The Nigerian government has expelled American missionary Alex Barbir, accusing him of making statements capable of inciting violence and deepening divisions, particularly in parts of the country already affected by conflict.
Government officials said his remarks, especially those made in Jos, Plateau State, had immediate consequences and heightened tensions within communities.
According to authorities, his activities were considered a threat to public peace, leading to his removal from the country.
Barbir arrived in Nigeria presenting himself as a humanitarian, working in conflict-hit areas such as Benue State and Plateau.
Through his initiative and partnerships with international organisations, he helped rebuild homes, drill boreholes and support displaced communities.
In places like Yelwata, residents and local leaders praised his efforts, saying his intervention brought relief where government response had been slow.
But as his profile grew, so did criticism.
Controversial Statements
Barbir repeatedly described the violence in Nigeria’s Middle Belt as organised and systematic, often framing it in religious terms.
He also openly criticised Nigerian authorities, questioning their handling of the crisis and alleging corruption in humanitarian efforts.
Critics argue that such comments oversimplify a complex conflict involving banditry, communal clashes and insurgency.
Some warn that framing the violence along religious lines risks inflaming tensions further.
Prominent figures, including clerics and political commentators, called for an investigation into his activities, saying his rhetoric could threaten national unity.
Despite the backlash, Barbir’s supporters insist he has drawn global attention to a long-neglected humanitarian crisis.
They argue that his work has helped communities rebuild and given a voice to victims.
Barbir himself defended his actions, pointing to his reconstruction projects and insisting that both Christians and Muslims have suffered from the violence.
Under Nigerian law, authorities have broad powers to deport foreign nationals whose actions are considered contrary to public interest.
Officials say the decision to expel Barbir was taken to prevent further division and avoid escalation.
Some government representatives also drew parallels with past conflicts, warning against allowing inflammatory narratives to take root in a fragile environment.
While Barbir has denied allegations linking his statements to violence, the controversy surrounding his activities highlights broader concerns about foreign involvement in sensitive internal conflicts.
For now, his exit closes a chapter that has sparked both praise and concern leaving behind a debate over whether his presence helped ease suffering or worsened divisions.
