass killings, and forced displacement. It is these patterns that have led some international actors, including voices within the United States, to frame the crisis in terms of religious persecution.
The US airstrikes themselves have become a symbol of this framing. According to statements attributed to American officials, the strikes were aimed at ISIS-linked elements and other extremist groups accused of orchestrating attacks against civilians. US Defence officials have suggested that the operation was conducted in coordination with Nigerian authorities, although details remain sparse. The Nigerian government has been cautious in its public response, neither fully endorsing nor outright rejecting the American action, a stance that reflects the delicate balance Abuja seeks to maintain between asserting sovereignty and benefiting from international security cooperation.
It is within this context of ambiguity that Donnelly’s challenge to President Tinubu assumes heightened significance. By stating that Tinubu must publicly condemn Gumi or risk being seen as complicit, Donnelly has effectively placed the Nigerian president at a crossroads. A public condemnation could signal a firm stance against rhetoric perceived as justifying extremist violence, potentially reassuring affected communities and international partners. However, such a move could also provoke backlash from segments of the population that view Gumi as a legitimate religious leader and fear marginalisation.
DDM NEWS investigations indicate that the presidency is acutely aware of the sensitivities involved. Tinubu’s administration has sought to project an image of inclusivity and national unity while grappling with severe security challenges and economic pressures. Taking a hard public stance against a figure like Gumi could be interpreted by some as politicising religion or favouring one faith community over another. Conversely, silence or perceived inaction risks reinforcing narratives that the government is unwilling to confront extremist sympathisers, thereby undermining confidence in its commitment to justice and security.
Beyond the immediate personalities involved, the controversy raises deeper questions about the boundaries of free speech, religious authority, and accountability in a democracy facing existential security threats. At what point does rhetoric cross the line from expression to incitement? How should states respond when influential figures appear to legitimise or excuse violence? And what role should international actors play when domestic responses are seen as inadequate? These are questions that Nigeria, and indeed many countries grappling with extremism, continue to struggle with.
As the debate rages on, reactions within Nigeria remain deeply divided. Christian leaders and advocacy groups have largely welcomed Donnelly’s intervention, seeing it as validation of their long-standing complaints about impunity and selective justice. Muslim leaders, meanwhile, have urged caution, warning against broad-brush accusations that could stigmatise entire communities. Civil society organisations have called for an independent investigation into both the impact of the US airstrikes and the broader issue of extremist violence, arguing that transparency and accountability are essential to preventing further escalation.
DDM NEWS will continue to monitor developments closely, including any official response from the presidency, security agencies, or the judiciary. Whether Sheikh Ahmad Gumi will face any form of legal scrutiny remains uncertain, but what is clear is that the controversy has once again exposed the fragile interplay of religion, politics, and security in Nigeria. As international attention intensifies and domestic pressures mount, the choices made in the coming days could have far-reaching implications for national unity, the fight against terrorism, and Nigeria’s standing on the global stage.
Media personality and entrepreneur Toke Makinwa has stirred debate after asserting that women are more likely to cheat than men, arguing that they are simply more discreet about infidelity.
Makinwa made the remarks on a recent episode of her podcast, Toke Moments, where she challenged the popular perception that men are the primary perpetrators of cheating in relationships.
According to her, women often have greater opportunity and ease when it comes to infidelity, unlike men who, she said, typically expend significant time, money and effort to cheat.
“Cheating is not a dealbreaker for me, but it comes with a caveat,” Makinwa said. “When I say that, people assume I’m encouraging cheating. I’m not. As I grow older, I realise that it’s not just men who cheat. Why do we make men feel special, as if they’re the only ones capable of it?”
She argued that women’s ability to attract attention and receive advances makes infidelity easier for them, adding that restraint, rather than lack of opportunity, is often what prevents women from cheating.
“Do you know how easy it is for a woman to cheat? It’s even easier for us,” she said. “Men will spend money, effort and time to cheat, but women are usually on the receiving end.
“A woman who is not cheating is not doing so because she can’t. It’s probably because she has restraint.”
Makinwa concluded by insisting that women engage in infidelity more frequently than is publicly acknowledged, but are better at concealing it.
“Women cheat more,” she said, “but they know how to hide it.”
Her comments have since generated widespread reactions on social media, with opinions divided over her claims and their implications for modern relationships.
The Governor of Gombe State, Muhammadu Inuwa Yahaya, has expressed deep sorrow over a fatal road accident that claimed the lives of seven residents of Lawanti community in Akko Local Government Area of the state.
The victims were reportedly travelling to Maiduguri, Borno State, to attend a wedding ceremony when the accident occurred.
In a statement issued on Saturday by his Director-General of Press Affairs, Isma’ila Uba Misilli, the governor described the incident as a painful and devastating loss to the affected families, the Lawanti community and the state at large.
Governor Yahaya said the untimely death of the victims had deeply touched the hearts of the people of Gombe, noting that no words could adequately console families who lost loved ones under such tragic circumstances.
He commiserated with the families of the deceased, including the District Head of Jalingo, Bello Hassan Babangida, who lost his sister and niece; Idris Lawanti Maigari, who lost his daughter; and Idris A. Isah Lawanti, the councillor representing Akko Ward, who also lost close relatives in the accident.
The governor prayed that Almighty Allah grants the bereaved families and the entire Lawanti community the strength, patience and fortitude to bear the losses.
He also asked Allah to forgive the shortcomings of the deceased and grant them Aljannatul Firdaus.
Authorities have not yet released further details on the cause of the crash.
