Mazi Nnamdi Kanu delivered a fiery broadcast on June 10, 2020.

He accused former U.S. President Barack Obama of playing a key role in Nigeria’s crisis.

Kanu claimed Obama supported Boko Haram to remove former President Goodluck Jonathan from office.

According to Kanu, Obama’s actions were part of a global plan to protect white supremacy.

Diaspora digital media (DDM) reviled that he insisted that Jonathan’s presidency faced opposition just 16 days after he was sworn in.

Kanu alleged that a conspiracy to oust Jonathan began with Obama’s backing.

He accused the former U.S. president of enabling Boko Haram’s rise to power.

Jonathan reportedly sought help from Obama during Nigeria’s security crisis.

Kanu claimed that Obama ignored Jonathan’s phone calls.

Jonathan later traveled to Washington to seek direct assistance.

Obama allegedly refused to help him during their meeting.

Kanu described Obama’s refusal as evidence of his support for Boko Haram.

According to Kanu, Obama’s goal was to ensure a Muslim-led government in Nigeria.

He claimed Yoruba politicians also contributed to Jonathan’s removal.

Kanu criticized Yoruba leaders for backing Muhammadu Buhari in the 2015 elections.

He accused them of undermining fairness in Nigeria’s political system.

Kanu argued that Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s presidential ambitions continued this unfair practice.

He claimed the Yoruba elite supported Tinubu over an Igbo candidate.

According to Kanu, this was part of a larger conspiracy against the Southeast.

Kanu links Jonathan’s struggles to Israeli intelligence

Kanu alleged that Jonathan sought help from Israel’s intelligence agency, Mossad.

Mossad reportedly advised Jonathan to consult former military ruler Ibrahim Babangida.

Jonathan then appointed Sambo Dasuki as national security adviser.

Kanu claimed Dasuki demanded unrestricted access to Nigeria’s central bank.

Jonathan allegedly agreed to this condition without hesitation.

Kanu stated that Dasuki recommended Sanusi Lamido Sanusi as central bank governor.

This appointment, according to Kanu, favored Babangida and other northern elites.

He accused them of looting Nigeria’s resources through the central bank.

Kanu argued that northern politicians manipulated Nigeria’s economy.

He said they enriched themselves while weakening Jonathan’s government.

Boko Haram and foreign involvement

Kanu accused Obama of enabling Boko Haram’s activities.

He claimed the U.S. government protected the terrorist group.

Kanu said Voice of America (VOA) reported on Obama’s involvement.

He alleged that northern leaders supported Boko Haram for political gain.

According to Kanu, Buhari had ties to the terrorist organization.

He criticized Yoruba politicians for supporting Buhari despite his alleged connections.

Kanu claimed that Yoruba leaders prioritized their own interests.

He argued that their decisions harmed the country’s stability.

Media manipulation and corruption

Kanu accused the Yoruba-controlled media of spreading false narratives.

He claimed they falsely labeled Jonathan as corrupt.

According to Kanu, this was part of a political agenda.

He alleged that the media’s goal was to discredit Jonathan.

Kanu insisted that Jonathan was a victim of propaganda.

He accused northern politicians of controlling the media.

Kanu said they used Sanusi’s position at the central bank to their advantage.

He alleged that Babangida had unlimited access to public funds.

According to Kanu, northern elites stole Nigeria’s wealth without consequences.

He criticized Babangida for continued corruption despite his health condition.

The case of Olisa Metuh

Kanu condemned the imprisonment of Olisa Metuh.

He argued that Metuh’s detention was politically motivated.

According to Kanu, Dasuki, who allegedly funded Metuh, was set free.

He questioned why Metuh remained in prison.

Kanu linked Metuh’s detention to his Igbo identity.

He claimed that the Nigerian government targeted Igbos unfairly.

Kanu insisted that IPOB would fight for Metuh’s release.

He accused the government of selective justice.

According to Kanu, northern politicians were never held accountable.

He said only Igbo politicians faced harsh punishments.

Obama blamed for Nigeria’s crisis

Kanu linked Nigeria’s ongoing killings to Obama’s failures.

He accused the former U.S. president of allowing violence to spread.

Kanu stated that Christians in Nigeria were suffering because of Obama.

He listed individuals he believed were responsible for Nigeria’s crisis.

Obama topped Kanu’s list of alleged perpetrators.

He also blamed Babangida, Buhari, and Dasuki.

Sanusi Lamido Sanusi was also named by Kanu.

He accused the northern governors of complicity.

Kanu claimed they enabled insecurity for personal gain.

He alleged that their actions led to continuous bloodshed.

Nigeria is finished – Kanu declares

Kanu concluded his broadcast with a dire warning.

He declared that Nigeria was beyond repair.

According to Kanu, the country was already “finished.”

He vowed to continue fighting for Biafra’s independence.

Kanu expressed frustration over Nigeria’s political system.

He accused the government of systemic oppression.

Kanu reaffirmed IPOB’s commitment to justice.

He warned Aisha Buhari over Olisa Metuh’s case.

Kanu threatened consequences if Metuh was not released.

His broadcast sparked widespread reactions across Nigeria.

Many supporters hailed Kanu’s remarks as bold.

Critics dismissed his claims as unfounded conspiracy theories.

Kanu’s speech intensified debates on Nigeria’s future.

His accusations against Obama remained controversial.

The broadcast reflected Kanu’s radical stance on governance.

It highlighted his distrust of Nigeria’s leadership.

Kanu remains a polarizing figure in Nigerian politics.

His calls for Biafra’s independence continue to gain support.

Nigeria’s political landscape remains deeply divided.

Kanu’s statements will likely fuel further discussions.

The struggle for justice and equity in Nigeria continues.

His words resonate with many who feel marginalized.

Kanu’s influence continues to shape political discourse.

His movement remains strong despite government opposition.

Many believe his accusations reveal deeper truths.

Kanu’s voice continues to challenge the Nigerian establishment.

His fight for Biafra remains at the center of national debates.

As Nigeria faces ongoing security challenges, Kanu’s claims remain relevant.

His criticism of past and present leaders keeps his supporters engaged.

Kanu’s message continues to inspire both support and resistance.

His influence in Nigerian politics cannot be ignored.

Whether admired or opposed, Kanu remains a major political figure.

His June 10 broadcast adds to his legacy of activism.

Kanu’s impact on Nigeria’s future is yet to be determined.

For Diaspora Digital Media Updates click on Whatsapp, or Telegram. For eyewitness accounts/ reports/ articles, write to: citizenreports@diasporadigitalmedia.com. Follow us on X (Fomerly Twitter) or Facebook