(DDM) – The National Judicial Council has announced that 34 nominees, including a senior police officer, failed its newly introduced judges’ integrity assessment, raising fresh concerns about ethical standards within Nigeria’s justice system.
DDM gathered that the affected candidates were screened out after adverse public feedback and detailed background checks linked to allegations of misconduct, bribery, and questionable professional conduct.
The NJC disclosed that among those who failed the screening was a Chief Superintendent of Police who had been nominated for a judicial position but was reportedly linked to unresolved bribery allegations.
The council explained that the integrity test was designed to strengthen public confidence in the judiciary by ensuring that only individuals with proven character and clean records are appointed as judges.
According to the NJC, the process involved extensive security checks, financial scrutiny, and input from members of the public who were invited to submit petitions or observations against shortlisted nominees.
Officials said the feedback mechanism played a critical role in exposing issues that were not immediately apparent during routine credential reviews.
The NJC noted that integrity, honesty, and independence remain core requirements for judicial officers, stressing that technical competence alone is no longer sufficient.
It added that the inclusion of a serving police officer among the failed nominees underscores the seriousness of the exercise and the council’s willingness to apply the same standards across institutions.
The council did not disclose the full identities of all 34 nominees but confirmed that the decisions were unanimous and based on verified information.
It also clarified that the failure of the integrity test does not amount to a criminal conviction but reflects concerns significant enough to bar the individuals from judicial appointment at this time.
Nigeria’s judiciary has faced persistent criticism over allegations of corruption, political interference, and compromised rulings over the past two decades.
Several judges have previously been suspended, dismissed, or prosecuted over bribery allegations, including high-profile cases that attracted international attention.
These controversies have weakened public trust in the courts and raised questions about the fairness of the justice system.
In response, the NJC has introduced reforms aimed at improving transparency in judicial appointments and discipline.
The integrity test is part of a broader effort to restore credibility and ensure that judges are beyond reproach.
Legal analysts say the decision to publicly acknowledge failed nominees signals a shift toward greater openness within the judiciary.
They argue that public participation in the screening process could deter unqualified or compromised candidates from seeking judicial office.
However, some critics warn that the process must be carefully managed to prevent false allegations or politically motivated petitions.
The NJC has insisted that all claims are subjected to verification before decisions are taken.
The council also reaffirmed its commitment to protecting the independence of the judiciary while upholding accountability.
It urged Nigerians to continue engaging constructively by reporting credible concerns about judicial candidates.
The development comes at a time when Nigeria is under pressure to reform key institutions amid rising public distrust in governance.
Observers say the outcome of the integrity test could mark a turning point if sustained and applied consistently.
For now, the NJC says only candidates who meet both professional and ethical standards will be recommended for appointment.
The council added that further reforms are underway to strengthen judicial oversight and discipline nationwide.
