Netanyahu ignores court, appoints Shin Bet chief amid backlash

DDM News

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has ignited political and legal controversy by naming a new head of the Shin Bet security agency, defying a binding court ruling.

Diaspora Digital Media (DDM) reports that the appointment has drawn fierce backlash from legal authorities and civil rights groups, marking yet another episode in the prime minister’s ongoing power struggles.

Attorney General Gali Baharav-Miara strongly condemned Netanyahu’s decision.

She said the prime minister acted against express legal directives, thereby violating the law and undermining judicial authority.

According to Baharav-Miara, Netanyahu’s move reflects a serious conflict of interest and disregards the established legal process.

The controversy stems from a Wednesday ruling by Israel’s High Court, which determined that Netanyahu was disqualified from making top security appointments.

The court concluded he was conflicted after firing outgoing Shin Bet chief Ronen Bar.

Following the judgment, Baharav-Miara issued a clear order barring Netanyahu from proceeding with a new appointment under the present conditions.

Nevertheless, Netanyahu went ahead and publicly named a successor to lead Israel’s internal intelligence service.

The prime minister’s decision has received mixed responses across Israel’s political spectrum.

Justice Minister Yariv Levin supported Netanyahu, hailing the move as necessary for restoring executive authority.

Levin described the appointment as a “courageous” act of leadership and claimed it upholds democratic balance.

He asserted that the judiciary had overreached, and the prime minister’s action was a correction to an imbalance of power.

However, the reaction from civil society has been scathing.

The Movement for Quality Government in Israel labeled Netanyahu’s action as reckless and illegal.

The organization accused the prime minister of disrespecting both the attorney general and the High Court of Justice.

They warned that this behavior continues a disturbing trend of eroding the rule of law in the country.

The group emphasized that prioritizing personal or political agendas over legal accountability could further damage public confidence in democratic institutions.

Critics say Netanyahu’s move undermines Israel’s checks and balances, setting a dangerous precedent for governance.

They argue that the episode reflects a growing pattern of executive overreach, with legal experts voicing alarm over the country’s democratic resilience.

Observers note that Netanyahu’s tenure has been fraught with institutional conflict, particularly over his corruption trial and judicial reforms.

Analysts say the Shin Bet controversy adds to a list of recent incidents challenging Israel’s legal and political stability.

Some commentators believe the situation reveals deeper tensions between the judiciary and the executive branches of government.

There is growing concern that this appointment could trigger further constitutional crises.

Baharav-Miara’s warning signals a likely legal battle ahead, as civil rights advocates prepare to challenge the prime minister’s decision in court.

The attorney general’s office may file for legal reversal of the appointment or seek penalties for the violation.

Legal scholars stress that ignoring court rulings weakens the rule of law and threatens the legitimacy of democratic processes.

International observers are closely monitoring the situation, given its implications for rule-of-law standards in the region.

The Shin Bet, Israel’s internal security service, plays a critical role in national security, and its leadership is traditionally kept free from political maneuvering.

Critics say politicizing such appointments endangers institutional neutrality and could impair the agency’s operational effectiveness.

Proponents of the appointment insist that Israel’s government must reclaim authority over its internal affairs from judicial overreach.

But opposition figures warn that defying the courts destabilizes Israel’s governance framework and could escalate into broader civil unrest.

The fallout from the Shin Bet controversy continues to dominate public discourse, raising questions about the future of judicial independence in Israel.

As the legal and political ramifications unfold, all eyes remain on the attorney general and the courts to determine the next steps in this constitutional standoff.

For Diaspora Digital Media Updates click on Whatsapp, or Telegram. For eyewitness accounts/ reports/ articles, write to: citizenreports@diasporadigitalmedia.com. Follow us on X (Fomerly Twitter) or Facebook