(DDM) – Donald Trump has revealed that he personally advised Benjamin Netanyahu against launching further attacks on Iran’s gas infrastructure, as tensions in the Middle East continue to threaten global energy stability. The warning comes amid escalating conflict involving Iran, Israel, and the United States, with growing fears of disruption to critical energy supplies.
Speaking during a media briefing, Trump said he had made it clear to the Israeli leader that targeting Iranian gas fields could trigger severe consequences for global oil and gas markets. According to him, such strikes risk worsening an already fragile economic situation, especially as energy prices remain volatile due to ongoing geopolitical tensions.
The remarks highlight increasing concern within Washington over the broader economic implications of the conflict. Analysts explain that Iran holds significant natural gas reserves, and any sustained attack on its infrastructure could disrupt supply chains, raise global energy prices, and impact economies far beyond the Middle East.
Trump emphasized that while the United States continues to support Israel’s right to defend itself, there must be caution in choosing military targets. “We have to think about the bigger picture,” he reportedly said, underscoring the importance of preventing actions that could escalate the crisis into a full-scale regional war.
Energy experts warn that strikes on gas fields could have immediate ripple effects on international markets, particularly in Europe and Asia, where countries rely heavily on stable energy imports. The Strait of Hormuz, a critical shipping route for global oil and gas, is already under pressure due to heightened military activity, making any additional disruption potentially catastrophic.
The situation has also drawn reactions from global stakeholders, including energy traders, policymakers, and international organizations, all of whom are closely monitoring developments. Some experts believe Trump’s intervention reflects an attempt to balance military strategy with economic considerations, particularly as the conflict continues to evolve.
Meanwhile, Iran has repeatedly warned against attacks on its energy infrastructure, describing such actions as a “red line” that could provoke a stronger military response. The Iranian government has also accused the United States and its allies of fueling instability in the region, further complicating diplomatic efforts.
For Israel, the decision on whether to heed Trump’s warning carries both strategic and political implications. Military analysts suggest that while targeting energy infrastructure can weaken an adversary, it also risks international backlash and unintended economic consequences.
Historically, energy assets have often been sensitive targets during conflicts, given their importance to national economies and global markets. The current situation reflects a delicate balance between military objectives and economic stability, with world leaders under pressure to avoid actions that could deepen the crisis.
As tensions persist, Trump’s message signals a cautious approach aimed at preventing further escalation while safeguarding global energy security. Observers say the coming days will be critical in determining whether diplomatic restraint can prevail over military confrontation.
