President Bola Tinubu acknowledged the hardship caused by rising petrol prices across Nigeria but said the country is still better off than several other African nations, including Kenya.
He said this on Friday while addressing stakeholders during a visit to Bayelsa State, where he commissioned multiple infrastructure projects.
Among the projects inaugurated were a 60-megawatt gas turbine plant at Elebele in Ogbia Local Government Area, the 630-metre Angiama-Oporoma Bridge, the Sagbama/Ekeremor Road, and a 2.9-kilometre dual carriageway in Yenagoa, the state capital.
‘’It is very important that we are honest with our people. Yes, I hear you from various angles of the economy. The fuel price is biting hard, but look around, let us thank God together, that you are better off.
“Listen to them in Kenya and other African countries and what they are going through. We will not look back. We will continue to fine way to ameliorate the sufferings of the vulnerable”, he said.
Meanwhile, global fuel prices have skyrocketed in recent weeks, caused largely by tensions in the Middle East.
The increase has been linked to Iran’s blockade of The Strait of Hormuz, a critical route for global fuel shipments.
Moreover, the restriction was momentarily lifted following a two-week ceasefire agreement between Iran and the United States.
The conflict, which began on February 28, 2026, lasted until 48 hours ago when a temporary peace deal was reached.
A senior U.S. official has dismissed claims that Washington has agreed to release Iran’s frozen assets held in foreign banks, calling the report untrue.
The denial came after a Reuters report, citing an unnamed Iranian source, suggested the U.S. had agreed to unfreeze the funds as part of ongoing efforts to ease tensions in the Middle East.
But in a brief response from the White House, the official pushed back, saying: “False. The meetings have not even started yet.”
Talks between U.S. and Iranian representatives are expected to take place in Islamabad, Pakistan, as both sides look for a path to end the ongoing conflict in the region.
Iran had earlier indicated that any lasting agreement would likely depend on key conditions, including access to its frozen assets and an end to Israel’s military actions against Hezbollah in Lebanon.
Meanwhile, Shehbaz Sharif met with U.S. Vice President JD Vance in Islamabad ahead of the discussions. Officials say the talks aimed at de-escalating the crisis have now begun.uS
The Federal Government has ordered the immediate withdrawal and deactivation of Nigerian passports held by individuals who have officially renounced their citizenship.
Minister of Interior, Olubunmi Tunji-Ojo, gave the directive to the Nigeria Immigration Service, making it clear that once a person gives up their Nigerian citizenship, they are no longer entitled to hold a Nigerian passport.
According to the minister’s media aide, Alao Babatunde, the decision is based on provisions of the 1999 Constitution.
The law states that any Nigerian who formally declares their intention to renounce citizenship and whose request is approved and registered by the President automatically ceases to be a citizen.
Tunji-Ojo explained that keeping a Nigerian passport after that process is no longer valid, since the document represents the country’s sovereignty and is only meant for its citizens.
The move is part of a broader effort by the Interior Ministry to tighten passport and visa processes.
Authorities say it is aimed at strengthening border security, reducing identity fraud, and protecting the integrity of Nigerian citizenship.
The minister added that the government will continue to improve systems that both support legitimate travel and prevent misuse of official documents.
The House of Representatives has announced the death of serving lawmaker Muhammad Hassan, calling it a major loss to the National Assembly and to Nigeria’s legislative development.
Hassan, who represented Dawakin Kudu/Warawa Federal Constituency of Kano State, died Friday evening in Abuja at 66 after an illness, House Spokesman Akin Rotimi said in a statement on Saturday.
The statement reads: “With profound sorrow but in total submission to the will of Almighty Allah (SWT), the House of Representatives regrets to announce the passing of our esteemed colleague, Rep. Muhammad Danjuma Hassan.”
Until his death, Hassan served as Deputy Chairman of the House Committee on Judiciary and was elected into the National Assembly in 2023 on the platform of the New Nigeria Peoples Party (NNPP).
The House noted that his death represents “a profound loss to the House of Representatives, his constituents… and the nation at large,” adding that Nigeria has lost “one of its foremost Legislative Counsel and Legal Draftsmen.”
It further added: “Indeed, many of the laws enacted over past decades bear his enduring imprint.”
Before joining partisan politics, the late lawmaker had a long career within the National Assembly bureaucracy, rising to the rank of Permanent Secretary.
The House said his “extensive background in administration and governance… significantly enriched his contributions to parliamentary work and national discourse.”
Colleagues also recalled his role in strengthening legislative processes and the justice system, particularly through his work on the Judiciary Committee and other committees, including Public Petitions, Aviation, Solid Minerals, Constitution Review, and Treaties, Protocols and Agreements.
“As Deputy Chairman of the House Committee on Judiciary, he made valuable contributions informed by deep institutional knowledge, administrative competence, and a firm commitment to strengthening Nigeria’s justice system and upholding the rule of law,” the statement added.
The Speaker of the House, Abbas Tajudeen, extended condolences to the family of the deceased, his constituents, and the government and people of Kano State.
The House also described Hassan as “widely respected for his professionalism, depth of legislative experience, and commitment to public service,” noting his “humility, calm disposition, and dedication to consensus-building.”
He is expected to be buried on Saturday in accordance with Islamic rites.
President Donald Trump said Iran should not charge fees to tankers going through the Strait of Hormuz, which has been blockaded since the start of the Iran war, causing the worst disruption to global energy supplies in history.
“There are reports that Iran is charging fees to tankers going through the Hormuz Strait,” Trump wrote on Truth Social.
Media reports have suggested Iran might want to charge a toll for ships passing through.
Western leaders have pushed back on the idea of paying any such fees.
Iran will demand toll payments in cryptocurrency to retain control over Hormuz during a two-week ceasefire with the U.S., the Financial Times quoted Hamid Hosseini, a spokesperson for Iran’s Oil, Gas and Petrochemical Products Exporters’ Union, as saying on Wednesday.
In a separate post, without elaborating, Trump said “you’ll see Oil start flowing, with or without the help of Iran.”
The U.S. and Israel attacked Iran on February 28. Iran responded with its own strikes on Israel and Gulf states with U.S. bases.
The war has raised oil prices and shaken global markets.
U.S.-Israeli strikes on Iran and Israeli attacks on Lebanon have killed thousands and displaced millions.
Trump announced a ceasefire with Iran on Tuesday, after having previously threatened to destroy Iran’s entire civilisation.
Ship traffic through the strait stood at well below 10% of normal volumes on Thursday amid the fragile ceasefire as Tehran asserted its control by warning ships to keep to its territorial waters while doing so.
The war brought traffic through the strait, a chokepoint for about 20% of global oil and liquefied natural gas shipments, close to a standstill.
Eculaw Group , it’s high time you distanced your writes from Biafra War-related history. This advice is necessary to preserve dignity and avoid deliberate distortion. If you are confident, we can host a debate to settle the matter. I am not IPOB. I am not an agitator. Just an informed and polished author.
Your recent piece is not only a distortion of history but also a disrespect to the Igbo people. Biafra has come and gone; we have moved on from it, but you simply want to discredit our history because of a misguided young man who opened a limited liability company called IPOB.
I wouldn’t mind taking you on a debate to correct the ignorance you spew out each time you write something related to the history of the Biafra War.
Your latest piece, which addressed Emmanuel Ifeajuna’s spectacle, is not only a distortion of history but also ignorance decorated with fake research and investigation.
Let me correct your impression there. The concept or idea that Ojukwu executed Ifeajuna because he was in competition with him (a rival) or the story that he executed Ifeajuna because Ifeajuna felt Biafra wasn’t going to defeat Nigeria is nothing but a conspiracy theory. No self-confessed record. No witness account. No supporting events. No link whatsoever. Just you taking up a conspiracy theory and writing trash. And who even told you that Ojukwu was expecting victory against Nigeria?
History is not critically challenged with conspiracy theories or contemporary stories; rather, it’s often challenged with self-confessions of actors or investigations (involving actors, witnesses, or those who lived in that era) that connect or modify existing history.
What you wrote, which says that Ifeajuna and Ojukwu were rivals, and that rivalry resulted in the execution is a fallacy that investigation and history captioned ‘conspiracy theory’
I don’t want to offer a lecture on what transpired, but let me give you something to ponder on. If you dare, let’s debate and get the correct history rather than emotionally charged fallacies of yours. Look, I have done investigation and had live interviews and detailed chats with veterans of the war. Even one of the Midwestern recruits who reported Ifeajuna’s activities that led to his arrest. You can imagine what I know from the actors. Now ponder on these seven points that would hopefully put your fallacy to rest.
1. Ojukwu didn’t prosecute Ifeajuna; the head of Biafran intelligence did. Odogwu prosecuted him. (Documented fact)
1a. (Documented fact) His prosecution was accelerated (rushed) because there was no time, as Biafra was in the middle of war (federal troops were rapidly advancing).
2. There were witnesses among Midwestern troops who confessed or bore witness (against Ifeajuna) to what transpired (documented fact). I was fortunate enough to interview one of them; he is still alive. He is one of the founders of Biafran Vandals. I know the name “Biafran Vandals” is new to you. I can offer a lecture on that and the history of the group.
3. (Documented fact) Ifeajuna was second to Banjo; even when he fought with a fellow Midwestern officer, Ojukwu intervened and made sure he was not punished. (This gesture shows no rivalry or competition.)
4. (Documented fact) Ifeajuna’s sabotage was reported to Biafran military intelligence headquarters by troops, and he was arrested by the intelligence department. Ojukwu wasn’t part of the initial process. His order to execute was sorted, and he granted it; for the sake of transparency, he couldn’t shield him as usual.
5. (Documented Fact) Ojukwu released Ifeajuna after the coup of 1966 and facilitated his position in the Biafran Army as lieutenant colonel and then Biafran chief of staff of the Midwest Liberation Force (101-division). This alone shows there was no competition or rivalry.
6. You singled out competition and rivalry with Emmanuel Ifeajuna. (Documented fact) Bro, did you forget Brigadier Victor Banjo, Major Philip Alale, and Samuel Agbam (civilian) suffered the same fate as Ifeajuna? Was Ojukwu also in competition and rivalry with Banjo, Philip, and a bloody civilian?
7. Finally, just as Trump was telling Iran a few days ago that they had better surrender because they don’t stand a chance, one lieutenant colonel in Iran went behind Iranian leadership and discussed a way to give up Iranian leadership and end the war because Iran cannot win. Despite whatever the argument was, sabotage is sabotage. Whatever reason that inspired the sabotage doesn’t absolve the lieutenant colonel of sabotage.
Ifeajuna sabotaged Biafra and was duly prosecuted. If anyone regretted the fallout, it was Ojukwu who lost his friend and brother to the military execution.
President Donald Trump has said that large numbers of empty oil tankers are currently heading to the United States to load crude oil and gas, amid ongoing tensions in the Middle East.
In a post on Truth Social, Trump stated that “massive numbers” of some of the world’s largest tankers are en route to the U.S. to pick up what he described as the “best and sweetest” oil globally.
He also claimed that the United States has more oil reserves than the next two largest oil-producing economies combined, highlighting the country’s production strength.
The statement comes as officials from the U.S. and Iran continue indirect talks in Islamabad, with Pakistan acting as a mediator in efforts to de-escalate the ongoing conflict.
The diplomatic efforts follow weeks of heightened tensions that have disrupted global energy supplies, particularly around the strategic Strait of Hormuz.
Earlier, Trump warned that Iran should not impose charges on oil tankers passing through the strait, which has been partially blocked, triggering one of the most significant disruptions to global oil flows in recent history.
ABUJA, NIGERIA – The Federal High Court has fixed April 14 for the hearing of a legal battle challenging the leadership structure of the African Democratic Congress.
The suit, filed by Nafiu Gombe, seeks to restrain a faction of the party led by former Senate President David Mark from presenting themselves as the legitimate leaders of the party.
The case has introduced fresh tension within the African Democratic Congress, as internal disputes over leadership continue to deepen ahead of future political alignments.
The plaintiff has argued that the actions of the David Mark-led group violate party structures and established procedures guiding leadership recognition.
He has asked the court to intervene and prevent what he describes as unlawful representation of the party’s leadership.
Legal observers say the case could determine the direction and stability of the party as Nigeria gradually moves toward another electoral cycle.
They have noted that internal party disputes often weaken opposition parties and affect their ability to compete effectively during elections.
The African Democratic Congress has emerged in recent years as one of the smaller but active political parties seeking to expand its influence within Nigeria’s political space.
The involvement of high-profile figures such as David Mark has drawn increased attention to the party’s internal dynamics.
Analysts have explained that leadership disputes are common in Nigerian political parties, especially as elections approach and factions compete for control.
They have argued that such conflicts often revolve around access to party structures, candidate selection processes, and strategic positioning.
Nigeria’s political environment has historically witnessed similar court cases, where rival factions seek judicial intervention to resolve internal disagreements.
Courts have frequently played decisive roles in determining party leadership, sometimes reshaping political alliances and election outcomes.
Experts warn that prolonged legal battles could distract party members and reduce public confidence in the party’s cohesion.
They have stressed that unity within political parties remains essential for effective opposition and democratic balance.
The Federal High Court’s decision to hear the case on April 14 signals the urgency and significance attached to the dispute.
Stakeholders across the political landscape will closely monitor proceedings, given the potential implications for party leadership legitimacy.
Observers believe the outcome could either resolve the crisis or further complicate internal divisions depending on the court’s ruling.
They have emphasized that transparent and lawful processes remain critical in maintaining credibility within Nigeria’s democratic system.
As the hearing date approaches, both factions are expected to present arguments to support their claims to leadership.
The case underscores the continuing role of the judiciary in shaping political developments in Nigeria.
ABUJA, NIGERIA – Police authorities have arrested no fewer than 20 suspected railway vandals in 2025 as part of intensified efforts to protect critical transport infrastructure nationwide.
The Nigerian Railway Corporation has disclosed that the arrests followed coordinated security operations targeting individuals accused of sabotaging railway assets across multiple locations.
Officials have confirmed that suspects allegedly tampered with rail tracks, signalling systems, and other vital components necessary for safe train operations.
They have warned that such acts pose serious risks to public safety and disrupt transportation services relied upon by thousands of commuters and businesses.
They have emphasized that railway vandalism not only causes financial losses but also undermines national efforts to modernize the transport sector.
The arrests come amid renewed government focus on revitalizing Nigeria’s rail network as a cost-effective and efficient alternative to road transport.
Nigeria has invested heavily in railway development in recent years, including the construction and rehabilitation of major rail lines connecting key cities.
Authorities have identified vandalism as one of the major threats facing the sustainability of these investments.
Security agencies have intensified surveillance and enforcement measures to deter criminal activities targeting public infrastructure.
Experts have noted that railway vandalism often involves the theft of metal components, which perpetrators sell in illegal scrap markets.
They have explained that economic hardship and weak enforcement mechanisms have contributed to the persistence of such crimes.
They have also highlighted the need for stricter penalties and improved monitoring systems to protect infrastructure assets.
The Nigerian Railway Corporation has reiterated its commitment to collaborating with security agencies to safeguard railway facilities.
It has urged communities living near railway corridors to remain vigilant and report suspicious activities to authorities.
It has stressed that public cooperation remains essential in preventing vandalism and ensuring the longevity of infrastructure projects.
Analysts have warned that continued vandalism could discourage investment in the rail sector and slow down national development plans.
They have argued that reliable rail transport plays a critical role in reducing road congestion, lowering transportation costs, and boosting economic productivity.
The Federal Government has continued to promote railway expansion as part of its broader infrastructure development strategy.
However, stakeholders have insisted that protecting existing assets must remain a top priority alongside new investments.
Authorities have assured the public that investigations into the arrested suspects are ongoing and that those found guilty will face prosecution.
They have maintained that sustained enforcement efforts will help deter future acts of vandalism and protect Nigeria’s transport infrastructure.
ABUJA, NIGERIA – Nigeria’s capital spending has dropped significantly by N1 trillion in 2025 as rising recurrent expenditure continues to strain the country’s fiscal space, according to the World Bank.
The report has revealed that increasing government spending on salaries, debt servicing, and administrative costs has reduced the funds available for infrastructure and development projects.
The World Bank has explained that the growing burden of recurrent expenditure has limited the Federal Government’s ability to invest in long-term capital projects critical to economic growth.
It has noted that capital expenditure plays a vital role in funding infrastructure such as roads, power, healthcare, and education, which are essential for national development.
It has warned that sustained reductions in capital spending could slow economic expansion and weaken Nigeria’s capacity to improve productivity and competitiveness.
Analysts have pointed out that Nigeria has historically struggled with balancing recurrent and capital expenditure, with a significant portion of its budget often allocated to non-developmental spending.
They have explained that recurrent expenditure typically includes wages, pensions, and operational costs, which tend to rise steadily due to inflation and government obligations.
They have argued that the imbalance between recurrent and capital spending has long hindered Nigeria’s ability to achieve sustainable economic growth.
They have added that heavy debt servicing obligations have further constrained fiscal flexibility, reducing funds available for critical investments.
Nigeria’s fiscal challenges have intensified in recent years due to declining oil revenues, currency volatility, and rising public debt levels.
The country, which relies heavily on oil exports for revenue, has faced fluctuations in global oil prices that directly impact government earnings.
Economic experts have emphasized that diversification of revenue sources remains essential to stabilizing Nigeria’s fiscal position.
They have also stressed the need for improved tax collection efficiency and reduction in wasteful spending to create more room for capital investment.
The World Bank has recommended that Nigeria implement fiscal reforms aimed at reducing recurrent expenditure while boosting revenue generation.
It has suggested that the government prioritize investments that stimulate economic growth and create employment opportunities.
It has highlighted the importance of maintaining a sustainable balance between immediate financial obligations and long-term development goals.
Observers have warned that continued fiscal pressure could lead to further cuts in capital spending if structural reforms are not implemented.
They have noted that infrastructure deficits remain a major constraint on Nigeria’s economic development, affecting sectors such as transportation, energy, and manufacturing.
They have argued that increased capital investment is necessary to address these challenges and unlock economic potential.
The Federal Government has continued to explore various strategies to manage fiscal pressures, including subsidy reforms and efforts to increase non-oil revenue.
However, experts have cautioned that without decisive action, the fiscal squeeze could persist and further limit Nigeria’s development prospects.
They have concluded that addressing the imbalance between recurrent and capital expenditure will be crucial for ensuring sustainable economic growth and improving living standards across the country.
ONDO STATE, NIGERIA – Student leaders across Ondo State have begun mobilising support for the re-election of President Bola Tinubu as political activities gradually intensify ahead of the 2027 presidential poll.
The Minister of Interior, Olubunmi Tunji-Ojo, has spearheaded the mobilisation effort, targeting youths and student communities as key drivers of grassroots political engagement.
He has initiated outreach programmes across tertiary institutions and youth networks within the state, encouraging participation in the political process and support for the ruling All Progressives Congress.
He has framed the mobilisation as part of broader efforts to consolidate the achievements of the current administration and ensure continuity in governance beyond the first term.
He has emphasized the importance of youth involvement in shaping Nigeria’s political future, describing students as critical stakeholders in democratic development.
Political observers say the move reflects early strategic positioning by key figures within the ruling party as preparations for the next electoral cycle begin to take shape.
They note that youth mobilisation has become a central feature of modern political campaigns in Nigeria, given the country’s large and growing young population.
They argue that engaging students at this stage could significantly influence voter sentiment and participation during the 2027 elections.
The development comes as political actors across party lines quietly begin consultations and alliance-building ahead of the All Progressives Congress presidential primary.
Analysts say the ruling party is likely to focus on consolidating its support base while addressing internal dynamics that could shape its primary elections.
Nigeria’s political landscape has historically seen intense competition during party primaries, often determining the eventual outcome of general elections.
The All Progressives Congress, which came to power in 2015, has relied heavily on grassroots mobilisation and strategic alliances to maintain electoral dominance.
Experts recall that youth engagement played a significant role in previous elections, particularly in shaping narratives on social media and influencing public discourse.
They add that political actors now increasingly invest in youth-focused campaigns to strengthen their chances of electoral success.
Critics, however, caution that such mobilisation efforts should go beyond political support and address real issues affecting young Nigerians, including unemployment, education, and economic opportunities.
They argue that without tangible improvements in these areas, political messaging may struggle to resonate with a growing number of disillusioned youths.
Supporters of the mobilisation effort insist that continued engagement will help build stronger connections between government and the younger generation.
They maintain that involving students in political processes fosters civic responsibility and promotes democratic participation.
As preparations for the 2027 elections gradually gather momentum, stakeholders say early mobilisation efforts like this could play a decisive role in shaping the political landscape.
They conclude that the coming months will reveal how effectively political actors can translate youth engagement into sustained electoral support across Nigeria.
ABUJA, NIGERIA – Health workers across federal tertiary institutions have intensified protests over delays in implementing upgraded allowances under the CONMESS and CONHESS salary structures, demanding urgent intervention from the Federal Government.
Workers including doctors, nurses, pharmacists, and laboratory scientists have expressed frustration over what they describe as prolonged government inaction despite earlier commitments to improve their welfare.
They have insisted that authorities must immediately implement the revised allowances to reflect current economic realities and ease the financial burden facing healthcare professionals nationwide.
They have warned that the delay continues to weaken morale across hospitals, where staff already struggle with heavy workloads, inadequate infrastructure, and rising living costs.
They have argued that government failure to fulfill its promises undermines trust and discourages dedication among frontline healthcare workers who remain critical to national health delivery.
Health workers have emphasized that the CONMESS and CONHESS salary structures were originally designed to standardize pay and improve conditions across Nigeria’s healthcare system.
They have explained that the proposed upgrades aimed to address inflation, economic hardship, and disparities in remuneration within the sector.
They have noted that authorities announced these adjustments as part of broader health sector reforms, yet implementation has remained inconsistent and incomplete.
The ongoing protests reflect deeper systemic challenges within Nigeria’s healthcare system, where funding constraints and policy delays frequently disrupt service delivery.
Nigeria’s healthcare sector has faced recurring labour disputes over the years, with unions often resorting to strikes to press home demands for better wages and improved working conditions.
These disputes have historically led to disruptions in medical services, leaving patients vulnerable and increasing pressure on already overstretched facilities.
Experts have warned that continued delays in implementing agreed allowances could trigger fresh industrial actions that may severely affect healthcare access across the country.
They have also highlighted the growing concern over the migration of Nigerian healthcare professionals to foreign countries in search of better opportunities.
This trend, widely known as brain drain, has steadily reduced the number of skilled workers available within Nigeria’s health system.
Analysts have pointed out that poor remuneration and lack of incentives remain key drivers pushing professionals to leave the country.
They have stressed that without urgent reforms, Nigeria risks further weakening its healthcare capacity at a time when demand for quality medical services continues to rise.
The protesting workers have called on the Federal Government to act decisively by implementing the upgraded allowances without further delay.
They have also urged policymakers to prioritize healthcare funding and create policies that retain skilled professionals within the country.
They have demanded transparent engagement between government officials and health sector stakeholders to resolve the dispute sustainably.
Government authorities have yet to provide a definitive timeline for full implementation, raising concerns among workers about prolonged uncertainty.
Observers believe that how the government responds to these demands will significantly influence labour relations within the health sector in the coming months.
They have concluded that a swift resolution could restore confidence, improve service delivery, and strengthen Nigeria’s fragile healthcare system.
NIGERIA – The Manufacturers Association of Nigeria has renewed its call for a comprehensive restructuring of the country’s tax system, urging policymakers to shift focus from revenue collection to policies that actively stimulate production and accelerate economic growth.
The association argued that Nigeria’s current tax framework places excessive emphasis on short-term revenue generation for government coffers, often at the expense of industrial expansion, job creation, and long-term economic stability. It maintained that a modern economy must prioritize production-driven taxation policies that encourage investment, strengthen local manufacturing, and reduce dependency on imports.
The Manufacturers Association of Nigeria, which represents the interests of industrial producers across various sectors of the economy, stated that tax reforms should be designed as economic enablers rather than fiscal burdens. According to the group, countries that have successfully built strong manufacturing bases achieved this through tax systems that reward productivity, encourage reinvestment, and support businesses during critical growth phases.
The call comes amid ongoing debates in Nigeria over fiscal reforms, rising cost of production, and efforts by the government to broaden the tax base. Manufacturers have repeatedly expressed concerns that multiple taxation, regulatory overlaps, and rising compliance costs are weakening competitiveness and discouraging both local and foreign investment in the productive sector.
In recent years, Nigeria has faced persistent challenges in industrial development, including high energy costs, foreign exchange volatility, infrastructure deficits, and reliance on imported finished goods. These factors have significantly increased the cost of manufacturing, making it difficult for local producers to compete with cheaper imports flooding the market.
Industry stakeholders argue that without targeted tax incentives and a more supportive fiscal environment, the country risks further deindustrialization. They insist that taxation policies should be aligned with industrial policy goals, particularly those aimed at expanding local production capacity and achieving economic diversification away from oil dependency.
Economic analysts note that tax reform has become a central issue in Nigeria’s broader economic transformation agenda. Policymakers have been exploring measures to improve revenue efficiency while also attempting to protect small and medium-sized enterprises that form the backbone of manufacturing and job creation.
The Manufacturers Association of Nigeria emphasized that a production-focused tax system would not only increase industrial output but also expand the country’s tax base in the long run. It explained that when businesses thrive and scale up, government ultimately benefits from higher sustainable revenue rather than short-term collection pressures that may stifle growth.
The association also called for improved coordination between fiscal authorities and industrial regulators to ensure that tax policies are predictable, transparent, and supportive of long-term investment planning. It warned that policy inconsistency remains one of the major deterrents to manufacturing sector expansion in Nigeria.
As discussions on tax reforms continue, manufacturers are urging the government to adopt a growth-oriented approach that balances revenue needs with the realities of production challenges in Africa’s largest economy. They argue that a tax system built around industrial growth would strengthen national competitiveness, create jobs, and support broader economic stability.
ABUJA, NIGERIA — Former Vice President Atiku Abubakar has expressed deep concern over the rising level of poverty in Nigeria, following a recent report by the World Bank which placed the country’s poverty rate at 63 percent.
DDM learnt that Atiku made the remarks on Friday, warning that the worsening economic situation reflects deeper structural challenges affecting millions of Nigerians across both urban and rural areas.
The former presidential candidate noted that the increasing poverty level is a clear indication that current economic policies may not be effectively addressing the needs of the population.
He emphasized that urgent and decisive action is required to reverse the trend and improve living conditions, particularly for vulnerable groups who are most affected by economic hardship.
According to Atiku, the growing poverty rate underscores the need for comprehensive reforms in key sectors such as agriculture, industry, and social welfare, which are critical to job creation and income stability.
Background analysis shows that Nigeria, Africa’s largest economy by population, has faced persistent economic challenges in recent years, including inflation, unemployment, and currency instability.
The World Bank report highlighting a 63 percent poverty rate has further intensified public discourse around economic management, inequality, and the effectiveness of government interventions.
Experts note that poverty in Nigeria is influenced by multiple factors, including rapid population growth, limited industrial expansion, insecurity in farming regions, and insufficient social protection systems.
Rising food prices and cost of living have also compounded the situation, pushing more households below the poverty line and increasing economic vulnerability among low-income earners.
Analysts argue that without targeted policies aimed at boosting productivity, improving infrastructure, and supporting small and medium enterprises, the poverty rate may continue to rise.
Atiku also stressed the importance of transparent governance and accountability, noting that efficient use of public resources is essential for achieving meaningful economic progress.
Observers say his comments reflect broader concerns shared by economists, civil society organisations, and international partners about Nigeria’s economic trajectory.
They add that addressing poverty will require coordinated efforts between federal, state, and local governments, as well as collaboration with private sector stakeholders.
The issue of poverty is expected to remain a central topic in Nigeria’s political and policy discussions, particularly as the country prepares for future elections and debates on economic direction intensify.
As the conversation continues, stakeholders are calling for practical solutions that can deliver measurable improvements in living standards and restore confidence in the nation’s economic outlook.
Taiwo Oyedele, Minister of State for Finance, has admitted that Nigeria’s newly introduced tax reform laws contain errors, assuring that steps are already being taken to correct them.
Oyedele made this known during a fireside chat at the 2026 conference of the Nigerian Bar Association Section on Legal Practice, where he explained that the discrepancies arose from procedural lapses during the law-making process.
According to him, the errors were largely due to manual drafting processes and multiple review stages, which led to inconsistencies between versions of the law. He urged Nigerians to await the outcome of an ongoing legislative probe into the issue.
The minister noted that the government plans to address the problems through a proposed Finance Bill that will correct the identified flaws.
He also called for greater transparency in the legislative process, stressing the need for all versions of laws to be publicly accessible.
Oyedele emphasised that the implementation of the tax reforms would be guided by fairness, clarity, and transparency, adding that understanding the intent behind policies is crucial for proper interpretation.
He further highlighted that the reforms aim to fix long-standing inconsistencies in Nigeria’s tax system, particularly disparities between personal and corporate taxation, which he said have discouraged business formalisation.
On the issue of equity, Oyedele said the reforms are designed to protect low-income earners and small businesses, noting that many Nigerians earn below ₦70,000 monthly and should not be overburdened by taxation.
He added that the new framework removes minimum tax requirements for loss-making businesses, describing the previous system as effectively taxing capital instead of profit.
The development follows earlier concerns raised by lawmakers, including Abdussamad Dasuki, who alleged discrepancies between the versions of the tax laws passed by the National Assembly and those later circulated.
The controversy prompted the House of Representatives to set up a special committee to review and reconcile the differences.
The Federal High Court in Abuja has fixed April 14 for the hearing of a suit challenging the leadership of the African Democratic Congress (ADC) led by former Senate President David Mark.
The case was filed by Nafiu Bala Gombe, who is seeking to stop Mark and other party leaders from parading themselves as executives of the party.
Justice Emeka Nwite fixed the hearing date after notices were issued to all parties involved.
Those listed as defendants include:
The African Democratic Congress
David Mark
Rauf Aregbesola
Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC)
Ralph Nwosu
Background to the dispute
The matter had earlier been adjourned indefinitely pending an appeal. However, the Court of Appeal on March 12 directed all parties to return to the trial court and maintain the status quo.
Following that ruling, INEC reportedly removed the names of Mark and Aregbesola from its official portal as the party’s National Chairman and National Secretary.
In response, the Mark-led faction filed a motion asking the court to:
Compel INEC to restore their names
Grant accelerated hearing of the case
Objections from defendants
Mark and Aregbesola have both filed preliminary objections seeking dismissal of the suit.
Mark argued that the plaintiff lacks locus standi (legal right to file the case), claiming he had already resigned his party position.
He also maintained that the matter concerns internal party affairs, which courts typically do not adjudicate.
Aregbesola described the suit as frivolous and asked the court to award ₦50 million in costs against the plaintiff.
Similarly, Nwosu argued that the case is premature, stating that internal dispute resolution mechanisms within the party were not exhausted before heading to court
The case is part of a broader leadership crisis within the ADC, which could significantly affect opposition alignments ahead of the 2027 general elections.
Nigeria’s political landscape witnessed a significant development earlier this week as the Governor of Bauchi State, Bala Mohammed, hosted members of the All Progressives Congress (APC) from the House of Representatives at his Abuja residence, a move widely interpreted as a strategic step toward a possible political realignment ahead of the 2027 elections. The meeting, which brought together key political actors from Bauchi State, has sparked fresh speculation about the governor’s future within the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and the broader implications for the state’s political direction.
The gathering, described by insiders as both consultative and strategic, comes amid growing indications that Bala Mohammed is considering a major political shift that could see him exit the PDP, the platform under which he rose to power, and align with another party. While speculation has centered largely on a possible move to the APC, recent developments suggest that the situation remains fluid, with multiple political options still under consideration.
Speaking after the meeting, Dabo Ismail, who represents the Toro Federal Constituency, confirmed that the engagement was convened at the instance of the governor to discuss ongoing political developments and the future of Bauchi State. According to him, the meeting provided an opportunity for stakeholders to deliberate on pressing issues affecting the state as well as the evolving political environment in Nigeria.
He noted that the discussions were productive and yielded positive outcomes, although he stopped short of revealing specific details. He emphasized that further consultations would continue in the coming days, with stakeholders expected to be briefed on the decisions reached. His remarks suggested that while no final position has been publicly declared, the groundwork is being laid for a significant announcement that could reshape political alignments in the state.
DDM News gathered that the meeting in Abuja is part of a broader series of engagements by Bala Mohammed aimed at navigating the complex terrain of party politics in the lead-up to the next electoral cycle. The governor has in recent weeks held discussions with leaders across different political platforms, signaling a calculated approach to building alliances and securing a favorable position for himself and his supporters.
Earlier this month, the governor hosted the national chairman of the APC, Nentawe Yilwatda, alongside the governor of Kano State, Abba Yusuf, at the Government House in Bauchi. That meeting was widely seen as a strong indication of warming relations between Mohammed and the ruling party, further fueling speculation about a potential defection.
However, the political equation took an interesting turn shortly afterward when Bala Mohammed also hosted members of the African Democratic Congress (ADC), during which he openly acknowledged that he had considered joining the APC but expressed reservations about the party’s willingness to accommodate him and his political base. In that context, he described the ADC as a more receptive and potentially viable platform, adding a new layer of complexity to the unfolding political narrative.
DDM News understands that the governor’s consultations are not occurring in isolation but are part of a wider pattern of political realignment across Nigeria. As the 2027 elections approach, politicians and parties are actively repositioning themselves, seeking alliances that can enhance their chances of success. In Bauchi State, this process appears to be particularly dynamic, with multiple factions and interest groups vying for influence.
The involvement of APC lawmakers from Bauchi in the Abuja meeting highlights the importance of legislative backing in any potential defection. Their participation suggests a willingness among some members of the ruling party to engage with the governor and possibly support his transition, should he decide to formally join their ranks. At the same time, it reflects the strategic calculations being made by politicians who must weigh party loyalty against broader political opportunities.
Despite these developments, the prospect of Bala Mohammed joining the APC has not been without controversy. Reports indicate that some APC stakeholders in Bauchi State have expressed reservations about the move, urging the party’s National Working Committee to involve them in any negotiations before admitting the governor. This internal resistance underscores the challenges that often accompany high-profile defections, particularly in a political environment where party structures and loyalties are deeply entrenched.
For the PDP, the potential exit of a sitting governor represents a significant setback, both in terms of political strength and symbolic value. As one of the party’s prominent figures, Mohammed’s departure could have ripple effects, influencing the decisions of other politicians and altering the balance of power in the state and beyond. It also raises questions about the party’s ability to retain key members and maintain cohesion in the face of growing competition.
On a broader scale, the unfolding events in Bauchi reflect the fluid nature of Nigeria’s political system, where alliances are often shaped by strategic considerations rather than rigid ideological boundaries. The willingness of political actors to engage across party lines highlights the importance of pragmatism in navigating the country’s complex political landscape.
As consultations continue and anticipation builds, all eyes remain on Bala Mohammed and his next move. Whether he ultimately aligns with the APC, the ADC, or remains within the PDP, his decision is likely to have far-reaching implications for Bauchi State and the national political scene.
For now, the meeting in Abuja stands as a clear indication that significant political shifts may be on the horizon. As DDM News continues to monitor developments, the coming days are expected to provide greater clarity on the governor’s intentions and the future direction of politics in Bauchi State.
A significant political development unfolded earlier today as Funso Doherty officially declared his intention to contest the 2027 governorship election in Lagos State under the platform of the African Democratic Congress (ADC), signaling a renewed push by opposition forces to challenge the long-standing dominance of the ruling party in the state. The announcement, made during a party gathering and amplified through the ADC’s mobilization channels, has immediately stirred conversations within Nigeria’s political space, particularly regarding the evolving dynamics ahead of the next electoral cycle.
In a statement captured in a video circulated by party stakeholders, Doherty expressed his ambition with a tone of humility and determination, declaring his readiness to serve the people of Lagos State. His words reflected both a personal commitment and a broader political vision aimed at offering what he described as a credible alternative to the current governance structure in the state.
The declaration marks a notable return to the ADC platform for Doherty, who previously contested the Lagos governorship election before making a brief political transition to the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP). His recent resignation from the PDP, which he attributed to internal crises and leadership disputes within the party, appears to have paved the way for his re-entry into the ADC and his renewed gubernatorial ambition.
DDM News gathered that Doherty’s decision to run under the ADC comes at a time when the party is positioning itself as a major opposition platform in Nigeria, particularly in the build-up to the 2027 elections. The party has been actively working to consolidate its base and attract influential political figures, with the aim of presenting a formidable challenge to the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC), which has maintained political dominance in Lagos State since the return to democracy in 1999.
Supporters of Doherty within the ADC have described him as a strong and marketable candidate, capable of mobilizing voters and articulating a vision that resonates with the aspirations of Lagos residents. Party stakeholders emphasized that his candidacy represents a strategic opportunity to redefine the political narrative in the state and to offer voters a viable alternative in the forthcoming election.
DDM News understands that Doherty’s political journey has been shaped by a consistent emphasis on governance reform, economic inclusion, and institutional accountability. Over time, he has positioned himself as an advocate for improved public services, transparency in government operations, and policies that address the everyday challenges faced by citizens. His campaign is expected to focus on these themes, particularly in areas such as infrastructure development, cost of living, and access to quality education and healthcare.
The timing of his declaration is also significant, as it comes at a period when political alignments are beginning to take shape ahead of the 2027 elections. Analysts note that early declarations such as this often serve to set the tone for broader political engagement, allowing candidates to build momentum, establish networks, and articulate their policy agendas well in advance of the election season.
In the context of Lagos State’s political history, Doherty’s ambition represents both continuity and change. While the state has long been considered a stronghold of the APC, recent electoral outcomes have shown that opposition parties can make significant inroads under the right conditions. This evolving landscape suggests that the 2027 governorship race could be more competitive than in previous cycles, particularly if opposition parties succeed in uniting around strong candidates.
The ADC’s growing profile at the national level further adds to the significance of Doherty’s declaration. With increasing interest from political actors seeking alternative platforms, the party is gradually emerging as a focal point for opposition politics in Nigeria. This trend could enhance its ability to mobilize resources, attract grassroots support, and present credible candidates across various states, including Lagos.
For many observers, Doherty’s candidacy will be closely watched as a test of the ADC’s capacity to translate its ambitions into electoral success. His performance in the coming months, including his ability to connect with voters and build a broad coalition of support, will likely play a crucial role in shaping perceptions of the party’s viability as a major political force.
At the same time, the declaration is expected to intensify political activity within Lagos State, as other aspirants and parties begin to position themselves for the contest ahead. The ruling APC, in particular, is likely to respond by strengthening its own structures and strategies to maintain its hold on the state, setting the stage for what could become a highly competitive and closely watched election.
As the political landscape continues to evolve, the entry of Funso Doherty into the race adds a new dimension to the unfolding narrative of the 2027 governorship election in Lagos State. His declaration not only reflects personal ambition but also highlights the broader contest for political influence and governance direction in one of Nigeria’s most strategic states.
With months of campaigning, alliances, and policy debates ahead, the journey toward 2027 promises to be both dynamic and consequential. As DDM News continues to monitor developments, the emergence of new contenders like Doherty underscores the vibrancy of Nigeria’s democratic process and the enduring quest for leadership that can meet the expectations of the people.
WASHINGTON, UNITED STATES — A United States-based lobbying firm has reportedly mounted pressure on former President Donald Trump and members of the U.S. Congress to consider sanctions against Nigeria following the allege deregistration of the African Democratic Congress (ADC) by the country’s electoral body.
DDM learnt that the lobbying effort is linked to concerns over the role of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), with claims that the move to deregister the party raises questions about democratic integrity and political inclusiveness in Nigeria.
Sources familiar with the development indicated that the lobbying group is pushing for diplomatic and economic measures, arguing that any action perceived to limit political participation could undermine democratic principles.
The call reportedly urges U.S. policymakers to review Nigeria’s electoral processes and consider targeted sanctions if actions by authorities are deemed inconsistent with international democratic standards.
Background analysis shows that Nigeria’s electoral system has faced scrutiny in the past, particularly regarding party deregistration, election transparency, and the independence of electoral institutions.
INEC, which is constitutionally empowered to regulate political parties and oversee elections, has in previous instances deregistered parties that failed to meet specific legal and performance criteria.
However, such decisions have sometimes sparked controversy, with affected parties and observers raising concerns about fairness, political bias, and the broader implications for multiparty democracy.
The involvement of a U.S.-based lobbying firm highlights the growing role of international actors and diaspora-linked organisations in influencing political discourse around Nigeria’s governance.
Analysts note that calls for sanctions are often complex and politically sensitive, as they can affect diplomatic relations, economic cooperation, and perceptions of national sovereignty.
They also point out that while external pressure can draw attention to governance issues, it may also trigger debates within Nigeria about foreign interference in domestic affairs.
The potential involvement of figures such as Donald Trump and members of Congress suggests that the issue could gain traction within U.S. political circles, particularly if framed within broader discussions on democracy and human rights.
Observers caution, however, that the process of imposing sanctions involves multiple layers of review within the U.S. government and typically requires substantial evidence and policy consensus.
As developments unfold, attention will focus on Nigeria’s response to the allegations and whether the situation escalates into a diplomatic issue between both countries.
The situation underscores the increasing intersection between domestic political decisions and international advocacy, especially in an era where global attention on democratic practices continues to grow.
Nigeria is a failed state because it can “no longer perform its basic security and developmental (educational, power, health, etc) functions and has no effective control over its entire territory”. Nigeria was run aground by a series of kleptomania and scoundrels masked as leaders. In their self-defeating escapism, they refuse to take responsibilities for their actions. Instead, they blame the problems they brought on Nigeria on a variety of factors, including the evil legacies of colonialism and the inherent complexity and intractable dilemmas of our enormous size and atypical diversity.
But then, their blames ring hollow because some bigger and more diverse countries, like China and India have successfully handled their more daunting problems of size and diversity. About one-sixth of humanity lives in China. Interestingly, with her unitary government, she clothes, feeds, shelters and secures the lives and property of this staggering number of humanity. She has also risen from what a onetime British prime minister, Winston Churchill, once characterized, as a “vast degenerate peasantry” to a modern industrial, military and economic power. Nigerians have been embroiled in an endless, enervating debate on a pertinent constitutional arrangement: unitary versus federalism. China has demonstrated that with the right leadership and respect for the rule law, either form of constitution can be wonderful for nation building.
Unlike China that was never colonized, Indian, like Nigeria, was colonized by the British. And like Nigeria, after independence, she grappled with the supposed deleterious legacies of British colonialism, like cultural shocks of colonialism and artificial sovereignty, which our failed rulers blame for their botched statecraft. Yet, Indian is a very successful democracy; she has not known even one episode of military intervention in politics. And she has lifted herself up from a third world country to a semi-first world country. Her strides into modernity, although streaked by periodic orgies of sectarian violence, have not been marked by repressive and authoritarian government policies.
In addition, her success story refutes the blames on size and heterogeneity for the problems of Nigeria. Nigeria has a population of about 250 million, with three official indigenous languages, Igbo, Yoruba and Hausa; and two official religions: Christianity and Islam. On the other hand, India has a population of about 1.4 billion individuals and twenty two official indigenous languages, and seven official religions.
It is leadership that defines a country; it builds or destroys it. Undoubtedly, India’s accomplishments resulted from the quality of her leaders. Corollary, it is bad leadership that spelt the doom of Nigeria. The onetime American president, Richard Nixon, described leadership as, “a current in history”. He described true leaders, as “brave and principled and governed by courage and absolute commitment to a cause, to the point, that, even their personal survival becomes secondary to them. Driven by these attributes of great leaders, the first post-colonial Indian president, Mohandas Gandhi, said, “Only if I die for India shall I know that I was fit to live”. Less than 24 hours before her assassination, Indira Gandhi said, “I do not mind, even, if I die in the service of the country, because I believe my blood will strengthen and unify the country”. It was this readiness, on the part of Indian leaders, to subordinate self to the public good, and the willingness to give their all, even their lives, not in advancement of any personal agenda, but for the betterment of the country that led Indian to greatness.
On the other hand, in Nigeria, we have buccaneering deviants and perfidious opportunists masquerading as leaders. Their depravity is made evident in their parlance. Just before the partial gubernatorial election re-run in Ekiti State in March, 2009, the then Speaker of the House of Representatives, Demeji Bankole, was at Ado –Ekitti. He sang and danced to songs that extolled his party’s, People’s Democratic Party (PDP), earlier intimidation of voters with gun brandishing security personnel and their plans to do the same in the partial re-runs. To extol the terror of the gun, as a means of securing electoral victory faintly echoes Mao Tse Tung’s maxim that “Power flows from the barrel of the gun”. Mao’s maxim was apt in the tumultuous early 20th Century China. But to suggest, no matter how dimly, in 21st Century Nigeria, that the terror of the gun is a legitimate source of power was most unconscionable.
In 2007, in his desperation to foist his favored candidates on the country, the then Nigerian president, Olusegun Obasanjo, said that his party’s, PDP, victory in the general election was a “do-or-die affair”. Before the 2023 election, our president, Bola Ahmed Tinubu instructed his political supporters to snatch and grab power and run with it. There is no gainsaying that do-or-die politics is contemptuous of the rule of law and the tenets of democracy. It countenances no political defeat, and thus, will not flinch, even, at rigging elections and repudiating the electoral verdict of the people. The words – snatch and grab – smacks squarely in the face of respect for the rule of law. Grabbing and snatching of power are unquestionably in negation to free, fair and credible elections. Power grabbers and snatchers can neither appreciate nor respect the solemnity of the electoral process.
As the saying goes, “From the abundance of the heart, the mouth speaketh.” Inevitably, our words provide a glimpse into our hearts and minds; and reveal the stuff we are made of.
The words of the Indian ruling elite epitomize qualities for great leadership: selflessness, sacrifice and selfless and unwavering dedication to the good of the country. Thus, they are building a great country. The utterances of the Nigerian power elite exemplify qualities of dangerous and despicable leadership: selfishness, lawlessness and readiness to tear down the country in advancement of selfish and clique interests. Not surprisingly, they literally destroyed a great country, and, in their self-deceit, found refuge in blame game.
Tochukwu Ezukanma writes from Lagos, Nigeria.
maciln18@yahoo.com
0803 529 2908
Gunmen attacked Mbwelle village in Bokkos Local Government Area of Plateau State on Thursday night, killing at least eight people.
Most of the victims were members of the same family, according to local reports.
The victims have been identified as Elder Iliya Mangut Dakus, Mr Luck Titus Dakus, Mr Habila Istifanu Dakus, Mr Hassan Istifanus Dakus, Mrs Hassan Moses Dakus, Biggie Lucky Dakus, Sunday Gideon Dakus and Mr Innocent Barnabas Makwin.
While confirming the unfortunate incident in Jos on Friday, the Chairman of the Community Peace Observers in Bokkos LGA, Kefas Mallai, said the attackers struck at about 11pm, shooting indiscriminately at residents.
He said aside from those killed, about three people sustained injuries, while several others were yet to be accounted for.
Mallai said: “There was an attack last night at Mbwelle village. The village is very close to Bokkos town. So far eight persons have been confirmed dead this morning.
“The people are saying they want to protest because the security men have not protected them and the attack lasted for hours and yet, no presence of security to repel the assailants until those people finished and left. No trace.”
He added: “The attack lasted for several hours with no visible security presence to repel the attackers.”
Mallai further alleged that despite the closeness of security formations, there was no response, claiming that operatives were instead deployed to guard a community suspected by Bokkos natives to be linked to the attackers.
Also speaking, the Youth Leader of Bokkos, Christopher Luka, described the incident as tragic and devastating.
“The gunmen came around 11pm and started shooting sporadically. They targeted one family mostly. We have eight confirmed dead, some seriously injured, and others still unaccounted for,” Luka said.
The Federal High Court in Abuja has fixed April 14 for the hearing of a suit filed by Nafiu-Bala Gombe seeking to stop the Sen. David Mark- led African Democratic Congress, ADC, from parading themselves as leaders of the party.
The News Agency of Nigeria gathered that Justice Emeka Nwite fixed the date, following the hearing notices issued to parties in the suit.
Gombe, in the suit marked: FHC/ABJ/CS/1819/2025, had sued ADC, Mark, Ogbeni Rauf Aregbesola, Independent National Electoral Commission, INEC, and Chief Ralph Nwosu as 1st to 5th defendants respectively.
Justice Nwite had, at the last hearing date, adjourned the case sine die (indefinitely) to await the decision of the Court of Appeal.
The judge adjourned the matter indefinitely after counsel for the defendants informed the court of an appeal filed against the lower court order.
However, the Appeal Court, in its March 12 judgment, ordered the parties to go back to the trial court and maintain status quo ante bellum pending the hearing and determination of the substantive suit.
Against the appellate court’s judgment, INEC, on April 1, removed the names of Mark and Aregbesola from its official portal and website as ADC’s national chairman and national secretary respectively.
In reaction to INEC’s decision, the Mark-led leadership, in a motion on notice filed on April 7 by Sulaiman Usman, SAN, prayed the court to ordered the commission to restore their names as it were, prior to the institution of the suit by Gombe.
They also sought an order for accelerated hearing of the case.
Meanwhile, Mark and Aregbesola have urged the court “to dismiss the suit in limine for want of jurisdiction.”
The former Senate President, in his preliminary objection filed on April 7 by his lawyer, Usman, argued that Gombe lacked the locus standi to file the suit, having voluntarily resigned his position as deputy national chairman of ADC.
He argued that the suit is predicated on falsehood and suppression of material facts, particularly concerning the plaintiff’s resignation.
The embattled national chairman stated that the subject matter of the suit borders on internal affairs of a political party, which are non-justiciable.
According to him, the plaintiff has disclosed no reasonable cause of action.
“This honourable court lacks jurisdiction to entertain this suit.
“The suit constitutes a gross abuse of court process,” he added.
Aregbesola, in his consequential counter affifavit deposed to by Anthonia Nwafor from the law firm of M.E. Sheriff & Co, equally urged the court to dismiss the suit.
He said Gombe, in his suit, seeks to approbate and reprobate at the same time because he is no longer a member of the National Executive Committee of ADC, having resigned his position as the deputy chairman of the committee to make way for smooth and effective coalition and restructuring.
He stated that the party communicated the resignation of Gombe to INEC, in compliance with its standard rules and guidelines.
Aregbesola, who said that the suit is unmeritorious, sought an order awarding the sum of N50 million to him as cost for being discommoded by defending the suit.
On his part, Nwosu, in his preliminary objection filed on April 7 by his lawyer, P. I. Oyewole, equally prayed the court to dismiss the suit.
The ex-party’s national chairman, who argued that the case is premature, submitted that Gombe had failed to exhaust the internal dispute resolution mechanism before filing the suit.
A fresh wave of violence has once again shaken communities in Kwara State, as suspected bandits launched a deadly overnight assault on Nuku village in Kaiama Local Government Area, killing five forest guards and leaving residents in fear and devastation. The attack, which occurred in the early hours of Friday, marks yet another grim chapter in the escalating insecurity that continues to plague rural areas across the region.
According to local accounts, the attackers stormed Nuku village at approximately 3:00 a.m., taking advantage of the darkness and the vulnerability of the sleeping community. Witnesses described a terrifying scene as heavily armed men invaded the settlement, firing gunshots indiscriminately and causing widespread panic among residents. The sudden eruption of violence forced many villagers to flee their homes in desperation, seeking safety in nearby bushes and surrounding areas.
A community source, who spoke under anonymity due to fears of retaliation, revealed that the attackers arrived in large numbers and operated with little or no resistance for several hours. The source explained that the assailants appeared familiar with the terrain, entering through known routes and executing their ആക്രമണം with chilling coordination. Within a short period, they had carried out their deadly mission, targeting both civilians and security personnel stationed in the area.
Among those killed were five recently recruited forest guards, individuals who had been tasked with protecting the community and its surrounding വനമേഖല from criminal elements. Their deaths have been described by residents as a devastating blow, not only because of the loss of lives but also because it underscores the apparent ضعف of local security structures in the face of increasingly bold and organized bandit groups.
DDM News gathered that in addition to the loss of lives, the attackers inflicted significant damage on property within the community. Motorcycles belonging to the forest guards were set ablaze, while patrol vehicles reportedly used by mobile police units were also destroyed during the ആക്രമണം. The destruction of these assets further compounds the challenges faced by security agencies in responding effectively to such incidents, as critical resources are lost in the process.
As of the time of filing this report, the Kwara State Police Command had not released an official statement detailing the circumstances of the attack or the steps being taken to apprehend the perpetrators. When contacted, the command’s spokesperson, Adetoun Ejire-Adeyemi, stated that she had not yet been briefed on the incident but assured that updates would be provided once more information becomes available. The absence of an immediate official response has done little to calm the fears of residents, who remain deeply обеспокоены about their safety.
The latest attack has reignited concerns over the deteriorating security situation in Kaiama and surrounding communities. For many residents, the घटना is a painful reminder of the vulnerability they face on a daily basis. Families who have already endured previous attacks now find themselves once again grappling with fear, uncertainty, and the loss of loved ones.
DDM News understands that this assault comes barely two months after a similarly devastating attack on Woro and neighboring Nuku communities within the same local government area. That earlier incident reportedly resulted in the deaths of over 200 people, with approximately 176 others abducted, including women and children. The scale of that ആക്രമണം shocked the nation and drew widespread condemnation, yet for residents of the المنطقة, it has become part of a troubling pattern of recurring violence.
Adding to the anxiety is the recent emergence of a disturbing video showing abducted villagers from Woro and nearby communities. In the footage, victims can be seen making desperate appeals for government intervention, their voices filled with anguish and desperation. Some of the captives, including women and children, spoke of their prolonged captivity and the dire conditions they faced, pleading for rescue before it was too late.
One young woman in the video, speaking in English, described the situation as their “last opportunity” to be heard, while others echoed similar sentiments in local languages. The video also featured one of the вооружённых men, who claimed responsibility for the abduction and attempted to justify their actions, further highlighting the brazen nature of these criminal groups.
In response to the earlier security crisis, the Kwara State Government had expressed concern and reassured residents of ongoing efforts to secure the release of abducted persons. The Commissioner for Communications, Bolanle Olukoju, had stated that the government was committed to ensuring the safe return of all affected citizens, while also cautioning against speculation regarding the exact number of victims due to conflicting reports.
Despite these assurances, the renewed attack on Nuku has deepened skepticism among residents, many of whom feel that more decisive action is needed to address the root causes of insecurity in the area. The repeated nature of these incidents has led to growing calls for increased security presence, improved intelligence gathering, and stronger collaboration between government agencies and local communities.
As the dust settles on yet another tragic event, the people of Nuku and surrounding areas are left to mourn their dead and pick up the pieces of their shattered lives. The attack serves as a stark reminder of the urgent need for comprehensive strategies to combat banditry and restore peace to affected communities.
In the broader context, the situation in Kwara State reflects a wider security challenge facing parts of the country, where rural communities continue to bear the brunt of violent преступления. For many Nigerians, the event in Kaiama are not just isolated incidents but part of a larger narrative of insecurity that demands immediate and sustained attention.
As DDM News continues to monitor developments, the hope remains that decisive action will be taken to prevent further loss of life and to bring those responsible for these heinous acts to justice. Until then, the people of Nuku and neighboring communities remain on edge, living under the постоянная threat of another нападение.
