ABUJA, NIGERIA — The Nigeria Security and Civil Defence Corps Mining Marshals have defended the continued closure of the Stone Rockers quarry site in Abuja, insisting the facility remains a crime scene in an ongoing criminal prosecution and cannot be reopened pending the determination of the case before the Federal High Court .
The clarification follows a petition by Stone Rockers Nigeria Limited to President Bola Tinubu and other government officials over the 13-month shutdown of its operations. The company had alleged that the action was unlawful and unsupported by any court order .
According to the Commander of the Mining Marshals, ACC John Onoja Attah, the quarry was sealed not as an administrative sanction but because it constitutes the locus criminis—the scene of the crime—in a criminal matter currently before the court . Stone Rockers and its director, Mr. Kolawole Olaiya, are standing trial in Charge No. FHC/ABM/VR/338/2026 over allegations of illegal mining activities within a mineral title area legally belonging to Lord’s Career Ventures Nigeria Limited .
Investigation and Evidence
The Commander explained that the prosecution followed extensive investigations triggered by a series of petitions submitted by the complainant company over a period of more than one year. The petitions were subsequently referred by the Minister of Solid Minerals Development and the Minister of Interior to the Mining Marshals through the Commandant General of the NSCDC for investigation and prosecution .
Investigators arrested the defendants at coordinates identified as longitude 7°17’24″E and latitude 8°52’11″N, which, according to findings by the Mining Marshals, fall within Mining Lease No. 000395 ML belonging to Lord’s Career Ventures Nigeria Limited . To support the claim, the agency cited a letter dated January 23, 2026, from the Mining Cadastre Office, which reportedly confirmed that the disputed coordinates are located within the complainant’s licensed mining area .
The Mining Marshals further revealed that part of the evidence to be tendered before the court includes correspondence allegedly written by a member of the defence team, Mohammed Olanrewaju Jibril, during the investigation phase. According to the Commander, the letter, dated August 12, 2025, and allegedly written on the instructions of the defendants, contains admissions relevant to the allegations now before the court .
Agency Rejects Allegations of Bias
The agency also questioned what it described as attempts by the defendants to seek administrative intervention while criminal and civil proceedings relating to the dispute remain before the courts . “The issues raised by the defendants are already the subject of judicial proceedings,” the Commander said, warning against actions capable of undermining or prejudicing the ongoing cases .
He further alleged that the defendants were pursuing “every extrajudicial means” to frustrate the criminal proceedings and argued that their latest petition to the President did not merit official consideration . According to him, the petition formed part of a broader effort to shape public opinion after what he described as unsuccessful attempts to harass him through petitions to the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission .
The Commander maintained that neither public campaigns nor institutional pressure would deter the Mining Marshals from pursuing the case. “No matter the level of blackmail and harassment deployed by illegal mining and erring industry players, the Mining Marshals will not be deterred from ensuring that the full weight of the law is pressed very tightly against everyone who breaks the laws in the Nigerian mining sector,” he said .
Workers May Be Relisted in Criminal Proceedings
On the status of workers initially arrested during enforcement operations, the Mining Marshals said prosecutors had earlier amended the charge to exclude them on the grounds that they acted as employees of a disclosed principal and might not possess the criminal intent required for prosecution . However, the agency said recent developments, including the participation of some workers in protests over the shutdown, have prompted a review of that decision. The Commander disclosed that prosecutors have now been directed to consider relisting the affected workers in the criminal proceedings if evidence establishes a greater level of involvement in the alleged illegal mining activities .
The Mining Marshals also rejected allegations that enforcement actions were influenced by financial inducement, stressing that enforcement decisions were based solely on evidence gathered during investigations and not on the financial status of either party . The Commander reaffirmed the agency’s commitment to combating illegal mining and ensuring that those who break the law face the full weight of legal consequences .
