Connect with us

Igbo Corner

Peter Obi’s Final Written Address to Tribunal: Law demands Shettima must be disqualified for double nomination

Published

on

The candidate of the Labour Party (LP) in the presidential election held on the 25th day of February, 2023, Mr. Peter Gregory Obi, has sked the Presidential Election Petition Court (PEPC) to disqualify the All Progressives Congress (APC) presidential and vice presidential candidates, Alhaji Bola Ahmed Tinubu and Senator Kashim Ibrahim Shettima, respectively for double nomination of the latter, insisting that is what the law demands.

Peter Obi made the demand in his Final Written Address at the Tribunal holden at the Court of Appeal sitting in Abuja.

Obi insisted that Shettima was at the time of the presidential election not qualified to contest the election as the vice presidential candidate of APC as the double nomination invalidated his qualification to contest the said election.

Demanding a disqualification of the Tinubu/Shettima duo, Peter Obi stated as follows:

We submit that the 3rd Respondent was at the time of the Presidential Election held on February, 2023 not qualified to contest the election as the Vice-Presidential Candidate of the 2nd Respondent and same invalidated the qualification of the 2nd Respondent to contest the said election.

The Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 (as amended) makes it mandatory that every President Candidate must nominate a valid Vice-Presidential Candidate. Section 142, provides as follows:

(1) In any election to which the foregoing provisions of this part of this chapter relate, a candidate for an election to the office of President shall not be deemed to be validly nominated unless he nominates another candidate as his associate from the same political party for his running for the office of President, who is to occupy the office of Vice-President and that candidate shall be deemed to have been duly elected to the office of vice-president of the candidate for an election to the office of President who nominated him as such associate is duly elected as President in accordance with the provisi0ns aforesaid.

(2) The provisions of this part of this chapter relating to qualification for election, tenure of office, disqualification, declaration of assets and liabilities and oaths of President shall apply in relation to the office of Vice-President as if references to President were references to Vice-President.

The unchallenged facts before this Honourable Court are that the 2nd Respondent in purported compliance with this Constitutional requirement nominated the 3rd Respondent as his Vice-Presidential Candidate. He made the nomination on July 14, 2022, while the 3rd Respondent was the Senatorial Candidate of the 4th Respondent for Borno Senatorial District. The was clearly in contravention of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 (as amended) and the extant provisions of the Electoral Act 2022, its Manuals, Guidelines and Regulations.

We submit that the Respondents cannot take refuge under the Supreme Court decision in PDP V INEC & Ors (2023) LPELR-60457 (SC). The decision of the apex court is well decided for the facts and evidence before it. We submit that the case turned on whether another political party who is not an aspirant can challenge the nomination of a party in a pre-election matter. We submit that the comments of the court on the date of withdrawal of the 3rd Respondent is not a ratio of the case. We submit that the date of July 6, 2022, on the letter of withdrawal cannot be the effective date.

It is not in dispute that the 3rd Respondent signed INEC Senatorial Election Notice of Withdrawal of Candidate Form EC11C on July 15, 2022. Until July 15, 2022, the 3rd Respondent remained in the records of INEC as the Senatorial Candidate of the 4th Respondent for Borno Central Senatorial District. He could not validly accept nomination for the position of Vice-Presidential Candidate of the 2nd Respondent before July 15, 2022. The fact before the Court is that it was on July 14, 2022, that the 3rd Respondent signed Form EC11A (Notice of Withdrawal of Candidate pursuant to Section 33 of the Electoral Act 2022) with officials of the 4th Respondent.

We submit that as at July 14, 2022, when he accepted nomination for the position of Vice­ President of the 2nd Respondent, he was still in the records of the 1st Respondents the Senatorial Candidate of the 4th Respondent for Borno Senatorial District. We submit further that these facts distinguish the decision in PDP V INEC & Ors (2023) LPELR- 60457 (SC). These facts were not canvassed before the Supreme Court, and they make the said decision not a precedent for this Petition.

The issue of double-nomination as raised by the Petitioner is an issue of qualification that can be ventilated under section 134(1) (a) of the Electoral Act 2022 (formerly section 138(1)(a) of the Electoral Act 2010, as amended), see the recent cases of APC V. CHIMA (2019) LPELR-48878 (CA) AND ACHILONU V. CHIMA (2019) LPELR-48837 (CA) at 6-10 where the Court of Appeal clarified thus:

“It is to be noted that section 38 of the Electoral Act, 2006, is now section 37 of the Electoral Act of 2010 (as amended). It would however appear that the current judicial disposition having regard to cases decided by the Supreme Court, is to the effect that a case of double nomination is stricto sensus not one of “party nomination” under section 87(9) of the Electoral Act and can comfortably be brought under the provisions of section 138(1) of the Electoral Act 2010, if properly articulated and a successful challenge in that regard being sufficient to void the votes cast in an election, if proved“. (Underlining ours, for emphasis)

The Supreme Court put the issue beyond argument when it held in PDP V DEGI­ EREMIENYO (2020) LPELR-49734 SC, as follows:

‘The sum total is that the joint ticket of the 1st and 2nd respondents sponsored by the 1st respondent was vitiated by the disqualification of the 1st respondent. Both candidates disqualified are deemed not to be candidates at the governorship election conducted in Bayelsa State. It is hereby ordered that INEC, (the 4th respondent herein) declare as winner of the governorship election in Bayelsa State, the candidate with the highest number of lawful votes cast with the requisite constitutional (or geographical) spread. The 4th respondent (INEC) is hereby further ordered to f01ihwith withdraw the ce1iificate of return issued to the I st and 2nd respondents and issue ce1iificate of return to the candidate who had the highest number of lawful votes cast in the governorship election and who also had the requisite constitutional (or geographical) spread.” 

Section 35 of the Electoral Act 2022 provides that where a candidate knowingly allows himself to be nominated by more than One political party or in more than one constituency, his nomination shall be void. The Court of Appeal in Ekpeudom v APC & Anor (2022) LPELR-56956 (CA), per Tsamani JCA, put it succinctly that:

“This provision of the Electoral Act, 2022 clearly stipulates the invalidity of multiple nominations and by the use of the word “shall” in the statute, it amounts to a command, a must, compulsion or an obligation or mandatory. See Aladejobi V NBA (2013) LPELR – 20940 (SC), Bamaiyi V Attorney General Federation & Ors. (2001) 12 NWLR (Pt. 727) 466 at 497. Thus, the intention of the drafters of this beautiful piece of legislation is to ensure credibility and integrity of the Electoral Process.”

We submit that the candidacy of the 2nd Respondent is invalidated by the vitiated, purported and failed nomination of the 3rd Respondent.

We further submit that, when the 2nd Respondent stood election as the Presidential Candidate of the 4th Respondent, despite his own disqualification by vi1iue of Section 137 (1) (d) of the 1999 Constitution as shown above. Both the 2nd and 3rd Respondents were affected by the virus of constitutional and statutory disqualification affecting each and both of them.

We urge your lordship to resolve this issue in favour of the Petitioners and invalidate the election of the 2nd and 3rd Respondents.

 Read more.

READ ALSO:  Naira exchange rate for Friday, February 3, 2023

— 

©Copyright 2023 News Band

(If you would like to receive CURRENT NEWS updates from News Band on WhatsApp, or Telegram, or wish to send eyewitness accounts/ reports/ articles, write to elstimmy@gmail.com and we will respond instantly. Follow us on twitter @News Band; like our Facebook page: News Band.)

Continue Reading

Analysis

Nigeria is radicalizing the Igbo, one injustice at a time ~ by Abolaji Rasaq

Published

on

There’s something about persecution that does two things to a people: it either breaks them, or it makes them beasts of survival.

For centuries the Jews… they were hunted, hated, and humiliated by empires. But they didn’t vanish.

They evolved. They adapted. And today, the Jews are arguably the most powerful tribe in the world economically, intellectually, and politically. Ruthless when necessary.

They are unapologetic about their survival. Now, look at the Igbo. A tribe known for industry, resilience, and brilliance.

A people who just want to live, do business, and thrive. But Nigeria doesn’t want that. Nigeria wants control.

Nigeria wants submission. And the one thing the Igbo have never known how to do is bow. And that’s the real issue.

So what does Nigeria do? It sidelines them. Isolates them. Provokes them. Bombs their villages under the guise of security.

Locks up their agitators. Shuts down their businesses. Mocks their pain. Ignores their history. Prevent them from voting. Play politics with their education. Sponsored bigotry on them.

And then Nigeria pretends to be surprised that there’s growing radicalization in the East?

Let me be clear: The Igbo didn’t start this fire. Nigeria did.

And history, the very same history we keep refusing to learn from, has shown us that when you keep pushing a tribe that knows how to survive, they evolve into something stronger, something unstoppable.

It’s happened before. With the Jews. Europe tried to exterminate them. Instead, they became the backbone of global finance, media, tech, and diplomacy.

You don’t touch a Jew today without consequences. You don’t push them to the wall and expect them to stay quiet.

READ ALSO:  Trump pledges to impose more tariffs

Now Nigeria is doing the same to the Igbo, pushing, prodding, provoking.

But here’s the warning: when you push an animal to the wall, it doesn’t stay calm. It fights back. It bites. And this time, when it bites, don’t act shocked.

But this isn’t just about the Igbo solely. Nigeria has perfected the art of creating monsters, then acting surprised when they bite.

The Niger Delta? Radicalized. The region was exploited for oil, polluted beyond repair, and ignored until their youths picked up arms.

The Fulani terrorists? Radicalized. Left behind by the same government that claimed to represent them, now manipulated by religion and resentment.

The Almajiri? Radicalized. Abandoned by an elite that used their poverty as a vote bank and then left them to rot.

The Agbero? Radicalized. Uneducated, weaponized, and unleashed as tools of political chaos.

Even the middle class is slowly being radicalized, not with guns, but with hopelessness. That, too, is a ticking time bomb.

A nation cannot continue to marginalize its most brilliant tribe and expect peace.

The Igbo are not docile. They are not quiet. They are not forgetful. They are survivors, and survivors don’t beg for space forever. At some point, they take it.

The Igbo didn’t set out to be radicals. They were made into one by a country that won’t stop seeing their confidence as a threat.

You can’t keep pretending unity means silence. You can’t keep preaching peace while planting injustice.

The Igbo are not asking for too much, they just want to live, build, and grow.

READ ALSO:  Cristiano Ronaldo and His Partner Georgina Announce Engagement

But if you insist on turning their dignity into defiance, their enterprise into enmity, and their survival into sedition, then you are creating a monster.

And if history has taught us anything, it’s this: when a persecuted people decide that survival is no longer enough, when they decide to stop running and start resisting, they don’t just fight back. They win.

Nigeria must understand this: you cannot keep pushing people into a corner and expect submission.

When you back a lion into a wall, don’t expect it to purr. It will roar. It will claw. It will tear through anything standing between it and freedom.

So here’s the final warning, for those who still care to listen: Nigeria is radicalizing the Igbo.

But worse, Nigeria is radicalizing everyone. And it won’t end well.

When the fire spreads, when the rebellion multiplies, when the beast we created begins to fight back, don’t act shocked; no tribe will be left untouched.

Don’t pretend it wasn’t preventable. We all made it happen. You don’t corner a lion and expect peace.

Abolaji Rasaq is a public affairs analyst.

Continue Reading

Igbo Corner

Crisis hits Nnewi over Uruagu PG election, as BoT members protest, resign

Published

on

Palpable crisis is brewing in Nnewi over the election of the President General of Uruagu Community in the industrial town of Anambra State, with a business mogul and owner of Organiser Plc., Chief Innocent Okoli, accused of upsetting the apple cart.

The crisis has led to protests and resignation of members of the Board of Trustees (BoT).

One of the resignation letters sighted by News Band was from a legal practitioner, J. N. Obi, Esq.

Barrister Obi, until his resignation served as the Secretary of the Executive Committee and member, Uruagu Board of Trustees.

Tendering his resignation letter, Obi cited brazen violation of the Constitution of Uruagu Nnewi Community Development Union.

The letter was referenced OB/03 /296/2025, dated May 8, 2025, and addressed to His Highness. Obi A. C. Obi (Ogidi IV).

In the letter entitled “Letter of resignation as member, Board of Trustees (B.O. T) Uruagu Nnewi. Obi announced his resignation based on the following reasons:

  1. Article 8. 9 (a) of the Constitution of Uruagu Nnewi Community Development Union. 2022 (As Amended) states and I quote:
    “The Board shall “Ensure the observance of this Constitution”. 
  2. Article 14.4 of the Constitution of Uruagu Nnewi Community Development Union 2022 (As Amended) states and I quote:
    “Each ward shall submit a list of the Electors In writing to the Secretary General of the Union, one month before any election.
    “The submission of the list of the Electors shall be done by the Ward Chairman In consultation with the Ward’s Obi.”
  3. “The election sought to be conducted on Saturday, 10th day of May 2025, did not comply with the above provisious as it was on the Union’s general meeting of the I3th day of April 2025 that the expiration of the tenure of the Executives was announced.”

The legal pratictioner, however, noted that the election to be held on May 10 will not be up to one month.

READ ALSO:  BREAKING: Court grants Emefiele bail

He, therefore, resigned his membership of B. 0. T for failure to abide by the above provisions of the Constitution as stated above.

On his part, the former President General of Uruagu Nnewi, Chief Ambassador Charles Nwonye, decried series of illegalities in the proposed election championed by Chief Okoli.

He recalled the efforts of past and present stakeholders to ensure that Uruagu Nnewi Community Development Union is recognised as a legal and responsible entity in the state.

He, however, speaking in a voice note obtained by Diaspora Digital Media (DDM), regretted:

“It’s very, very unfortunate that those counsels that instituted Uruagu Development Union are no longer alive.

“They were the ones who were known for speaking out the truth. But at the same time, we will not all keep quiet.

“I, hereby, wish to bring the following to the attention of all Uruagu indigenes, scattered all over Nigeria and in the diaspora that four years ago, a similar thing happened.

“Uruagu Nnewi Constitution was also flagrantly violated four years ago.

“At the end, a lot of stakeholders asked the former Executive Committee to resign and leave en masse.

“The Constitution, however, allowed them to recontest.

“The Executive Committee then honourably resigned and no one of us recontested, ushering in a new Executive Committee.

“They argued that following the election, the Constitution will be amended to correct all the flaws and ensure no such flagrant abused repeats itself.

“They went for the election and what happened there was the same illegality we’re talking about.

“Some of our youths went and connived with mischief makers, disrupted the election and declared the present Executive Committee members winners.

READ ALSO:  Inflation rate reported by NBS Nigeria is fake — IPC Justice

“The youths stood by them in their misguided thoughts that the Executive Committee members enjoy special gains in the office.

“They disrupted the election and ensured that the present crop of Executive Committee members was ushered in.

“The election was heavily flawed and rigged in favour of Eloka Ike and Innocent Okoli, but we let go and left peacefully.

“The new Executive Committee promised to preside for only four years and leave, but we are currently seeing the same illegalities.

“I dare ask: Should Uruagu be known only for illegalities? I thought Ndi Uruagu are smart people?

“I have observed that there are certain individuals who are hell-bent on ensuring that the Uruagu leadership fails.

“They seem bent on destroying all our efforts, acting as agents of chaos and destruction.

“How can one man gather a bunch of Umuezeagu indigenes and take them to the court, claiming that they sued the union to court?

“They deceived the High Court and got a frivolous injunction against Uruagu people, all in the name of election!

“When I got this information, I knew that something was wrong.

“How can someone, after serving a tenure fraught with irregularities, fight his way to a second tenure against the people’s wish?

“I want to make it clear to all the delegates in the so-called election that it will not be possible to make an illegality legal.

“Anyone who casts a vote in that sham election is an agent provocateur, as well as a villain.

“Let it be on record that I denounced the so-called election founded on illegality and fraud and all participants, be it a delegate or participant in any manner is an enemy of the people.”

READ ALSO:  Naira exchange rate for Friday, February 3, 2023

Chief Okoli and other responsible people of Nnewi leadership could not be reached for comment at the moment of this publication.

More details will follow…

Continue Reading

Celebrity/Entertainment

Late Mbaise monarch—Eze Nwabueze Ugorji to be buried May 22, 2025

Published

on

The remains of HRH Eze Stephen Nwabueze Ugorji, Orji Ukwu 1 of Lorji Nwekeukwu Autonomous Community in Aboh Mbaise Local Government Area, will be laid to rest on Thursday, May 22, 2025.

The late Eze Ugorji will be buried in his palace at Orji Ukwu Estate, Lorji, following a Catholic funeral Mass at St. Andrews Catholic Church, Lorji.

News Band was informed that His Excellency the Catholic Bishop of Ahiara Diocese, Bishop Okezuo Nwobi, has been invited to officiate at the ceremony.

Bishop Nwobi, it was learnt, has also accepted the family’s invitation to officiate at the funeral rites of the late grand traditional ruler.

This information was provided to members of the press in Owerri by the Opara Eze (First Son of the Eze), former Commissioner for Homeland Security and Vigilante Affairs, Dr. Ugorji Okechukwu Ugorji.

His Lordship Bishop Okezuo Nwobi, the Catholic Bishop of Ahiara Diocese (Mbaise) and Eze Nwabueze Ugorji's First Son, Dr. Ugorji Okechukwu Ugorji

His Lordship Bishop Okezuo Nwobi, the Catholic Bishop of Ahiara Diocese (Mbaise) and Eze Nwabueze Ugorji’s First Son, Dr. Ugorji Okechukwu Ugorji

“The family is grateful to His Lordship for granting us a rare request to officiate at a funeral on a Thursday,” Dr. Ugorji said.

“Our father will feel honored and appreciated because he was not just a devoted Catholic, he shouldered the building of the St. Andrews Catholic Church at Lorji until his death,” the former commissioner added.

Continue Reading

Igbo Corner

EXCLUSIVE: Ngozi Orabueze dissolves Biafra Govt In Exile as Simon Ekpa may spend longer time in prison

Published

on

Mr. Simon Ekpa and Dr. Ngozi Orabueze

Dr. Ngozi Orabueze has abruptly dissolved the Biafra Government In Exile following secret information that his former boss, Simon Ekpa may not be coming out from Finnish detention in a hurry.

News Band reported that Mrs. Orabueze, a former Chief of Staff to Mr Simon Ekpa, the self-acclaimed Prime Minister of Biafra Government In Exile, toppled his principal after he was thrown into prison for promoting violent agitation and terrorism in the Southeast of Nigeria.

Ekpa’s trial is scheduled to start in May 2025.

Ngozi, a former chairperson of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) in Atlanta, United States in a statement on Wednesday, announced the dissolution of Biafra Government In Exile.

She said all assets of the Biafra Republic Government In Exile and it’s affiliates shall be transferred to the secretary of the State of the United States of Biafra.

Orabueze also directed all officers of the former exile government to report to their counterpart with the United States of Biafra for reassignment.

The statement reads, “It is resolved that the Biafra Republic Government In Exile (BRGIE) is hereby dissolved as it’s reason for the existence has been superceded by the November 29, 2024 Declaration of the restoration of the Independent United States of Biafra

“All assets of the Biafra Republic Government In Exile and it’s affiliates(BRGIE corporation ID: D237527271) shall be transferred to the secretary of the State of the United States of Biafra.

“All officers of the former exile government shall report to their counterpart with the United States of Biafra for reassignment. All activities of the Biafra Republic Government In Exile shall cease as of February 15, 2025”.

READ ALSO:  Our reforms will ease pension hardships, Buhari assures

Meanwhile, an insider source in the movement reliably told News Band that Ngozi decided to dissolve BRGIE after receiving intel that Simon Ekpa might spend longer time in prison.

The source also revealed that the Nigerian government is doing everything within it’s power to nail Simon Ekpa for all his atrocious acts in the SouthEast region.

So, the only way to keep the agitation going in the absence of Ekpa is to dissolve BRGIE.

“Yes, Ngozi Orabueze dissolved the Biafra Republic Government In Exile so as to be fully in charge of the assets belonging to the movement. With the way the Nigerian government is going about the case of Simon Ekpa, he may spend longer time in prison”, the source said.

Moreover, before now, Orabueze has been at war with some arrowheads of the separatist movement who refused to acknowledge her authority.

This however, has led to series of fights, accusation and counter accusations among the agitators.

Continue Reading

Igbo Corner

A tribute to Mrs. Roseline Udu Eze

Published

on

We celebrate the life of Mrs. Roseline Udu Eze, a devoted wife, mother, grandmother, and pillar of strength.

Her unwavering love, kindness, and selflessness left an indelible mark on all who knew her.

Though we mourn her passing, we take solace in the legacy she leaves behind and the cherished memories we hold. Rest peacefully in the arms of the Lord, dear Roseline.

You will forever be missed.

May her soul rest in perfect peace.

Amen.

 

Continue Reading

Latest from DDM TV

Latest Updates

‘Gate of Hell’ Will Open on Gaza’– Israeli Defence Issues Finally Warning to Hamas

NAFDAC Raises Alarm as Fake Cowbell Milk Floods Nigerian Markets

‘Misplaced Priority’: Peter Obi Blasts FG’s ₦142bn Bus Terminal Project

Why I’ll never encourage my son to visit Nigeria — Taribo West

Hardship: Man commits suicide in Imo

Canada Announces Permanent Residence Lottery Results for Foreign Workers

First son blocks mother’s burial in imo over alleged settlement dispute

Nigeria is on the rise again, return home — Tinubu tells Nigerians in diaspora

Japan Designates City as Hometown for Nigerians

Elon Musk’s SpaceX Launches Secretive US Military Spacecraft

Subscribe to DDM Newsletter for Latest News

Trending

Copyright © 2023 -2024 Diaspora Digital Media (DDM) www.diasporadigitalmedia.com. All Rights Reserved . NOTE: All opinion articles published on Diaspora Digital Media are ENTIRELY those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the publishers.

Get Notifications from DDM News Yes please No thanks