News
Afe Babalola Sets Conditions for Resolving Defamation Case After Peter Obi’s Intervention
By: Amaechi Okoro

Renowned legal icon, Afe Babalola, has conveyed a clear message to Peter Obi, the 2023 Labour Party presidential candidate, following Obi’s visit to him over a contentious defamation case involving Dele Farotimi, a prominent figure in the “Obidient Movement.” Babalola stated unequivocally that Farotimi must retract his not-guilty plea and issue a public apology in major national newspapers for the matter to be resolved amicably.
This development, reported by The Diaspora Digital Media (DDM), occurred during Obi’s visit to Babalola on Monday evening. Obi reportedly made the trip to appeal for clemency on behalf of Farotimi, who has been in detention since last week over allegations of criminal defamation and cybercrime.
Farotimi’s arrest and detention have sparked widespread debate, particularly because of the alleged defamatory statements made in his book, Nigeria and its Criminal Justice System, where he reportedly criticized Babalola’s reputation and professional conduct. The case, which has drawn public attention, underscores the ongoing tension between the rights to free expression and the responsibility to avoid defamation.
The roots of the controversy date back to the publication of Farotimi’s book, which purportedly contained statements that Babalola described as a direct attack on his character and legacy. Babalola, a senior advocate of Nigeria and an influential figure in the legal field, expressed outrage over the remarks, insisting that they were not only false but also damaging to his decades-long reputation.
The situation escalated when Farotimi, refusing to retract the statements, maintained his stance in public appearances. This defiance led Babalola to initiate legal proceedings against him, citing criminal defamation and violations of cybercrime laws.
Farotimi’s arrest in Ado-Ekiti last week marked a turning point in the case. While some individuals argued that the charges were excessive, others emphasized the need for accountability when public figures make unsubstantiated claims. The legal process intensified as Farotimi was remanded in custody pending a hearing on his bail application, scheduled for December 20.
Peter Obi’s visit to Babalola represented a notable attempt to mediate the escalating conflict. Sources revealed that Obi, a former governor of Anambra State and a well-respected figure in Nigerian politics, sought to appeal to Babalola’s sense of forgiveness. He aimed to secure leniency for Farotimi, emphasizing the need for reconciliation rather than prolonged legal battles.
Obi’s intervention was not an isolated effort. Prior to his visit, former President Olusegun Obasanjo and Catholic Bishop of Sokoto Diocese, Matthew Hassan Kukah, reportedly reached out to Babalola to discuss the issue. Their involvement highlighted the significance of the case and the widespread concern over its implications for both parties.
During his meeting with Babalola, Obi acknowledged the gravity of the allegations against Farotimi but urged for a resolution that would allow the matter to be settled outside the courtroom. He expressed hope that an apology from Farotimi could bring the case to an end.
Babalola, in response to Obi’s plea, reiterated his willingness to drop the case if specific conditions were met. He emphasized that Farotimi must publicly admit to the allegations and publish a formal apology in several prominent newspapers. According to a source privy to the conversation, Babalola stated, “I have nothing to gain by keeping Farotimi in detention. If he acknowledges the falsehood of his claims and apologizes publicly, I will consider withdrawing the case.”
However, Babalola also posed a critical question to Obi during their discussion. He asked whether Obi had personally spoken to Farotimi to gauge his level of remorse. This query underscored Babalola’s insistence on genuine contrition from Farotimi as a prerequisite for any reconciliation.
Farotimi, on the other hand, has reportedly adopted a defiant position. Sources revealed that he expressed disinterest in having anyone plead on his behalf. Instead, he demanded that the charges against him be dropped as a precondition for any apology. This stance has further complicated efforts to resolve the dispute.
Observers have noted that Farotimi’s approach reflects his belief in the validity of his claims and his unwillingness to compromise under pressure. However, this position also risks prolonging the legal battle and potentially exacerbating the fallout from the case.
The case has sparked broader conversations about the balance between free speech and accountability in Nigeria’s legal and political landscape.
While some commentators have supported Babalola’s pursuit of legal redress, others have questioned the appropriateness of criminal charges in a defamation case.
Critics of Farotimi have argued that public figures must exercise caution when making statements that could harm others’ reputations.
On the other hand, advocates of free speech have warned against the use of legal actions to silence dissenting voices, emphasizing the need for proportionality in addressing disputes.
As the case unfolds, it has drawn attention to the complexities of Nigeria’s defamation and cybercrime laws. Legal experts have highlighted the need for clearer guidelines to address conflicts between the right to free expression and the protection of individual reputations.
Farotimi is expected to remain in custody until December 20, when Magistrate Adeosun will rule on his bail application. In the meantime, efforts to mediate the dispute are likely to continue, with stakeholders exploring avenues for reconciliation.
For Babalola, the case represents an opportunity to assert his commitment to defending his reputation against unfounded attacks.
For Obi and other mediators, it is a chance to demonstrate the value of dialogue and forgiveness in resolving conflicts.
Ultimately, the resolution of this case will depend on the willingness of both parties to find common ground. Whether through public apologies, legal proceedings, or further mediation, the outcome will likely have significant implications for Nigeria’s political and legal spheres.
We will keep you updated…….
For Diaspora Digital Media Updates click on Whatsapp, or Telegram. For eyewitness accounts/ reports/ articles, write to: citizenreports@diasporadigitalmedia.com. Follow us on X (Fomerly Twitter) or Facebook