Obama Fires Back: Trump’s ‘Treason’ Claim Called ‘Bizarre, Ridiculous’

In a highly unusual move, former President Barack Obama’s office has issued a rare and forceful rebuke against President Donald Trump’s recent allegations claiming that the Obama administration orchestrated a conspiracy to subvert the 2016 U.S. presidential election.

This rebuke came in direct response to Trump’s intensified accusations, which include allegations of “treason” against Obama for allegedly ordering intelligence assessments meant to implicate Trump in colluding with Russia during the 2016 election.

The statement from Obama’s office described Trump’s claims as “ridiculous,” “bizarre,” and a “weak attempt at distraction.”

It emphasized that normally the office does not dignify what it called “constant nonsense and misinformation” from the current White House with a direct response.

However, the severity and blatant nature of the allegations prompted an exception.

The statement reaffirmed the well-established conclusion that Russia did indeed seek to interfere in the 2016 election.

This was a finding supported by multiple bipartisan investigations, including the 2020 bipartisan Senate Intelligence Committee report led by then-Senator Marco Rubio.

Crucially, it underscored that none of the credible reports or documents undermined the consensus that no votes were manipulated or that the election infrastructure was compromised.

President Trump, meanwhile, has doubled down on his accusations, calling for the Justice Department to prosecute former President Obama.

Speaking from the Oval Office, Trump alleged that Obama was the “leader of the gang” behind intelligence assessments intended to tarnish Trump’s legitimacy.

He described the actions as “serious criminal activity” and repeatedly labeled them as an attempted “coup” and “treason.”

Trump named several former officials alongside Obama.

They include Joe Biden, FBI Director James Comey, and former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper.

Trump named them as complicit in what he called a conspiracy to manipulate the election results.

He further claimed that these efforts extended into the 2020 election, asserting without evidence that the election was “rigged” against him and that he actually won “in a landslide” each time.

The backdrop to these renewed claims involves a recently declassified report and documents released by Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard.

Gabbard’s report alleged that Obama and his administration “manufactured and politicized intelligence” concerning Russian attempts to interfere in 2016, framing it as part of a prolonged effort to undermine Trump’s presidency.

These documents include internal communications from the Obama administration discussing Russia’s cyber activities.

They reportedly concluding at the time that sabotage of election infrastructure was unlikely.

It however stated that Russia’s actions could influence voter opinion and trust in the electoral process.

Importantly, the original intelligence assessments did not claim that vote tallies or election machines had been altered.

The Obama administration and Democrats have dismissed these claims as politically motivated and filled with errors.

They insist the intelligence community’s findings have been thoroughly scrutinized and vindicated by bipartisan investigation.

The findings according to them, are not evidence of any deliberate attempt to manufacture a false narrative.

They contend the allegations from the current Republican-led disclosures are attempts to redirect attention away from other controversies surrounding Trump, including matters related to Jeffrey Epstein.

Journalists like Matt Taibbi have noted that these developments place Obama “squarely in the crosshairs” of what has been dubbed the “Russiagate” investigation.

However, no formal indictments or charges against Obama have been announced, and the Justice Department’s response remains uncertain.

Historically, investigations into Russia’s interference in the 2016 election have reportedly found substantive evidence of Russian efforts to meddle.

However, no conclusive proof that the Obama administration unlawfully manipulated intelligence to harm Trump’s candidacy.

Obama himself has historically refrained from directly engaging in public spats with Trump over these issues.

However, in this case, his office felt compelled to respond given the seriousness and repeated nature of the accusations.

The statement reflects a wider context in which Obama’s team sees Trump’s allegations as a diversionary tactic to deflect from ongoing investigations into Trump’s own actions.

They also see it as a diversionary tactic to deflect ongoing investigations from scandals involving Trump allies and controversies such as Epstein.

In summary, the clash over the 2016 election narrative has recently escalated with Trump accusing Obama of a treasonous plot to undermine his presidency through politicized intelligence.

Obama’s office reacted with a rare public statement, categorically denying these charges.

It also underscores the legitimacy of the intelligence community’s longstanding conclusions on Russian interference.

The dispute highlights the deep partisan divisions still surrounding the 2016 election and ongoing political battles over the legitimacy of election security and interference narratives in the United States.

For Diaspora Digital Media Updates click on Whatsapp, or Telegram. For eyewitness accounts/ reports/ articles, write to: citizenreports@diasporadigitalmedia.com. Follow us on X (Fomerly Twitter) or Facebook