Trump slams his own Supreme Court picks: ‘They failed me when it mattered most’

DDM News

Former U.S. President Donald Trump has reportedly voiced private frustrations over the performance of Supreme Court justices he nominated during his presidency.

Sources close to the matter say Trump is particularly displeased with Justice Amy Coney Barrett, his most recent appointee to the high court.

Diaspora Digital Media (DDM) learned that Trump’s discontent extends beyond Barrett and includes Justices Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh, also appointed during his administration.

Insiders reveal that Trump has been lamenting the perceived disloyalty of the justices for over a year behind closed doors.

According to these sources, Trump expected unwavering support from the justices, especially on issues aligning with his administration’s agenda.

Justice Barrett, in particular, has drawn Trump’s ire after conservative allies told him she appeared “weak” in key rulings.

They argue Barrett’s judicial decisions have not aligned with how she portrayed herself prior to her nomination in 2020.

“It’s not just one ruling. It’s been a few different events he’s complained about privately,” a senior Trump administration official told CNN.

Trump’s grievances have reportedly intensified following rulings he considers betrayals by judges he believed would uphold his political and legal interests.

The discontent reportedly boiled over after a recent ruling by a three-judge panel that blocked his proposed tariff plan.

This decision spurred Trump to attack Leonard Leo, the Federalist Society figure instrumental in advising him on judicial appointments.

Trump has also expressed concern that his judicial picks were not delivering the type of steadfast conservative rulings he envisioned.

Legal experts suggest Trump’s dissatisfaction reflects a fundamental misunderstanding of judicial independence and the role of the Supreme Court.

The Court, despite being filled with Republican-nominated justices, has occasionally ruled in ways that defy partisan expectations.

These rulings include decisions on election-related lawsuits, immigration policies, and trade regulations that have sometimes gone against Trump.

Barrett, who succeeded the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, was expected by many conservatives to be a reliable ally on the Court.

Her judicial philosophy and originalist leanings were praised by the right during her confirmation process in late 2020.

However, her decisions on certain high-profile cases have surprised and, in some cases, angered her supporters, including Trump.

Justices Gorsuch and Kavanaugh, also appointed under Trump, have likewise rendered decisions that did not conform to conservative or presidential preferences.

Trump’s disappointment in Kavanaugh is particularly notable, given the intense political battle that accompanied his confirmation.

Trump has hinted in conversations that the Federalist Society, once one of his key allies in judicial appointments, may have misled him.

His frustration reportedly stems from the belief that his appointees should show a stronger allegiance to his legal and political strategies.

Despite these sentiments, Trump’s spokesperson insists he still supports the Court’s constitutional role.

“President Trump will always stand with the U.S. Supreme Court, unlike the Democrat Party, which, if given the opportunity, would pack the court, ultimately undermining its integrity,” said principal deputy press secretary Harrison Fields.

“The President may disagree with the Court and some of its rulings, but he will always respect its foundational role,” Fields added.

The Supreme Court, for its part, declined to issue a comment in response to inquiries about Trump’s alleged criticisms.

Observers note that Trump’s attacks come at a time when he is increasingly at odds with the broader conservative legal community.

Some believe this rift reflects growing tension between political loyalty and judicial independence among Republican-aligned institutions.

The Federalist Society, once a staunch supporter of Trump’s judicial picks, has itself faced growing scrutiny from the former president and his allies.

Legal scholars argue that Trump’s approach to the judiciary reveals an expectation that judges serve as political loyalists rather than independent arbiters of law.

The former president’s recent legal troubles, including indictments and lawsuits, may also be fueling his desire for judicial backing.

His growing frustration suggests he views unfavorable court rulings not as independent legal judgments, but as betrayals by supposed allies.

Critics warn that this mindset poses a risk to the judiciary’s role as a neutral and nonpartisan branch of government.

They say Trump’s rhetoric undermines public trust in the courts and pressures judges to consider political consequences over legal merit.

As Trump prepares for a potential 2024 presidential run, his views on the judiciary may become a key part of his campaign messaging.

Analysts predict he may seek to reshape the judicial nomination process if given another term, possibly seeking more overtly loyal candidates.

Some conservative activists have begun echoing Trump’s concerns, pushing for judges who are more reliably aligned with right-wing politics.

Meanwhile, the Supreme Court continues to navigate politically charged cases, drawing scrutiny from all sides of the political spectrum.

With a conservative supermajority in place, the Court’s decisions still vary, revealing deep ideological complexities and judicial independence.

For now, Trump’s behind-the-scenes complaints underscore a growing divide within the conservative movement over what the judiciary should be.

This evolving tension could influence not only future court appointments but also the broader battle over the rule of law in American politics.

For Diaspora Digital Media Updates click on Whatsapp, or Telegram. For eyewitness accounts/ reports/ articles, write to: citizenreports@diasporadigitalmedia.com. Follow us on X (Fomerly Twitter) or Facebook