(DDM) – Nigerian activist and former presidential candidate Omoyele Sowore has questioned the political confidence of the ruling establishment, asking why leaders allegedly supported by dozens of governors would still fear opposition rallies.
Diaspora Digital Media (DDM) reports that Sowore made the remarks on Monday, March 16, 2026, while commenting on Nigeria’s evolving political climate and the role of public demonstrations in democratic engagement.
The activist’s comments were aired during a discussion highlighted by Symfoni TV, where he reflected on political power, public participation, and the growing debate over rallies and gatherings in the country.
Sowore questioned what he described as a contradiction between claims of overwhelming political support and the apparent reluctance to allow opposition mobilization.
He asked why political actors who insist that President Bola Ahmed Tinubu enjoys the backing of 33 state governors would still express concern over public rallies.
According to Sowore, such fears suggest that political influence in Nigeria may not be as secure as some leaders portray.
He argued that rallies and demonstrations are essential elements of democratic participation.
Public gatherings allow citizens to express opinions, mobilize support, and engage directly with political ideas.
Sowore noted that in many established democracies, rallies are seen as routine political activities rather than threats to stability.
He suggested that attempts to discourage or restrict such gatherings could signal insecurity among political leaders.
According to the activist, genuine political support should be strong enough to withstand public debate and opposition activities.
Sowore also raised concerns about what he described as psychological tactics sometimes used in Nigerian politics.
He argued that political elites occasionally rely on fear narratives to discourage citizens from participating in opposition activities.
Such tactics, he suggested, can create an atmosphere where people feel hesitant to express dissenting views.
Nigeria’s political environment has long been influenced by the balance between ruling party power and opposition mobilization.
Public rallies have historically played a major role in shaping political momentum in the country.
From pro-democracy protests in the 1990s to campaign gatherings during election cycles, public demonstrations have often served as platforms for citizens to voice political opinions.
Political analysts note that rallies can serve multiple purposes beyond campaigning.
They can energize supporters, attract media attention, and demonstrate the strength of a political movement.
At the same time, authorities sometimes express concerns about security risks associated with large gatherings.
Crowd control, public safety, and the potential for clashes between rival supporters are frequently cited as reasons for regulating rallies.
However, critics argue that security concerns are sometimes used selectively in political contexts.
Opposition figures occasionally claim that their events face greater scrutiny or restrictions compared to those organized by ruling parties.
Sowore’s comments reflect a broader debate about political openness and democratic participation in Nigeria.
Supporters of stronger civic engagement believe that rallies and protests are essential tools for accountability.
They argue that a healthy democracy must allow citizens to gather, debate ideas, and challenge leaders without intimidation.
Opponents of unrestricted rallies, however, sometimes emphasize the need for stability and order.
They warn that poorly managed demonstrations could lead to unrest or disruptions.
The discussion surrounding rallies has gained renewed attention as Nigeria approaches future election cycles.
Political parties are increasingly using both physical gatherings and digital platforms to mobilize supporters.
Social media has also amplified political debates, allowing statements such as Sowore’s to quickly reach national audiences.
His remarks have already sparked conversations across online platforms and news forums.
Many Nigerians are debating whether political leaders should embrace more open engagement with citizens.
Others argue that the real test of political strength lies in the willingness to face public scrutiny.
For Sowore, the issue ultimately revolves around political courage and transparency.
He insists that leaders who claim widespread support should not view public rallies as threats.
Instead, he believes such gatherings should be welcomed as opportunities for democratic interaction.
The ongoing conversation highlights the continuing tension between political authority and citizen participation in Nigeria’s democracy.
As the country’s political landscape evolves, debates over rallies, protests, and public engagement are likely to remain central to discussions about governance and accountability.
