(DDM) – A fresh war of words has erupted within Nigeria’s opposition political space after Paul Ibe publicly criticised former Ekiti State governor Ayodele Fayose over a 48-hour ultimatum linked to a controversial statement.
Ibe, who serves as media adviser to former Vice President Atiku Abubakar, rejected Fayose’s demand that a statement concerning him be withdrawn, and instead mocked the timeframe given for compliance.
The exchange followed comments Fayose reportedly made in which he threatened to reveal more details about a political meeting in Minna if the statement was not retracted within two days.
Reacting on his verified X account, Ibe argued that Fayose failed to distinguish between him and diplomat Phrank Shaibu, whom he said actually authored the statement in question.
Ibe used sharp language and sarcasm in his response, suggesting that Fayose may have misread the situation or confused the identities involved.
He questioned whether the 48-hour ultimatum was excessive and ridiculed the demand by making references to alcohol and recovery time, framing Fayose’s reaction as misguided.
The dispute quickly drew attention because both men remain influential voices within the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) ecosystem and Nigeria’s broader opposition politics.
Fayose, a former two-term governor of Ekiti State, has long built a reputation as a blunt and outspoken political figure who frequently comments on national issues.
He has also maintained a complicated relationship with Atiku and other PDP leaders, sometimes supporting party positions and at other times offering public criticism.
Atiku, who has contested multiple presidential elections, remains a central figure in opposition politics as conversations quietly build toward the 2027 general elections.
Analysts say internal disagreements like this reflect deeper tensions within opposition ranks as politicians position themselves for future influence.
Public clashes among party stakeholders often signal ideological rifts, personal rivalries, or strategic disagreements over party direction.
In Nigeria’s political culture, media advisers and spokespersons play key roles in shaping narratives, defending principals, and countering rivals.
Their statements, especially on social media, frequently escalate into headline-making disputes that ripple across party lines.
Observers note that such exchanges can energise supporters but also risk portraying disunity within parties seeking to present themselves as credible alternatives to ruling powers.
As of now, Fayose has not issued a detailed counter-response to Ibe’s latest remarks.
The situation adds to a growing list of public disagreements among Nigerian politicians conducted in the media rather than behind closed doors.
Political watchers expect more reactions as stakeholders interpret the implications for party cohesion and future alliances.
For many citizens, the episode highlights how personality clashes continue to shape Nigeria’s political discourse as much as policy debates.
The report was first highlighted by Daily Post and has since circulated widely across online platforms, drawing mixed reactions from supporters and critics alike.
