Jasveen Sangha, widely known as the “Ketamine Queen,” has been sentenced to 15 years in prison for her role in the chain of events that led to the death of Hollywood actor Matthew Perry. The sentencing, delivered on April 8, 2026, brings a major legal chapter to a close in a case that has gripped public attention worldwide.
According to investigators, Sangha operated a covert drug distribution network out of North Hollywood, where she allegedly supplied controlled substances, including ketamine, to a network of clients. Authorities say her activities placed her at the center of the supply chain connected to Perry’s fatal overdose.
While the court did not establish that she directly administered the substance, prosecutors successfully argued that her role in providing access to the drug made her criminally liable for the outcome. The case underscored how individuals involved in illegal drug distribution can be held accountable when their actions contribute to a loss of life.
Throughout the proceedings, evidence presented included alleged communications, transaction records, and links to a broader underground network facilitating the movement of narcotics. The prosecution maintained that this system enabled dangerous substances to reach vulnerable individuals outside any form of medical supervision.
The death of Matthew Perry, best known for his iconic role on the television series Friends, added a deeply emotional layer to the trial. Beyond his fame, Perry had long been open about his struggles with addiction and his efforts to help others on the path to recovery, making the circumstances of his passing particularly heartbreaking for fans around the world.
The case has also reignited conversations around the misuse of ketamine a drug that, while legally used in controlled medical settings, can be highly dangerous when abused. Law enforcement officials emphasized that the sentencing should serve as a warning to those operating within illegal drug markets.
Public reaction has been mixed. Some see the 15-year sentence as a necessary step toward justice, while others believe it highlights deeper systemic issues surrounding substance abuse and the networks that sustain it.
Although this ruling marks a significant milestone, authorities suggest that investigations into related individuals and supply channels may still be ongoing. For many, the case stands as both a pursuit of accountability and a sobering reminder of the devastating consequences tied to illicit drug distribution.
