Connect with us

Legal Affairs

Presidential Election Tribunal live updates for June 16, 2023

Published

on

Time: 9:30am

Mr Peter Obi is in court live

Labour Party legal counsel team have arrived as well

The Justices are here.

Lead Justice, Hon. Justice Tsammani welcomes everyone and the case is called CA/PEPC/03/2023.

 

Time: 9:44am

PARTIES

– Peter Obi represents the Petitioners.

– Saturday Monsigna represents 4th Respondent

Counsels:

PETITIONERS LEGAL TEAM
LEAD: DR LIVY UZOUKWU SAN
– Awa Kalu SAN
– PIN Ikwueto SAN
– Ben Anechebe SAN
– Ikechukwu Ezechukwu SAN
– Valerie Azinge SAN
– Emeka Opoko SAN
– Alex Ejesieme SAN
– Peter Afuba SAN
– Audu Anuga SAN

– Rita Garba Esq
– Olusola Esq
– Emelia Esq

1ST RESPONDENTS LEGAL TEAM (INEC)
LEAD: AB MAHMOUD SAN
– Essien
– Stephen SAN
– TM Inuwa SAN
– Suleiman Ibrahim SAN

– Nasara Auta Esq
– Patricia Obi Esq
– Wendy Kuku Esq

2ND & 3RD RESPONDENTS LEGAL TEAM (TINUBU/SHETTIMA)

LEAD: CHIEF AKIN OLUJIMI SAN
– Prof. Taiwo Osipitan SAN
– Adebayo SAN
– Dr. Hassan Liman SAN
– Chief Onoja SAN
– Olatunde Busari SAN
– AU Mustapha SAN
– Mutalib Ojo SAN

– Dr Tunji Abayomi Esq
– Ibrahim Audu Esq
– Akintola Makinde Esq

 

4TH RESPONDENT (APC):

LEAD: LO FAGBEMI SAN
– Charles Edosowan SAN
– Afolabi Fashanu SAN
– Abiodun Owonikoko SAN
– Dakas Dakas SAN
– Suraj SAN
– Gboyega Oyewole SAN
– Tajudeen Oladoja SAN
– Mumini Hanafi SAN
– Saheed Sanusi SAN

– Omosanya Popoola Esq
– O. Akintola Esq
– Oyedele Esq

 

Time: 9:44am

 

The battle now begins!

Dr. Livy for LP informs the court that they will continue from yesterday and make PW4 available for Cross-examination by the respondents.

He defers to Ikwueto SAN to conduct the proceedings for the Petitioners.

 

 

Time: 10:8am

 

 

The witness, Prof. Eric is reminded that he is still on oath

1st Respondent Cross-examination:
Q. Where were you on election Day?
A. I went to vote

Q. You voted and it went on smoothly?
A. Yes

Q. You were commissioned to produce this report by the LP?
A. I was requested to produce the repo.

Q. You were paid for it?
A. Nobody paid me

Q. You acted as a patriotic Nigerian?
A. I’m a patriotic Nigerian, yes.

Q. As a disinterested party?
A. Yes

Q. Going by the terms of reference mentioned in Para3 of your WSO, primary source of data was the IREV Portal.
A. Yes

Q. In your witness statement, you made reference to Forms EC8As as well as results uploaded on the IREV Portal, I assume you were referring to the same thing?
A. Not exactly

Q. What did you mean?
A. It’s because they are different

Q. What’s the difference?
A. Forms EC8A is different

A. From what’s uploaded

Q. The Form EC8A uploaded on the portal is the only document you could see on the portal?
A. Not really

Court: what is not really?that’s not a definite answer
A. His questions did not require a definite Answer

Question is repeated
A. No

Q. What else can you see
A. There were blurred images and some that were not related to the analysis done. For instance, results of Senate replaced for House of Reps.

Q. When you refer to Blurred images of Forms EC8A, you did not mean the physical copies could be blurred?

 

A. I didn’t see physical copies

Q. In all your review, you did not see anything on the portal that suggests there is an electronic collation system?
A. The IREV portal is an electronic collation system

Q. Are you suggesting to the court that the portal is capable of collating

AB: are you suggesting that the portal is capable of collating and tabulating the election by result?

W: it is not capable of doing that

AB: in your wsoo you made reference to 18,000 polling unit with blurred result then you used LP agents results (pg 8) In appendix E

W: Yes

Q. And tabulating the results
A. It’s not capable of doing that

Q. In Appendix E, you made reference to Labour Party agent Forms EC8As
A. Yes

Q. Did you attach them to your report?
A. It has been tendered to the court. I did not

Q. You’re not an election expert
A. It depends

 

Time: 10:18am

Q. I suggest to you that there was no way you undertook the task in Para3(c) of your Witness Statement, not being an expert.
A. If I understand you clearly, the electoral act and guidelines for conduct of election requires online..

Q. Just answer the question. Are you an election expert, can you determine compliance?

A. I can determine compliance

Q. Look at Exhibit PCB1 series, for Rivers State. (He’s shown the report he tendered that was marked as Exhibit) What LGA is that?

(The court officials are trying to get the document in question which have been marked, looks like they didn’t bring it into the courtroom earlier)

Q. Confirm to the court when you concluded your assignment
A. 19th of March

Q. Back to Exhibit PCB2. Can you read out to LGA
A. Degema

Q. In Ward 7, the Polling Unit you see is?
A. 002

Q. Accredited Voters is 40 correct?
A. Yes

Q. Number of voters 40 correct?
A. Yes

 

Q. No over voting correct?
A. No over voting

AB Mahmoud: thank you very much Professor, thank you my Lords

 

2ND AND 3RD RESPONDENTS CROSS-EXAMINATION (Tinubu/Shettima)

Q. You’ll agree with me that votes are cast at the polling unit?
A. I agree

Q. At end of election, the votes cast will be sorted, counted and recorded in Forms EC8As?
A. Yes

Q. It is the image of Form EC8A that will be transmitted to

Q. IREV but the hard copies will be taken by the presiding officer to the ward collation center?
A. Yes

READ ALSO:  EFCC Seizes Atiku Abubakar’s Son-In-Law’s Passport

Q. The statutory channel for computation of results of voting begins from the polling unit to ward, to LGA, to state a d to national collation centers?
A. Correct my Lord.

 

Time: 10:23sm

 

 

Q. It is part of your claim in your report that some forms you downloaded were blurred

A. Yes

Q. Will I be correct to say that whether transmission failed or what you downloaded was blurred, it will not change the result recorded at the Polling Unit.

A. It will not change if…

A. …Properly used

Q. You also will confirm that IREV is not a collation center

A. It’s not a collation center but meant to serve as a checker

Q. Your report covers only two states, Benue and Rivers State?

A. We did analysis of all the states

 

Time: 10:28am

Q. Your report is for 2 states?

A. Not only 2 states, Benue and Rivers are part of what I tendered.

Q. Did you tender for Oyo State?
A. Yes

Q. Apart from Rivers and Benue, which other state did you tender?

A. In what I tendered the two states stood out, Rivers and benue

Q. Prof, which other state did you tender?
A. You’re asking the question and smiling, I don’t know…

The whole court is laughing…
Court: Chief Olujimi, you better frown while asking 😀😀😀
Court: this is between senior Advocate of the law and senior Advocate of mathematics.

Time: 10:29am

Court: did you tender for any other state apart from benue and Rivers?
A. No

Q. In your report, you made it clear that you worked only on available data.
A. I worked only on available data but it is expected that the data should be completed.

 

Time: 10:32am

 

Q. If you had more data, your report will be different
A. Yes

Q. in your witness statement at paragraph 2B, page 2, you listed recent data analysis practical experience
A. Yes

Q. You’ve not claimed in this witness statement to have done any analysis for a court case in election

Q. Matter like this?
A. No

Q. At Paragraph 3, Page 2 of your witness statement, you said you were requested on 20th Feb. 2023 by Labour Party to carry out analysis on the results for election not yet held?
A. Yes

 

Q. You were also in that engagement required to determine INEC compliance with electoral act and regulations
A. Yes.

 

Time: 10:40am

 

Q. At same Paragraph 3 Sub B, part of your mandate was to determine whether the results to be announced by INEC match with result uploaded without any anticipation that LP will lose the election?

A. That’s part of what was requested of me to do

Q. I find it strange that after your engagement showing you specifically what you were told to do, you now insisted on subpoena
A. In that engagement, nobody made mention of coming to court so I didn’t anticipate coming to court.

This cross-examination is ended!

4TH RESPONDENT CROSS-EXAMINATION

Q. Prof. The report you’ve tendered was based on blurred result downloaded from INEC IREV portal

A. Not just blurred results

Q. The exercise you conducted on the blurred result, what aspect of mathematics did you apply?
A. There’s no theory in knowing that something is blurred

Q. I’ll be correct to say that your report based on that aspect of complain is not a product of any expertise?

A. Of course

 

Time: 10:42am

 

Q. Can you assist the honourable court, what level of numeral literacy do you suggest a person must posses to add results and collate it at different levels?

A. INEC does not require experts to do that

Q. To be able to do arithmetic, are you suggesting that?
A. youre correct, (any level of mathematical knowledge)

Q. Your choice of Rivers and benue, was it as a result of random pick not informed by any theory?
A. Random pick

 

Time: 10:47am

 

Q. You’re aware that at the last presidential election PDP, APC and LP all won a number of states in terms of majority of votes

A. My job have nothing to do with who win and who did not win

Q. Did you know?

A. What you heard may not be correct

Q. Confirm you did not hear anything about the evential outcome of the election.
A. I heard something

Q. Who won the election based on what INEC announced?

Q. Who won in benue state based on what INEC declared?

(Witness is dragging in answering the question)

 

Q. Do you now recall which party won in Rivers and benue?

A. I can’t say for now

Q. Those two states were won by APC is that correct?

A. I told you can’t say for now

Q. In your report, there’s an element of statistics involved

A. I dealt on exact data

Q. What you did was to sample and extrapolate
A. Sampling have to do with forecasting, I used exact data

Q. How many polling units are there in Rivers State?
A. I don’t have everything off-head

Q. How about benue state?

A. Same answer my Lord

 

Q. The total number of polling units in Rivers and benue does not amount to 18,000 blurred results you want the court to cancel
A. Since I do not know the number of polling unit, how do I know? They will not add up.

Time: 10:55am

 

Q. Admonition for statistics: Researchers should be aware of statistical error and sampling error arising from random sampling and bias.
A. I’m not a statistian. The data is an exact data, there’s no randomness in it.

 

Time: 11am

 

Q. So your choice of two states was not a random choice?

A. The data is an exact data but when it comes to selection of sample space, the selection is done randomly

READ ALSO:  BREAKING: Ex-president Obasanjo in crucial meeting with S'east leaders in Enugu

Court: you said you did random sampling?

A. No, the choice of states is random but the sampling data is exact

Q. If you have opportunity to do research on other states, you’ll get different results?

A. Each state will come up with its own results

Q. In your report, you analyzed Forms EC8As on the IREV, nowhere did you allude to what was on EC8Bs and EC8Cs

A. Once it’s wrong at the polling unit level, it will be wrong up, so the most important form to analyze is Form EC8A

That’s all on the CROSS-EXAMINATION!

 

Time: 11:4am

 

There’s no questions in reexamination from the LP team. Ikwueto SAN for LP now asked that the witness be discharged.

The court discharges him from the witness box.

 

Time: 11:7am

 

Ikwueto SAN for LP: my Lords after PW5 we crave your indulgence to allow us call a very short witness within time

Court: your witness is very short?

Everyone laughs 🤣🤣🤣

The witness PW5 Lummie is now called.

 

1ST RESPONDENT CROSS-EXAMINATION (INEC)

They do not have any questions for the witness

 

On a second thought, the 1st Respondent (INEC) will now ask few questions.

 

Time: 11:14am

 

Q. You’re an experienced broadcaster?

A. Correct

Q. You’re also familiar with the use of computers and various platforms for transmitting or broadcasting

A. Yes

Q. You know the difference between transfer of information and transmission

A. Yes. Transfer means moving it from one

A. Known/designated location to another known/designated location

Q. Transmission on the other hand does not necessarily connotes transfer from one location to another

A. Yes

Q. You work with AriseTV

A. Arise News

Q. When you broadcast, you arr actually transmitting

Q. Yes

 

Time: 11:17am

 

Q. Any number of persons withing transmission zone can access it if they have appropriate device?

A. Yes

Q. You’ll agree that technically, transfer and transmission are distinct
A. Yes.

That’s all

2nd and 3rd Respondent (Tinubu/Shettima) cross-examination:

Q. Do you confirm you were not at Chatham House during that briefing?

A. Physically, No. It was a live streaming, so I was present online.

Q. The national chairman, INEC, Prof Yakubu Mahmoud is still alive today?

A. Yes, as far as I know

 

That’s all for the witness…

4TH RESPONDENT (APC) CROSS-EXAMINATION:

Q. can you summarize the message of relevance in the drive that was played.
A. In summary, INEC and it’s officials decided to use technology for the elections.

 

Time: 11:22am

Q. Out of that deployment of technology will include use of bvas exclusively for accreditation of voters?

A. In my understanding

Q. Before 2023 election, you had observed election, you knew how accreditation was done. Bvas not used in 2019

A. Yes, in 2019. Bvas was not used

Q. Bvas was an innovation in 2023 election?
A. I think so

Q. Will I be right to say you’re familiar with INEC regulations and guidelines

A. I’m not totally familiar

Q. From the flash that you played, we heard the chairman of INEC indicating that for the purpose of carry public along, copies of completed Forms EC8As will be snapped and uploaded on the IREV protal is that correct?

A. Yes

 

Time: 11:28am

Q. That was about 17th January, referring to paragraph 12 of your statement?

A. Yes

Q. Between 17 January and 25 February, your station and other media houses had regular interface with INEC?

A. I believe so, but my duty is not editorial but technical

Q. Content on Arise TV, you also get to view them either live or afterwards in a recorded version?

A. Yes, as much as I can

Q. After 17 January, did you by an chance happen to know that a Federal High Court in Abuja

Objection by SAN Ikwueto for LP: the witness came for a specific purpose to produce video and they as asking him about what High Court did. He came to produce, tender and play in open court the recording of Mahmoud Conference in Chatham House by the Subpoena.

 

Court: Evidence act allows them not to remain on the basis of coming.

Ikwueto SAN: My Lord, but it must be based on the facts.

Court: you’d have allowed him to land on the question, he had not finish asking the question, he only mentioned federal High Court Judgment.

 

Time: 11:34am

 

Q. Are you aware that after Chatham House interview, INEC informed the public that they were no longer going to transmit electronically

A. I’m not aware of such

The lawyer of the 4th respondents want to tender the paper from the bar and the court is shocked and refuses that he is not the maker and the witness says he knows nothing about the documents.

The witness is now discharged without any reexamination.

Ikwueto SAN for LP:

He now tells the court that they will now call witness PW6

Court:

You mean your short witness, I thought it’s Aki and Pawpaw.

 

Time: 11:45am

All the Respondents are asking to come back by Monday, skipping Saturday.

Dr. Livy now addresses the Court that the witness required to give evidence, the burial ceremony of their Chairman of the organization (AIT)is starting Monday and will not be disposed to come.

The court now allows them to take the witness today and Dr. Livy says tomorrow can be a free day.

They’ll now the witness, PW6… It’s a lady

It’s the favourite Ijeeeeeeooooma Osamor from AIT
@AIT_Online

We will now move into witness Examination

Q. Your name is Ijeaoma Osamor
A. Yes

Q. Where do you work?
A. With DAAR Communications, owners of AIT, RayPower and Faaji I have my ID card with me.

READ ALSO:  Police gun down 3 suspected kidnappers in Kwara

(Ikwueto now seeks to tender her ID Card, they’ve made a copy of the card, he notes)

Now to Objections. There are no objections.

The Court:
The Copy of PW6 Staff ID Card is hereby admitted into evidence and marked as Exhibits PCH accordingly.

As the court pleases.

 

Time: 11:50am

 

Q. Your organization was served with a subpoena to attend court today?
A. Yes, I have a copy of the subpoena

Q. Following that Subpoena, you came to this court and deposed to a witness Statement?
A. Yes

Q. Would you like the court to adopt it as your evidence
A. Of course

 

Time: 11:54am

 

OBJECTIONS
2nd and 3rd Respondents:
They object that the WSO were not front loaded (given before hearing) and they adopt their earlier arguments in that regard and to uphold the Objection & render the witness incompetent to testify.

1st Respondent:
They object on similar grounds.

 

Time: 12:24pm

Court Update continues:

Ikwueto SAN for LP now applies to the court for the flash drive to be played…

There’s no objections to the video being played by all Respondents.

Time to watch another video

A video is now being played. It shows Ijeoma Osamor on Democracy today program where she also played a video where Mahmoud is heard to say copies of results will be uploaded to IREV by the BVAS device

He further assures Nigerians that BVAS has come to stay and ‘results will be uploaded REAL-TIME AND NIGERIANS WILL VIEW IT BEING UPLOADED DIRECTLY 4rm POLLING UNITS.

He also assures that it will be done in real time, that it has been done in other elections and will be done now.

On collection of PVCs, he assures Nigerians that the commission will soon release the guidelines for the further collection of the PVCs.

That brings it to an end of the video of about 3 minutes

The video ends.

1ST RESPONDENT CROSS-EXAMINATION

NO QUESTIONS but thanks the witness for coming

2ND AND 3RD RESPONDENTS CROSS-EXAMINATION

Q. That video you just played, you said in your witness statement that you anchored the program?

Yes sir.

Q. You had cameramen of AIT who took pictures of that program

A. Yes, every studio, there are cameramen

Q. It’s not part of your duty to handle camera?

A. No it’s not.

Q. Now, you said the program was streamed live on Facebook and YouTube?

A. Yes My Lord

Q. The only other role that you played before we got to this video was you to go to Facebook to download with ur phone

A. Yes

Q. You transfered the video from Facebook to the flash

A. I used my phone to get the video when I was asked to provide the copy of the video by the subpoena

Q. How come about the flash drive

A. Flash drive was from the office. I sent what I downloaded to them

A. I sent the link to the office and further transfer to the drive.

Q. There were 3 levels of operations before the flash drive.
A. Yes

Q. The National Chairman of INEC seen in the video is still alive

A. Before I came into the court, he was alive, I don’t know thereafter 😂😂

4TH RESPONDENT CROSS-EXAMINATION

Q. the report which took place in your program was an event outside of the AIT?

A. Yes My Lord

Q. The program Democracy Today is anchored inside the AIT Studio?

A. Yes My Lord

Q. And AIT crew attended that program?
A. Yes My Lord

Time: 12:29pm

 

Q. It was their recording brought back to the studio you played during your program?
A. Yes My Lord

Q. Please what’s the duration of Democracy Today?
A. It’s 55minutes

Q. Every short program, a copy of the recording must be kept in studio
A. Because we stream live..

A. We have the studio copy and online copy

Q. The one you brought to the court, you got it from cyberspace
A. Yes

Q. Did you have any challenge making a copy from the official copy in the studio
A. We only keep them in the libraries and I got a call by at about 11pm

A. For shortness of time, I accessed the online copy

Q. The versions kept in the library, do you normally submit copies to NBC
A. NBC comes sometimes to get records of broadcast and visitors

Q. I’ll be right to say that since this was an official order of court, you’ll prefer

Q. apart from the events of 22nd November, you also gave full coverage of the events leading to Presidential elections.
A. Yes

Q. Do you access copies from other media houses?

Q. So you’ll be surprised to see that news.
A. Newspaper can get information from interviews, we deal with cameras.

That’s all for the cross-examination

A. Our news is breaking, we don’t accept second hand report.

 

Ikwueto applies for the discharge of the witness who he says indeed she has shown that she’s a professional broadcaster ☺️☺️☺️
Court: are you marketing her?😂😂😂

Ikwueto: my Lord, trading, that’s what my people do very well 😂😂😂

 

Time: 12:36pm

 

Ikwueto SAN appreciates the court for the indulgence abd hands over to Livy SAN who thanks the court for the opportunity to call their last witness for the day.

He says that with that witness, they do not have any problem by the application of the respondents 4 a free day tomorrow

AB Mahmoud SAN: the Court asked for our views, and we gave our views, we didn’t apply for anything.

Livy SAN: Fine, then we’re ready to come back tomorrow my Lord.

The Court now adjourns till Monday June 19, 2023 at 2pm for the continuation of hearing.

Continue Reading

Legal Affairs

Outrage as Court Grants Bail to Suspects in Wedding Guest Killings in Plateau

Published

on

Relatives of the 13 wedding guests killed in Plateau State have condemned the State High Court’s decision to release 20 suspects on bail.

The victims were brutally murdered on June 12, 2025, when a mob attacked their bus in Mangun district, Mangu Local Government Area.

They were traveling from Kaduna State to attend a wedding in Qua’an Pan LGA before tragedy struck.

According to reports, the group lost their way and entered a volatile community already shaken by recent terrorist activity.

Local youths allegedly mistook them for bandits and launched a deadly assault, leaving 13 people dead on the spot.

Following the killings, security operatives arrested 21 suspects.

In an earlier court sitting, 20 of them were remanded at the Jos Correctional Center while investigations continued.

However, on Wednesday, August 20, Justice Nafisa Lawal Musa granted bail after a motion filed by defence counsel, Garba Pwul (SAN).

This ruling has triggered outrage among the families of the victims, who insist the development is a slap in the face of justice.

Mallam Abdullahi Tahir Balami, a relative of one of the deceased, condemned the court’s action.

Speaking to reporters, he described the ruling as suspicious and raised concerns about possible foul play.

“With this development, we are now questioning the commitment of the Plateau State government to justice,” Balami said.

“It is saddening that suspects in a multiple homicide case can be released on bail.”

Another relative, Mallam Ubale Anguwar Dantsoho, who lost several family members, also expressed anger.

He described the decision as shocking and warned that justice may never be served.

READ ALSO:  BREAKING: Ex-president Obasanjo in crucial meeting with S'east leaders in Enugu

“How can suspects in a murder case be granted bail?” he asked. “It shows that our system is failing us.”

Maryam Usman, widow of the driver killed in the massacre, expressed her heartbreak.

She said she struggled to understand why suspects linked to such a crime would be freed.

“What kind of court is this?” she asked in despair. “Instead of justice, the court dashed our hopes. We no longer believe justice will come.”

Her words echoed the feelings of many families now convinced that the judiciary has abandoned them.

Human rights activists are also calling for urgent intervention from both the state and federal governments to ensure accountability.

The Plateau killings have become one of the most disturbing tragedies in recent months.

The case now highlights the growing tension between grieving families and a judicial system accused of ignoring victims.

Continue Reading

Legal Affairs

Court upholds Zamfara govt’s seizure of 40 vehicles from Matawalle

Published

on

Zamfara State Governor, Ambassador Bello Matawalle

The Court of Appeal in Sokoto has upheld the Federal High Court’s decision dismissing former Zamfara State Governor Bello Matawalle’s challenge over the confiscation of over 40 official vehicles seized from his residence after he left office in 2023.

Delivering its unanimous verdict on August 8, 2025, a three-member panel led by Justice A.M. Talba ruled that Matawalle failed to provide credible evidence proving personal ownership of the vehicles.

The court emphasized that the vehicles were government property, not private assets, and rejected his claim that the seizure violated his fundamental property rights.

According to Zamfara State Governor Dauda Lawal’s spokesman, Sulaiman Idris, the vehicles were recovered in June 2023 after Matawalle and his deputy ignored a five-day ultimatum to return them.

Following their refusal, the state government sought and obtained a court order, enabling police operatives to raid Matawalle’s residence and recover the vehicles.

Initially, Matawalle secured an interim ruling from the Federal High Court in Gusau for the vehicles to be returned to him.

He also filed a separate suit claiming the confiscation breached his fundamental rights.

However, the case was transferred to the Sokoto division of the Federal High Court, which dismissed his claims in December 2023, affirming that the vehicles remained state property.

Dissatisfied with the lower court’s ruling, Matawalle escalated the matter to the Court of Appeal.

The appellate court, however, upheld the Federal High Court’s decision, affirming that the police acted lawfully in investigating the alleged misappropriation and that the state government followed due process in retrieving the vehicles.

READ ALSO:  Niger State APC Suspends 3 Senators, 6 Reps - Channels

The court concluded that Matawalle’s claims lacked merit and could not shield him from investigation or potential prosecution.

 

Continue Reading

Legal Affairs

Your tenure as LP chairman is over — Court, INEC tell defiant Abure

Published

on

Abure faction of Labour Party insists Supreme Court Labour Party judgment was in Abure's favour

The leadership crisis tearing the Labour Party apart appears to have reached a turning point as the Federal High Court in Abuja, on Friday, struck out Julius Abure’s case against the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), officially affirming that he is no longer the party’s National Chairman.

The court, in Suit No. FHC/ABJ/CS/1523/2025, dismissed Abure’s suit due to a lack of jurisdiction, aligning with the Supreme Court’s earlier verdict on April 4, 2025 (Appeal No. SC/CV/56/2025), which voided all prior recognitions of his leadership.

However, while speaking on the judgment, Senator Nenadi Usman, the party’s Interim National Chairman, described the ruling as a clear victory for the rule of law.

“This decision removes every lingering doubt about Abure’s status. The chapter is closed. It’s time to put distractions behind us and rebuild the Labour Party into the disciplined, people-centred movement Nigerians deserve”, she said.

Also, INEC’s counter-affidavit in the case further solidified the court’s position, stressing that Abure’s tenure, along with that of the National Executive Committee, had expired in June 2024.

The commission also argued that the controversial March 27, 2024 “Nnewi National Convention” was invalid as it violated the 1999 Constitution, the Electoral Act 2022, INEC guidelines, and the Labour Party’s own constitution.

Senator Usman commended the electoral commission for its “clarity, courage, and institutional integrity” in presenting the facts and urged party members to “respect the supremacy of the Constitution and the authority of the courts.”

With bye-elections on the horizon and the 2027 general elections in sight, this ruling could mark the end of a year-long factional battle that has plagued the party.

READ ALSO:  BREAKING: Ex-president Obasanjo in crucial meeting with S'east leaders in Enugu

The focus now shifts to uniting the Labour Party and preparing for the political challenges ahead.

 

Continue Reading

Legal Affairs

NNPC secures landmark court victory against Senator Araraume

Published

on

Senator Araraume

 

On August 8, 2025, the Court of Appeal, sitting in Abuja, upheld NNPC Ltd.’s appeal against the Federal High Court’s April 2023 judgement that annulled Senator Ifeanyi Araraume’s removal as non-executive Chairman of the NNPC Board and awarded him ₦5 billion in damages.

The Court of Appeal’s judgement spares NNPC Ltd a massive financial payout and removes a legal risk that could have invalidated all decisions of the Board since 2021.

The Appeal Court agreed to NNPC Ltd.’s position that the Federal High Court’s earlier decision was delivered in error, noting amongst others, that the claim was statute-barred.

This decision of the Court of Appeal secures governance stability for NNPC Ltd., sets a corporate governance precedent in Nigerian law, and upholds the validity of Board resolutions critical to the oil and gas industry’s investment and policy direction.

 

Continue Reading

Legal Affairs

Ibom Airport Saga: Court discharges Comfort Emmason

Published

on

Comfort Emmanson

An Ikeja Magistrates’ Court on Wednesday cleared Miss Comfort Emmason of all charges related to unruly behavior and assaulting the flight crew aboard an Ibom Air flight from Uyo to Lagos.

Magistrate Olanrewaju Salami struck out the five-count charge following the withdrawal of the case by the police prosecution team.

During the hearing, prosecutor Oluwabunmi Adeitan informed the court of new developments that led to the decision to discontinue the case.

She submitted a formal application for its withdrawal, which the court accepted, effectively bringing the matter to a close.

 

 

 

 

 

Continue Reading

Latest from DDM TV

Latest Updates

2027: ADC Coalition Deceiving Nigerians – Baba-Ahmed

Tinubu Secures Fresh $238m Loan from Japan

‘Gate of Hell’ Will Open on Gaza’– Israeli Defence Issues Finally Warning to Hamas

NAFDAC Raises Alarm as Fake Cowbell Milk Floods Nigerian Markets

‘Misplaced Priority’: Peter Obi Blasts FG’s ₦142bn Bus Terminal Project

Why I’ll never encourage my son to visit Nigeria — Taribo West

Hardship: Man commits suicide in Imo

Canada Announces Permanent Residence Lottery Results for Foreign Workers

First son blocks mother’s burial in imo over alleged settlement dispute

Nigeria is on the rise again, return home — Tinubu tells Nigerians in diaspora

Subscribe to DDM Newsletter for Latest News

Trending

Copyright © 2023 -2024 Diaspora Digital Media (DDM) www.diasporadigitalmedia.com. All Rights Reserved . NOTE: All opinion articles published on Diaspora Digital Media are ENTIRELY those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the publishers.

Get Notifications from DDM News Yes please No thanks