Social media activist VeryDarkMan has once again stirred intense reactions online following fresh allegations involving Seyi Tinubu and influencer King Mitchy.
In a viral statement circulating across multiple platforms, VeryDarkMan claimed that Seyi Tinubu has allegedly been financially supporting King Mitchy since 2023, suggesting that the influencer was strategically positioned to gain public sympathy and indirectly promote favorable narratives about the government.
According to him, King Mitchy allegedly received ₦10 million around the period of Nigeria’s fuel subsidy removal — a time marked by widespread economic hardship and public outrage. He further alleged that an additional ₦15 million was given in 2025, claiming this financial backing explains why the influencer rarely criticizes national issues or speaks openly about the country’s economic struggles.
The activist concluded his remarks by placing responsibility on Seyi Tinubu, stating, “Na Seyi I blame,” implying that political figures may be using social media personalities to shape public opinion.
The allegations have since triggered heated debates online, with Nigerians divided in their reactions. While some social media users are calling for transparency and accountability from public figures and influencers, others have warned against spreading unverified claims without concrete evidence.
As of now, neither Seyi Tinubu nor King Mitchy has publicly responded to the allegations. The claims also remain unproven, with no official confirmation or documented evidence released to support the accusations.
The controversy highlights growing concerns about the intersection of politics, influencer culture, and digital propaganda in Nigeria, especially at a time when citizens increasingly rely on social media voices for commentary on governance and national affairs.
Observers note that the situation reflects a broader conversation about trust, influence, and the responsibility that comes with large online platforms particularly when political narratives and public perception are involved.
More reactions are expected as the story continues to trend across Nigeria’s online space.
Pakistan has launched airstrikes on major Afghan cities, including Kabul, in what officials described as an “open war” against Afghanistan’s Taliban-led government following months of escalating border clashes.
The strikes, carried out early Friday, targeted locations in Kabul as well as southern areas including Kandahar, a key stronghold of the Taliban authorities.
Residents and journalists reported hearing fighter jets and multiple explosions that continued until dawn.
Pakistan’s Defence Minister, Khawaja Asif, said tensions between both countries had reached a breaking point, declaring an “all-out confrontation” after repeated cross-border violence.
The escalation follows renewed fighting along the Pakistan–Afghanistan border, where Afghan forces allegedly attacked Pakistani troops a day earlier.
Islamabad has accused the Taliban administration of failing to curb activities of the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), a militant group responsible for a surge in attacks inside Pakistan allegations denied by Kabul.
Pakistan’s Information Minister, Attaullah Tarar, said Afghan Taliban defence targets were struck in Kabul, Paktia province, and Kandahar during the operation.
Afghanistan’s Taliban government confirmed the airstrikes but said no casualties were recorded in Kabul.
However, Afghan officials reported that several civilians were wounded after a mortar shell hit a camp for returning refugees near the Torkham border crossing.
The latest violence marks a sharp deterioration in relations between the neighbouring countries, whose border crossings have largely remained closed since deadly clashes in October that reportedly killed more than 70 people on both sides.
Diplomatic mediation efforts led by Qatar, Turkey, and more recently Saudi Arabia had attempted to de-escalate tensions but failed to secure a lasting ceasefire.
Iran has now offered to facilitate dialogue between the two nations.
Both countries’ militaries claim to have inflicted heavy losses on each other in the recent fighting, raising fears of a wider regional conflict if hostilities continue.
(DDM) – Pakistan’s defense minister has warned that his country is now in “open war” with the Taliban following deadly cross-border clashes along the Afghanistan-Pakistan frontier.
The confrontation erupted late Thursday when Taliban forces reportedly launched attacks on Pakistani positions along sections of the 1,600-mile border, a rugged and often disputed region marked by mountains and desert.
Pakistan’s military responded with artillery and mortar fire, escalating tensions in what has become a recurring cycle of violence between the nuclear-armed state and the Taliban, who seized control of Afghanistan in 2021.
Defense Minister Khawaja Asif told reporters that Islamabad’s patience “has run out” and described the Taliban’s incursions as deliberate provocations against Pakistan’s sovereignty.
The conflict pits Pakistan’s well-funded and technologically advanced military against seasoned Taliban fighters who gained battlefield experience over decades, including their resistance against US and NATO forces during the Afghanistan war.
Border communities have borne the brunt of the latest clashes, with reports of civilian casualties, property damage, and internal displacement. Local authorities are struggling to provide basic services amid ongoing shelling.
Analysts warn that the renewed violence risks destabilizing a region already fragile due to militant activity, humanitarian crises, and political uncertainty in Afghanistan.
This latest flare-up underscores long-standing grievances over border control, insurgent safe havens, and competing influence in the region. Pakistan has frequently accused the Taliban of harboring anti-Pakistan militants, while Taliban authorities insist they respect Afghan sovereignty.
The international community has urged both sides to exercise restraint, but with both governments entrenched in their positions, prospects for de-escalation appear limited.
The clashes mark a new chapter in the complex Pakistan-Afghanistan relationship, highlighting the challenges of managing security along a porous border while contending with insurgent forces experienced in asymmetric warfare.
Military experts caution that if the fighting escalates further, it could draw in regional powers and worsen humanitarian conditions in border districts.
For now, Pakistan has mobilized additional troops along the frontier, and the Taliban have reportedly reinforced key positions, signaling that the standoff could continue for weeks or months.
This development follows decades of intermittent conflict, peace talks, and fragile ceasefires, reflecting the persistent volatility of the Afghanistan-Pakistan border region.
(DDM) – Dr. Ralph Abraham has resigned as principal deputy director of the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the agency confirmed Monday.
Abraham, who was sworn in on December 15, cited “unforeseen family obligations” as the reason for his sudden departure, according to a CDC statement.
“It has been an honor to serve alongside the dedicated public health professionals at the CDC and to support the agency’s critical mission,” Abraham said in his announcement.
His resignation comes amid a wave of leadership changes at the CDC during the second Trump administration, reflecting ongoing instability at the agency in the months leading up to this year’s midterm elections.
Earlier, the CDC’s acting director, Jim O’Neill, left his post at the Department of Health and Human Services, prompting further organizational shifts. Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, director of the National Institutes of Health, assumed the role of acting CDC director this month.
Public health experts warn that leadership turnover at the CDC could affect the agency’s ability to respond effectively to ongoing health challenges. The agency plays a central role in disease surveillance, vaccination programs, and public health guidance, making continuity at the top critical.
Abraham had joined the CDC with experience in epidemiology and health policy and was seen as a stabilizing figure during the transition following the previous director’s departure. His exit now leaves the agency navigating yet another leadership gap.
Staff at the CDC praised Abraham’s tenure, noting his commitment to advancing the agency’s mission despite the turbulent political environment. However, the abrupt timing underscores the strain public health leaders often face balancing personal obligations with federal responsibilities.
The CDC did not immediately announce a permanent replacement for Abraham, signaling that interim leadership will continue to manage operations while the agency seeks a successor.
Observers note that frequent changes in senior CDC leadership may complicate ongoing initiatives, including vaccination campaigns and infectious disease preparedness programs, particularly as public trust in health institutions remains a key concern.
Dr. Abraham’s departure adds to a growing list of high-profile exits in federal health agencies, raising questions about continuity, morale, and the future direction of the CDC under current administrative pressures.
(DDM) – Women across the United States are facing ongoing shortages of estrogen patches as demand for menopause hormone therapy continues to climb.
For patients like Emily Padgett, accessing the small estradiol patches that help manage perimenopausal symptoms has become a months-long struggle involving pharmacy transfers and brand switches.
Padgett said she went without the medication for several weeks earlier this year after local pharmacies ran out of stock. During that time, she noticed the return of symptoms such as anxiety and other discomforts associated with hormonal changes.
Estrogen patches, which deliver estradiol through the skin, are commonly prescribed to ease hot flashes, night sweats and sleep disturbances linked to menopause. Many physicians consider transdermal hormone therapy an effective option for women seeking symptom relief.
Pharmacists and health experts say the supply strain reflects a combination of manufacturing constraints and a surge in prescriptions. Increased awareness about menopause treatment options has encouraged more women to seek care, particularly after updated medical guidance emphasized that hormone therapy can be safe and beneficial for many patients when appropriately prescribed.
Unlike oral estrogen, patches provide a steady dose of hormone absorbed directly into the bloodstream. Some clinicians favor this method because it may carry a lower risk of certain side effects compared with pills, though suitability varies by individual health history.
For patients experiencing perimenopause or menopause, sudden interruptions in therapy can be distressing. Symptoms such as intense heat episodes, disrupted sleep and mood changes may reappear when treatment is paused. Experts advise women facing shortages to consult their healthcare providers about alternative dosages, brands or formulations if their regular prescription is unavailable.
Independent pharmacies in some communities have been able to secure limited supplies, but availability can fluctuate week to week. Larger retail chains have also reported intermittent backorders, prompting patients to call multiple locations before finding stock.
Public health specialists note that menopause affects millions of American women annually, and the growing demand for treatment underscores shifting attitudes toward women’s midlife health. Where menopause was once discussed quietly, more patients are openly seeking medical support and evidence-based therapies.
As manufacturers work to stabilize distribution, many women continue to approach the pharmacy counter with uncertainty. For those relying on hormone therapy to maintain quality of life, the fear of hearing “out of stock” remains an ongoing concern.
(DDM) – Dr. Casey Means is preparing to make her case on Capitol Hill as she seeks confirmation to become the nation’s next surgeon general.
Her nomination comes as she aligns herself with the “Make America Healthy Again” agenda championed by Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who currently serves as secretary of the US Department of Health and Human Services.
If confirmed, Means would serve as the country’s top public health spokesperson under President Donald Trump, placing her at the center of debates over vaccines, chronic disease and federal health priorities.
Means, a physician turned wellness influencer, has argued that the United States faces a crisis of chronic illness driven by metabolic disease, poor nutrition and environmental factors. Her supporters view her focus on lifestyle-driven prevention as a needed shift in public health strategy.
However, her association with Kennedy’s MAHA platform could complicate her confirmation. Kennedy has drawn criticism from some lawmakers and medical groups over his past vaccine skepticism and unconventional health policy views. As surgeon general, Means would be expected to communicate science-based guidance to the public, a role that requires bipartisan credibility.
Means was initially scheduled to testify before the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee last October, but the hearing was canceled on the morning it was set to occur after she went into labor with her first child. The session has since been rescheduled for Wednesday.
During her appearance, senators are expected to press Means on where she stands regarding Kennedy’s policy priorities. She may face pointed questions about vaccine safety and effectiveness, reproductive health access, food regulation and environmental health standards.
Supporters argue that Means represents a new generation of health leadership focused on prevention rather than treatment alone. Critics counter that the surgeon general must be firmly grounded in established public health consensus and able to reassure a divided nation.
Ultimately, the confirmation hearing could serve as a referendum not only on Means’ qualifications but also on whether the administration’s broader “Make America Healthy Again” message can win broader public trust.
(DDM) – Dr. Casey Means told senators that the United States is grappling with unprecedented levels of chronic and mental illness, describing the country as a “nation with a broken heart” during her confirmation hearing to become surgeon general.
Appearing before the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee, Means testified for more than two hours, outlining her broader vision for public health while downplaying vaccines as an immediate policy focus.
Means said that if confirmed, her primary emphasis would be on addressing chronic disease, lifestyle-related conditions and systemic health challenges. She signaled that vaccine policy would not be at the top of her agenda, a statement that drew scrutiny from lawmakers.
At one point, she sparred with a senator over the effectiveness of influenza vaccination. During the exchange, she avoided directly answering repeated questions about whether flu shots reduce hospitalization and death, prompting visible frustration from some committee members.
Senators from both parties pressed Means on a wide array of issues, including vaccines, abortion access, contraception policy and pesticide regulation. The questioning also extended to her professional qualifications and potential conflicts of interest.
Means, a Stanford-trained physician and wellness author, has built a national profile as a health influencer. Her critics have questioned whether her public positions align with established scientific consensus in certain areas. Supporters argue that her focus on preventative health and metabolic disease reflects urgent national priorities.
Lawmakers also asked Means about her personal experiences, including past use of psychedelic mushrooms, which she acknowledged. The line of questioning underscored the intense scrutiny nominees face in high-profile public health roles.
The hearing came nearly four months after her initial confirmation session was postponed due to the birth of her child. The delay added anticipation to Wednesday’s proceedings, which were closely watched by medical professionals and political observers alike.
If confirmed, Means would serve as the nation’s top public health spokesperson, advising the administration and shaping messaging on health risks and prevention strategies. Her performance before the committee offered insight into how she may approach contentious issues in a politically polarized environment.
(DDM) – Zohran Mamdani arrived at the White House with a detailed housing proposal and visual props aimed at persuading Donald Trump to back what he describes as the largest federal housing investment in half a century.
The meeting followed a previous sit-down between the two leaders in November, where they reportedly agreed on at least one shared goal: expanding construction and development in New York City. Trump, long associated with real estate branding in his hometown, has often emphasized large-scale building projects as part of his economic messaging.
According to Mamdani’s chief spokesperson, Joe Calvello, the mayor presented a project proposal that would deliver approximately 12,000 housing units. The pitch sought substantial federal support to address affordability pressures and housing shortages across the city.
To reinforce his case, Mamdani brought along a reproduction of the historic 1975 front page of the New York Daily News featuring then-President Gerald Ford and the headline widely remembered as “Ford to City: Drop Dead.” That headline symbolized federal resistance to assisting New York City during its fiscal crisis.
In a symbolic twist, Mamdani also created a mock version of the same front page — this time displaying Trump’s face under a revised headline reading: “Trump to City: Let’s Build.” The prop was designed to frame the current moment as an opportunity for cooperation rather than confrontation.
The housing initiative forms part of a broader effort by New York City officials to secure increased federal investment for urban development. Rising rents, limited supply, and growing demand have placed sustained pressure on city leaders to pursue ambitious solutions.
Political observers note that Mamdani’s approach blends policy advocacy with theatrical presentation, a strategy aimed at capturing the president’s attention and appealing to his development-focused background. Whether the visual messaging will translate into concrete funding commitments remains uncertain.
The White House has not yet detailed its response to the housing proposal. Federal housing appropriations require coordination with Congress, making any large-scale initiative dependent on broader legislative negotiations.
Still, the meeting reflects an unusual moment of potential alignment between a progressive New York mayor and a president known for his business roots in the city. The outcome could shape the trajectory of housing policy debates in one of the nation’s most expensive urban markets.
(DDM) – A federal prosecutor told a Nashville courtroom that he was not directed by senior officials in Washington to bring charges against Kilmar Abrego Garcia, pushing back against claims that the case was vindictively pursued.
The testimony came during a high-stakes hearing before US District Judge Waverly Crenshaw, who has previously indicated there is a “realistic likelihood” that the prosecution may have been retaliatory in nature. Crenshaw’s earlier finding placed the criminal case in jeopardy and raised questions about whether it should be dismissed altogether.
The lead prosecutor, Robert McGuire, testified over several hours that officials at the United States Department of Justice headquarters did not influence his decision to pursue two human smuggling charges against Abrego Garcia. McGuire repeatedly emphasized that he independently evaluated the evidence and made the charging decision himself.
Abrego Garcia, a Salvadoran national, became the subject of intense legal and political scrutiny after he was deported last March to a maximum-security prison in El Salvador.
Authorities later acknowledged that the deportation was improper. The case drew national attention as the administration of Donald Trump initially resisted efforts to return him to the United States.
After being brought back to face charges, Abrego Garcia’s criminal case has struggled to move forward.
Judge Crenshaw previously cited evidence suggesting that high-ranking Justice Department officials may have had a role in pursuing the indictment, potentially in response to the public controversy surrounding the deportation.
During Thursday’s proceedings, McGuire rejected that characterization, insisting that no one in Washington instructed him to prosecute Abrego Garcia.
He maintained that the charges were based solely on law enforcement considerations and evidence gathered during the investigation.
Legal experts note that claims of vindictive prosecution are serious and difficult to prove.
A defendant must typically demonstrate that the charges were brought to punish them for exercising legal rights or in retaliation for protected conduct. If a judge determines that a prosecution was vindictive, dismissal of the charges is a possible remedy.
The courtroom exchange represents the latest development in a complex web of litigation connected to Abrego Garcia’s deportation and return. The case has become emblematic of broader debates over immigration enforcement, prosecutorial discretion and executive accountability.
Judge Crenshaw has not yet ruled on whether the case will proceed or be dismissed. His decision could have significant implications for both Abrego Garcia’s legal future and the standards courts apply when evaluating allegations of political influence in federal prosecutions.
(DDM) – Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton forcefully denied any connection to the criminal activities of Jeffrey Epstein after spending more than six hours answering questions from lawmakers on the House Oversight Committee.
Speaking to reporters in Chappaqua, New York, following the closed-door session, Clinton said she had “answered every one of their questions as fully as I could based on what I knew.”
She stressed repeatedly that she never met Epstein and had no communication with him.
“I don’t know how many times I had to say, ‘I did not know Jeffrey Epstein,’” she told members of the press.
The deposition took place behind closed doors, a decision Clinton sharply criticized. She argued that Republican lawmakers should have held a public hearing instead of conducting the questioning in private.
By doing so, she said, they denied the public the opportunity to directly observe her testimony.
Clinton also addressed questions about Ghislaine Maxwell, who was convicted in connection with Epstein’s crimes.
Clinton said she knew Maxwell only casually and described her as an acquaintance. She explained that Maxwell attended her daughter Chelsea Clinton’s 2010 wedding as the guest of another invitee.
The deposition forms part of a broader Republican-led inquiry into individuals and institutions that may have had past associations with Epstein, whose criminal case and subsequent death in federal custody fueled widespread scrutiny and conspiracy theories.
Lawmakers on the House Oversight Committee have sought to examine any potential political or institutional ties to the disgraced financier.
Clinton has long faced intense political scrutiny, and Thursday’s questioning underscores how Epstein’s shadow continues to reach prominent public figures years after his conviction.
While she maintained that she possessed no knowledge of his misconduct, Republicans have defended their investigative efforts as necessary oversight.
Democrats, meanwhile, have accused GOP lawmakers of using the issue for political theater. Clinton’s criticism of the private setting signals a broader dispute over transparency and process in congressional investigations.
No immediate details emerged about whether lawmakers uncovered new information during the session. Committee leaders have not yet released a transcript of the deposition.
Clinton concluded her remarks by reiterating that she cooperated fully and provided all relevant information available to her. The episode adds another chapter to the enduring political reverberations surrounding Epstein’s case and the figures who once crossed paths, however briefly, with his social circle.
(DDM) – A simmering rivalry between Dan Crenshaw and Ted Cruz has erupted into public view, intensifying pressure on the Houston-area congressman as he battles for political survival in a heated Republican primary.
According to accounts detailed by CNN, the tension escalated during a recent encounter when both men prepared to board the same flight from Houston to Washington. Crenshaw reportedly accused Cruz of working behind the scenes to undermine his reelection campaign. Cruz responded bluntly, warning that if he were actively opposing Crenshaw, the congressman would know it.
This week, Cruz made his position unmistakable. The Texas senator endorsed Steve Toth, a state lawmaker and former megachurch pastor challenging Crenshaw in Tuesday’s Republican primary. Cruz also recorded an advertisement now airing in the Houston media market, funded by a pro-Toth super PAC.
The endorsement marks a significant development in a race already shaped by ideological tensions within the Republican Party. Crenshaw, a former Navy SEAL who gained national recognition for his outspoken and combative style, has clashed repeatedly with factions aligned with the “Make America Great Again” movement. Critics within that wing argue that he has not demonstrated sufficient loyalty to Donald Trump.
Crenshaw’s strained relationship with parts of the MAGA base has fueled primary challenges in previous cycles. However, the involvement of Cruz, a powerful figure in Texas Republican politics, raises the stakes considerably. Endorsements from high-profile party leaders often shape donor networks, grassroots mobilization, and voter perception in closely contested primaries.
The contest also underscores broader divisions within the GOP. While Crenshaw has maintained conservative positions on fiscal and national security issues, he has occasionally criticized elements of Trump-aligned rhetoric and strategy. Toth, by contrast, has positioned himself firmly within the party’s populist wing.
Political analysts say Cruz’s endorsement could sway undecided voters who prioritize alignment with the MAGA movement. At the same time, the move risks deepening fractures within Texas Republican ranks, particularly if Crenshaw survives the primary and must reunite the party ahead of the general election.
Neither Crenshaw nor Cruz has publicly detailed the full scope of their disagreement beyond the reported exchange. However, the visible rift signals a turning point in a rivalry that may shape the future of Republican politics in one of the nation’s most influential conservative states.
As primary day approaches, Crenshaw faces not only a challenger in Toth but also opposition from within his own party’s upper ranks, a combination that could redefine his political trajectory.
(DDM) – A member of the US men’s Olympic hockey team has publicly distanced himself from a controversial video posted by the White House that appeared to show him insulting Canadians after Team USA’s gold medal victory.
The clip, shared on the White House TikTok account, featured what looked like Brady Tkachuk delivering inflammatory remarks about Canada following the United States’ 2–1 overtime win.
A disclaimer at the bottom of the video acknowledged that it contained AI-generated media, indicating that the footage had been digitally altered.
The video surfaced shortly after the US men’s Olympic hockey team defeated Canada to claim gold, a high-stakes rivalry that often carries strong national pride on both sides of the border.
The altered clip appeared to modify comments from one of Tkachuk’s press conferences and present them as direct insults toward Canadians.
Tkachuk, however, rejected the portrayal. Speaking to reporters on Thursday, he made clear that he did not condone the video or its content.
He did not endorse the language used in the AI-generated post and did not share the animosity suggested in the clip.
The controversy comes against the backdrop of broader political tensions between the administration of Donald Trump and Canada.
While political rhetoric between the two countries has at times grown heated, sports diplomacy has historically remained more measured.
Tkachuk’s position carries additional weight because he plays professionally in Canada as captain of the Ottawa Senators, a franchise in the National Hockey League. His professional ties to a Canadian-based team underscore his ongoing relationship with Canadian fans and teammates.
The White House has not publicly elaborated on the intent behind the AI-generated video beyond the disclaimer noting digital manipulation.
The use of artificial intelligence in political messaging has drawn growing scrutiny, particularly when altered media depicts real individuals making statements they did not actually say.
Media analysts say the episode highlights the risks associated with AI-edited content in politically sensitive contexts. Even with disclaimers, altered videos can quickly circulate on social platforms and shape public perception before clarifications emerge.
For Tkachuk, the focus appears to remain on his team’s athletic achievement rather than political controversy. By distancing himself from the video, he signaled a desire to keep sportsmanship separate from political messaging.
The incident adds to ongoing debates about digital ethics, political communication, and the responsibility of public institutions when sharing AI-generated media featuring private citizens or public figures.
(DDM) – The administration of Donald Trump is preparing to release more than $5 billion in long-delayed disaster relief funds to states across the country, but several Democratic-led states will reportedly not receive any portion of the immediate disbursement.
Sources familiar with the plan told CNN that the funding decision excludes states where Trump has previously clashed with governors, including California, Illinois, Minnesota and Colorado.
The funds originate from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), which operates under the oversight of the Department of Homeland Security. States depend on FEMA resources to support disaster recovery, infrastructure rebuilding, and mitigation projects following hurricanes, wildfires, floods, and other emergencies.
More than $14 billion in disaster assistance has remained stalled in the pipeline in recent months, partly due to stricter spending rules imposed by Homeland Security, according to sources. Officials now plan to release over one-third of that backlog.
However, the reported exclusion of certain states has sparked accusations that politics may be influencing the allocation of critical emergency funding. Critics argue that disaster aid should follow objective damage assessments rather than political considerations.
California, which frequently battles catastrophic wildfires and severe storms, has historically relied heavily on FEMA assistance. Illinois and Minnesota also face recurring flood risks, while Colorado contends with both wildfire and winter storm damage.
Governors from Democratic-led states have not yet issued comprehensive public responses to the reported exclusion, but political analysts say the decision could intensify tensions between the White House and state executives.
The administration has not publicly detailed the criteria used to determine which states would receive immediate funding and which would not. Federal disaster aid typically follows formal emergency declarations and damage verification processes.
Observers note that disputes over disaster funding are not new in American politics. However, withholding assistance from states facing active recovery challenges could have significant humanitarian and economic consequences.
As the funds begin flowing to selected states, attention will focus on whether additional tranches will include those currently excluded and whether Congress or oversight bodies will intervene to ensure equitable distribution.
Nigeria’s electoral calendar for the 2027 general elections has undergone a significant adjustment following a fresh announcement by the Independent National Electoral Commission confirming that the presidential and National Assembly elections will now hold on January 16, 2027, while the governorship and state Houses of Assembly elections have been rescheduled for February 6, 2027. The decision reshapes the timeline for political parties, candidates, voters, and election administrators across the country and signals a new phase in preparations for one of the most consequential electoral cycles in the nation’s recent history. Stakeholders across the political spectrum are now digesting the implications of an earlier voting window and the compressed sequence of nationwide polls that will unfold within a short period.
The announcement was conveyed by the Commission’s National Commissioner and Chairman of the Information and Voter Education Committee, Mohammed Haruna, who explained that the revised dates were necessitated by changes in the legal framework governing elections. According to the Commission, the repeal of the Electoral Act, 2022 and the enactment of the Electoral Act, 2026 introduced new statutory timelines and procedural requirements that INEC is obligated to follow. This legal shift compelled the electoral body to recalibrate its operational roadmap to ensure full compliance with the law and to avoid vulnerabilities that could undermine the credibility of the 2027 polls.
Before the latest review, INEC had fixed February 20, 2027, for the presidential and National Assembly elections and March 6, 2027, for the governorship and state Houses of Assembly elections. However, the Commission determined that maintaining those dates would conflict with the updated legal provisions on party primaries, submission of candidate lists, campaign windows, logistics preparation periods, and other pre-election activities. The review, therefore, was not merely a policy preference but a legal necessity driven by the need to align every stage of the electoral process with the provisions of the new law.
Beyond the legal rationale, the new timetable reflects a strategic attempt by INEC to decongest the election season and create clearer buffers between critical operational milestones. Election managers have long grappled with the pressure of compressed schedules, particularly in areas such as the procurement and deployment of sensitive materials, recruitment and training of ad hoc staff, testing and configuration of election technology, and coordination of security deployments across Nigeria’s diverse terrain. By moving the presidential poll earlier in the year, the Commission aims to spread out these processes in a manner that reduces last-minute bottlenecks and operational risks.
The earlier presidential election date also carries political consequences. Parties and candidates will now need to intensify preparations sooner, finalize campaign strategies ahead of the new calendar, and recalibrate outreach efforts to account for seasonal factors that could affect voter mobilization in January. Holiday travel patterns, economic pressures at the start of the year, and varying weather conditions across regions may all influence turnout dynamics. Campaign organizations are expected to adapt their messaging and field operations to ensure sustained engagement with voters under the revised timeline.
For governorship and state assembly contests, the February 6 date places subnational elections in close succession to the presidential poll. This configuration could influence voter turnout patterns, coalition negotiations, and the pace of political realignments as parties pivot quickly from national to state-level contests. The tight sequence may also test the capacity of political parties to sustain campaign momentum, manage resources efficiently, and maintain discipline among supporters during a period of heightened political activity.
Election observers and civil society organizations have welcomed the clarity of the revised dates, noting that early and definitive scheduling reduces uncertainty and curbs speculation. However, they have also called on INEC to publish a comprehensive activity schedule detailing every statutory milestone from party primaries to voter registration updates, permanent voter card distribution, mock accreditation exercises, and final collation procedures. Such transparency, observers argue, will help the public track progress and hold institutions accountable to clearly defined timelines.
Security agencies are also expected to align operational planning with the new dates. The proximity of the two election phases will require sustained deployment of personnel, enhanced intelligence coordination, and robust community engagement strategies to deter electoral violence, protect polling officials and voters, and secure the movement of materials. In flashpoint areas where election-related tensions have historically been high, the compressed timeline may demand even closer collaboration between security forces, community leaders, and election officials.
From a legal standpoint, the revised calendar underscores the practical impact of the Electoral Act, 2026 on election management. Compliance with statutory timelines is likely to shape future judicial scrutiny of the 2027 process, with any deviations potentially becoming grounds for litigation. This reality places a premium on procedural discipline by the electoral body and political actors alike, as the courts are expected to closely examine adherence to the law in resolving post-election disputes.
For voters, the new dates offer both opportunity and responsibility. The earlier presidential poll compresses the civic education window and heightens the urgency for eligible citizens to verify their registration status, collect their permanent voter cards, and familiarize themselves with polling unit locations. Civil society organizations are expected to intensify voter education and election observation efforts to ensure that participation in the 2027 elections is informed, inclusive, and peaceful.
Taken together, the decision to move the presidential and National Assembly elections to January 16, 2027, and the governorship and state assembly elections to February 6, 2027, represents more than a simple change of dates. It is a structural reset of Nigeria’s 2027 electoral timeline driven by legal reform and operational recalibration, one that will test the preparedness of INEC, the adaptability of political parties, the readiness of security agencies, and the engagement of citizens in shaping the next chapter of the country’s democratic journey.
The government of New Zealand has announced travel bans against 40 Iranian officials in response to what it described as a violent crackdown on protesters in Iran.
Foreign Minister Winston Peters said the sanctions target individuals accused of serious human rights violations.
Those affected include Iran’s interior and intelligence ministers, the prosecutor general, and members of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC).
Peters described the scale of violence against demonstrators as deeply disturbing.
“It has been horrifying to witness the brutal killing of thousands of protestors in Iran,” he said, condemning the reported deaths of large numbers of civilians.
The New Zealand government said the move aligns it with international partners, including Australia, the United Kingdom, Canada, the European Union, and the United States, all of which have imposed similar restrictions.
Iran’s embassy in Wellington rejected the sanctions, describing them as politically motivated and based on what it termed inaccurate information.
In a statement, the embassy argued that countries backing US-led sanctions lacked the moral authority to criticise Iran on human rights grounds.
Deputy Prime Minister David Seymour also condemned Tehran’s actions, accusing Iranian authorities of killing large numbers of their own citizens to maintain control.
He said those responsible should face consequences, including being barred from entering New Zealand.
The travel bans mark New Zealand’s latest diplomatic response to the unrest in Iran and signal continued international pressure on Tehran over its handling of protests.
Leaders of the African Democratic Congress (ADC) and the New Nigeria Peoples Party (NNPP) have called on the National Assembly to commence a fresh amendment of the Electoral Act 2026, describing certain provisions of the law as anti-democratic.
Speaking at a press conference in Abuja on Thursday, NNPP National Chairman, Ajuji Ahmed, who addressed journalists on behalf of opposition leaders, urged lawmakers to expunge what he termed “objectionable provisions” in the newly enacted law.
The Electoral Act 2026, recently passed by the National Assembly and signed into law by Bola Tinubu on February 18, restricts political parties to direct primaries and consensus arrangements for the nomination of candidates.
Under the previous Electoral Act 2022, parties were allowed to adopt direct primaries, indirect primaries through delegates, or consensus methods. The new law also shortens campaign periods and timelines for party primaries. In addition, funding for the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) will now be released six months before elections instead of 12 months as previously provided.
Concerns Over Electronic Transmission
Ahmed criticised the inclusion of a proviso in Section 60(3) of the Act, which grants discretionary powers to presiding officers in cases of network failure during the transmission of results. He alleged that the clause could undermine electronic transmission of results from polling units.
He cited statements previously made by former INEC Chairman, Mahmud Yakubu, and ex-INEC Commissioner, Festus Okoye, who had indicated that the Bimodal Voter Accreditation System (BVAS) operates offline and has recorded a high success rate nationwide.
According to Ahmed, available data from the Nigerian Communications Commission shows that over 95 per cent of Nigeria had 2G coverage as of 2023, which he said is sufficient for the transmission of election results.
He argued that restricting mandatory real-time transmission based on network concerns was not supported by evidence and accused the ruling party of attempting to weaken electoral transparency ahead of the 2027 general elections.
Party Primaries Debate
On party primaries, the opposition leaders faulted the amendment to Section 84 of the Act, which limits parties to direct primaries and consensus options. They argued that this infringes on the constitutional autonomy of political parties to determine their internal processes.
“There is nothing undemocratic about indirect primaries,” Ahmed said, insisting that the method creates an orderly and transparent electoral college system for candidate selection.
He maintained that the mode of nomination should remain an internal affair of political parties and not be dictated by legislation.
Stakeholders in Attendance
Prominent opposition figures present at the press conference included ADC National Chairman David Mark; former Vice-President Atiku Abubakar; and the 2023 presidential candidate of the Labour Party, Peter Obi.
Others in attendance were NNPP chieftain Buba Galadima; former Rivers State Governor Rotimi Amaechi; ADC National Secretary Rauf Aregbesola; Senator Dino Melaye; former ADC National Chairman Ralph Nwosu; and former Cross River State Governor Liyel Imoke, among other stakeholders.
The opposition leaders insisted that the National Assembly must urgently revisit the Act to ensure it reflects the aspirations of Nigerians for free, fair, and credible elections.
Opposition leaders in Nigeria have rejected the amended Electoral Act 2026 signed into law by President Bola Tinubu.
They criticize the process, calling for a fresh amendment to remove “obnoxious provisions” and ensure free, fair, and transparent elections.
The opposition bloc, which includes major parties and is led by former Vice-President Atiku Abubakar, criticised the process through which the National Assembly passed the legislation.
While addressing a press briefing, Ajuri Ahmed of the New Nigeria People’s Party (NNPP) said the All Progressives Congress (APC) is working to present President Tinubu as the only serious presidential candidate in 2027.
He noted that statistics available to them shows that election results can be transmitted from every polling unit and wondered why the manual proviso should be included in the act.
He said they were surprised at the speed that the President signed the act, while he did not do that with other acts.
He said the just concluded Federal Capital Territory (FCT) election shows why the APC was in haste to signed the Electoral Act.
The opposition leaders also rejected the FCT election, saying that the FCT Area Council Poll was the litmus test, which the new Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) Chairman had failed.
Residents of Kaduna State on Thursday staged a peaceful protest at the Government House, calling for a public audit of former governor Nasir El-Rufai’s administration and demanding answers over the disappearance of Abubakar Idris, widely known as Dadiyata.
The protesters, made up of youths and women, converged at the UTC roundabout in Kaduna metropolis before marching to the seat of power.
They chanted solidarity songs and displayed placards bearing inscriptions such as “We demand public scrutiny, audit now,” “Malam Nasir El-Rufai, where is Dadiyata?” and “Publish loan agreement and spending breakdown now.”
Dadiyata, a lecturer and social media commentator, was abducted by gunmen from his residence in 2019 and has not been seen since.
His disappearance continues to generate controversy within and outside the state.
Speaking to journalists during the demonstration, one of the protest leaders, Anas Yusuf, said the action was not politically driven but centred on accountability.
“We are not here for politics; we are here for accountability.
Kaduna bled. Communities were attacked, Birnin Gwari faced isolation, banditry escalated, citizens were kidnapped, families buried loved ones, and fear became normal during the last administration,” he said.
“Those years cannot be erased with speeches.
Former Governor Nasir El-Rufai must answer hard questions. You governed, and now you must account.”
Another protest leader, Joseph Chori, described Dadiyata’s disappearance as “an open wound,” adding, “A family still waits. Kaduna still asks: what happened?”
The group also called for full disclosure of the $350 million World Bank loan secured during El-Rufai’s tenure, urging the state government to publish the loan agreement and a detailed account of how the funds were utilised.
“Loans are not free money. Public debt demands public accountability because citizens will repay that debt.
They deserve transparency,” the protesters stated.
They further demanded an independent public security audit of the former administration, insisting that insecurity during that period must be thoroughly examined.
El-Rufai has previously denied any involvement in Dadiyata’s disappearance.
In an earlier interview with Arise Television, he said the missing lecturer had been a critic of the Kano State government rather than his administration in Kaduna.
The demonstrators noted that the state is experiencing relative calm under Governor Uba Sani and maintained that their protest was aimed at strengthening democracy and ensuring justice.
“We will not allow destabilisation to shield anyone from scrutiny.
This is not revenge; this is justice and democracy. We will not forget the victims. Kaduna deserves better,” the group said.
Obi donates N15m to Edo Philomena School of Nursing Sciences
Former presidential candidate, Mr. Peter Obi, has donated N15 million to Philomena School of Nursing Sciences in Edo State.
According to a statement issued on Thursday, Obi said the donation was made in continuation of his commitment to supporting critical sectors of development, which include healthcare, education, and poverty reduction.
He called on government at all levels, as well as wealthy Nigerians, to channel greater attention and resources toward the critical pillars of development.
The statement reads: “On Tuesday, 24 February, in continuation of my commitment to supporting critical sectors of development – healthcare, education, and poverty reduction – I visited Benin City. While there, I stopped at the Philomena School of Nursing Sciences, one of the largest nursing institutions in the region.
“This was not my first visit. Over the years, I have made it a duty to encourage both staff and students of schools across the country as they pursue excellence in healthcare training. In further demonstration of this commitment to Philomena School of Nursing Sciences, and to support the school’s facilities as I have done previously, I donated the sum of fifteen million (₦15M) naira.
“I call on government at all levels, as well as wealthy Nigerians, to channel greater attention and resources toward the critical pillars of development – security, healthcare, education and poverty reduction.
“These are the foundations upon which a just and prosperous society must stand.
Suspected Lakurawa terrorists have attacked a mosque in Dadinkowa community, Maiyama Local Government Area of Kebbi State, killing four worshippers and injuring five others.
According to Zagazola Makama, a counter-insurgency publication focused on the Lake Chad region, the assault occurred on Wednesday evening while congregants were observing prayers.
The gunmen reportedly stormed the mosque and opened fire sporadically.
The attack is believed to be in retaliation for a foiled military ambush earlier in the week.
Troops under Operation FANSAN YANMA had reportedly “neutralised” five suspected Lakurawa members near Mayama Hill during a failed attempt to ambush a military convoy.
The convoy was said to belong to Bemgha Koughna, the General Officer Commanding (GOC) 8 Division, who was on an operational tour of the state.
During the encounter, security operatives recovered one OJC gun, one PKT machine gun, two AK-47 rifles, four AK-47 magazines, a bandolier of PKT ammunition, several rounds of 12.7mm ammunition, a camel bag containing N840,000, two mobile phones, and five motorcycles.
Security Response
Security authorities have confirmed that operations are ongoing to track down the perpetrators and restore calm to the affected community.
The injured victims were reportedly taken to nearby medical facilities for treatment.
The incident adds to growing security concerns over Lakurawa activities in the north-west region. On February 20, suspected Lakurawa terrorists reportedly killed at least 33 residents in coordinated attacks on communities in Arewa Local Government Area of Kebbi State.
Police authorities had stated that the assailants invaded the communities to rustle cattle but were confronted by residents.
Security agencies say efforts are being intensified to curb further attacks and ensure the safety of residents in the state.
Global music icon Sade Adu has once again secured a nomination for induction into the prestigious Rock & Roll Hall of Fame, marking her second appearance on the ballot following her first nomination in 2024.
The Nigerian-born British singer, widely celebrated for her smooth contralto voice and timeless classics such as Smooth Operator, No Ordinary Love, and The Sweetest Taboo, joins an impressive and diverse list of artists competing for a place in the 2026 induction class.
At 67, Sade remains one of the most influential figures in modern soul and pop music. As the lead vocalist of the band Sade, she helped redefine global music in the 1980s by blending soul, jazz, R&B, and soft rock into a sophisticated sound that continues to inspire generations of artists worldwide.
Her career milestones include making history in 1986 as the first Nigerian-born artist to win a Grammy Award — a moment widely regarded as groundbreaking for African representation in international music. Over the decades, her music has maintained remarkable longevity, consistently attracting new listeners through streaming platforms and cultural rediscovery.
The 2026 Rock & Roll Hall of Fame nominee class reflects a wide range of musical eras and genres. First-time nominees include Jeff Buckley, Phil Collins, Melissa Etheridge, Lauryn Hill, INXS, New Edition, Pink, Shakira, Luther Vandross, and Wu-Tang Clan.
Returning nominees alongside Sade include The Black Crowes, Mariah Carey, Billy Idol, Iron Maiden, Joy Division/New Order, and Oasis, making this year’s competition particularly intense.
To qualify for nomination, artists must have released their first commercial recording at least 25 years prior. Final inductees will be selected by a voting body of more than 1,200 artists, historians, and music industry professionals, with results expected to be announced in April. The official induction ceremony will take place later in the year.
For many fans and industry observers, Sade’s continued recognition signals growing acknowledgment of her lasting cultural impact and artistic influence. Should she be inducted in 2026, it would further solidify her legacy as one of the most successful and influential British female artists — and one of the most globally respected musicians of all time.
U.S. President Donald Trump said on Wednesday that he would never allow Iran to acquire a nuclear weapon.
“My preference is to solve this problem through diplomacy,” Trump said in his State of the Union address.
“But one thing is certain: I will never allow the world’s number one sponsor of terror to have a nuclear weapon.”
Trump said he had not received any commitment from Tehran to renounce nuclear weapons development.
Iran maintained that its nuclear programme was for civilian purposes, though it had refused to give up uranium enrichment, which can be used to produce weapons-grade material.
The U.S. and Iran are currently engaged in negotiations over Tehran’s nuclear programme, but no significant progress has been reported.
Tensions have remained high since last June, when Israel launched a 12-day military campaign against Iranian nuclear facilities, with support from the U.S…
Iran retaliated with rocket attacks on Israeli cities, including Tel Aviv.
A heated debate has erupted online after a critic called out popular content creator King Mitchy following her announcement that she renovated a public school within six days and planned to show others how similar community projects could be executed.
The controversy intensified after claims surfaced that businessman and political figure Seyi Tinubu was among those who supported or funded the renovation effort. While supporters praised the initiative as a positive contribution to education, critics argued that the development raises deeper political questions.
In a strongly worded reaction circulating online, the critic alleged that influential individuals connected to government circles should focus on pushing systemic reforms rather than sponsoring isolated renovation projects through influencers. According to the argument, individuals with proximity to power are in a position to inform national leadership about the deteriorating condition of public schools across the country.
The commentary VeryDarkMan further suggested that such philanthropic gestures risk being interpreted as political image management, especially as Nigeria gradually approaches the 2027 election cycle. The critic claimed that projects carried out through social media personalities may serve to generate goodwill and public praise rather than address long-standing structural issues within the education sector.
Supporters of King Mitchy, however, have defended her actions, insisting that community intervention should not be politicized. Many argue that regardless of who funded the project, the renovation directly benefits students and teachers who would otherwise continue learning in poor conditions.
Others noted that private citizens and influencers stepping in to assist struggling institutions reflects a broader reality — that public-private collaboration has increasingly become necessary where government resources fall short.
The situation has sparked wider conversations about accountability, governance, and the role of influencers in socially driven projects. While some see such initiatives as genuine acts of service, others believe they highlight deeper failures within public infrastructure management.
As discussions continue online, the debate underscores a growing tension between grassroots philanthropy and political perception, raising questions about whether visible charitable efforts can exist independently of political interpretation in Nigeria’s highly charged public space.
Some suspected Lakurawa terrorists have attacked a Mosque, killed five worshippers and injured three others in a reprisal following a failed ambush on the convoy of a Nigerian Army General Officer Commanding (GOC).
The News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) reports that the attackers stormed Dadinkowa community Mosque in Maiyama Local Government Area on Wednesday while congregants were at evening prayers, and opened fire on the worshippers.
When contacted, the Kebbi Command Police Public Relations Officer, SP Bashir Usman, confirmed the attack, saying that the terrorists targeted the Mosque in retaliation for their earlier military defeat.
“The attack was a reprisal by suspected Lakurawa terrorist elements following a failed ambush on troops of the Nigerian Army attached to the 8 Division,” Usman said.
He said the chain of events began on Feb. 24, when the GOC, 8 Division, and Commander, Sector 2, Operation FANSAN YAMMA, Maj.-Gen. Bemgha Koughna, came under attack while on his way to visit frontline troops deployed in the state.
“The GOC’s convoy, while navigating the forested terrain near Mayama Hill, came under heavy gunfire from armed terrorists believed to be members of Lakurawa group.
“Troops responded with superior firepower, engaged the attackers in a fierce gun duel and neutralised five of them, thereby foiling the ambush,” Usman said.
On the recent incident, the PRO confirmed that five worshippers died from gunshot wounds sustained in the attack, while three others suffered varying degrees of injuries and were evacuated to nearby medical facilities for treatment.
Justice has been served in Delta State following the conviction of a 56-year-old man identified as Mr. Collins, who has been sentenced to 60 years imprisonment with hard labour for sexually assaulting a nine-year-old child.
The judgment was delivered by a High Court sitting in Orerokpe after a prolonged legal process that began in 2023 when the incident reportedly occurred in Ugolo community. The court found the defendant guilty after reviewing evidence and testimonies presented during the trial.
In addition to the lengthy prison sentence, the court ordered the convict to pay ₦50 million as compensation to the young victim. Legal observers say the compensation order reflects growing judicial efforts to ensure that survivors of abuse receive financial support for recovery, medical care, and psychological rehabilitation.
Reports surrounding the case also revealed that during the investigation and trial period, the convict allegedly attempted to interfere with the course of justice by offering ₦111,000 to Delta-based activist Israel Joe in an effort to have the matter withdrawn. The activist reportedly rejected the offer and immediately handed the money over to law enforcement authorities in Orerokpe.
Israel Joe is said to have continued monitoring proceedings closely, working alongside authorities and community stakeholders to ensure the case was pursued to its conclusion without intimidation or compromise.
The verdict, announced publicly on February 25, 2026, has drawn strong reactions from residents and advocacy groups across the state. Many community members expressed relief that justice was achieved, describing the ruling as a clear message that crimes against children will attract severe consequences.
Child rights advocates have also praised the judgment, noting that strict sentencing helps deter similar offences while reinforcing public confidence in the justice system. They further called for increased awareness, stronger child protection mechanisms, and community vigilance to prevent abuse cases from occurring.
Legal experts say the ruling highlights the judiciary’s commitment to protecting vulnerable citizens and holding offenders accountable, particularly in cases involving minors.
As conversations continue nationwide, the case serves as a reminder of the importance of reporting abuse, supporting survivors, and ensuring that perpetrators face the full weight of the law.
