A former President of the Court of Appeal, Isa Ayo Salami, has declared that Mr. Peter Obi shouldn’t have been allowed to contest the 2023 presidential election under the Labour Party.
Salami, a retired jurist, based his position on “clear constitutional limitations”, arguing that the process leading to Obi’s emergence as candidate of the party was outrightly flawed.
Salami said this on Tuesday in Ilorin while receiving an award from the Wole Soyinka Centre for Investigative Journalism (WSCIJ), where he also raised concerns about declining standards within Nigeria’s judiciary.
“For instance, Peter Obi ought not be allowed to contest the 2023 presidential election,” Salami said. “In the sense that by the time he lost the PDP primary, LP had submitted its list of members to the Independent National Electoral Commission. And the Constitution says there cannot be an independent candidacy.
“How did he become a candidate of LP if he does not belong to LP?”
Additionally, he linked what he described as controversial judicial outcomes to gaps in competence among some members of the bench.
“There are a few bad eggs amongst some judges. Strictly speaking, I will not say bad eggs. Some of them have a problem with learning. They don’t have a good background to be judges. Imagine appointing a higher registrar as a judge. He has no experience,” he said.
“Personally, they are inadequate. This might be responsible for their wrong judgments. At times, if you see the judgments of some of them, even the Supreme Court judgments, you will be astounded and wonder at what is happening.”
Salami further cited a similar case involving Kano State Governor, Abba Yusuf, questioning party membership processes and judicial decisions that upheld them.
“But the Supreme Court countenanced it, even though the tribunal and Appeal Court frowned at it. That is the problem of competence. People get to the Supreme Court not because they are good but because there is a vacancy in their zone,” he added.
While reflecting on his own career, Salami bemoaned a system where seniority and experience are sometimes overlooked in judicial appointments.
“I am a practical example. Some of them who came ten years after I had got to the Court of Appeal, got recommended to the Supreme Court by me because my zone did not have a vacancy. That is the tragedy we have found ourselves in. We hope that with time, everything will be corrected.”
However, despite his criticism, Salami expressed appreciation to the WSCIJ for honouring him, describing the recognition as significant and encouraging for members of the judiciary.
“I am very happy to receive the award. I hope and pray that your organisation will flourish… There is hardly any judge who will not appreciate this type of award,” he said.
He also credited Nobel laureate Wole Soyinka and late nationalist Obafemi Awolowo as key influences in shaping his views and legal career.































and then