Connect with us

Legal Affairs

BREAKING: Judge withdraws from Natasha’s suit against Akpabio

Published

on

Justice Obiora Egwuatu of a Federal High Court in Abuja on Tuesday, recused himself from the suit filed by Sen. Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan, against the Senate President, Godswill Akpabio, and others.

The suit is seeking to stop the Senate Committee on Ethics, Privileges and Public Petitions from going ahead with the disciplinary proceedings over alleged misconduct by Akpoti-Uduaghan.

Justice Egwuatu announced his withdrawal from the case over allegations of bias levelled against the court by Akpabio, who is the 3rd defendant in the matter.

When the matter was called on Tuesday, the judge, after taking the appearance of lawyers for the parties in the suit, announced his decision to withdraw from the case.

He cited the allegation as the major reason for his decision.

It was gathered that the senate president had expressed lack of confidence in the ability of the court to do justice on the matter, hence the reason for the development.

The judge subsequently ordered that the case file be remitted back to the Chief Judge, Justice John Tsoho, for reassignment.

Justice Egwuatu had, on March 19, set aside its order of March 4, declaring the suspension of Sen. Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan by the Senate as null and void.

Justice Obiora Egwuatu, in a ruling, vacated the suit after listening to the arguments of counsel for the plaintiff and lawyers to the defendants in the suit.

NAN observes that though the court had earlier fixed today for the hearing of the matter, March 19 was however, rescheduled to take the motion on notice filed by the Senate (2nd defendant) to seek for the order vacating the March 4 order which declared any action taken by the defendants during the pendency of the suit as null, void and of no effect whatsoever.

READ ALSO:  Gas explosion on Otedola Bridge kills newlywed couple, others

The judge had granted Natasha’s five reliefs on March 4, including Order Number Four which declared any action taken by the defendants during the pendency of the suit as null, void and of no effect whatsoever.

The judge granted the five prayers after Sanusi Musa, SAN, who appeared for Natasha, moved the ex-parte motion marked: FHC/ABJ/CS/384/2025.

Natasha, who represents Kogi Central Senatorial District, had, in the motion ex-parte, sued clerk of the National Assembly and the Senate as 1st and 2nd defendants.

She also named the President of the Senate and Sen. Neda Imasuem, who is the Chairman, Senate Committee on Ethics, Privileges and Code of Conduct as 3rd and 4th defendants respectively.

The senator had sought an order of interim injunction restraining the Senate’s committee headed by Imasuem from proceeding with the purported investigation against her for alleged misconduct sequel to the events that occurred at the plenary on Feb. 20, pursuant to the referral by the Senate on Feb. 25, pending the hearing and determination of the motion on notice for interlocutory injunction, among others.

However, the Senate, in a motion on notice filed on March 17 by its lawyer, Chikaosolu Ojukwu, SAN, had sought an order setting aside Order Number Four in the enrolled ex-parte order made by Justice Egwuatu against the defendants in Natasha’s suit.

The Senate, through Mr Ojukwu, urged the judge to vacate the order in the interest of fair hearing.

“By Section 4 of the 1999 Constitution, the Senate of the Federal Republic of Nigeria is one of the Houses of the National Assembly established to make laws for the peace, order and good governance of the Federal Republic of Nigeria.

READ ALSO:  Domestic violence: Arrest, prosecute Anambra LG boss, HURIWA tasks Soludo

“That the said Order No. 4 of 4th March, 2025 as granted, effectively restrains the Senate of the Federal Republic of Nigeria from conducting any of its legislative duties in accordance with its constitutional functions.”

Mr Ojukwu said enforcing the said order, as granted, would result in a constitutional crisis and anarchy, as the entire legislative duties of the Senate would be made to grind to a halt.

“The order offends the doctrine of separation of powers as enshrined in Section 4 of the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria.

“This honourable court lacks the jurisdiction to restrain parliament from conducting its constitutional duties,” he said.

He therefore urged the court to hold that the entire proceedings of March 4 upon which that breach occured was in nullity.

Lawyer to the clerk, Charles Yoila; Kehinde Ogunwumiju, SAN, who appeared for Akpabio and Umeh Kalu, SAN, who represented Imasuem, aligned themselves with Ojukwu’s argument.

But counsel, who appeared for Natasha, Michael Numa, SAN, disagreed with their submissions.

He described their argument as the conspiracy of the defence.

The lawyer urged the court to dismiss the defence application and exercise its disciplinary powers on them for alleged contempt of the valid court order.

He argued that the defendants had, with audacity, disobeyed the order of the court.

While responding to the argument of Ojukwu, Numa submitted that “parties are bound by the prayers on the motion paper.”

He urged the court to discountenance the application.

The lawyer argued that the court must consider the entire orders in their ex-parte motion and not in piecemeal.

READ ALSO:  INEC summons parties, police plan N13bn firearms purchase

He said their argument was immaterial.

According to him, the Senate (2nd defendant) did not mention the propriety of Orders One, Two, Three and Five made by this honourable court.

“The fact that Order Four was made is only an ancillary order to give effect to the motion that until the matter is dispensed with,” he said.

Numa described the application by the defence as an affront on the court, that the judge should set aside the orders they had not challenged.

He said the defendants had not even addressed the order directing them to show cause within 72 hours upon the service of the order.

“This is an invitation to anarchy my lord,” he said, citing previous cases to back his argument.

“Whatever reservation they have, their only duty is to come to court. The order was that the respondents to come and show course.

“Their application is self-defeating,” he argued.
NAN reports that in her contempt charge, the embattled lawmaker argued that her suspension constituted wilful disobedience to the subsisting court order issued on March 4.

She stated that an enrolled order of the interim injunction issued by Justice Egwuatu was duly served on the defendants on March 5.

According to Form 48, the defendants/contemnors “deliberately and contumaciously disregarded” the binding directive of the court and “proceeded with acts in flagrant defiance of the authority of the court.”

NAN

 

Continue Reading

Legal Affairs

Outrage as Court Grants Bail to Suspects in Wedding Guest Killings in Plateau

Published

on

Relatives of the 13 wedding guests killed in Plateau State have condemned the State High Court’s decision to release 20 suspects on bail.

The victims were brutally murdered on June 12, 2025, when a mob attacked their bus in Mangun district, Mangu Local Government Area.

They were traveling from Kaduna State to attend a wedding in Qua’an Pan LGA before tragedy struck.

According to reports, the group lost their way and entered a volatile community already shaken by recent terrorist activity.

Local youths allegedly mistook them for bandits and launched a deadly assault, leaving 13 people dead on the spot.

Following the killings, security operatives arrested 21 suspects.

In an earlier court sitting, 20 of them were remanded at the Jos Correctional Center while investigations continued.

However, on Wednesday, August 20, Justice Nafisa Lawal Musa granted bail after a motion filed by defence counsel, Garba Pwul (SAN).

This ruling has triggered outrage among the families of the victims, who insist the development is a slap in the face of justice.

Mallam Abdullahi Tahir Balami, a relative of one of the deceased, condemned the court’s action.

Speaking to reporters, he described the ruling as suspicious and raised concerns about possible foul play.

“With this development, we are now questioning the commitment of the Plateau State government to justice,” Balami said.

“It is saddening that suspects in a multiple homicide case can be released on bail.”

Another relative, Mallam Ubale Anguwar Dantsoho, who lost several family members, also expressed anger.

He described the decision as shocking and warned that justice may never be served.

READ ALSO:  KWARA: Saraki Allies Shift Gears, Spark 2027 Political Storm

“How can suspects in a murder case be granted bail?” he asked. “It shows that our system is failing us.”

Maryam Usman, widow of the driver killed in the massacre, expressed her heartbreak.

She said she struggled to understand why suspects linked to such a crime would be freed.

“What kind of court is this?” she asked in despair. “Instead of justice, the court dashed our hopes. We no longer believe justice will come.”

Her words echoed the feelings of many families now convinced that the judiciary has abandoned them.

Human rights activists are also calling for urgent intervention from both the state and federal governments to ensure accountability.

The Plateau killings have become one of the most disturbing tragedies in recent months.

The case now highlights the growing tension between grieving families and a judicial system accused of ignoring victims.

Continue Reading

Legal Affairs

Court upholds Zamfara govt’s seizure of 40 vehicles from Matawalle

Published

on

Zamfara State Governor, Ambassador Bello Matawalle

The Court of Appeal in Sokoto has upheld the Federal High Court’s decision dismissing former Zamfara State Governor Bello Matawalle’s challenge over the confiscation of over 40 official vehicles seized from his residence after he left office in 2023.

Delivering its unanimous verdict on August 8, 2025, a three-member panel led by Justice A.M. Talba ruled that Matawalle failed to provide credible evidence proving personal ownership of the vehicles.

The court emphasized that the vehicles were government property, not private assets, and rejected his claim that the seizure violated his fundamental property rights.

According to Zamfara State Governor Dauda Lawal’s spokesman, Sulaiman Idris, the vehicles were recovered in June 2023 after Matawalle and his deputy ignored a five-day ultimatum to return them.

Following their refusal, the state government sought and obtained a court order, enabling police operatives to raid Matawalle’s residence and recover the vehicles.

Initially, Matawalle secured an interim ruling from the Federal High Court in Gusau for the vehicles to be returned to him.

He also filed a separate suit claiming the confiscation breached his fundamental rights.

However, the case was transferred to the Sokoto division of the Federal High Court, which dismissed his claims in December 2023, affirming that the vehicles remained state property.

Dissatisfied with the lower court’s ruling, Matawalle escalated the matter to the Court of Appeal.

The appellate court, however, upheld the Federal High Court’s decision, affirming that the police acted lawfully in investigating the alleged misappropriation and that the state government followed due process in retrieving the vehicles.

READ ALSO:  A’Ibom Polls: INEC, REC say tribunal erred in cancelling 18 LGs

The court concluded that Matawalle’s claims lacked merit and could not shield him from investigation or potential prosecution.

 

Continue Reading

Legal Affairs

Your tenure as LP chairman is over — Court, INEC tell defiant Abure

Published

on

Abure faction of Labour Party insists Supreme Court Labour Party judgment was in Abure's favour

The leadership crisis tearing the Labour Party apart appears to have reached a turning point as the Federal High Court in Abuja, on Friday, struck out Julius Abure’s case against the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), officially affirming that he is no longer the party’s National Chairman.

The court, in Suit No. FHC/ABJ/CS/1523/2025, dismissed Abure’s suit due to a lack of jurisdiction, aligning with the Supreme Court’s earlier verdict on April 4, 2025 (Appeal No. SC/CV/56/2025), which voided all prior recognitions of his leadership.

However, while speaking on the judgment, Senator Nenadi Usman, the party’s Interim National Chairman, described the ruling as a clear victory for the rule of law.

“This decision removes every lingering doubt about Abure’s status. The chapter is closed. It’s time to put distractions behind us and rebuild the Labour Party into the disciplined, people-centred movement Nigerians deserve”, she said.

Also, INEC’s counter-affidavit in the case further solidified the court’s position, stressing that Abure’s tenure, along with that of the National Executive Committee, had expired in June 2024.

The commission also argued that the controversial March 27, 2024 “Nnewi National Convention” was invalid as it violated the 1999 Constitution, the Electoral Act 2022, INEC guidelines, and the Labour Party’s own constitution.

Senator Usman commended the electoral commission for its “clarity, courage, and institutional integrity” in presenting the facts and urged party members to “respect the supremacy of the Constitution and the authority of the courts.”

With bye-elections on the horizon and the 2027 general elections in sight, this ruling could mark the end of a year-long factional battle that has plagued the party.

READ ALSO:  Anambra State secures N3 billion grant from Central Bank

The focus now shifts to uniting the Labour Party and preparing for the political challenges ahead.

 

Continue Reading

Legal Affairs

NNPC secures landmark court victory against Senator Araraume

Published

on

Senator Araraume

 

On August 8, 2025, the Court of Appeal, sitting in Abuja, upheld NNPC Ltd.’s appeal against the Federal High Court’s April 2023 judgement that annulled Senator Ifeanyi Araraume’s removal as non-executive Chairman of the NNPC Board and awarded him ₦5 billion in damages.

The Court of Appeal’s judgement spares NNPC Ltd a massive financial payout and removes a legal risk that could have invalidated all decisions of the Board since 2021.

The Appeal Court agreed to NNPC Ltd.’s position that the Federal High Court’s earlier decision was delivered in error, noting amongst others, that the claim was statute-barred.

This decision of the Court of Appeal secures governance stability for NNPC Ltd., sets a corporate governance precedent in Nigerian law, and upholds the validity of Board resolutions critical to the oil and gas industry’s investment and policy direction.

 

Continue Reading

Legal Affairs

Ibom Airport Saga: Court discharges Comfort Emmason

Published

on

Comfort Emmanson

An Ikeja Magistrates’ Court on Wednesday cleared Miss Comfort Emmason of all charges related to unruly behavior and assaulting the flight crew aboard an Ibom Air flight from Uyo to Lagos.

Magistrate Olanrewaju Salami struck out the five-count charge following the withdrawal of the case by the police prosecution team.

During the hearing, prosecutor Oluwabunmi Adeitan informed the court of new developments that led to the decision to discontinue the case.

She submitted a formal application for its withdrawal, which the court accepted, effectively bringing the matter to a close.

 

 

 

 

 

Continue Reading

Latest from DDM TV

Latest Updates

Police Arrest Fake Doctor as Woman Dies During Abortion

Trump Orders Review of 55 Million US Visa Holders in Mega Crackdown

2027: ADC Coalition Deceiving Nigerians – Baba-Ahmed

Tinubu Secures Fresh $238m Loan from Japan

‘Gate of Hell’ Will Open on Gaza’– Israeli Defence Issues Finally Warning to Hamas

NAFDAC Raises Alarm as Fake Cowbell Milk Floods Nigerian Markets

‘Misplaced Priority’: Peter Obi Blasts FG’s ₦142bn Bus Terminal Project

Why I’ll never encourage my son to visit Nigeria — Taribo West

Hardship: Man commits suicide in Imo

Canada Announces Permanent Residence Lottery Results for Foreign Workers

Subscribe to DDM Newsletter for Latest News

Trending

Copyright © 2023 -2024 Diaspora Digital Media (DDM) www.diasporadigitalmedia.com. All Rights Reserved . NOTE: All opinion articles published on Diaspora Digital Media are ENTIRELY those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the publishers.

Get Notifications from DDM News Yes please No thanks