Former Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has been killed in a US-Israeli airstrike in Tehran, along with several of his bodyguards who were members of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC).
The attack also claimed the lives of other high-ranking officials of the Islamic Republic.
According to reports, Ahmadinejad was under house arrest at the time and was killed in a targeted strike on his residence.
He was Iran’s sixth president from 2005 to 2013.
At home and abroad, he was often viewed as a confrontational hardliner whose economic decisions contributed to rising inflation, and whose provocative rhetoric further isolated Iran on the international stage.
He became especially infamous in the West for his remarks on Israel and the Holocaust. At a 2005 conference titled “A World Without Zionism,” he invoked Iran’s founding leader, now deceased Ayatollah Khomeini, describing Israel as “the occupying regime of Jerusalem” and a “disgraceful cancerous growth” that “must be wiped off the map.”
Supporters later argued that translations of his comments were disputed, but critics insisted that the meaning was unmistakably hostile.
As the war between US-Israel and Iran continue to rage, President Donald Trump has announced that over 9 Iranian Naval ships have been destroyed and sunk.
He disclosed this in a statement issued on Sunday evening.
He said some of the ships are relatively large and important.
President Trump vowed that as the war presses on, more of Iranian ships will be destroyed and they will soon be floating at the bottom of the sea.
He said: “I have just been informed that we have destroyed and sunk 9 Iranian Naval Ships, some of them relatively large and important. We are going after the rest — They will soon be floating at the bottom of the sea, also! In a different attack, we largely destroyed their Naval Headquarters. Other than that, their Navy is doing very well!”.
Iran has appointed Ayatollah Arafi as its interim Supreme Leader following the death of Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei in a joint US–Israeli airstrike on Saturday, February 28, 2026.
The announcement comes as the country begins formal preparations for a leadership transition amid rising regional tensions.
Ayatollah Arafi will temporarily assume the responsibilities of the Supreme Leader while the Assembly of Experts, the constitutional body tasked with appointing and supervising Iran’s highest authority, convenes to select a permanent successor.
In accordance with Iran’s legal provisions for succession, Arafi will serve on an interim three-member leadership council, alongside President Masoud Pezeshkian and Chief Justice Gholamhossein Mohseni-Ejei.
The council is mandated to oversee the functions of the Supreme Leader during the transitional period, ensuring continuity of governance and religious authority.
Arafi, 67, is a senior cleric with decades of experience within Iran’s political and religious establishment.
He has previously served on the influential Guardian Council and was confirmed as a member of the interim body by the Expediency Discernment Council.
He studied in the holy city of Qom, Iran’s foremost seminary center, under prominent scholars and has attained the rank of mujtahid, granting him the authority to issue independent Islamic legal rulings.
Officials said that further details on the succession process are expected as the Assembly of Experts convenes to determine Iran’s next Supreme Leader.
The transitional appointment comes amid a period of heightened instability following Khamenei’s death, with Iran responding to the US–Israeli military operation with retaliatory strikes across the region.
The interim council is tasked with maintaining stability and guiding Iran through what is expected to be a delicate and closely watched leadership transition, as the country navigates both domestic challenges and international pressures in the wake of the strike that killed Khamenei.
Demolition of illegal structures at Onitsha Main Market has begun, as ordered by the Onitsha North Local Government Council, aiming to restore the market’s original layout and boost trade.
The move follows warnings and a 14-day extension given to affected traders, which expired on February 28, 2026.
In a statement signed by Hon. Anthony Nwora, Chairman of Onitsha North Local Government, the council informed owners and occupants of unlawful buildings in Parks 1, 2, and 3 of Main Market, Onitsha, that the grace period had ended.
The notice, titled “Final Reminder on Demolition of Illegal Structures at Main Market, Onitsha,” stated that an initial 14-day notice had been given to the affected occupants, which expired on February 14, 2026.
“The owners/occupants of all the illegal structures located at Park 1, Park 2, and Park 3 of Main Market, Onitsha, are hereby reminded that after the 14 days earlier notice of demolition of the illegal structures given to them, which expired on 14th February 2026, was extended based on their request by another 14 days, which will expire on 28th February 2026, the Onitsha North Local Government will carry out the demolition of the illegal structures anytime from Sunday, 1st March 2026,” the statement read.
Governor Charles Soludo’s administration seeks to reclaim the market’s architectural integrity, citing congestion and safety concerns.
However, traders have expressed concerns over potential financial losses and disruptions to their businesses.
A court had restrained the government from proceeding with the demolition pending a hearing on March 16, 2026, after traders filed a lawsuit challenging the plan.
This photo taken and handout on May 9, 2025 by The Vatican Media shows Pope Leo XIV during a mass with cardinals in the Sistine Chapel in The Vatican. (Photo by Handout / VATICAN MEDIA / AFP) / RESTRICTED TO EDITORIAL USE - MANDATORY CREDIT "AFP PHOTO / VATICAN MEDIA" - NO MARKETING - NO ADVERTISING CAMPAIGNS - DISTRIBUTED AS A SERVICE TO CLIENTS
Pope Leo XIV has delivered a strong message to United States President Donald Trump regarding the escalating military actions in the Middle East, emphasizing the need for dialogue over violence.
Speaking from the Vatican on Sunday, the pontiff expressed deep concern over the unfolding situation in Iran following the death of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.
“I am following with deep concern what is happening in the Middle East and in Iran during this tumultuous time,” Pope Leo XIV said.
“Stability and peace are not achieved through mutual threats, nor through the use of weapons, which sow destruction, suffering, and death, but only through reasonable, sincere, and responsible dialogue.”
The remarks came shortly after Trump vowed to strike Iran “with a force that has never been seen before” in retaliation for Tehran’s threats of revenge.
The Pope, the first-ever American-born pontiff, warned of the potential for large-scale bloodshed if tensions continue to escalate.
“Faced with the possibility of a tragedy of enormous proportions,” he said, “I address to the parties involved a heartfelt appeal to assume the moral responsibility to stop the spiral of violence before it becomes an irreparable abyss!”
He concluded by calling on nations to prioritize diplomacy and the pursuit of peace.
“May diplomacy recover its role and may the good of peoples be promoted, peoples who long for peaceful coexistence founded on justice. And let us continue to pray for peace.”
The US Central Command has denied Iran’s claim of hitting the USS Abraham Lincoln with four ballistic missiles in the Gulf, stating that the Lincoln was not hit and the missiles didn’t even come close.
“The Lincoln was not hit. The missiles launched didn’t even come close,” Central Command said in a post on X.
“The Lincoln continues to launch aircraft in support of CENTCOM’s relentless campaign to defend the American people by eliminating threats from the Iranian regime.”
The denial comes after Iran’s Revolutionary Guards claimed to have struck the US aircraft carrier in retaliation for US-Israeli strikes that killed Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.
“The US aircraft carrier Abraham Lincoln was struck by four ballistic missiles,” the Guards said in a statement carried by local media, warning that the “the land and sea will increasingly become the graveyard of the terrorist aggressors.”
The USS Abraham Lincoln is one of America’s nuclear-powered aircraft carriers, which the Navy calls “the largest warship in the world.” In a statement, the Pentagon denied it had been hit.
It makes up the ten nuclear-powered aircraft carriers in the US, known as the Nimitz-class.
Nimitz-class carriers are 333 metres long, can move approximately 100,000 tons of equipment, including 65 aircraft and multiple missile mounts, according to the US Navy.
The USS Abraham Lincoln was sent to the Gulf towards the end of January as part of what President Donald Trump called an “armada” which was moved to the region “just in case” as tensions spiked over Iran’s crackdown on protesters angry about the country’s economy
The U.S. military says one of Iran’s naval ships has been struck and is now sinking following the opening phase of Operation Epic Fury, the U.S.–led offensive against Iran.
According to a statement Sunday from U.S. Central Command on X, an Iranian Jamaran‑class corvette was hit by U.S. forces during the initial hours of the operation on Saturday.
Central Command said the vessel is now “sinking to the bottom of the Gulf of Oman” at a pier near Chah Bahar.
In its statement, the U.S. military reiterated a call for Iranian military personnel to abandon ship and lay down their weapons, echoing previous messages directed at members of Iran’s armed forces, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) and law enforcement.
The Jamaran‑class corvette, commissioned in 2010, was designed as a versatile warship capable of carrying more than 120 crew and equipped with surface‑to‑air missiles, torpedoes and modern naval guns, according to earlier reports.
The vessel is part of Iran’s northern naval fleet and has been involved in multiple regional deployments since entering service.
The sinking marks a significant escalation in naval engagements tied to the broader conflict between Iranian forces and the U.S.–Israeli military campaign.
It underscores the widening scope of Operation Epic Fury, which has already seen air, naval and missile exchanges across the Middle East.
U.S. Central Command did not immediately release details on whether there were casualties aboard the Iranian vessel.
Airlines are scrambling to cancel and divert flights to and from the Middle East following the US and Israel’s strikes on Iran.
British Airways and Virgin Atlantic are among the carriers grounding flights, with Dubai International and Al Maktoum International airports in Dubai suspending operations.
The UK Foreign Office is advising British citizens to avoid non-essential travel to Bahrain, Kuwait, Qatar, and the UAE, and those already in these countries are being told to shelter in place.
The situation is fluid, with many airlines offering rebooking options or full refunds for affected passengers.
This came after Iran launched retaliatory attacks on the Gulf states.
Long-haul travel is being affected more widely and Heathrow has urged travellers to check with their airlines.
One person has been killed and 11 others were injured at airports in Dubai and Abu Dhabi. Four of those injuries were among members of staff at Dubai International.
British Airways has cancelled services to Tel Aviv and Bahrain until Wednesday.
It said services between Heathrow and Abu Dhabi, Amman, Bahrain, Doha, Dubai or Tel Aviv could be affected for several days.
Virgin Atlantic said it was suspending services between Heathrow and Riyadh on Sunday, after earlier cancelling flights from Heathrow to Dubai on Saturday and Sunday.
It has warned that flights to India, Saudi Arabia and the Maldives may take longer due to them being rerouted around the affected region.
Virgin is among airlines across Europe, Asia and the Middle East that have had to cancel or reroute flights to avoid the closed or restricted airspace.
Airspace over Iran, Israel, Iraq, Qatar, Bahrain, Kuwait, Syria and the UAE remained closed on Sunday morning, while there is a partial closure in Saudi Arabia. Jordanian and Lebanese airspace remains open but there is limited flight activity.
The U.S. military has confirmed that three American service members were killed in action during ongoing operations linked to the joint U.S.–Israeli offensive against Iran, officials said Sunday.
Five others are seriously wounded, according to a statement from U.S. Central Command.
The casualties represent the first reported American military deaths since the offensive began with coordinated strikes targeting Iranian military infrastructure, including the compound of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.
CENTCOM said additional U.S. troops have sustained minor injuries from shrapnel and concussions and are being treated, while combat operations continue across multiple fronts.
Smoke was seen rising over Tehran after joint U.S. and Israeli strikes early Saturday, which triggered waves of retaliation from Iranian forces against U.S. and allied positions throughout the Middle East.
Suspected ISWAP militants attacked a Nigerian military base at Banki Junction in Borno State, killing an Army Major, U.I. Mairiga, and several soldiers.
The insurgents, who arrived in multiple groups, Diaspora Digital Media understand, opened fire on troops stationed at the base around 4:00 a.m.
Sources said that several Nigerian soldiers were killed, while others fled into the bush.
“An attack at Forward Base operations at Banki junction around 0400hrs by gunmen suspected to be Boko Haram terrorists led to the death of an Army Major and many other soldiers this morning.
“Their corpses are being transferred to 7 Division military hospital in Maiduguri,” a source said.
The latest incident comes weeks after troops were killed during a similar raid on a military base in Jakana, Kaga Local Government Area of Borno State.
In that attack, the assailants reportedly set ablaze armoured tanks and other military vehicles before carting away a large cache of ammunition.
Meanwhile, following the death of Boko Haram leader, Abubakar Shekau, ISWAP has continued expanding its influence around the Lake Chad region.
The group’s ranks have reportedly grown with the defection of hundreds of Boko Haram fighters previously loyal to Shekau.
Senator Ned Nwoko representing Delta North Senatorial District at the National Assembly, had expressed profound shock and grief over the passing of former Deputy Governor of Delta State, Chief Benjamin Elue.
In a condolence message issued in Abuja, Senator Nwoko said the death of the elder statesman, at 85, was a monumental personal and collective loss.
He recalled decades of close social, cultural and political association with the departed leader, noting that their relationship was built on mutual respect and enduring affinity.
The Senator described the late Octogenarian as a father figure, humble counsellor and a dependable confidant with a gentle and decent spirit.
According to Senator Nwoko, Chief Elue brought rare integrity, honesty, and accountability to public office during his tenure as Deputy Governor.
He emphasized that the late statesman’s high moral character and disciplined approach to governance distinguished him as one of the finest political leaders Delta State has ever produced.
The lawmaker further described him as a uniquely modest leader whose social refinement, humility, and contentment stood in sharp contrast to the excesses often associated with Nigeria’s political environment.
“It is with immense grief that I received the sad news of the passing of Chief Benjamin Elue, former Deputy Governor of our dear state.
He will be remembered as an exemplary patriot and accomplished statesman who made outstanding contributions to the growth and development of Delta State.
His legacy of disciplined and selfless service will continue to endure.
“He was a rare breed of leader modest, principled, and humane.
His life embodied service above self and dignity in public conduct.
“Chief Elue’s death marked the end of an era, but his legacy of integrity, decency, and unwavering commitment to public service will remain indelible in the political history of Delta State.
“On behalf of my associates and the entire people of Delta North,I extend heartfelt condolences to the Elue family, praying for the peaceful repose of his soul and for strength and comfort to bear the loss” Nwoko stated.
Violent protests broke out in Pakistan and Iraq on Sunday following the killing of Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei in joint U.S.-Israeli strikes, leaving at least nine people dead and dozens injured as demonstrations escalated into clashes with security forces.
In Pakistan’s southern city of Karachi, protesters stormed the outer perimeter of the U.S. Consulate, prompting armed security personnel to open fire after crowds breached security barriers, according to local authorities.
Demonstrators chanting anti-American and anti-Israel slogans gathered outside the diplomatic compound shortly after news of Khamenei’s death spread across the region.
Officials said protesters set a vehicle ablaze near the main entrance and clashed with police before the situation turned deadly.
Sukhdev Assardas Hemnani, a spokesperson for the local government, said consulate guards fired shots as demonstrators pushed through the outer security layer.
Police confirmed that at least nine people were killed and 34 others injured, all suffering gunshot wounds, according to Karachi’s Civil Hospital.
U.S. diplomatic missions in Pakistan did not immediately comment on the incident.
In a brief statement posted online, the U.S. Embassy in Islamabad said it was monitoring demonstrations and advised American citizens to exercise heightened caution.
Pakistan’s Interior Minister Mohsin Naqvi called for calm, urging protesters to remain peaceful while expressing solidarity with public grief over developments in Iran. Provincial authorities have ordered a high-level investigation into the violence.
Protests quickly spread to other cities across Pakistan, home to one of the world’s largest Shi’ite Muslim populations outside Iran.
In the northern region of Gilgit-Baltistan, demonstrators set fire to a United Nations office building in the city of Skardu.
Local officials said the facility was destroyed but reported no casualties.
Hundreds of protesters also gathered outside the U.S. consulate in Lahore, where police used tear gas to disperse crowds attempting to damage security installations.
In the capital, Islamabad, authorities blocked roads leading to the diplomatic enclave known as the Red Zone as protesters attempted to march toward foreign embassies.
Western diplomatic missions across Pakistan heightened security measures, restricting staff movements amid fears of further unrest.
Clashes in Baghdad
In neighboring Iraq, hundreds of pro-Iranian demonstrators assembled outside Baghdad’s fortified Green Zone, where the U.S. embassy is located.
Iraqi security forces fired tear gas and stun grenades to disperse the crowd and prevent protesters from breaching the heavily guarded area.
The demonstrations reflect rising anger among supporters of Iran across parts of the Middle East following Khamenei’s death, an event that has significantly escalated regional tensions.,
An Iranian government official has accused United States President Donald Trump of crossing a “very dangerous red line” following the killing of Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, warning that Tehran has no choice but to respond.
Speaking in an exclusive interview with CNN on Sunday, Iran’s Deputy Foreign Minister, Saeed Khatibzadeh, said the assassination of the country’s top religious and political authority would provoke strong reactions among Shiite Muslims worldwide.
“From a religious aspect, he was a great religious leader,” Khatibzadeh said.
“Many Shiite followers across the region and around the world are going to react to that.
President Trump passed a very dangerous red line.”
The Iranian official stressed that retaliation was inevitable following the strikes.
“We have no option but to respond,” he added.
The remarks come after coordinated military strikes on Saturday that killed Khamenei, triggering a sharp escalation in regional tensions.
Iran subsequently launched a wave of retaliatory attacks across the Middle East, targeting countries hosting U.S. military bases, including Bahrain and the United Arab Emirates.
According to regional reports, the strikes have continued throughout the weekend, causing civilian casualties, damaging infrastructure, and disrupting air and maritime traffic in several Gulf states.
Khatibzadeh said Tehran had previously warned Gulf Arab governments about the presence of U.S. military installations, which Iran considers a direct threat to its security.
“We communicated with them either shut down those American bases that are constantly threatening Iran, or we would have no option but to push back,” he said.
He added that Iran lacks the capability to directly strike U.S. territory and therefore views American military bases abroad as legitimate targets.
“Iran cannot reach American soil, so we have no option but to attack bases under U.S. jurisdiction,” he said.
When asked whether diplomacy remained possible, the deputy foreign minister expressed skepticism, accusing Washington of repeatedly undermining diplomatic efforts and initiating the current conflict.
“If President Trump didn’t want Iran to hit back, he should not have started this war from the beginning,” Khatibzadeh said, describing the confrontation as “a war of choice.”
200120-N-HD110-0245
SAN DIEGO (Jan. 20, 2020) The Nimitz-class aircraft carrier USS Abraham Lincoln (CVN 72) transits San Diego Bay. Lincoln arrives at Naval Air Station North Island after a 10-month deployment in support of maritime security operations and theater security cooperation efforts in the U.S. 6th, 5th, and 7th Fleet areas of operations. (U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class Danielle A. Baker/Released)
Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) has claimed responsibility for a missile attack targeting the USS Abraham Lincoln, according to statements carried by Iranian state media on Sunday.
In the statement, the IRGC said it launched four ballistic missiles at the U.S. aircraft carrier, escalating tensions amid the widening regional conflict.
The claim has not been independently verified, and the United States has not issued an immediate response.
The USS Abraham Lincoln is the fifth Nimitz-class aircraft carrier in the United States Navy and forms part of a powerful carrier strike group deployed to the region.
The vessel is equipped with advanced F-35 stealth fighter jets designed to evade enemy radar systems.
Its strike group typically includes three guided-missile destroyers armed with Tomahawk land-attack cruise missiles and is often accompanied by a nuclear-powered submarine capable of launching the same weapons.
Satellite imagery verified by BBC Verify previously showed the carrier operating off the coast of Oman on February 15.
There has been no confirmation from U.S. officials regarding damage or casualties, and Washington has yet to comment on the Iranian claim.
The reported attack, if confirmed, would mark a significant escalation in hostilities between Iran and U.S. forces operating in the Middle East.
An Iranian missile strike on a residential neighbourhood in the Israeli city of Beit Shemesh has killed at least eight people, marking the deadliest attack inside Israel since the current conflict began, according to emergency and medical officials.
Rescue teams and emergency responders rushed to the scene shortly after the strike, where a residential building collapsed after being hit while residents were sheltering inside.
Authorities say search operations are ongoing amid fears that more victims may still be trapped beneath the rubble.
The impact left widespread destruction across the neighbourhood, with piles of broken concrete, twisted metal and debris scattered across the area. A large crater at the site indicates the force of the explosion, while several vehicles parked nearby were completely destroyed.
Israel’s military confirmed that its early warning system had been activated before the missile struck, alerting residents of incoming fire. Officials said the circumstances surrounding the impact are under review.
Paramedics described chaotic scenes as rescue efforts unfolded under continuing threat of incoming rockets.
Ori Lazarovich, a paramedic with Israel’s Magen David Adom emergency medical service, said teams moved toward the scene immediately after receiving the alert.
“When we got the warning, we headed straight towards the fire and the smoke,” Lazarovich said. “We arrived with dozens of medics and began pulling people from the rubble and treating casualties while rockets were still flying overhead.”
He added that several buildings in the area were “completely demolished” by the strike.
Medical teams pronounced multiple victims dead at the scene, while survivors suffered severe injuries, including crush wounds, smoke inhalation and serious burns.
Authorities have not yet released the identities of the victims as search and rescue operations continue.
The attack has intensified fears of further escalation as exchanges between Israel and Iran continue, raising concerns about broader regional instability.
Belgian authorities have seized an oil tanker suspected of belonging to Russia’s so-called “shadow fleet,” accusing the vessel of operating under false registration and documentation in violation of international sanctions.
Belgian Defence Minister Theo Francken said on Sunday that the country’s armed forces, supported by French defence personnel, boarded the tanker during an operation carried out earlier in the day.
The ship is now being escorted to the Belgian port of Zeebrugge, where it will remain under seizure as investigations continue.
According to Belgian officials, the vessel identified as Ethera appears on the European Union’s sanctions list targeting ships believed to be helping Russia circumvent restrictions on oil exports imposed after its invasion of Ukraine.
Francken said preliminary findings suggested the tanker had been sailing under a “false flag” and carrying falsified documents.
Belgium’s federal prosecutor’s office confirmed that inspectors discovered evidence supporting those suspicions during an onboard search, prompting authorities to open a criminal investigation and order the ship diverted into Belgian territorial waters.
The Russian embassy in Belgium said it had not received official notification regarding the seizure and was seeking clarification, including whether any Russian nationals were among the crew.
Western sanctions designed to limit Moscow’s oil revenues have contributed to the emergence of a network of ageing tankers often described as a shadow fleet.
These vessels typically operate through complex ownership structures and frequently lack recognized Western insurance or safety certification.
Shipping and insurance industry sources warn that such ships pose significant environmental risks, as poorly regulated tankers are more vulnerable to mechanical failures, oil leaks, and maritime accidents that could threaten marine ecosystems.
Russia has previously condemned similar seizures of vessels carrying its oil, describing them as acts of piracy.
Francken defended Belgium’s actions, arguing that disrupting the shadow fleet is necessary to weaken Russia’s ability to finance its war in Ukraine.
“Without this shadow fleet, Russia cannot sustain its aggression,” he said, adding that Belgium intends to continue enforcing sanctions rigorously.
Ukraine welcomed the move, with Foreign Minister Andrii Sybiha urging international partners to adopt similar measures to counter sanctions evasion and increase pressure on Moscow.
The incident underscores growing European efforts to clamp down on alternative shipping networks that have allowed Russian crude exports to continue despite sweeping Western restrictions.
(DDM) – A prominent Diaspora political figure has raised alarm over Nigeria’s evolving electoral framework, warning that new digital compliance requirements could reshape the country’s democratic landscape ahead of the 2027 general elections.
Diaspora Digital Media (DDM) reports that Dr. Kenneth Gbandi, a Hamburg-based opposition stalwart and former leader within the Nigerians in Diaspora Organisation Europe (NIDOE), has openly criticized the Independent National Electoral Commission’s 2027 electoral timetable.
At the center of the controversy is INEC’s directive requiring political parties to submit verified digital membership registers within 34 days, a move the commission says is part of broader efforts to modernize party administration and strengthen internal democracy.
But Gbandi argues the timeline is not reform-driven innovation, but what he describes as “digital disenfranchisement” disguised as modernization.
In a strongly worded statement, he warned that the compressed deadline may function as a structural barrier that disproportionately disadvantages smaller political parties lacking financial and technological capacity.
He described the 34-day window as a “predatory timeline” in a country still grappling with unstable power supply, uneven broadband access, and wide digital literacy gaps.
Nigeria’s 2023 general elections provide important context for the current distrust.
INEC had promised technological safeguards, including the Bimodal Voter Accreditation System (BVAS) and real-time results upload through the IReV portal, to enhance transparency and credibility.
However, delays and inconsistencies in results transmission during the presidential election sparked nationwide debate and litigation, leaving segments of the electorate skeptical about the system’s reliability.
Gbandi referenced this history in his critique, saying millions of Nigerians endured economic hardship during the 2023 vote because they believed technology would safeguard their mandate.
According to him, introducing stricter digital conditions without first conducting a transparent audit of past technological failures risks deepening public suspicion.
He also warned that the new compliance requirements could consolidate incumbency advantage, since dominant political structures often have better access to state-linked resources, technical consultants, and digital infrastructure.
Smaller parties, by contrast, may struggle to harmonize membership data nationwide within such a narrow timeframe.
Beyond domestic party politics, Gbandi tied the issue to the long-running campaign for Diaspora voting rights.
Nigeria receives billions of dollars annually in remittances from citizens abroad, making the Diaspora one of the country’s most significant economic stakeholders.
Yet, Nigerians living outside the country remain excluded from direct participation in national elections.
Gbandi, who has previously described the Diaspora as Nigeria’s “37th State,” argued that if INEC can enforce digital compliance in 34 days, it should demonstrate equal urgency in implementing voting rights for citizens overseas.
He further called for what he termed “symmetrical reform” before imposing additional administrative burdens on political actors.
Specifically, he demanded an independent audit of the 2023 IReV and BVAS performance, broader consultation with political parties and civic groups in designing digital timelines, and clear proof of institutional reliability under new INEC leadership.
Nigeria’s 2027 election cycle is expected to be politically decisive, as parties recalibrate alliances and opposition blocs attempt to consolidate against the ruling establishment.
Analysts say debates over digital governance, electoral transparency, and inclusivity may become defining campaign themes.
For Gbandi and other Diaspora advocates, the question is larger than administrative procedure.
It is whether technological reform will expand democratic participation or quietly narrow the space through compliance thresholds that only the strongest institutions can meet.
As Nigeria approaches another pivotal electoral season, the tension between modernization and access is now firmly at the center of national conversation.
Nigerian content creator King Mitchy has once again set social media ablaze after publicly defending her relationship with Seyi Tinubu, the son of Nigeria’s President Bola Tinubu, following criticism from fellow online personality Peller. The exchange has reignited debates around influencer culture, politics, and personal relationships in Nigeria’s digital space.
The controversy reportedly began after Peller mocked Mitchy during a live session, questioning her friendship with Seyi Tinubu and implying that her association with him was politically motivated. Peller’s comments appeared to suggest that Mitchy was leveraging her connection to the influential Tinubu family for personal gain or public visibility.
In her response, King Mitchy took a firm stance, insisting that her relationship with Seyi Tinubu is genuine and rooted in personal support rather than political maneuvering.
“You want to push me to post chats… someone who calls me when I’m down? The same person that gave me money to celebrate his birthday?” she stated, directly challenging the narrative being pushed against her.
Mitchy’s comments quickly went viral, with fans and social media users dissecting her words and weighing in on the debate. Many praised her for standing up for herself and refusing to let online critics define her personal relationships. Others, however, questioned why public figures often reference financial gestures when defending personal friendships, highlighting the complicated intersection of money, influence, and perception.
Social media reactions to the feud have been intense. Supporters argue that acts of kindness and emotional support between friends should not be politicized. They insist that Mitchy’s revelation demonstrates a level of personal loyalty and authenticity, challenging the assumption that all relationships involving high-profile figures are transactional. Critics, however, maintain that friendships with powerful political families naturally attract scrutiny, especially in Nigeria’s charged political and social climate. In this context, even gestures of generosity can be interpreted through a political lens, making it difficult for influencers to separate personal bonds from public perception.
The debate also highlights a larger issue within Nigeria’s influencer and content creation space. As online personalities gain influence and visibility, their personal lives often become subject to public discussion, commentary, and even judgment. The rise of livestreams, viral videos, and real-time social media reactions means that private friendships can quickly become national talking points.
King Mitchy’s clash with Peller is just the latest example of how influencers’ relationships with politically connected individuals are scrutinized. Over the past few years, social media users have increasingly questioned the motives and ethics of influencers who interact with politicians, wealthy business figures, and other public personalities. While some believe these relationships can be purely personal, others see them as strategic alliances that serve to increase visibility, access, or influence. Mitchy’s case demonstrates the delicate balancing act influencers must navigate when friendships intersect with public life, fame, and politics.
Neither Seyi Tinubu nor Peller has issued a public statement following Mitchy’s remarks, but the drama continues to trend across social media platforms. Fans have been dissecting livestream clips, sharing opinions, and debating the boundaries between friendship, influence, and financial support.
For now, King Mitchy appears unshaken, asserting that her relationship with Seyi Tinubu is built on genuine friendship, care, and support not political ambition or public approval. The incident underscores one reality of Nigeria’s online space: in the age of viral moments and social media scrutiny, even private friendships can become public battlegrounds. As influencers navigate the intersection of fame, personal relationships, and politics, it is clear that loyalty, perception, and authenticity will continue to be topics of heated discussion.
(DDM) – Israeli Defence Minister Israel Katz announced that the Israel Air Force will shift into a sustained 24/7 combat posture over Iranian airspace, maintaining continuous operations against what the military describes as “regime targets” in and around Tehran.
Katz’s statement comes as the IDF and its US counterparts press offensive action against Iranian military infrastructure in the ongoing conflict sparked by last week’s joint US‑Israeli campaign that hit hundreds of targets deep inside Iran.
The multination strikes, dubbed Operation Lion’s Roar, have reportedly involved more than 1,200 munitions on over 1,000 Iranian targets, with the Israeli air force asserting it has achieved aerial superiority in parts of Iranian airspace.
In his address, Katz made clear that the IAF’s role would not be limited to isolated raids but would instead encompass a near‑continuous “stand‑in” presence, effectively bomber and fighter patrols cycling through Iranian skies around the clock.
This posture, senior Israeli military officials say, is designed to ensure sustained pressure on regime military and command infrastructure while disrupting any attempt by Tehran to regroup its air defenses or launch further attacks.
The move follows catastrophic initial strikes that targeted Iranian air defense systems, missile launch sites and strategic facilities, including areas around the capital, in a massive aerial offensive involving hundreds of aircraft.
Israeli military officials have stated that establishing air dominance enables persistent operations and targeted reconnaissance deep within Iran’s borders.
The announcement marks a notable escalation of air operations, as Israel transitions from a series of coordinated strikes into what senior commanders define as prolonged aerial campaign action.
The strategy reflects confidence within the Israeli high command that its aircraft and long‑range munitions can operate with significantly reduced risk from Iranian air defenses, which have been heavily degraded by sustained bombardment.
Israel’s continuous aerial posture also aims to deter any further Iranian retaliation by maintaining a permanent combat air presence, something rarely seen in the country’s modern military history. Officials describe the step as necessary to prevent Tehran from reconstituting its offensive capabilities or coordinating further missile and drone barrages against Israeli territory and allied positions.
International reactions to the evolving conflict have been sharply divided. Some Western allies have expressed measured support for decisive action aimed at crippling Iran’s military reach, even as global diplomatic voices call urgently for restraint and efforts to prevent wider regional war.
Meanwhile, Tehran has condemned the strikes as unlawful aggression and vowed unrelenting retaliation, citing civilian casualties and damage to essential infrastructure.
The continuous air campaign underscores how deeply the conflict has evolved beyond isolated strikes, raising fears that the Middle East could be engulfed in a broader confrontation that involves multiple nations and prolonged combat operations.
As the Israel Air Force maintains its near‑round‑the‑clock offensive posture over Tehran and beyond, analysts warn that both the strategic and humanitarian stakes are escalating with every flight sortie and missile impact, leaving a region already on edge bracing for the next chapter of a rapidly intensifying crisis.
(DDM) – Tehran reeled on Sunday as a series of Israeli airstrikes struck deep within the Iranian capital, triggering multiple explosions and sending shockwaves through a city already reeling from heightened regional conflict.
Residents across central Tehran reported hearing loud blasts in several districts early Sunday, with some strikes centered near government facilities and major thoroughfares. Footage emerging from the city showed towering plumes of smoke rising above the skyline as sirens wailed and emergency responders rushed to affected areas.
According to statements attributed to the Israeli Defence Forces (IDF), the strikes aimed to degrade Iran’s military capabilities and target key installations in the heart of the capital. The IDF described the operation as part of a broader campaign against what it calls the Iranian “terror regime,” asserting that the airstrikes were designed to establish air superiority and weaken Tehran’s capacity to launch future attacks.
The bombardment comes just days after a joint US-Israeli military offensive reportedly killed Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, and top military figures — a development that has significantly escalated military tensions across the Middle East. Following those initial strikes, Iran launched retaliatory missile and drone attacks targeting Israeli territory and US military bases in several Gulf states, including Bahrain, the United Arab Emirates, and Qatar.
The latest strikes on Tehran have unnerved both local residents and international observers. Tehran, home to over 9 million people, houses key government ministries, intelligence offices, and strategic military infrastructure, making it a deeply symbolic and significant target. Emergency services were seen evacuating civilians from impacted neighborhoods and treating the wounded, though precise casualty figures have not been released.
Iranian authorities condemned the strikes as blatant acts of aggression and violations of international law, vowing to respond with force. Officials described the bombardment of central Tehran as an escalation that could further destabilize an already volatile region. The Iranian government also called for international condemnation and urged global powers to intervene diplomatically to prevent the conflict from spiraling into a wider war.
The attacks add to a growing list of strikes that have rocked Iranian cities in recent days. Coordinated attacks were reported in more than 20 Iranian cities during earlier phases of the conflict, according to the Iranian Red Crescent. Civilians across Iran have faced road closures, disrupted services, and widespread fear as explosions and emergency sirens have become a regular occurrence.
International reactions have been mixed. Some US and Israeli allies have expressed cautious support for actions aimed at curbing Iran’s military reach, while others — including Russia and China — have condemned the attacks and called for restraint. The United Nations and various human rights groups have urged both sides to seek de-escalation and prevent further civilian casualties.
The unfolding situation in Tehran underscores how the conflict has moved beyond isolated military engagements, drawing in regional powers and intensifying fears of a broader Middle Eastern war. As airstrikes continue and Tehran braces for further attacks, diplomatic channels remain strained and global concern grows over the potential for widespread instability.
(DDM) – Residents in central Israel were shaken on Sunday as a rocket impact was reported in Beit Shemesh, a city approximately 30 kilometers from Jerusalem, escalating fears of renewed conflict amid regional instability.
Local authorities confirmed that the projectile landed in a residential area, though preliminary reports indicate no casualties have been recorded so far. Emergency services quickly responded to the site to assess damage and secure the surrounding area.
The rocket strike comes amid heightened tensions following US-Israeli military operations against Iranian targets and Iran’s retaliatory missile and drone attacks across the Middle East, including strikes on Gulf states and other regional infrastructure. Analysts warn that this latest attack demonstrates how the conflict is increasingly spilling into Israeli territory.
Beit Shemesh, located in Israel’s Jerusalem District, is a city of over 120,000 residents and serves as a critical suburban hub linking the capital to southern regions. The proximity of the strike to Jerusalem, Israel’s political and spiritual center, has raised alarm among both government officials and civilians.
Israeli defense forces reported that early warning systems detected the incoming projectile, and some residents followed standard civil defense protocols by taking shelter in reinforced areas. Authorities continue to monitor airspace and have urged citizens to remain vigilant and report any suspicious activity.
Historically, rocket attacks in this area have been rare, though previous conflicts in Gaza and northern Israel have occasionally led to indirect fire reaching central regions. Security experts note that the increasing range and precision of missiles and drones in the current conflict could threaten cities previously considered relatively insulated.
The Israeli government has pledged a firm response to protect civilian areas.
Military spokespersons emphasized that any attacks on urban centers will be met with calculated retaliatory measures to ensure national security.
Meanwhile, residents of Beit Shemesh and surrounding communities are navigating a climate of anxiety and uncertainty.
Schools, workplaces, and public facilities have been advised to maintain heightened security measures until the situation stabilizes.
The strike also comes at a time when global attention is focused on Iran’s expanding retaliatory campaign, which has targeted US military bases, airports, and critical infrastructure across the Gulf region.
The attack on Israeli soil underscores the potential for regional escalation, with the risk of broader confrontations involving multiple states.
International observers have called for restraint and de-escalation, warning that continued attacks on civilian areas could trigger wider military confrontations, disrupt energy supplies, and further destabilize the Middle East.
Israeli authorities continue to investigate the origin of the rocket, the number of projectiles involved, and the potential groups responsible. Security analysts stress that the coming days will be critical in determining whether these attacks are isolated incidents or part of a sustained campaign against Israeli population centers.
With tensions rising across the region, residents and governments alike are bracing for the potential of further cross-border attacks, emphasizing the urgent need for both defensive preparedness and diplomatic engagement to prevent an escalation into broader conflict.
The Israeli army on Sunday said it had launched a broad wave of strikes “in the heart of Tehran”.
Shortly afterward, a massive explosion rocked the Iranian capital, sending a huge plume of smoke into the sky.
Though, it was not immediately clear what the target was, but it appeared centered in a neighborhood home to the country’s police headquarters and Iranian state television.
In a significant political clarification ahead of the 2027 Nigerian presidential election, the South-South zonal leadership of the African Democratic Congress (ADC) has emphatically denied reports that it endorsed former Rivers State Governor Rotimi Amaechi as the party’s consensus candidate. The rebuttal comes amid widespread circulation of media narratives suggesting that key ADC figures from the South-South geopolitical zone had thrown their weight behind Amaechi’s presidential ambitions.
Leadership Clarifies Intent of Zonal Meeting
The controversy stems from a February 27 gathering at the residence of former national ruling party chairman Chief John Odigie-Oyegun in Benin City, Edo State, where Amaechi formally notified regional leaders of his intention to seek the ADC’s presidential ticket. However, according to Mabel Oboh, the South-South Zonal Publicity Secretary, the purpose of the meeting was mischaracterised by some media outlets.
In a statement issued on February 28, Oboh described reports of an endorsement as “misleading, undemocratic, and a troubling example of how selective narratives can distort political reality.” She stressed that the meeting was organised to strengthen internal party cohesion, deepen grassroots mobilisation, and strategically position the party for future electoral contests, not to make any formal political endorsements on behalf of the zone.
“Consultation is not endorsement, and courtesy is not coronation,” Oboh said, emphasising that no motion was moved, no resolution adopted, no vote taken, and no consensus reached in support of Amaechi or any other presidential aspirant during the session.
Democratic Principles Underlined
Oboh further highlighted the importance of upholding internal party democracy and constitutional processes. She pointed out that the authority to nominate and elect candidates lies with the party’s recognised organs and its members, not a small group of leaders at a zonal consultation meeting.
According to her, turning a courtesy briefing into a headline endorsement undermines both the ADC’s internal democratic framework and broader democratic norms in Nigerian politics. “Misinformation in political reporting does not merely mislead the public; it risks undermining democratic processes, fueling unnecessary tension within parties, and eroding confidence in institutional procedures,” she warned.
Pat Utomi Denies Endorsement Claim
Adding weight to the South-South leaders’ position, Professor Pat Utomi, a senior ADC chieftain and respected academic, addressed the dispute publicly. In a post shared on social media platform X, Utomi made it clear that no endorsement occurred at the meeting, affirming that Amaechi’s announcement of interest was merely received according to party tradition and protocol. “No word of discussion took place on the matter. Representation of endorsement is inaccurate and disingenuous,” he stated.
Utomi’s clarification reinforces the view of Oboh and other party officials that the alleged endorsement narrative was a misinterpretation — or misreporting — of events at the Benin City gathering.
Broader Implications for Nigerian Politics
The incident has drawn attention to the challenges facing political communications and media reporting in Nigeria’s evolving democratic environment. With the 2027 elections approaching, political actors remain sensitive to how narratives are shaped and disseminated, particularly when national aspirations and internal party dynamics are involved.
For the ADC’s South-South leadership, the swift denial serves two purposes: dispelling inaccurate reports that could suggest internal bias or division — and reinforcing a commitment to democratic values and due process within party structures.
As the presidential race intensifies, political parties and their supporters are likely to face increased scrutiny over statements and appearances. This episode highlights the growing need for responsible reporting and careful communication from all stakeholders in Nigeria’s political landscape.
The United States Congress is preparing to confront President Donald Trump’s authority to launch military action against Iran, as lawmakers from both parties question the legality of strikes ordered without prior congressional approval.
Diaspora Digital Media gathered that the debate comes after the United States carried out a major military assault on Iranian targets, a decision that alarmed senior Democrats and a small group of Republicans who argue the president bypassed constitutional limits on war powers.
Lawmakers had already scheduled votes this week in both the House of Representatives and the Senate to determine whether future military action against Iran must receive explicit congressional authorization.
Trump’s decision to proceed with strikes days before those debates has intensified political tensions on Capitol Hill.
Democratic Representative Ro Khanna of California criticized the move, saying the president initiated military action without consultation at a time when lawmakers were dispersed across the country and Congress was not in session.
“This represents a clear disregard for Congress,” Khanna said, arguing that the Constitution grants lawmakers not the president the authority to decide when the nation enters war.
Rare Bipartisan Opposition Emerges
Opposition has not been limited to Democrats. Republican Representative Thomas Massie of Kentucky, long known for opposing foreign military interventions, joined calls to immediately reconvene Congress for a formal vote on the conflict.
“I am opposed to this war,” Massie said, rejecting claims that the operation aligns with an “America First” foreign policy.
Senator Rand Paul also voiced strong concerns, emphasizing that the constitutional power to declare war rests with Congress in order to prevent unnecessary conflicts.
He said his obligation to uphold the Constitution required him to oppose unilateral presidential military action.
Another Republican lawmaker, Representative Warren Davidson of Ohio, signaled support for legislation requiring the president to seek congressional approval before expanding military operations in Iran.
Davidson stated plainly that war demands authorization from lawmakers.
Test of Republican Unity
The upcoming votes are expected to test unity within the Republican Party, particularly among conservative lawmakers who previously supported Trump’s pledge to avoid prolonged foreign wars.
While party leadership has largely rallied behind the president, dissent within GOP ranks has begun to surface.
Republican leaders including House Speaker Mike Johnson and Senate Majority Leader John Thune quickly praised the strikes, framing them as necessary for national security.
However, several lawmakers have called for greater transparency and detailed briefings from the White House regarding the scope and objectives of the operation.
Senator Thom Tillis of North Carolina said Congress must soon receive a comprehensive explanation of the military campaign, known as Operation Epic Fury, in order to determine whether further authorization is required.
Even if Congress passes a resolution limiting the president’s war authority, the measure would likely face a presidential veto.
Overriding such a veto would require a two-thirds majority in both chambers a difficult threshold to reach.
Still, lawmakers say passage alone would represent a significant political rebuke to the administration, drawing comparisons to the historic 2002 congressional vote authorizing the Iraq War.
Behind the scenes, frustrations have been building for months among lawmakers who say the administration has provided limited information about overseas operations.
Although senior congressional leaders received classified briefings prior to the strikes, several sources said lawmakers were not given a full legal justification for the action.
Democrats are coordinating their response ahead of an internal party meeting, though divisions remain among some pro-Israel members who are hesitant to restrict military action against Iran.
Meanwhile, even Republicans supportive of Trump’s tougher stance toward Tehran have urged closer consultation with Congress moving forward.
Representative Don Bacon of Nebraska said lawmakers should engage in deeper dialogue with the administration, arguing that while Iran’s leadership poses a long-term threat, Congress must remain involved in decisions that could expand into a broader conflict.
As Washington prepares for contentious votes in the coming days, the dispute underscores a recurring constitutional struggle between Congress and the presidency one now unfolding amid a rapidly escalating crisis in the Middle East.
Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, has died at the age of 86 following a large-scale military operation carried out jointly by the United States and Israel, Iranian state media confirmed early Sunday, March 1, 2026.
His death marks a historic turning point for the Islamic Republic, which he led for more than three decades as its most powerful political and religious authority.
Khamenei, who served as Iran’s supreme leader from 1989 until his death, shaped the country’s domestic and foreign policies through an uncompromising vision of Islamic governance.
Throughout his rule, he maintained firm control over state institutions while steering Iran into repeated confrontations with Western powers and Israel.
From Religious Student to Revolutionary Figure
Born in July 1939 in the northeastern city of Mashhad, Khamenei grew up in a deeply religious family belonging to Iran’s Azeri minority.
He pursued advanced Islamic studies in the holy city of Qom, where he became a devoted student of Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, the cleric who would later lead Iran’s 1979 Islamic Revolution.
Inspired by Khomeini’s teachings, Khamenei joined opposition movements against Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi’s monarchy.
His political activism led to multiple arrests before the revolution ultimately overthrew the shah and established the Islamic Republic.
Following the revolution, Khamenei quickly rose within the new political order. He was appointed to key religious and security positions and became a prominent figure within Iran’s revolutionary leadership.
Political Rise and Controversial Leadership
In 1981, Khamenei survived an assassination attempt when a bomb exploded during a speech in a Tehran mosque, leaving his right arm permanently disabled. Later that year, he was elected president of Iran at age 41 and served two terms during the Iran-Iraq war.
After Khomeini’s death in 1989, Iran’s Assembly of Experts selected Khamenei as supreme leader in a controversial succession process. Though not considered among the highest-ranking clerics at the time, constitutional changes strengthened the authority of the position, enabling him to consolidate power.
As supreme leader, Khamenei became commander-in-chief of the armed forces and held ultimate authority over Iran’s judiciary, security institutions, and electoral system. Over time, he centralized decision-making and reinforced the doctrine of velayat-e faqih, or rule by Islamic jurists, cementing clerical dominance over the state.
Domestic Unrest and Crackdowns
Khamenei’s tenure was repeatedly challenged by waves of domestic protests. Demonstrations erupted in 1999, during the disputed 2009 presidential election, and again amid economic crises in 2017 and 2019.
One of the most significant challenges came in 2022 following the death of Mahsa Amini, a young woman detained by Iran’s morality police. Nationwide protests under the slogan “Woman, Life, Freedom” shook the regime, prompting a harsh crackdown by security forces that human rights groups said left hundreds dead.
Despite growing dissent, Khamenei maintained authority through close ties with Iran’s Revolutionary Guards and security apparatus.
Architect of Regional Strategy
On the international stage, Khamenei played a central role in shaping Iran’s nuclear policy and regional alliances. While Tehran denied seeking nuclear weapons, disputes over its nuclear programme led to sweeping sanctions that severely strained Iran’s economy.
He approved the landmark 2015 nuclear agreement between Iran and world powers, though tensions reignited after the United States withdrew from the deal in 2018 and reimposed sanctions.
Under Khamenei’s leadership, Iran expanded influence across the Middle East through allied groups in Lebanon, Iraq, Syria, and Yemen — a network often described as the “axis of resistance.” However, years of conflict gradually weakened these alliances following Israeli military operations against regional militant leaders.
Escalation and Final Conflict
Regional tensions intensified after renewed clashes between Israel and Iran escalated into direct confrontation. Israeli leaders openly stated that eliminating Khamenei could end hostilities, while U.S. President Donald Trump repeatedly warned Tehran over its nuclear ambitions.
On February 28, the United States and Israel launched what they described as preventive air strikes targeting Iranian military and strategic sites, including facilities in Tehran linked to the supreme leader.
Khamenei’s death during the operation brings uncertainty over Iran’s political future, succession leadership, and nuclear programme.
Analysts warn the development could reshape the balance of power across the Middle East while raising the risk of prolonged instability.
After decades at the helm of the Islamic Republic, Khamenei leaves behind a nation deeply divided at home and increasingly isolated abroad facing an uncertain path in the aftermath of its longest-serving leader’s rule.
