United States President Donald Trump has criticised Iran for appointing Mojtaba Khamenei as the country’s new Supreme Leader, describing the decision as a “big mistake” amid rising tensions in the Middle East.
Trump made the remarks during an interview with NBC News following confirmation that Mojtaba had assumed the powerful position after the death of his father, Ali Khamenei.
“I think they made a big mistake” in selecting Mojtaba Khamenei, Trump said on Monday.
The appointment of Mojtaba Khamenei marks a dramatic transition in Iran’s leadership.
His father, Ali Khamenei, had served as the country’s supreme leader since 1989 and was Iran’s highest political and religious authority until his death.
Reports indicate that Ali Khamenei was killed on February 28, 2026, during joint military strikes carried out by the United States and Israel targeting Iranian leadership and military infrastructure in Tehran.
Both Iranian state media and U.S. officials confirmed the death, prompting Iran to declare a 40-day national mourning period.
The decision to appoint Mojtaba was reportedly made by Iran’s Assembly of Experts, the clerical body responsible for selecting the country’s supreme leader.
In earlier remarks, Trump reportedly dismissed the new Iranian leader as a “lightweight,” expressing doubts about his ability to consolidate power during a period of heightened geopolitical tension.
Analysts say Mojtaba Khamenei, a mid-ranking cleric with close ties to the powerful Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, had long been viewed by parts of Iran’s ruling establishment as a potential successor to his father.
Although Iran’s political ideology traditionally rejects hereditary succession, observers say Mojtaba’s influence within the clerical establishment and the Revolutionary Guards helped secure his rise.
During the interview, Trump also addressed speculation about potential U.S. actions targeting Iran’s oil sector, which is a key pillar of the country’s economy.
The president said it was “too soon to talk about” whether Washington might seize Iranian oil resources, but he added that he “doesn’t rule it out.”
While he did not provide details on possible steps, analysts say the statement suggests the United States could consider additional economic or strategic measures against Tehran depending on how the crisis develops.
The leadership change in Iran comes at a time of escalating conflict across the Middle East, with military confrontations and political tensions intensifying between Tehran and Western powers.
Ali Khamenei had ruled Iran for more than three decades, shaping the country’s ideological stance against Israel and the West and playing a central role in supporting the regional alliance often referred to as the “Axis of Resistance,” which includes armed groups across Lebanon, Iraq, Syria, Yemen and the Palestinian territories.
Reports have emerged that Donald Trump has told senior advisers he would support the killing of Mojtaba Khamenei, the newly appointed Supreme Leader of Iran, if Tehran refuses to comply with U.S. demands.
According to a report by The Wall Street Journal, the U.S. president made the remark during private discussions with aides as tensions continue to escalate between Washington and Tehran amid the ongoing Middle East conflict.
The newspaper said Trump told advisers he would back the killing of Khamenei if the Iranian leader refused to make key concessions sought by the United States.
Among the demands reportedly being pushed by Washington are a halt to Iran’s nuclear development programme and other strategic concessions related to regional security.
The report quoted Trump as saying: “I’m not going through this to end up with another Khamenei,” suggesting the comment was made during internal strategy discussions.
The remarks have not been officially confirmed by the White House.
Foreign policy analysts warn that public or private endorsement of the killing of a foreign head of state could provoke retaliatory actions from Tehran and further destabilise the region.
The development comes amid rising hostilities in the Middle East, including missile and drone attacks targeting Gulf countries and energy infrastructure.
U.S. allies, including members of NATO, have historically urged restraint and adherence to international law during periods of heightened geopolitical tension.
Diplomatic sources say such remarks could trigger urgent consultations among allied governments concerned about the risk of further escalation.
Security analysts also warn that heightened tensions could increase risks around the strategically vital Strait of Hormuz, a major shipping route through which a large portion of the world’s oil supply passes.
Any escalation in the confrontation between the United States and Iran could disrupt global energy flows and add pressure to already volatile oil markets.
The situation continues to develop as international observers closely monitor responses from Tehran and Washington.
For decades, Nigeria has stood as one of the world’s largest oil-producing nations, pumping millions of barrels of crude oil from its rich Niger Delta reserves. Yet paradoxically, despite its enormous natural wealth, the country has struggled with persistent fuel shortages, soaring petrol prices, and a controversial subsidy regime that has drained trillions of naira from the national treasury. At the center of this long-running controversy is what many analysts describe as the “subsidy cabal,” a powerful network of oil marketers, depot owners, political elites, and business interests who allegedly benefited from a deeply flawed fuel subsidy system. The debate surrounding this system has frequently drawn attention to influential figures in Nigeria’s oil sector, including billionaire businessman Femi Otedola and Africa’s richest man, Aliko Dangote.
The story of the subsidy cabal is rooted in Nigeria’s long-standing policy of subsidizing petrol. For many years, the Nigerian government paid oil marketers billions of naira to import refined fuel and sell it domestically at a reduced price. The intention behind the subsidy was to protect ordinary citizens from high energy costs. However, over time the system became deeply vulnerable to abuse. According to investigations and testimonies presented in public hearings, some companies allegedly claimed subsidy payments for fuel that was never imported, using falsified shipping documents, ghost cargoes, and manipulated paperwork.
The scale of the alleged fraud shocked many Nigerians. Reports indicated that billions of dollars disappeared through the subsidy program while the country continued to experience fuel scarcity and rising government debt. In some cases, marketers reportedly collected subsidy payments for millions of litres of petrol that never entered Nigerian waters. The scandal exposed serious weaknesses in oversight mechanisms within Nigeria’s petroleum supply chain.
One of the most explosive moments in the controversy came during the investigations by Nigeria’s House of Representatives into subsidy payments in 2012. The probe uncovered widespread irregularities involving dozens of companies and billions of naira in questionable claims. During that period, businessman Femi Otedola, who was active in the downstream petroleum sector through his company Zenon Petroleum and Gas, became involved in a high-profile bribery scandal linked to the investigation. Otedola admitted that he gave $620,000 to a lawmaker, Farouk Lawan, in what he described as a sting operation coordinated with security agencies to expose corruption within the probe itself.
The scandal further reinforced public perception that Nigeria’s subsidy system had become a playground for powerful interests. Many Nigerians began to question how a country that produces crude oil in large quantities could spend enormous sums importing refined petrol while simultaneously losing billions through subsidy payments.
Years later, the debate resurfaced when Otedola made new claims about the magnitude of the subsidy fraud. According to him, more than two trillion naira was siphoned through questionable subsidy claims during the administration of former President Goodluck Jonathan. He stated that the system had been structured in a way that favored depot owners and oil marketers who controlled fuel storage infrastructure.
Otedola’s remarks reignited national debate about the role of powerful players in Nigeria’s downstream petroleum sector. Critics argued that the subsidy regime encouraged rent-seeking behavior rather than productive investment. Instead of building refineries or improving domestic fuel production, many marketers found it more profitable to import fuel and rely on government reimbursements.
The controversy surrounding the subsidy system also intersects with the rise of Dangote’s massive refinery project in Lagos. The Dangote Refinery, one of the largest single-train refineries in the world, was built to address Nigeria’s chronic dependence on imported refined fuel. With a projected capacity capable of meeting Nigeria’s entire petrol demand, the refinery is expected to transform the country’s energy sector and potentially end the decades-long cycle of fuel importation.
For Dangote, the refinery represents not only a business venture but also a strategic intervention in Nigeria’s energy independence. Supporters argue that domestic refining could eliminate the need for costly fuel imports and remove the conditions that allowed subsidy fraud to flourish in the first place. However, the emergence of such a large refinery has also sparked tensions with existing fuel marketers and depot owners who fear losing their dominance in the downstream supply chain.
The fuel subsidy controversy reached a dramatic turning point in 2012 when the Nigerian government attempted to remove the subsidy entirely. The decision triggered nationwide protests known as the Occupy Nigeria movement. Millions of Nigerians took to the streets to protest the sudden increase in petrol prices and the perceived failure of government to address corruption within the subsidy system. The demonstrations forced the government to partially restore the subsidy, illustrating the political sensitivity of fuel pricing in Nigeria.
Behind the protests was a deeper frustration: Nigerians were not only angry about higher fuel prices but also about the belief that public resources were being looted by a small group of powerful individuals. The idea of a “subsidy cabal” became a popular explanation for the persistent dysfunction in the petroleum sector.
Economists and policy experts have long argued that the subsidy system was financially unsustainable. At one point, the subsidy reportedly cost the Nigerian government billions of dollars annually, consuming a large share of the national budget that could otherwise have been used for infrastructure, healthcare, and education. Even former President Goodluck Jonathan acknowledged that the subsidy had become a major drain on government finances and was riddled with corruption.
In recent years, Nigeria has taken steps toward deregulating the downstream petroleum sector and removing fuel subsidies entirely. Advocates of deregulation believe that eliminating subsidies will reduce corruption, encourage private investment in refining, and allow market forces to determine fuel prices.
However, the legacy of the subsidy era continues to shape Nigeria’s economic and political debates. Many questions remain unanswered about how much money was lost, who benefited from the system, and whether those responsible have ever been held accountable.
For many Nigerians, the story of the subsidy cabal symbolizes a broader struggle over transparency, governance, and the management of the nation’s natural resources. The country’s oil wealth, which should have been a blessing, has often appeared instead as a source of controversy and missed opportunities.
As Nigeria moves into a new phase of energy reform with the rise of domestic refining and deregulation, the lessons of the subsidy era remain deeply relevant. The scandal exposed structural weaknesses in regulatory oversight, highlighted the enormous influence of powerful business interests, and revealed how easily public policies can be manipulated when transparency is lacking.
Ultimately, the mystery of Nigeria’s “missing oil wealth” is not only about subsidy payments or individual billionaires. It is about the broader challenge of ensuring that the country’s vast petroleum resources serve the interests of its people rather than enriching a privileged few. Whether the new era of deregulation and domestic refining will finally end the era of the subsidy cabal remains one of the most important questions facing Nigeria’s energy future.
A high school teacher in the U.S. state of Georgia has died after being accidentally run over during a prank carried out by some of his students.
The teacher, Jason Hughes, 40, stepped outside his home when students arrived to carry out a common high school prank known as “rolling,” where toilet paper is thrown over trees and around a house.
According to authorities, Hughes had reportedly been aware of the prank and planned to surprise the students while they were carrying it out. However, the situation took a tragic turn when he slipped on the wet ground outside his home, which had been made slippery by rain.
Police said that as the students attempted to leave the scene in two vehicles, Hughes was accidentally struck by one of the cars.
The driver of the vehicle, Jayden Ryan Wallace, 18, has been charged with vehicular homicide. Wallace and four other students involved in the incident are also facing charges of criminal trespass and littering on private property.
Officials said Wallace and two others immediately stopped to assist Hughes before emergency responders arrived and rushed him to the hospital, where he later died.
Hughes’ family, however, has appealed for the charges against the students to be dropped.
His wife, Laura Hughes, who also teaches at the same school, told the New York Times that her husband was deeply loved by his students and had been looking forward to catching them in the act.
“This is a terrible tragedy, and our family is determined to prevent another tragedy from occurring by ruining the lives of these students,” she said. “That would go against Jason’s lifelong dedication to investing in the lives of these children.”
A spokesperson for the Hall County School District described Hughes as a passionate teacher, mentor and coach who was highly respected by both students and colleagues.
Meanwhile, members of the community have set up a memorial outside the school where Hughes taught and coached to honour his memory.
(DDM) – The Secretary of the Membership Mobilization, Revalidation and Registration (MMRR) committee of the African Democratic Congress (ADC) in Enugu State, Prince Kingsley Acharabagu, has raised concerns over what he described as attempts by the state MMRR Chairman, Barrister Sunday Okereke, to compromise the party’s mobilization structure in the state.
Speaking to Diaspora Digital Media on Monday morning from Abuja, Acharabagu cautioned against any move aimed at selling, manipulating, or taking unilateral control of the structure created for the ADC Membership Mobilization, Revalidation and Registration exercise in Enugu State.
He emphasized that the structure was established strictly to strengthen the party and mobilize supporters across the grassroots, and not for personal or political advantage.
Acharabagu, who also serves as the Enugu North Zonal Chairman of the ADC, explained that the mobilization exercise is a key national programme of the party aimed at expanding its grassroots presence across Nigeria.
According to him, the MMRR initiative was designed to update the party’s membership records, revalidate existing members, and register new supporters across wards and local government areas.
He noted that the exercise has become particularly significant as the ADC continues efforts to position itself as a credible political alternative within Nigeria’s evolving democratic environment.
However, the party chieftain criticized what he described as the unilateral distribution of ADC membership cards by the MMRR Chairman without the knowledge of the committee’s leadership and members.
According to Acharabagu, Barrister Okereke allegedly began sharing ADC membership cards without informing the secretary of the committee or the other ten members of the MMRR committee in Enugu State.
He further stated that the development was even more troubling because the Enugu State Chairman of the ADC was not carried along in the process.
“The attempt by contestants to hijack the structure is not the best practice,” Acharabagu told Diaspora Digital Media during the telephone conversation from the Federal Capital Territory.
He stressed that the MMRR structure was built through collective efforts by party stakeholders and must be protected in order to preserve transparency, accountability, and fairness within the party’s organizational framework.
As the state secretary of the MMRR committee in Enugu, Acharabagu said he has a responsibility to safeguard the process and ensure that it is not manipulated by individuals pursuing personal interests.
“I must resist every attempt to hijack this process in the state,” he said, emphasizing that party-building should be guided by democratic principles and respect for due process.
The ADC official also issued a strong warning to members of the MMRR across the wards in Enugu State, particularly those who may attempt to sign or validate membership cards in ways that violate party procedures.
He cautioned that anyone who signs or endorses membership cards while impersonating an ADC ward chairman would be committing a serious criminal offence.
According to him, such actions would not only violate the party’s internal regulations but could also attract legal consequences.
He warned that any individual found impersonating the ADC ward chairman or engaging in unauthorized validation of membership cards should be prepared to face legal action in court.
Political observers note that membership mobilization exercises play a crucial role in strengthening political parties because they determine grassroots support, influence internal decision-making, and shape party structures at ward and state levels.
The ADC’s nationwide Membership Mobilization, Revalidation and Registration programme has been promoted by party leaders as a strategic step toward expanding the party’s national base and preparing its structures for future political contests.
For stakeholders in Enugu State, the success and credibility of the exercise are considered vital for consolidating the party’s presence in the South-East region.
Acharabagu therefore urged party members to remain committed to transparency, unity, and adherence to due process as the mobilization exercise continues across the state.
(DDM) – Former Anambra State governor and 2023 Labour Party presidential candidate, Peter Obi, has spoken out against what he described as the continuous detention and political targeting of opposition figures under the current administration.
In a statement shared on his official X account on Monday, March 9, 2026, Obi called for strict adherence to the rule of law, emphasizing that political persecution under the guise of criminal prosecution threatens Nigeria’s democratic framework.
Obi specifically referenced the ongoing cases involving former Attorney General of the Federation, Abubakar Malami, and former Kaduna State governor, Nasir El-Rufai, both associated with the African Democratic Congress (ADC). He expressed concern over the manner of their arrests, the legal processes, and the agencies handling the cases, raising questions about fairness and transparency.
“Time to End the Persecution of Political Opponents,” Obi wrote. “The current administration must put an end to the blatant persecution of political opponents disguised as criminal prosecution. The integrity of the rule of law in Nigeria is non-negotiable; its degradation undermines our economic development and threatens national stability.”
The former presidential candidate argued that as Nigeria approaches another electoral cycle, anti-corruption efforts must be implemented impartially, ensuring that citizens are not targeted for their political affiliations. He warned that undermining judicial integrity could have far-reaching consequences for governance and public trust in the country’s institutions.
Obi’s statement has sparked widespread debate online, generating reactions from both supporters and critics. Advocates of fair governance applauded his call for accountability and due process, while some critics suggested that political commentary on ongoing legal cases could escalate tensions ahead of elections.
Observers note that the cases of Malami and El-Rufai have been closely followed, with allegations of misconduct by investigative agencies adding to public scrutiny. The continued detention of high-profile political figures has raised questions about the independence of law enforcement and prosecutorial agencies in politically sensitive matters.
Legal experts emphasize that Nigeria’s judiciary is expected to uphold the principles of fairness, due process, and impartiality, even in cases involving politically connected individuals. Any perception of selective enforcement could undermine public confidence and fuel partisan tensions.
Obi’s intervention is seen as part of broader advocacy for political accountability and the protection of opposition voices in Nigeria. Analysts say that his comments may influence public discourse on governance, the role of law enforcement, and the protection of democratic rights in the lead-up to future elections.
As debates continue, civil society groups and political commentators are closely watching how the government and judicial authorities respond to calls for transparency and respect for the rule of law.
The former governor’s statement reinforces the ongoing conversation about balancing anti-corruption measures with political fairness and safeguarding the country’s democratic institutions.
(DDM) – A prominent civil society coalition, the Northern Citizens Investigative Platform (NCIP), has openly criticized Vice President Kashim Shettima and the Federal Government over what it described as inadequate responses to rising killings, abductions, and displacements in Northern Nigeria.
The condemnation follows a recent spate of violent attacks across several communities in Borno State, including Ngoshe, Konduga, Marte, Jakana, and Mainok, which have left residents traumatized and displaced.
Speaking on behalf of NCIP chapters from all 19 Northern states, Comrade IG Wala demanded a transparent, time-bound action plan to restore security in the region. He stressed that repeated press statements and public reassurances have done little to stop the bloodshed.
“For over a decade, the people of the Northeast have known Kashim Shettima,” the statement read. “We knew him as a governor during the Boko Haram insurgency and now as Vice President. Yet, the madness of insurgency in our region continues unabated.”
The group emphasized that the North requires actionable strategies to achieve collective peace, rather than mere rhetoric. According to the NCIP, Shettima, as the highest-ranking Northern officer in government, must provide leadership that goes beyond ceremonial statements.
“The time for deploring attacks is over,” the statement continued. “We demand a transparent, time-bound report on the tactical assets being deployed and accountability for why the security architecture continues to fail despite intimate knowledge of these terrains.”
Political analysts note that the Northeast has been disproportionately affected by insurgency and armed banditry for years. Efforts to contain these threats have been criticized as slow and reactive, leaving local communities vulnerable.
NCIP’s critique underscores growing public frustration in the North, where citizens feel that governmental promises of protection have not matched realities on the ground. The organization also urged clear communication regarding deployment of security forces, intelligence operations, and the strategies planned to secure affected communities.
The coalition warned that without demonstrable results, continued insecurity could further erode public trust in both regional and federal leadership. They called for decisive measures to protect civilians and ensure the return of displaced families.
“The North knows you as a son, Vice President Shettima,” the statement concluded. “But until that knowledge translates into the safety of our mothers and the return of our children, your leadership is nothing more than a name without a benefit.”
Observers say the NCIP’s intervention adds pressure on the federal administration to not only increase security measures but also improve transparency and reporting mechanisms to reassure citizens and prevent further destabilization.
The demand for action from Vice President Shettima comes at a time when Northern communities continue to bear the brunt of insurgency, highlighting the urgent need for coordinated and effective countermeasures.
This public call also reflects wider national debates on accountability, governance, and the role of high-ranking officials in safeguarding citizens in conflict-prone regions.
(DDM) – A major political shift has emerged in northwestern Nigeria after the governor of Zamfara State, Dauda Lawal, alongside his deputy Mani Malam Mummuni, announced their decision to leave the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and join the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC), a move that could significantly reshape the state’s political landscape and deepen national debates about party loyalty and political realignment.
The announcement was made by Deputy Governor Mummuni during a gathering with supporters and political stakeholders across the state. Speaking on behalf of Governor Lawal, he said the decision followed extensive consultations with political allies and key stakeholders in Zamfara.
According to the deputy governor, the leadership of the state concluded that shifting allegiance to the APC would better position Zamfara to attract federal support and address pressing developmental and security challenges affecting the region.
“We, the Governor, his team, and I, have decided to officially leave the Peoples Democratic Party and join the All Progressives Congress,” Mummuni said while addressing the crowd, adding that the decision was taken after carefully evaluating the political direction of both the state and the country.
He emphasized that the move was not merely a political calculation but one aimed at improving governance and strengthening cooperation with the federal government.
“This decision is taken to align with the direction that will better serve our people, secure more federal support, address security challenges, and accelerate development in Zamfara,” he said.
Zamfara, one of Nigeria’s most security-challenged states, has for years struggled with armed banditry, kidnappings, and rural violence. Local communities have repeatedly called for stronger federal intervention and improved security coordination.
Political observers say aligning with the ruling APC at the federal level may help the state government push for more support from Abuja in tackling these challenges.
The defection also reflects the fluid nature of Nigeria’s political alliances, where party switching among high-profile politicians is relatively common, particularly as election cycles approach.
Governor Lawal was elected in 2023 under the banner of the PDP, defeating the incumbent APC administration at the time. His victory was widely seen as a significant political upset in Zamfara, a state that had previously been considered an APC stronghold.
His departure from the opposition PDP now raises questions about the future strength of the party in the region and the broader political implications ahead of the next electoral cycle.
Analysts say the decision may further strengthen the APC’s influence in the northwest while weakening the PDP’s foothold in one of Nigeria’s strategically important political zones.
The move also comes amid wider national political tensions and shifting alliances across Nigeria’s political landscape since the emergence of President Bola Tinubu and the APC-led federal government.
For supporters of the governor, the switch is seen as a pragmatic decision aimed at attracting development and improving security cooperation. Critics, however, argue that such defections often reflect political survival strategies rather than ideological commitment.
Mummuni, however, urged party loyalists and residents across Zamfara to support the transition, insisting it was taken in the best interest of the state.
“We call on all our supporters, party members, and the good people of Zamfara to support this move for the greater good of the state,” he said.
As political reactions continue to emerge, the defection could trigger further realignments within Zamfara politics and possibly influence alliances across Nigeria ahead of future elections.
(DDM) – Nigeria’s political and economic landscape witnessed fresh developments on Monday as opposition figures intensified criticism of the federal government, while legal controversies and investment discussions also dominated national headlines.
Former Minister of Transportation, Rotimi Amaechi, alleged that President Bola Tinubu and leaders of the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC) are already showing signs of anxiety ahead of the 2027 general elections.
Amaechi, a chieftain of the African Democratic Congress (ADC), made the remarks while addressing supporters in Rivers State. According to him, the political strength projected by the ruling party does not reflect the reality among voters across the country.
“I thought the President said they were popular,” Amaechi said, questioning the political confidence of the governing party.
He also accused the APC of attempting to intimidate voters as Nigeria gradually moves toward another election cycle.
In a separate development, the legal team of former Kaduna State governor, Nasir Ahmad El-Rufai, has accused the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC) of engaging in what they described as politically motivated actions against their client.
El-Rufai’s lawyer, Ubong Esop Akpan, issued a statement in Abuja demanding either the immediate release of the former governor or his formal arraignment in court.
The lawyer dismissed allegations linking El-Rufai to multi-billion-naira property investments in Egypt, describing the claims as fabricated and based on anonymous leaks rather than verifiable evidence.
Meanwhile, Nigeria’s economic outlook attracted international attention as global investors continued to explore opportunities in the country’s expanding commercial environment.
During a high-level investment mission to Lagos, the Commonwealth Enterprise and Investment Council highlighted Nigeria’s growing importance in the global economic shift.
The council’s Chief Executive Officer, Samantha Cohen, noted that investors from both Commonwealth nations and Gulf states are increasingly viewing Nigeria as a strategic destination for sustainable investment.
“Africa is booming, and Nigeria is front and centre of the big economic shift,” Cohen said, adding that the country’s growth potential continues to attract global interest.
In the energy sector, Nigeria also featured in international energy market developments after a shipment from Nigeria LNG Limited was diverted to Asia due to rising global gas prices.
Data from analytics firm Kpler showed that the LNG tanker BW Brussels, which loaded its cargo at the Bonny Island terminal, initially planned to deliver the shipment to Europe before altering its route toward Asia.
Analysts say the diversion reflects widening price differences between European and Asian gas markets following supply disruptions linked to geopolitical tensions and production challenges in the Middle East.
The combined developments underscore Nigeria’s complex political, legal, and economic environment as the country navigates governance debates, legal controversies, and increasing global economic attention.
(DDM) – The Dangote Petroleum Refinery has once again increased the price of Premium Motor Spirit (PMS), popularly known as petrol, marking the third upward adjustment within a week and raising fresh concerns over fuel costs in Nigeria.
The refinery announced on Monday that the gantry price of petrol has been raised to N1,175 per litre, up from N995 per litre announced just days earlier. The new rate represents an increase of N180 per litre, translating to roughly 18.1 percent within three days.
In addition to petrol, the refinery also adjusted the price of Automotive Gas Oil (AGO), commonly known as diesel, which now stands at N1,620 per litre at the gantry.
Industry analysts say the repeated price increases could have significant implications for fuel marketers, transport operators, and consumers across the country, especially as fuel prices continue to influence the overall cost of living.
The price announced by the refinery applies primarily to bulk buyers and fuel marketers purchasing directly from the facility. Retail pump prices at filling stations across the country may vary depending on distribution costs, logistics, and retailer margins.
The refinery, owned by Nigerian industrialist Aliko Dangote, is regarded as one of the largest single-train refineries in the world and was expected to reduce Nigeria’s long-standing dependence on imported petroleum products.
However, market dynamics such as global crude oil prices, exchange rate fluctuations, and supply chain costs continue to influence domestic fuel pricing.
Observers note that frequent price adjustments by the refinery reflect the broader challenges facing Nigeria’s energy market since the removal of fuel subsidies by the administration of President Bola Tinubu.
The subsidy removal policy, announced shortly after Tinubu assumed office in 2023, ended decades of government price controls on petrol, allowing market forces to determine the cost of the product.
While the policy was intended to reduce government spending and encourage private investment in the petroleum sector, it has also resulted in sharp increases in fuel prices across the country.
Economists warn that rising fuel costs could trigger further increases in transportation fares, food prices, and production expenses for businesses, as fuel remains a key driver of economic activity in Nigeria.
For now, consumers and industry stakeholders are closely watching developments in the petroleum market as the impact of the latest price adjustment begins to ripple through the economy.
(DDM) – Former Minister of Transportation, Rotimi Amaechi, has accused President Bola Tinubu and leaders of the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC) of allegedly adopting political tactics aimed at discouraging voter participation ahead of the 2027 general elections.
Amaechi made the remarks while addressing supporters during a political gathering, where he discussed the political climate surrounding preparations for the next electoral cycle.
The former Rivers State governor, who is now associated with the African Democratic Congress (ADC), suggested that the ruling party may be concerned about its political standing as Nigeria gradually approaches another election season.
According to him, the strategy being employed by the APC leadership is intended to create voter apathy, which could influence turnout during the next national elections.
“The reason why they are doing what they are doing is that they want apathy,” Amaechi said.
“They don’t want you to come out and vote because if you come out and vote, you’ll certainly not vote for APC.”
Amaechi also argued that the level of popularity often projected by leaders of the ruling party may not accurately reflect the political mood among many Nigerians.
He suggested that dissatisfaction with governance and economic conditions may shape voter decisions in future elections, particularly if citizens actively participate in the democratic process.
The former minister used the occasion to outline what he described as the political direction of the ADC as the party prepares for future contests.
According to him, the party plans to focus heavily on grassroots engagement and community mobilization in order to encourage citizens to participate more actively in elections.
He emphasized that one of the key objectives of the party would be to reduce voter apathy by educating citizens about the importance of participating in the democratic process.
Political analysts note that voter turnout has remained a major concern in Nigeria’s electoral system in recent years. Low participation levels have often raised questions about public trust in political institutions and the effectiveness of the electoral process.
Amaechi’s comments come at a time when discussions about the 2027 general elections are gradually gaining momentum across Nigeria’s political landscape.
Although the election is still several years away, statements by influential political figures suggest that early political positioning and party mobilization efforts may already be underway.
Observers say the debate around voter participation, governance performance, and political accountability is likely to intensify as parties begin to strategize for the next electoral contest.
Turning 40 is a milestone that brings new opportunities for personal growth, but it also signals changes in the body that require careful attention to health. Experts warn that continuing certain habits beyond this age can accelerate health risks and reduce quality of life.
According to specialists in Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, adults over 40 should adopt lifestyle adjustments to maintain heart, bone, and metabolic health. Avoiding harmful habits can prevent chronic diseases and support long-term wellness.
Here are key things you should stop doing once you hit 40:
1. Ignoring Regular Health Screenings Routine checkups become more critical after 40. Skipping screenings for blood pressure, cholesterol, blood sugar, and cancer markers such as colonoscopy or mammography can delay the detection of serious conditions like Heart Disease, Diabetes, and Colorectal Cancer. Early detection greatly improves outcomes.
2. Neglecting Physical Activity Sedentary lifestyles increase the risk of obesity, cardiovascular disease, and bone density loss. Adults over 40 should aim for at least 150 minutes of moderate-intensity exercise per week, including strength training to prevent muscle loss and maintain mobility.
3. Overlooking Mental Health Stress, anxiety, and depression can become more pronounced in midlife. Ignoring mental health can exacerbate physical health issues, including high blood pressure and heart disease. Experts recommend mindfulness practices, therapy, and regular social engagement to maintain emotional wellbeing.
4. Continuing Unhealthy Eating Habits Metabolism slows with age, making it easier to gain weight and harder to manage blood sugar levels. Consuming processed foods, excessive sugar, and high-fat diets can increase the risk of Type 2 Diabetes, high cholesterol, and cardiovascular problems. A balanced diet rich in vegetables, lean protein, whole grains, and healthy fats is crucial.
5. Ignoring Sleep Patterns Sleep quality often declines after 40, and insufficient rest is linked to weight gain, weakened immunity, and cognitive decline. Adults should aim for 7–8 hours of quality sleep per night and establish consistent sleep routines.
6. Smoking and Excessive Alcohol Consumption Both smoking and heavy alcohol use accelerate aging, increase the risk of cancers, and damage the liver, heart, and lungs. Quitting smoking and moderating alcohol intake are essential for maintaining health beyond 40.
7. Skipping Bone and Joint Health Practices Bone density naturally declines with age, increasing the risk of osteoporosis and fractures. Ignoring calcium and vitamin D intake, along with weight-bearing exercises, can accelerate bone loss. Regular checkups, supplementation if needed, and strength training help maintain skeletal health.
The Bottom Line Experts emphasize that turning 40 is not a warning sign—it’s an opportunity to prioritize long-term health. By avoiding harmful habits, undergoing regular screenings, exercising consistently, and maintaining a balanced diet, adults can prevent chronic diseases and enjoy a high quality of life well into later years.
Small, consistent lifestyle changes after 40 can have a profound impact on longevity and overall wellness, ensuring that the next decades are healthier and more vibrant.
(DDM) – Former Minister of Transportation, Rotimi Amaechi, has launched a sharp criticism of the administration of President Bola Tinubu, challenging the government to point to concrete achievements since assuming office.
Amaechi, who recently signaled interest in contesting the 2027 presidential election, accused the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC) government of focusing on distractions instead of delivering tangible development projects for Nigerians.
Speaking to journalists, the former Rivers State governor alleged that the current administration was already showing signs of political panic ahead of the next general election.
According to him, actions by the government suggest it is worried about growing opposition ahead of the 2027 polls.
“I thought the President said they were popular. What they are doing now are panic measures,” Amaechi said.
“They are scared. If you are not scared, let’s meet on the field. Let the people choose who they want to choose.”
Amaechi argued that the government appears to be trying to impose political choices on Nigerians rather than allowing the electorate to freely determine their leaders through democratic processes.
He urged voters to evaluate the performance of the APC administration before supporting the party in future elections.
“If you want to vote for APC, the question you ask yourself is: what have they done?” he asked.
The former minister also questioned the progress of the widely publicized Lagos–Calabar Coastal Highway project, which has been promoted by the government as a major infrastructure initiative.
“The noise was Lagos-Calabar coastal road. Where is the road?” Amaechi asked.
Drawing comparisons with his tenure as Minister of Transportation under former President Muhammadu Buhari, Amaechi listed several infrastructure projects he said were completed or initiated during that administration.
Among the projects he mentioned were the Itakpe–Warri railway line and the Lagos–Ibadan railway, both of which he noted are currently operational and being used by Nigerians.
He also cited the Kano–Kaduna railway project, which he said was already under construction before the end of the Buhari administration, as well as the Abuja–Kaduna railway corridor.
In addition, Amaechi pointed to the development of the Lekki Deep Sea Port as one of the major economic infrastructure projects executed during the previous administration.
The former minister insisted that those projects provided visible evidence of government performance and long-term infrastructure investment.
“Let this government show one thing they have done, either in the north or in the south, apart from stealing money,” he said.
Amaechi’s remarks come at a time when political discussions around the 2027 presidential election are gradually gaining momentum across Nigeria.
Although the election is still some years away, statements by influential political figures like Amaechi suggest that early positioning and political alignments may already be underway within Nigeria’s political landscape.
Analysts say criticism from former members of the ruling party could further intensify debates about governance performance, economic reforms, and infrastructure development as political actors begin to shape narratives ahead of the next electoral cycle.
Fresh attacks by Iran on energy infrastructure across the Gulf have heightened fears of global oil supply disruptions, sending crude prices sharply higher and rattling financial markets.
According to reports by Agence France-Presse (AFP), Iranian forces launched new strikes on Monday, including an attack on a petroleum complex in Bahrain.
The strike hit the Al Ma’ameer oil facility, triggering a fire and forcing the state-owned energy firm Bapco to declare force majeure, a legal clause used when companies cannot meet contractual obligations due to circumstances beyond their control.
In a statement, Bapco said it had “served notice of force majeure on its group operations which have been affected by the ongoing regional conflict in the Middle East and the recent attack on its refinery complex.”
Energy producers in Qatar and Kuwait had earlier made similar declarations, warning that the escalating conflict could prevent them from meeting export targets.
The attacks have sent shockwaves through global markets.
Oil prices surged to their highest level since the 2022 invasion of Ukraine by Russia, while Asian stock markets plunged as investors reacted to fears of prolonged instability in the Middle East.
Authorities across the Gulf region have been scrambling to manage the fallout from the continued missile and drone strikes.
In Qatar, officials said more than 300 people were arrested for sharing images and what authorities described as “misleading information” during the attacks.
The latest escalation follows an evacuation order issued by the United States Department of State, which directed non-emergency U.S. government staff and their families to leave Saudi Arabia due to growing security risks.
Last week, drones struck the United States Embassy in Riyadh, while U.S. diplomatic missions in Kuwait and the United Arab Emirates also reported damage from drone attacks.
Meanwhile, Bahraini authorities said another Iranian drone strike overnight targeted the island of Sitra, injuring 32 people, including several children.
The country’s health ministry confirmed that four victims sustained serious injuries, among them a 17-year-old girl with severe head and eye injuries and a two-month-old baby.
In Doha, AFP journalists reported hearing multiple explosions on Monday as Qatar intercepted incoming drones and missiles. Qatar’s defence ministry said its forces successfully intercepted a missile attack.
Similarly, Saudi Arabia’s defence ministry announced that air defence systems shot down two waves of drones heading toward the Shaybah oil field in the country’s southeast.
Authorities in the United Arab Emirates also confirmed that their air defence systems responded to a missile threat, while Kuwait reported another round of missile and drone attacks following earlier strikes on Sunday.
The Gulf region has become a key theatre of retaliation after the United States and Israel launched a large-scale aerial campaign against Iran on February 28, escalating tensions across the Middle East.
Since Iran began its retaliatory attacks, at least 21 people have been killed in the Gulf, including 10 civilians and seven U.S. service members.
Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian has warned that the Islamic Republic “will be forced to respond” against neighbouring countries if their territories are used to launch attacks against Iran.
Investigators with the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC) have reportedly traced several high-value properties in Egypt allegedly linked to former Kaduna State governor, Nasir El-Rufai.
Officials familiar with the inquiry disclosed that the properties, believed to be worth several billions of naira, were allegedly acquired between 2021 and 2023.
Sources within the anti-graft agency, who spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorised to discuss the matter publicly, said the properties are located in New Cairo, an upscale suburb of Cairo known for luxury estates and gated residential communities.
According to investigators, intelligence reports available to the commission suggest that multiple villas and apartments in the area may be linked to the former governor. The properties are reportedly situated in some of the city’s most exclusive residential estates, including Arabella Estate, Banafsek Estate, Oriana Estate and Cairo Festival City.
Findings indicate that villas within Cairo Festival City and Arabella Estate are priced between 50 million and 200 million Egyptian pounds, equivalent to approximately ₦5.3 billion, while luxury apartments in the area sell for about 26 million Egyptian pounds, roughly ₦700 million.
One investigator familiar with the probe said among the properties under scrutiny is a villa located at House No. 113 in Arabella Estate, situated in the Fifth Settlement district of New Cairo. Another property allegedly linked to the former governor is House No. 18 in Banafsek Estate, located in the First Settlement area.
Investigators also identified a property in Oriana II Estate, near the American University in Cairo, reportedly listed as House No. 11.
In addition to the villas, the agency has traced several apartments in the high-end Cairo Festival City development. According to sources, four apartments identified as Units 514, 515, 516 and 517 are among those currently under investigation.
Two other apartments in Oriana Estate, reportedly numbered 4000 and 4100, are also being examined as part of the ongoing probe.
An official involved in the investigation said the commission is currently reviewing intelligence reports and working to establish the ownership structure of the properties.
“We are analysing intelligence reports and attempting to trace the ownership structure of the properties,” the official said.
“The process also involves verifying property registries and financial trails. Because the assets are located outside the country, there are diplomatic and legal channels that must be followed.”
Officials declined to provide further details, citing the sensitivity of the ongoing investigation.
Efforts to obtain comments from the family of El-Rufai were unsuccessful as of the time of filing this report. Meanwhile, the ICPC has not issued an official public statement on the alleged properties or the current status of the investigation.
The Dangote Petroleum Refinery has again increased the price of Premium Motor Spirit (PMS), commonly known as petrol, to N1,175 per litre, marking the third price hike within one week.
The latest adjustment was communicated to fuel marketers on Monday, raising the refinery’s gantry price from N995 per litre announced on Friday. The new price represents an increase of N180, or about 18.1 per cent, within three days.
The refinery also revised the gantry price of Automotive Gas Oil (diesel) to N1,620 per litre, reflecting rising operational costs and volatility in the energy market.
A senior official at the refinery, who spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorised to comment publicly, confirmed the price adjustment.
“Yes, the gantry prices have been adjusted. PMS is now N1,175 per litre while Automotive Gas Oil is N1,620 per litre,” the official said.
According to the official, the increase is driven by fluctuations in the global energy market and the rising cost of replacing crude and refined products.
“The market has been extremely volatile, and replacement costs have shifted significantly in recent days. These adjustments reflect prevailing market fundamentals and the cost environment we are currently operating in,” the source added.
Checks on the industry pricing platform petroleumprice.ng show that the revised rates have already been reflected across depot pricing systems, signalling a new benchmark price for downstream marketers.
The latest development means petrol prices have surged sharply within days, after gantry prices previously rose from N774 to N995 per litre. As a result, retail pump prices in several parts of Nigeria have now crossed N1,000 per litre, with some filling stations selling petrol for as high as N1,200 per litre.
The increase is expected to further push up the cost of goods and services nationwide, as higher fuel prices typically lead to increases in transportation, logistics, and production costs for businesses.
Meanwhile, the Nigerian National Petroleum Company Limited is reportedly working to secure crude oil supplies for the refinery through third-party international traders in an effort to sustain domestic refining operations.
However, industry officials warn that the intervention may not immediately translate into lower fuel prices for consumers, as Nigerians continue to grapple with rising energy costs following the latest adjustments by the $20bn Lekki-based refinery.
The Rivers State House of Assembly has cleared five of the nine commissioner-nominees submitted by Siminalayi Fubara, Governor of Rivers State, while rejecting four others after a screening exercise that lasted more than two hours.
The decision was announced on Monday during plenary presided over by the Speaker, Martin Amaewhule, who said the House approved five nominees as commissioners-designate following what lawmakers described as a rigorous screening process.
Amaewhule explained that the four nominees were rejected due to poor performance during the screening and controversies surrounding their nominations, including petitions and issues relating to their documents.
“Distinguished colleagues, we have nine nominees forwarded to this Assembly by the governor. At the end of the screening exercise, the House has confirmed five of them,” the Speaker said.
“And four of them the House has chosen to take a deep breath, given their poor performance and controversies surrounding either their documents. They have not been able to show this august Assembly that they are indeed prepared to serve Rivers State or that they are able.”
He added that the lawmakers believed the rejected nominees were not suitable for positions in the state’s executive council.
Amaewhule further stated that the resolution of the House would be formally communicated to Governor Fubara, urging him to take necessary steps in the interest of the state.
“With your leave and in line with our rules, I will forward the resolution of this august Assembly to the governor so that he can take necessary steps for the interest of Rivers State,” he said.
Following the decision, the Speaker announced that a letter would be sent to the governor requesting him to swear in the confirmed nominees as soon as possible.
Those whose nominations were rejected are Prof. Datonye Alasia, Barr. Tamuno Williams, Otonye Amachree and Charity Deemua.
Meanwhile, the nominees confirmed by the Assembly are Tonye Belgam, Prof. Temple Nwafor, Dr Peters Nwagor, Lekue Kenneth and Amarigha Edward-Hart.
The House subsequently adjourned plenary to Tuesday, March 17, 2026.
(DDM) – Nigeria’s main opposition party, the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), has placed its leadership organs on high alert ahead of a crucial judgment expected from the Court of Appeal that will determine the rightful leadership of the party.
The anticipated ruling comes amid a deepening internal crisis that has split the party into rival factions following its last National Convention held in Ibadan. The convention produced a new National Working Committee (NWC) led by Tanimu Turaki, a development that has since been challenged by another faction within the party.
Party insiders say the judgment is expected to clarify lingering legal disputes surrounding the legitimacy of the Ibadan convention and the leadership it produced. The decision could also determine the direction of the party as it prepares for the 2027 general elections.
The faction opposing the Turaki-led leadership is believed to be loyal to the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory, Nyesom Wike. Members of this group, reportedly led by Abdulrahman Mohammed and Samuel Anyanwu, have established their own caretaker structure and have even begun preparations for a separate national convention.
In response to the legal uncertainty, the Turaki-led leadership has scheduled a series of high-level meetings involving key party organs. These include gatherings of the National Caucus, the Board of Trustees (BoT), and the National Executive Committee (NEC). Party sources say the meetings are part of broader preparations for political activities leading up to the next electoral cycle.
According to a senior party source, the leadership remains confident that the Ibadan convention that produced the current NWC was conducted in line with the law. The source noted that all required congresses were completed and that the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) was properly notified before the convention.
“The Independent National Electoral Commission was served with the required 21-day notice prior to the convention,” the source said, adding that the process followed established party procedures. The source also pointed out that the former acting national chairman, Umar Damagum, formally handed over leadership to the Turaki-led National Working Committee after the convention.
Party officials also argue that the PDP has deliberately refrained from holding certain statutory meetings while awaiting the court’s decision, emphasizing that the party remains committed to the rule of law.
Meanwhile, tensions within the party escalated further after the Turaki faction accused the rival camp of undermining the party while allegedly aligning with the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC).
However, the faction aligned with Wike dismissed those claims and expressed confidence that the appellate court will rule in their favor. Reacting to the development, Hon. Jungudo Haruna Mohammed, the National Publicity Secretary of the Wike faction, said the convention that produced Turaki violated existing legal provisions.
According to Mohammed, the convention allegedly proceeded despite a court order and without proper supervision from INEC. He argued that such an exercise could not produce a legally valid leadership structure.
“You cannot place something on nothing and expect it to stand,” he said, insisting that the convention violated provisions of the Electoral Act as well as the PDP constitution.
He further dismissed the planned NEC meeting by the rival faction, describing it as inconsequential and urging PDP members to ignore the gathering.
The ongoing leadership dispute highlights the internal divisions within the PDP at a time when the opposition party is trying to reposition itself politically. Analysts say the outcome of the Court of Appeal judgment could significantly influence the party’s unity, organizational stability, and readiness for future elections.
For now, both factions remain locked in a political and legal battle that may shape the future leadership of one of Nigeria’s most prominent opposition parties.
President Xi Jinping of China and President Donald trump of United States caught in a web of retaliations
Chinese state-owned refiners are reportedly considering resuming crude imports from the United States after a nine-month suspension, driven by a worsening energy supply crisis in the Middle East, according to S&P Global’s Platts.
The additional 20% tariffs on US crude remain in place, but market analysts and refinery sources suggest these may be temporarily set aside if disruptions persist.
“Beijing may even temporarily exempt the additional tariff on US energy if the supply crisis continues, as this would constitute a national emergency,” a Beijing-based market analyst told Platts, citing the country’s heavy reliance on US ethane, which is already tariff-exempt.
Last Thursday, Chinese authorities instructed the nation’s largest oil refiners to suspend exports of diesel and gasoline to secure domestic supplies, Bloomberg News reported, as the war in the Middle East threatens to exacerbate an energy crunch.
An eastern China refining source echoed the urgency, noting that the government must ensure stable domestic fuel supply.
Shipping data reviewed by Platts indicates that around eight crude cargoes from the US Gulf Coast could be delivered to China in the coming weeks, most likely comprising light sweet crude such as WTI Midland.
One cargo was loaded as of March 7.
Trade sources cautioned that shipments could still be diverted if supply conditions ease.
The move comes amid soaring energy prices, with NYMEX front-month crude surging $20.34 to $111.24 per barrel on March 8 due to infrastructure disruptions in the Middle East.
Freight rates for the 270,000-metric ton US Gulf Coast-China route have slightly declined to $26 million per shipment from a record $29.3 million on March 4, Platts said.
Before the conflict, Chinese refiners had largely avoided US crude due to tariffs, which previously made imports uneconomical.
A South China-based refining source estimated that buying US crude would have meant a loss of about $30 per barrel, after accounting for freight and tariffs.
“Every available barrel in the world is under consideration,” a Beijing-based procurement strategist from a state-run refining group told Platts.
“Supply risk is rising, as the duration of the Middle East war may be longer than previously expected.
Commercial inventories are limited, so we must look for anything available.”
China’s state-owned refineries are mandated to prioritize domestic energy supply over profits, according to market sources.
Despite suspending US crude imports since June 2025 cutting annual trade flows by 72.6% year-on-year onshore crude reserves reached a record 1.32 billion barrels on March 5, up from 1.31 billion barrels on February 26, according to Ursa Space data.
The government has also instructed refineries to reduce refined product exports to conserve crude.
Amid these energy concerns, China has reiterated that Iran’s appointment of Mojtaba Khamenei as the country’s new supreme leader following the death of his father, Ali Khamenei, is a domestic matter.
Beijing opposes any attempt to target the new leader, reflecting its strategic partnership with Tehran and its broader call for regional stability.
The escalating Middle East conflict, combined with supply chain disruptions and soaring crude prices, is prompting China to explore all options to secure its energy needs, including a potential temporary resumption of US crude imports.
Founder of Salvation Ministries, David Ibiyeomie, recently shared a personal story about his past support for former Rivers State governor and current minister Nyesom Wike, revealing how faith and prayer played a role during a difficult political moment.
Speaking during a sermon, Pastor Ibiyeomie recounted a time when Wike had just lost a court case and came to him feeling deeply distressed. According to the cleric, the politician was emotional and uncertain about what the future held for his political battle.
The pastor said he immediately tried to reassure him, encouraging him not to lose hope despite the legal setback. Ibiyeomie explained that he told Wike he would take the matter to God in prayer, believing that divine intervention could still change the outcome.
According to him, he told Wike that even if the judgment at the Supreme Court appeared to be going against him, God had the power to turn the situation around in his favor.
Pastor Ibiyeomie also revealed that he made personal sacrifices during that period to support Wike spiritually and materially. He claimed that he donated millions of naira on Wike’s behalf as part of faith-based acts, believing it would contribute to a positive outcome.
The cleric said the story did not end there. After Wike eventually emerged victorious and held a thanksgiving service to celebrate the outcome, Pastor Ibiyeomie stated that he was the only pastor invited to officiate at the event.
For the pastor, the moment served as a reminder of the power of faith, prayer, and standing by people during their lowest moments. He used the story to encourage members of his congregation to remain steadfast in their beliefs, even when situations appear impossible.
The revelation has since sparked conversations online, particularly among political observers and church followers, with many discussing the close relationships that sometimes exist between influential religious leaders and political figures in Nigeria.
Supporters say the story highlights loyalty and spiritual mentorship, while others see it as an example of the strong intersection between faith and politics in the country.
China on Monday said it opposes any attempt to target Iran’s newly appointed supreme leader, Mojtaba Khamenei, describing his appointment as an internal matter for the Islamic Republic.
Diaspora Digital Media reported that Iran has recently named Mojtaba Khamenei as supreme leader following the killing of his father, Ali Khamenei, during the first wave of strikes carried out by the United States and Israel against Iranian targets.
The Israeli military has since warned that any successor to the former Iranian leader could also be targeted, raising fears of further escalation in the ongoing conflict.
Responding to the development, Chinese foreign ministry spokesman Guo Jiakun said Beijing respects Iran’s sovereignty and rejects outside interference.
“Iran’s decision to appoint the younger Khamenei is based on its constitution,” Guo told reporters at a press briefing in Beijing.
“China opposes interference in other countries’ internal affairs under any pretext, and Iran’s sovereignty, security and territorial integrity should be respected,” he added.
Escalating Military Conflict
Fighting between Iran and its adversaries has intensified in recent days. The United States and Israel have continued to carry out strikes on Iranian targets, while Tehran has responded with missile and drone attacks on Israel and Gulf countries hosting American military bases.
The conflict has heightened tensions across the Middle East, raising fears of a broader regional war.
China Calls for De-escalation
China, a close economic partner of Iran, earlier condemned the killing of Ali Khamenei but has also criticized Iran’s retaliatory strikes against Gulf states.
China’s special envoy to the Middle East, Zhai Jun, called for restraint during talks with Faisal bin Farhan, the foreign minister of Saudi Arabia, on Sunday.
“China urges all parties to immediately cease military operations, prevent further escalation of tensions and avoid causing greater harm to the people of regional countries,” Zhai said.
Meanwhile, China’s foreign minister Wang Yi described the ongoing war as one that “should never have happened” and urged all sides to end the fighting.
Concerns Over Energy Security
The conflict is also raising concerns over global energy supplies and trade routes, which are vital to China’s economy.
According to data from analytics firm Kpler, more than 80 percent of Iran’s oil exports went to China last year, accounting for about 13 percent of China’s total seaborne oil imports.
However, more than half of China’s crude oil imports originate from the wider Middle East, making the country heavily dependent on shipping routes through the Strait of Hormuz.
With tensions continuing to rise in the region, analysts warn that disruptions to shipping lanes could threaten global energy security and further destabilize oil markets.
Missing a menstrual period is often immediately associated with pregnancy, but health experts say several other medical and lifestyle factors can also disrupt a woman’s menstrual cycle.
According to specialists in Gynecology, irregular or missed periods can occur even when a woman is not pregnant, and in some cases may signal underlying health conditions that require medical attention.
Medically known as Amenorrhea, the absence of menstruation can be influenced by hormonal changes, stress, lifestyle habits, or certain medical disorders.
Below are some of the most common reasons women may miss their periods without being pregnant.
1. High Levels of Stress
Chronic stress can interfere with the body’s hormonal balance and affect the part of the brain that regulates menstruation. When stress hormones remain elevated for long periods, they may delay or temporarily stop ovulation, causing missed periods.
Health experts note that emotional stress, work pressure, or major life events can significantly impact menstrual cycles.
2. Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS)
One of the leading medical causes of irregular or missed periods is Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS). This hormonal disorder affects ovulation and can lead to irregular cycles, excess hair growth, acne, and weight gain.
Women with PCOS often experience fewer periods each year because ovulation does not occur regularly.
3. Sudden Weight Loss or Excessive Exercise
Significant weight loss, strict dieting, or intense physical activity can disrupt the hormones responsible for menstruation. When body fat drops too low, the body may stop producing enough reproductive hormones to maintain a regular cycle.
This condition is sometimes linked to eating disorders such as Anorexia Nervosa.
4. Hormonal Birth Control
Some contraceptive methods can cause irregular periods or stop menstruation entirely. Birth control pills, injections, implants, or hormonal intrauterine devices may alter hormone levels and affect the menstrual cycle.
Doctors say these changes are usually temporary and may normalize once the body adjusts to the medication.
5. Thyroid Disorders
The thyroid gland plays an important role in regulating hormones that influence menstruation. Disorders such as Hypothyroidism and Hyperthyroidism can lead to missed or irregular periods.
Women with thyroid problems may also experience symptoms such as fatigue, weight changes, and mood disturbances.
6. Perimenopause
Women approaching menopause may begin to experience irregular menstrual cycles. This transitional stage, known as Perimenopause, often begins in the 40s but can occur earlier in some women.
Hormonal fluctuations during this phase can cause periods to become irregular, lighter, heavier, or occasionally absent.
When to See a Doctor
Medical experts advise women to seek medical evaluation if they miss several periods in a row, experience unusually heavy bleeding, or notice other unusual symptoms.
While occasional irregular cycles may not always be a cause for concern, persistent menstrual changes can indicate underlying health conditions that require diagnosis and treatment.
Maintaining a balanced diet, managing stress, exercising moderately, and attending regular medical checkups can help support healthy hormonal balance and menstrual health.
Words matter. In the theatre of political communication, they are the pigments with which public actors paint meaning across the canvas of national discourse. Through them, leaders connect dots and verses, dots of policy, verses of persuasion, until a coherent picture of governance emerges. Citizens read that picture not only to understand what their leaders are doing but also to measure whether those leaders mean what they say. Yet words possess an inconvenient habit: they remember. They linger long after the moment of utterance has passed, quietly waiting in the archive of public discourse. When circumstances change, they return sometimes gently, sometimes with the ferocity of a boomerang. And when they do, they demand explanation. This is the broader significance of the recent controversy surrounding Daniel Bwala, Special Adviser to the President on Policy Communication, following his appearance on the international programme Head to Head. The interview itself might have been another routine episode of political sparring, i.e., an assertive host confronting a government spokesperson with uncomfortable questions about policy, statistics, and public perception. Such encounters are hardly unusual in global media.
What transformed the episode into a moment of national reflection was a single explanation offered in response to questions about Bwala’s earlier criticisms of President Bola Tinubu. Confronted with statements he had made while aligned with the opposition, he dismissed them as the work of a “hired salesman” engaged to de-market a political rival. The phrase has since reverberated across Nigeria’s public conversation. Not merely because it acknowledged the rough-and-tumble nature of political rhetoric, but because of the deeper implications embedded within it. In attempting to explain away past statements, the metaphor unintentionally exposed a logical paradox that now defines the controversy. If yesterday’s denunciations were the scripts of a hired salesman, why should today’s praises be interpreted differently?
Political metaphors are rarely innocent. They carry assumptions about how the speaker understands his own role and the nature of the political enterprise he inhabits. The metaphor of salesmanship is particularly a self-destructive missile that devoured its author. A salesman’s duty is not to truth but to the product. He highlights virtues, downplays flaws, and persuades the audience that what he offers is superior to competing alternatives. Whether he personally believes in the product is secondary; his professional obligation is simply to sell. When a political communicator describes his past rhetoric as the work of such a salesman, he effectively reframes political speech as a commercial transaction. Words become marketing materials, crafted to achieve a predetermined objective rather than to express conviction. The problem, however, is that metaphors rarely remain confined to the past. Once invoked, they inevitably illuminate the present. If the earlier criticisms of Tinubu were merely salesmanship, the audience is left to wonder whether the current defence of Tinubu represents anything more than a different marketing assignment. Thus the explanation that was intended to dissolve a contradiction instead amplified it.
The controversy illustrates a familiar phenomenon in political discourse: the boomerang effect. Words launched in one political direction eventually circle back, returning with unexpected force.
In earlier periods of political history, such boomerangs travelled slowly. Statements made in speeches or interviews might fade from public memory, preserved only in scattered newspaper archives. The digital age has changed that dynamic entirely. Today, every tweet, interview, and speech forms part of a permanent record. When contradictions arise, they can be retrieved within seconds and juxtaposed with current statements. The interview that sparked the controversy demonstrated precisely how this archive functions. Past remarks were placed alongside present explanations, creating a stark contrast between what was once said and how it was now being interpreted. The result was less a debate about policy than an examination of credibility. And in the courtroom of public discourse, credibility is the currency that determines whether arguments carry weight.
What makes the salesman explanation so damaging is its internal logic. By acknowledging that earlier criticisms were professionally motivated exaggerations, the communicator inadvertently invites the public to apply the same logic to present statements. If political speech can be outsourced as a marketing service, then every subsequent statement becomes suspect. Praise may simply represent the mirror image of previous criticism—two sides of the same promotional coin.
The irony is profound. The metaphor that attempted to protect the present from the past ends up dissolving the boundary between them. In effect, the speaker tells his audience: “Do not take my earlier words seriously; they were part of my job.” But the audience inevitably replies: “Then why should we take your current words seriously?” Thus the defence collapses under its own reasoning. It is the rhetorical equivalent of a salesman confessing that he once promoted defective products because he was paid to do so—only to expect customers to trust his latest pitch.
Political language carries weight because it shapes how citizens interpret the character of leaders and the legitimacy of institutions. When accusations of corruption, incompetence, or authoritarianism are made, they are not merely tactical phrases; they are moral claims. To later dismiss such claims as marketing rhetoric trivialises their seriousness. It suggests that even the most severe allegations may simply be tools of partisan competition. This realisation damages more than the credibility of a single communicator. It undermines the entire ecosystem of political discourse. When citizens begin to suspect that accusations are merely strategic exaggerations and praises merely strategic promotions, trust erodes. Political speech becomes indistinguishable from advertising copy—dramatic, persuasive, but fundamentally transactional. Democratic debate cannot thrive under such conditions.
The “hired salesman” explanation also reveals a deeper feature of contemporary political culture: the increasing normalisation of transactional allegiance. In many political systems, actors frequently migrate between parties or ideological camps. Such movement is not inherently problematic; political beliefs evolve, alliances shift, and individuals reassess their positions. The difficulty arises when such transitions occur without intellectual explanation. If someone once described a political figure in the harshest possible terms and later becomes that figure’s most energetic defender, the public naturally expects an account of what changed. Did new evidence emerge? Did circumstances alter the analysis? Did reflection lead to reconsideration? When the explanation offered is simply that earlier criticisms were professional obligations, the implication is that conviction was never central to the discourse in the first place. And that implication proves corrosive.
The controversy also underscores the heightened demands placed upon political communicators in an era of relentless scrutiny. International platforms, in particular, operate within a culture that privileges documented evidence over rhetorical assertion. Statistics, reports from human rights organisations, economic indicators, and archived statements all form part of the evidentiary terrain. A communicator who approaches such a forum armed primarily with campaign-style talking points risks encountering precisely the kind of confrontation that unfolded during the interview. This does not mean that every spokesperson must prevail in every debate. But it does mean that preparation, factual familiarity, and intellectual clarity are indispensable. In the absence of those qualities, the conversation can quickly shift from policy defence to credibility examination.
Perhaps the most troubling consequence of the episode is the potential erosion of public trust in official communication. Government spokespeople occupy a unique position within democratic systems. They are expected to defend policy while simultaneously providing reliable information. When such voices appear to operate as rhetorical contractors rather than principled advocates, the credibility of official narratives suffers. Citizens become reluctant to accept explanations or assurances, assuming they may simply represent the latest version of political marketing. Over time, this suspicion can undermine governance itself. Policies that require public cooperation – economic reforms, security strategies, social programmes – depend heavily on credible communication. If that credibility evaporates, the distance between government and governed widens.
Ultimately, the controversy surrounding Bwala’s remarks offers a cautionary lesson about the enduring power of language. Political actors often treat words as temporary instruments—tools to be deployed aggressively during moments of partisan contestation. But words are not disposable. They accumulate, interact, and form patterns that attentive audiences eventually recognise. Each statement becomes a dot on the canvas of political communication. Over time, those dots connect into narratives that define reputations. When contradictions disrupt the pattern, the entire image changes.
The metaphor of the boomerang is therefore particularly apt. Words thrown into the public arena rarely disappear. They travel outward, sometimes gathering momentum, before returning to their origin. When they return, they often carry sharper edges than when they were first released. In the present controversy, the phrase “hired salesman” served precisely that function. Intended as an explanation, it became the boomerang that transformed a difficult interview into a broader reflection on credibility. For in the ears of many listeners, the phrase suggested that both past criticism and present praise might belong to the same rhetorical profession – one that appears less anchored in conviction than in the shifting Terms and Conditions of “Stomach Infrastructure.” In the Nigerian political lexicon, stomach infrastructure has long served as a sardonic shorthand for the politics of material inducement: loyalty purchased with access, patronage, or proximity to power. When political speech begins to sound indistinguishable from this transactional culture, the audience naturally suspects that rhetoric itself has become another commodity in the marketplace of survival. Under such conditions, words cease to function as moral commitments. They become negotiable instruments, adjusted to suit the economic or political environment of the speaker. Yesterday’s fiery denunciation becomes today’s glowing endorsement, not because the underlying facts have changed, but because the incentives surrounding the speaker have shifted. The rhetoric follows the stomach, not the conscience. The damage inflicted by such a perception is not merely personal; it is reputational in a broader, sociological sense. In many African communicative cultures, social face – the symbolic capital of honour, credibility, and public respect, is a prized possession.
When a public figure casually frames his own past words as professional exaggerations, he risks eroding that symbolic capital. The audience begins to interpret every subsequent statement through the prism of transactional motivation. In effect, the communicator becomes trapped within the very metaphor he invoked. If speech is merely a service rendered under the contractual logic of stomach infrastructure, then the public is left wondering whether the latest defence of policy or praise of leadership is another installment in the same commercial arrangement. And once that suspicion takes root, credibility begins to evaporate with remarkable speed. The hired salesman then discovers, rather painfully, that the damage is largely self-inflicted. As an Ezikeọba proverbial lore captures it with biting clarity: “Nwa wor onwe ye sị ne ọ bụ ọha wor ye”—someone deliberately wrecks his own house and then turns around to accuse the community of demolition. The proverb warns against the human temptation to externalise blame for self-authored misfortune. In the arena of political communication, reckless words often become the very tools of one’s undoing. When they return as boomerangs, the public is merely witnessing the collapse, not orchestrating it.
In the final analysis, the episode reminds us of a fundamental truth about public life: words matter. They matter because they connect the dots and verses on the vast canvas of political communication, shaping how citizens interpret the intentions and integrity of those who speak in the name of power. When words are treated as disposable instruments of hired salesmanship, the canvas becomes blurred. The dots fail to align, the verses lose coherence, and the portrait of leadership dissolves into suspicion. For political communicators, the lesson could not be clearer. Credibility is built slowly through consistency, conviction, and intellectual honesty. Once compromised, it cannot easily be restored by rhetorical dexterity. And in the long memory of democratic discourse, words do not simply vanish. They travel outward, gathering echoes, before returning to connect their own dots on the canvas of public meaning. In that enduring canvas, words always matter.
Health experts are urging men, particularly those over the age of 40, to pay closer attention to symptoms that may signal an enlarged prostate, a common condition that affects millions of men worldwide.
Medically known as Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH), an enlarged prostate occurs when the prostate gland increases in size and begins to press against the urethra, the tube that carries urine out of the body. Although the condition is non-cancerous, it can significantly affect a man’s quality of life if left untreated.
Doctors say many men often ignore early warning signs, assuming they are a normal part of aging. However, recognising the symptoms early can help prevent complications and allow for timely medical intervention.
Frequent Urination
One of the earliest and most common signs of an enlarged prostate is the need to urinate more often than usual, particularly during the night. This condition, known as Nocturia, can disrupt sleep and may indicate pressure on the bladder caused by the growing prostate gland.
Difficulty Starting Urination
Men with an enlarged prostate may find it difficult to begin urinating, even when the urge is strong. This occurs because the enlarged gland compresses the urethra, restricting the flow of urine from the bladder.
Weak or Slow Urine Stream
A weak or slow urine stream is another key symptom doctors warn men not to ignore. As the prostate enlarges, it can partially block the urethra, making it harder for urine to pass normally.
Feeling of Incomplete Bladder Emptying
Many men with prostate enlargement feel that their bladder does not fully empty after urination. This sensation can lead to repeated trips to the bathroom and ongoing discomfort.
Sudden Urge to Urinate
An urgent and sometimes uncontrollable need to urinate may also occur. In some cases, men may struggle to hold urine for long periods, which can interfere with daily activities.
Straining During Urination
Some men may need to strain or push in order to start or maintain urine flow. This can place additional pressure on the bladder and worsen urinary symptoms over time.
Blood in the Urine
Although less common, the presence of blood in the urine can occur in men with severe prostate enlargement. Medical experts warn that this symptom should be evaluated immediately, as it may also signal more serious conditions such as Prostate Cancer.
Importance of Early Medical Attention
Health professionals emphasize that regular prostate checks can help detect problems early and reduce the risk of complications such as Urinary Tract Infection or bladder damage.
Men experiencing persistent urinary symptoms are advised to seek medical evaluation. Early diagnosis and treatment can significantly improve quality of life and prevent the condition from progressing into more serious health problems.
Medical experts also recommend maintaining a healthy lifestyle, staying physically active, limiting alcohol and caffeine intake, and attending routine health screenings to support long-term prostate health.
Several life threatening diseases continue to pose major public health threats globally, claiming millions of lives every year despite advances in modern medicine. Health experts warn that many of these conditions can be prevented, managed, or treated effectively when detected early.
According to the World Health Organization, a combination of infectious and non-communicable diseases remains responsible for the majority of global deaths, particularly in developing countries where access to healthcare and early diagnosis may be limited.
Below are five deadly diseases that continue to take lives around the world.
1. Heart Disease
Heart disease, medically known as Cardiovascular Disease, remains the leading cause of death globally. The condition includes a range of disorders affecting the heart and blood vessels, such as Coronary Artery Disease and heart failure.
Risk factors include high blood pressure, smoking, unhealthy diets, lack of physical activity, and obesity. Without proper management, cardiovascular disease can lead to fatal complications such as heart attacks or strokes.
2. Cancer
Cancer is another major cause of death worldwide, responsible for millions of fatalities each year. The disease occurs when abnormal cells grow uncontrollably and spread to other parts of the body.
Common types include breast cancer, lung cancer, prostate cancer, and colorectal cancer. Early screening, improved lifestyle choices, and advances in treatment have helped increase survival rates in many countries.
3. Stroke
Stroke occurs when blood flow to the brain is interrupted or reduced, depriving brain tissue of oxygen and nutrients. Without immediate treatment, brain cells begin to die within minutes.
Stroke is closely linked to high blood pressure, diabetes, smoking, and high cholesterol levels. It remains a leading cause of death and long-term disability worldwide.
4. Tuberculosis
Tuberculosis is a highly infectious bacterial disease that primarily affects the lungs but can also spread to other parts of the body. It spreads through the air when an infected person coughs or sneezes.
Despite being preventable and treatable, tuberculosis continues to claim lives, particularly in low- and middle-income countries where diagnosis and treatment may be delayed.
5. Malaria
Malaria remains one of the deadliest infectious diseases in many tropical regions, including parts of Africa. The disease is transmitted through the bites of infected female Anopheles mosquitoes.
Young children and pregnant women are among the most vulnerable groups. Preventive measures such as insecticide-treated mosquito nets, prompt diagnosis, and effective treatment are critical in reducing malaria-related deaths.
Importance of Prevention and Early Detection
Health professionals stress that prevention, early detection, and improved healthcare access remain key strategies in reducing deaths from these diseases. Routine medical checkups, vaccination where available, healthy lifestyle choices, and prompt medical attention for unusual symptoms can significantly lower the risk of life-threatening complications.
Public health authorities also continue to advocate stronger awareness campaigns and improved healthcare systems to combat these deadly diseases and reduce their impact on communities worldwide.
