(DDM) – The family of Mazi Nnamdi Kanu, leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), has expressed strong opposition to his relocation to Sokoto Prison.
DDM gathered that the family claims the transfer is irregular and could endanger Kanu’s health and security.
They described the move as sudden, unexplained, and likely to exacerbate tensions in the South-East region.
The family appealed to Nigerian authorities to reconsider the decision, emphasizing the need to respect legal protocols and human rights.
According to the family, they were not formally notified before the transfer, raising concerns about transparency and adherence to due process.
They warned that the relocation could trigger unrest among IPOB supporters and other sympathizers across the country.
Observers say that Kanu’s imprisonment and previous movements between detention centers have always been highly sensitive, often prompting national debates about civil liberties and government handling of separatist movements.
Security sources confirmed that Kanu has been moved, citing logistical and operational reasons, though details remain scarce.
The relocation comes shortly after his conviction on terrorism-related charges, a ruling that already stirred tensions and widespread reactions across various communities.
Analysts argue that transferring Kanu to Sokoto, a distant northern facility, may increase fears of political targeting and undermine trust in the justice system.
The family insists that Kanu’s health conditions require careful monitoring and proper medical care, which they fear may not be adequately provided in the new location.
They also urged international organizations and human rights groups to intervene and ensure his safety.
Political commentators have expressed concern that such moves, if perceived as punitive or politically motivated, could escalate regional and national instability.
They note that previous relocations and detentions of high-profile figures in Nigeria have occasionally provoked protests, strikes, and civil disobedience.
The family further called for dialogue between government authorities and IPOB representatives to prevent unnecessary conflict and maintain peace.
They emphasized that peaceful resolution and respect for legal rights are essential to preventing further division in the country.
Security agencies, while maintaining that the transfer is lawful, have been advised to handle the situation with utmost sensitivity to avoid provoking unrest.
The South-East region has historically been a flashpoint for demonstrations linked to IPOB activities, and analysts warn that improper handling could have wider political ramifications.
The coming days are expected to be crucial, as IPOB members and sympathizers monitor developments closely.
The family remains steadfast in demanding that authorities provide explanations for the relocation and guarantee Kanu’s safety.
They stressed that continued transparency and adherence to due process are vital for national confidence in judicial proceedings.
Civil society organizations and human rights advocates have echoed the family’s concerns, calling for clarity and accountability from government officials.
Nigeria now faces a delicate moment, balancing legal enforcement with public perception, regional stability, and respect for human rights.
