At least three people, including two police officers, have been killed in an explosion on Yeletskaya Street in Moscow, Russian authorities said.
According to the Investigative Committee of Russia, the incident occurred when two traffic police officers approached a “suspicious individual” near a police vehicle.
The suspect reportedly detonated an explosive device as the officers attempted to detain him. The blast killed the two officers and a civilian who was standing nearby.
The officers have been identified by Russian media as Ilya Klimanov, 24, and Maxim Gorbunov, 25.
A spokesperson for the Investigative Committee, Svetlana Petrenko, confirmed via Telegram that a criminal investigation has been opened “regarding an attempt on the lives of traffic police officers.”
The explosion comes days after a senior Russian general, Lt. Gen. Fanil Sarvarov, 56, was killed in a car bombing in Moscow. Sarvarov, head of the armed forces’ operational training department, died when an explosive device planted under his car detonated.
Russian authorities have suspected Ukrainian involvement, although Ukraine has not commented on the claim.
Residents near the scene reported a loud blast. Alexander, who lives nearby, told Reuters:
“There was an explosion. It was a loud bang like with the car a few days ago.”
Sarvarov’s death marked the third bombing targeting military officials in Moscow in the past year. It is unclear whether the two recent explosions are linked.
The investigation into the Yeletskaya Street blast is ongoing.
The Federal High Court in Abuja has ordered the final forfeiture of two expansive plots of land originally designated for the Goodluck Jonathan Legacy Model Housing Estate, following allegations that the properties were used as proceeds of unlawful activity.
Justice Mohammed Umar delivered the ruling while hearing a motion filed by the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC), represented by counsel Osuobeni Akponimisingha. The defense, led by Hassan Liman (SAN), did not raise any objections to the motion.
In his ruling, Justice Umar directed the ICPC, acting on behalf of the Federal Government, to supervise the construction of 962 residential housing units on the forfeited lands. The exercise is to be carried out in collaboration with the Federal Mortgage Bank of Nigeria (FMBN), which the court identified as the victim of the alleged unlawful activity. A joint committee between ICPC and FMBN was mandated to oversee the project and ensure the units are ultimately allocated to the intended beneficiaries.
The forfeited properties include Plot No. 5, Cadastral Zone D12, Kaba District, Abuja, measuring approximately 122,015.80 square metres and valued at N1.94 billion, as well as Plot No. 4 in the same zone, measuring about 157,198.30 square metres and valued at N3.34 billion.
The court noted that the plots were initially allocated by the Federal Capital Territory Administration for the construction of residential units under the National Housing Fund Scheme through the FMBN. The project, approved on July 30, 2012, was to be executed by Good Earth Power Nigeria Limited with a loan facility of $65 million from Ecobank.
However, investigations by the ICPC revealed that despite full payment of the project funds, including a N3.78 billion drawdown in November 2012, no construction took place, and the developer allegedly attempted to sell the land to unsuspecting members of the public.
Justice Umar, who had earlier granted an interim forfeiture on July 9, 2025, emphasized the need to protect public assets and ensure that the project benefits low-income earners as intended. The court’s final forfeiture order now allows the ICPC and FMBN to take control of the properties and ensure the housing estate’s completion.
The ruling is seen as a significant step toward recovering public funds and safeguarding housing projects allocated under the National Housing Fund Scheme.
Nigeria’s kidnap-for-ransom crisis generated at least N2.57 billion for criminal groups between July 2024 and June 2025, according to SBM Intelligence’s report, The Year Ahead at an Inflexion Point. During the period, kidnappers demanded approximately N48 billion but received only a fraction of that amount.
The report recorded 4,722 abductions across 997 incidents, resulting in 762 deaths, highlighting how kidnappings have evolved into a structured, profit-driven industry.
Despite higher naira ransom demands, currency depreciation meant kidnappers earned only $1.66 million, slightly above the $1.13 million collected in 2022.
The Northwest dominated kidnapping activity, accounting for 42.6% of incidents and 62.2% of victims.
Zamfara State recorded the highest number of victims (1,203), followed by Kaduna and Katsina. Mass abductions incidents involving five or more victims constituted 23% of cases and were largely concentrated in northern states.
The report also highlighted escalating violence accompanying kidnappings, with large-scale attacks and massacres reported across Zamfara, Benue, Plateau, Katsina, Kebbi, and Sokoto States.
SBM Intelligence warned that the growing ransom economy is now an organized enterprise, posing economic risks, undermining state authority, and worsening local insecurity.
High-profile incidents, such as the St. Mary’s Catholic School abduction in Niger State, where over 300 students and 12 teachers were kidnapped, underscore the urgent need for action.
In response, President Bola Tinubu recently increased Nigeria Police Force recruitment from 30,000 to 50,000 to tackle rising security challenges
The political storm that has battered Rivers State for months did not arrive without warning, nor is it ending without consequences. Behind the public statements, court orders, legislative standoffs, and dramatic accusations lies a far-reaching political agreement whose implications may redefine power, loyalty, and democratic choice in one of Nigeria’s most strategically important states. At the centre of this unfolding drama is a claim by Nyesom Wike, Minister of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) and former governor of Rivers State, that the deal which brought Siminalayi Fubara to power was explicit, binding, and unambiguous: no second term ambition, no control of local governments, and in return, peace and stability in Rivers State.
According to Wike, that agreement was later violated, triggering the political implosion that plunged Rivers into legislative paralysis and executive-legislative warfare. Now, fresh revelations emerging from inside the Presidency suggest that President Bola Ahmed Tinubu personally intervened to broker a truce—one that may restore calm but at an enormous political cost to Governor Fubara.
Multiple sources familiar with the negotiations told DDM NEWS that President Tinubu agreed to reinstate Fubara as the substantive governor of Rivers State following weeks of tension and institutional breakdown, but only under strict and far-reaching conditions. Chief among them: that Fubara would complete his constitutionally mandated four-year tenure but categorically abandon any ambition to seek re-election in 2027.
The Making of a Political Pact
To understand the gravity of the current deal, one must return to the power transition of 2023. Wike, a dominant political force in Rivers for eight years, handpicked Siminalayi Fubara as his successor after an intense internal struggle within the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP). At the time, the choice was framed as continuity, stability, and loyalty. But insiders now insist it was also anchored on a deeper, unwritten understanding.
“The arrangement was clear: no second term, no local government control, and peace will return,” Wike was quoted as saying, a statement that has since reverberated across Nigeria’s political space. According to sources close to the former governor, Fubara was never meant to build an independent political structure or challenge the existing power configuration in Rivers. His role, they say, was transitional—govern, maintain stability, and exit after one term.
What changed, then, is the question that now dominates political discourse.
From Alliance to Open Warfare
Barely months into his tenure, cracks began to appear in the relationship between Fubara and his political benefactor. Disagreements over appointments, control of state institutions, and political loyalty quickly escalated into open confrontation. The Rivers State House of Assembly became the main battleground, splitting sharply along pro-Wike and pro-Fubara lines.
At the height of the crisis, 27 lawmakers loyal to Wike were suspended, effectively crippling the legislative arm and plunging the state into constitutional uncertainty. Accusations flew from both sides: betrayal, insubordination, political overreach, and sabotage. The situation deteriorated to the point where governance was stalled, public confidence shaken, and national attention firmly fixed on Port Harcourt.
For Wike, the crisis was the direct result of a broken pact. For Fubara’s supporters, it was the inevitable consequence of a governor attempting to assert independence and govern without external control.
Tinubu Steps In
With Rivers State teetering on the edge of prolonged instability, President Bola Tinubu reportedly decided that federal intervention was unavoidable. Sources within the Presidency confirmed to DDM NEWS that a closed-door meeting was convened at the Presidential Villa, bringing together all the principal actors in the crisis.
Present at the meeting were President Tinubu; Nyesom Wike, now a powerful cabinet member; Governor Siminalayi Fubara; Martin Amaewhule, the suspended Speaker of the Rivers State House of Assembly; and several lawmakers aligned with Wike. The atmosphere, according to those briefed on the meeting, was tense but pragmatic.
“The President made it clear that Rivers could not continue like this,” a senior presidency source told DDM NEWS. “The crisis was undermining governance, investor confidence, and national stability. Something had to give.”
What emerged from that meeting was a truce—carefully negotiated, politically weighted, and deeply consequential.
The Conditions of Peace
At the core of the agreement is Fubara’s reinstatement as governor, effectively restoring executive authority and ending the immediate constitutional limbo. But that restoration came with conditions that dramatically curtail his political future and operational control.
According to multiple presidency sources, Fubara agreed that he would not seek re-election in 2027 under any circumstances. This concession, insiders say, was designed to neutralize his long-term political leverage and reassure Wike’s camp that the existing power structure in Rivers would not be permanently disrupted.
In addition, Wike was reportedly granted the authority to nominate all local government chairpersons across the 23 local government areas of Rivers State. This provision, sources say, is not symbolic—it is strategic.
“Local government control is the backbone of grassroots politics,” a presidency source explained to DDM NEWS. “By retaining that leverage, Wike effectively maintains political dominance at the base, even without direct control of the state government.”
This arrangement, insiders argue, restores Wike’s grassroots machinery, ensuring his continued relevance and influence ahead of future political contests.
The Legislature and the Price of Calm
The agreement also addressed the legislative deadlock that had paralysed governance. As part of the truce, Fubara reportedly agreed to pay all outstanding allowances, salaries, and entitlements owed to the 27 lawmakers loyal to Wike who were suspended during the crisis.
This concession was crucial, sources say, to restoring the functionality of the Rivers State House of Assembly and bringing the lawmakers back into the fold. It was also a tacit acknowledgment that the suspensions, while politically expedient at the time, had become unsustainable.
“The deal was about restoring calm,” a source familiar with the negotiations told DDM NEWS, “but it came at a steep cost for Fubara.”
Democratic Order or Political Bargain?
Officially, presidency sources describe the agreement as part of a broader effort to restore democratic order in Rivers State. Privately, however, the deal has ignited fierce debate about the limits of democracy, the ethics of political bargains, and the power of unelected agreements over voters’ choices.
Critics argue that conditioning a sitting governor’s reinstatement on abandoning re-election ambitions undermines the very essence of democratic competition. Others question the propriety of allowing a federal minister to effectively control local governments in a state he no longer governs.
Supporters of the deal, however, insist that Rivers was heading toward chaos and that compromise was necessary to avert a deeper crisis.
“This was not an ideal solution,” a senior political insider told DDM NEWS, “but it was a practical one. The alternative was prolonged instability, court battles, and a complete breakdown of governance.”
Wike’s Enduring Shadow
What the agreement makes abundantly clear is that Nyesom Wike’s influence in Rivers politics remains formidable. Despite leaving office and taking up a federal role, he has retained deep control over party structures, legislative alliances, and now, reportedly, local government administration.
For Wike, the truce appears to validate his long-held position that political agreements must be respected. His assertion that “the agreement was clear” is not merely rhetorical—it is now backed by a settlement that largely aligns with his original terms.
Political analysts note that Wike’s ability to extract such concessions speaks volumes about his strategic relevance within the ruling power structure at the national level.
Fubara: Governor, But at What Cost?
For Governor Siminalayi Fubara, the agreement presents a paradox. On one hand, he retains his office, authority, and the opportunity to complete his tenure. On the other, his political wings appear clipped.
Without control of local governments and barred from seeking re-election, Fubara’s capacity to build a lasting political legacy is severely constrained. Some of his supporters see the deal as a betrayal of the popular mandate he received in 2023. Others argue that survival within a hostile political environment required painful compromise.
“Fubara chose governance over prolonged war,” a political observer told DDM NEWS. “Whether history judges that choice kindly remains to be seen.”
The Bigger Picture
Beyond Rivers State, the episode raises fundamental questions about Nigerian politics: the power of godfatherism, the fragility of institutions, and the extent to which behind-the-scenes agreements shape democratic outcomes.
It also underscores the growing role of the Presidency as an arbiter in state-level political conflicts, a trend that some analysts warn could weaken federalism if left unchecked.
As Rivers State cautiously steps back from the brink, the calm is fragile, the wounds are deep, and the future uncertain. What is clear, however, is that the 2027 political landscape in Rivers has already been reshaped—not by voters, but by negotiation.
For DDM NEWS, this developing story is not just about one state or one agreement. It is a window into the mechanics of power in Nigeria, where loyalty, leverage, and compromise often matter as much as ballots and constitutions. Whether the truce delivers lasting peace or merely postpones another confrontation will depend on how faithfully its terms are honoured—and how long the people of Rivers are willing to accept politics decided behind closed doors.
The US Supreme Court has halted the deployment of the National Guard by President Donald Trump in Chicago in order to shield Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents, handing the Trump administration its most significant defeat so far this year.
In an unsigned order that was released on Tuesday, the Court stated that “the federal government has not presented any constitutional basis to justify the use of the military to enforce federal laws in Illinois.” However, this ruling happened despite the opposition of judges Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas, and Neil Gorsuch.
“But at the present stage, the government has failed to point to a source of authority sufficient to empower the military to carry out the laws within the state of Illinois,” the court explained.
Legal experts explain the impact of the ruling may have in other United States cities. Steve Vladeck, a CNN Supreme Court Analyst, calls the ruling “by far the most significant defeat the Supreme Court has handed Trump all year.”
The Trump administration had based its action on a 1908 federal law that permits the activation of the National Guard by the president when the “regular forces” are not sufficient to carry out the execution of the law.
Nonetheless, the court clarified that “regular forces” may refer to the standing army but not the civilian agencies, such as ICE, responsible for the execution of the law.
Justice Brett Kavanaugh, although aligning with the majority ruling, expressed concern that the ruling could end up creating unforeseen consequences during future emergencies because of how much leeway the Supreme Court has decided to give to the presidency in matters of emergency response.
The Illinois Attorney General Kwame Raoul expressed his appreciation for the decision, stating that it established that the legal standard required in order for the deployment of the Guard to override the state’s objection is not met.
The dissenting judge, Alito, had argued that the president had the constitutional power to safeguard his officers and property, as this case could endanger the lives of federal officials.
The judge felt that the Supreme Court was questioning the judgment of the president in assessing how threatened the employees of ICE are.
This comes after months of legal disputes after Trump mobilized a large number of National Guard personnel from the states of Illinois and Texas as a measure to quell protests near ICE facilities within the city of Chicago.
This was after lower courts blocked them from operational deployment, fearing the use of peaceful protests as riots.
Even though tensions in Chicago have now been alleviated, the government insisted that the deployment of guards was justified because of attacks carried out against members of federal law enforcement.
The Supreme Court ruling does give President Trump very limited alternatives, although he still has recourse to using Insurrection Act.
The case is a significant trial of the power of the president in matters of the use of the military inside the country and upholds the long established prohibition of the use of the military in civilian law enforcement efforts.
The United States has dismissed reports claiming that its Ambassador to Nigeria has been recalled following recent diplomatic exchanges between Washington and Nigeria, insisting that any change in ambassadorial postings is part of normal administrative procedure and not a sign of bilateral tension.
A senior U.S. State Department official in Washington, DC, clarified the situation on Tuesday night in response to enquiries from Vanguard.
According to the official, ambassadorial changes are routine under any administration and should not be interpreted as punitive or politically motivated.
“Any change in ambassador is a standard process in any administration. An ambassador is a personal representative of the President,” the official said.
The clarification comes amid speculation that the ambassador’s recall was linked to recent diplomatic discussions between the two countries, particularly following comments by U.S. President Donald Trump on security and religious freedom in Nigeria.
Addressing President Trump’s concerns about alleged religious violence, the State Department official acknowledged Nigeria’s ongoing efforts and stressed the expectation of continued improvement.
“The Government of Nigeria has undertaken reforms to prioritize the protection of Christian populations from extremist violence, and we expect Nigeria to continue making measurable progress in combating religiously motivated violence against Christian communities,” the official stated.
Reports of a possible recall had gained traction after heightened diplomatic engagement between both countries over security cooperation and religious freedom concerns.
However, the U.S. response suggests that such reports were speculative and not grounded in official policy decisions.
Earlier, the Federal Government of Nigeria had also played down the issue, stating that any diplomatic disagreement arising from President Trump’s remarks had been largely resolved through ongoing dialogue.
The latest response from Washington indicates that U.S.–Nigeria relations remain active and functional, with continued engagement focused on security reforms, counter-extremism efforts, and the protection of vulnerable communities.
A British man and five others have been charged with dozens of serious sexual offences against a woman over a 13-year period, in what police have described as a complex and extensive investigation.
Philip Young, 49, has been remanded in custody and faces 56 charges, including multiple counts of rape, administering substances to overpower his victim for sexual purposes, voyeurism, possession of indecent images of children and possession of extreme pornographic material, according to Wiltshire Police.
The charges relate to alleged offences committed against his former wife, Joanne Young, now 48, between 2010 and 2023. She has waived her automatic legal right to anonymity following discussions with police and support services.
Five additional men have also been charged in connection with offences against Ms Young and are currently on bail. They include:
Norman Macksoni, 47, charged with one count of rape and possession of extreme images;
Dean Hamilton, 47, charged with rape, sexual assault by penetration and two counts of sexual touching;
Conner Sanderson Doyle, 31, charged with sexual assault by penetration and sexual touching;
Richard Wilkins, 61, charged with rape and sexual touching;
Mohammed Hassan, 37, charged with sexual touching.
All six defendants are due to appear before Swindon Magistrates’ Court in southwest England on Tuesday.
Detective Superintendent Geoff Smith of Wiltshire Police described the charges as a “significant update” in a long-running investigation, adding that Ms Young is being supported by specially trained officers throughout the legal process.
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) confirmed it authorised the charges after reviewing evidence gathered during the police investigation.
“Our prosecutors have determined that there is sufficient evidence and that it is in the public interest to proceed with criminal charges,” said James Foster, a specialist CPS prosecutor.
He added that the CPS had worked closely with police during the investigation into the alleged offences.
The case is expected to attract significant public attention due to the number of charges, the length of time over which the alleged offences occurred, and the involvement of multiple defendants
The House of Representatives has approved President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s request to extend the implementation of the capital component of the 2025 Appropriation Act to 31 March 2026, citing funding constraints and fiscal realities.
The approval was granted on Tuesday during plenary after lawmakers adopted the report of the House Committee on Appropriations following a clause-by-clause consideration of the revised 2024 and 2025 budget bills in the Committee of Supply.
President Tinubu had last Friday transmitted the Appropriation (Repeal and Re-enactment) Bills for 2024 and 2025, seeking legislative approval to repeal the existing budgets and replace them with revised expenditure frameworks aligned with prevailing fiscal conditions.
In his request, the president said the revised budgets reflect a 30 per cent capital implementation target, which he described as more realistic given the government’s execution capacity. He added that extending the 2025 budget timeline would ensure the full release and utilisation of capital allocations by ministries, departments and agencies (MDAs).
As part of the review, the House passed the revised 2024 budget, increasing the total size from ₦35.05 trillion to ₦43.56 trillion. The revised framework provides ₦1.74 trillion for statutory transfers, ₦8.27 trillion for debt servicing, ₦11.27 trillion for recurrent expenditure, and ₦22.28 trillion for capital expenditure and development fund contributions.
Lawmakers also approved the revised 2025 budget, reducing total expenditure from ₦54.99 trillion to ₦48.32 trillion for the period ending March 31, 2026. The budget allocates ₦3.64 trillion to statutory transfers, ₦14.31 trillion to debt service, ₦13.58 trillion to recurrent spending, and ₦16.76 trillion to capital expenditure.
Presenting the committee’s report, Chairman of the Appropriations Committee, Abubakar Bichi, said the revisions were necessary due to revenue shortfalls and funding gaps affecting capital projects. He disclosed that about ₦16.76 trillion earmarked for capital projects could not be funded within the original 2025 timeline and would be rolled over to 2026.
While acknowledging concerns over overlapping budget cycles, Bichi said the committee agreed the extension was unavoidable given current fiscal constraints.
The House passed the bills for third reading and adjourned plenary until 27 January 2026 for the Christmas and New Year recess.
Nigeria’s already fragile democratic landscape has been thrown into renewed turmoil following grave allegations of an alleged plot to arrest, intimidate, and politically neutralize some of the country’s most prominent opposition figures. The alarm was raised by public affairs analyst and civic activist, Adekunle Adebayo, who warned that powerful forces within the state may be orchestrating a calculated clampdown aimed at silencing dissent and engineering a de facto one-party system under the guise of law enforcement and national security.
In a strongly worded statement obtained by DDM NEWS, Adebayo alleged that former Vice President Atiku Abubakar, former Rivers State Governor and ex-Minister of Transportation Rotimi Chibuike Amaechi, and former Kaduna State Governor Nasir Ahmad el-Rufai have been “marked” for arrest in what he described as a dangerous escalation of political repression in Africa’s most populous democracy. According to him, the alleged plan is not isolated or accidental but rather part of a broader, coordinated strategy to intimidate opposition voices, weaken pluralism, and consolidate power in the hands of the ruling establishment.
Adebayo’s claims, though yet to be officially confirmed by security agencies, have triggered intense debate across political, civil society, and diplomatic circles, reviving painful memories of Nigeria’s authoritarian past and raising questions about the direction of governance under the current political order.
A Pattern of Intimidation?
At the heart of Adebayo’s warning is the assertion that the alleged plot follows a worrying pattern that has been unfolding quietly but steadily across the political space. He pointed to the reported arrests, interrogations, and detentions of high-profile political actors in recent months, including former Sokoto State Governor Aminu Waziri Tambuwal, former Anambra State Governor and ex-Minister of Labour Chris Ngige, and former Attorney General of the Federation Abubakar Malami.
While government officials have consistently framed such actions as routine anti-corruption or security-related measures, critics argue that the timing, selectivity, and intensity of these actions suggest political motivations rather than impartial law enforcement. Adebayo contended that the alleged targeting of opposition figures reflects a deliberate strategy to cow political rivals into silence, weaken alternative power centers, and send a chilling message to anyone contemplating resistance to the ruling order.
“This is not about fighting corruption or enforcing the law,” Adebayo stated in his submission to DDM NEWS. “This is about using the instruments of the state to intimidate political opponents and frighten citizens into submission. When the law is applied selectively, democracy becomes a hollow shell.”
The Names on the List
According to Adebayo, the list of those allegedly being targeted goes beyond Atiku, Amaechi, and el-Rufai. He claimed that other influential political figures and former public office holders, including Isa Ali Pantami, Rauf Aregbesola, Kashim Ibrahim Imam, and several unnamed opposition strategists, are also under scrutiny and may face arrest, harassment, or prolonged investigations designed to weaken their political relevance.
The diversity of the alleged targets—spanning different regions, parties, and ideological backgrounds—has only deepened concerns that the campaign is less about accountability and more about eliminating perceived threats to the ruling political structure. Observers note that many of the named individuals are either vocal critics of the current administration or potential power brokers ahead of future electoral contests.
Atiku Abubakar, in particular, remains one of the most formidable opposition figures in the country, having contested multiple presidential elections and maintained a nationwide political network. Rotimi Amaechi, despite his past affiliation with the ruling party, has increasingly positioned himself as a critic of the political status quo, while Nasir el-Rufai has not hidden his discontent with certain policy directions and internal party dynamics. Their combined influence, analysts argue, makes them prime targets in any attempt to reshape the political battlefield ahead of future elections.
Constitutional Red Lines
Adebayo’s warning went beyond naming alleged targets; it also raised profound constitutional questions. He argued that any attempt to arrest or detain individuals based on political affiliation or opposition activity would constitute a blatant violation of the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (as amended).
He cited provisions guaranteeing personal liberty, freedom of association and expression, equality before the law, and the independence of the judiciary, stressing that these rights are not optional privileges granted at the discretion of those in power but fundamental pillars of democratic governance.
“Selective application of law enforcement based on political affiliation is incompatible with constitutional democracy,” Adebayo warned. “Once the state begins to weaponize its coercive apparatus against political opponents, the line between democracy and authoritarianism is crossed.”
Legal experts who spoke to DDM NEWS echoed these concerns, noting that the legitimacy of any arrest depends not only on the existence of allegations but also on due process, transparency, and the absence of political interference. They cautioned that even the perception of politically motivated arrests can erode public trust in institutions, weaken the rule of law, and fuel instability.
One-Party State by Stealth?
Perhaps the most alarming aspect of Adebayo’s claims is his assertion that Nigeria is drifting toward a de facto one-party state, not through constitutional amendments or overt bans on opposition parties, but through a subtler, more insidious process of intimidation, selective justice, and political suffocation.
According to him, democratic institutions may continue to exist in form—elections will be held, courts will sit, and parties will operate—but their substance will be hollowed out if opposition figures are systematically harassed, arrested, or forced into political irrelevance.
This warning resonates with broader concerns raised by civil society organizations in recent years about shrinking civic space, increasing pressure on the media, and the use of security agencies to police dissent. Nigeria’s history, marked by long periods of military rule, makes these fears particularly potent.
“Democracy does not die overnight,” a senior civil society leader told DDM NEWS. “It dies slowly, through a thousand small cuts—intimidation here, selective prosecution there—until one day citizens wake up and realize that the institutions they relied on no longer protect them.”
Government Silence and Public Anxiety
As of the time of filing this report, neither the presidency nor relevant security agencies have issued an official response to Adebayo’s allegations. The silence has only fueled speculation and anxiety, with political actors across party lines calling for clarity and reassurance.
Some ruling party supporters have dismissed the claims as alarmist, arguing that no one is above the law and that investigations into former officials should not be politicized. However, critics counter that accountability must be even-handed and transparent, warning that justice perceived as partisan quickly loses legitimacy.
On social media and in political forums, Nigerians have expressed a mixture of skepticism, fear, and anger. Many recall past episodes where opposition figures were targeted under the guise of national security, only for charges to be dropped quietly once political objectives had been achieved.
International Implications
Adebayo also urged the international community to pay close attention to unfolding events, warning that Nigeria’s democratic health has implications far beyond its borders. As Africa’s largest economy and most populous nation, Nigeria is often seen as a bellwether for democratic governance on the continent.
Diplomats and international partners, he argued, should not wait until the situation deteriorates further before raising concerns. History, he noted, has shown that early warning signs of democratic erosion are often ignored until it is too late.
Foreign observers contacted by DDM NEWS declined to comment on specific allegations but emphasized the importance of rule of law, political pluralism, and respect for human rights in sustaining stable partnerships with Nigeria.
A Call to Vigilance
In his concluding remarks, Adebayo called on Nigerians from all walks of life—politicians, civil society actors, professionals, religious leaders, and ordinary citizens—to remain vigilant and resist any attempt to normalize political repression. He stressed that the defense of democracy is not the responsibility of opposition figures alone but a collective duty owed to future generations.
“Nigeria risks sliding into a system where democratic institutions exist only in form, while political power is consolidated through coercion and selective justice,” he warned. “If we fail to speak out now, we may soon find that the space to do so has disappeared.”
As the nation watches and waits, the allegations raised by Adekunle Adebayo have added a new layer of tension to Nigeria’s political atmosphere. Whether they will prompt transparency and reassurance from authorities or deepen mistrust and polarization remains to be seen. What is clear, however, is that the stakes are high. In a country still struggling to entrench democratic norms after decades of authoritarian rule, even the perception of politically motivated arrests can have far-reaching consequences.
(DDM) – Major oil marketers in Nigeria have insisted that the Dangote Petroleum Refinery, despite its increasing domestic output and recent sharp price reductions, cannot single-handedly satisfy the country’s petrol supply requirements.
The marketers raised concerns that overreliance on a single refinery to meet nationwide fuel demands is creating challenges across the downstream sector, affecting distribution, pricing, and availability.
Industry sources said while the Dangote Refinery has significantly boosted local production, Nigeria’s fuel consumption continues to outpace the capacity of any single facility.
The refinery, located in Lagos State, is currently the largest in Africa and has been projected to produce hundreds of thousands of barrels of refined petroleum products daily.
Despite this, oil marketers warned that the nation still requires multiple operational refineries and robust import channels to maintain a stable supply chain.
According to them, disruptions or delays at any single facility could trigger shortages and inflate retail fuel prices.
They noted that domestic fuel demand remains highly volatile, influenced by seasonal consumption patterns, transportation needs, and economic activity.
The marketers said coordination between federal agencies, private operators, and local distributors is crucial to avoiding systemic bottlenecks.
They highlighted that although Dangote’s refinery reduces dependence on imported petrol, the facility alone cannot replace the aggregate capacity previously supplied by multiple private and government refineries.
The marketers also pointed out logistical challenges, such as limited pipeline networks, storage constraints, and regional disparities in fuel distribution.
They warned that concentrating supply in one source can exacerbate these existing inefficiencies.
Industry analysts said Nigeria’s downstream market has historically struggled with underinvestment in infrastructure and recurring production disruptions.
They added that while new refineries like Dangote’s bring hope, a diversified supply strategy remains essential.
Government statistics indicate that Nigeria consumes millions of litres of petrol daily, requiring continuous supply from both domestic refineries and importation to meet nationwide demand.
The marketers urged policy makers to focus on creating an integrated fuel supply system, combining local refining capacity with strategic imports.
They also called for enhanced regulatory oversight to prevent artificial scarcity and ensure fair pricing for consumers.
Observers said the concerns underscore the importance of long-term planning in Nigeria’s energy sector.
They noted that relying heavily on a single entity, regardless of size or efficiency, exposes the market to avoidable disruptions.
The marketers concluded that while Dangote Petroleum Refinery is a critical milestone for the nation, it should be part of a broader, multi-source strategy to guarantee consistent and affordable petrol supply.
Experts say improving infrastructure, maintaining existing refineries, and diversifying import channels remain vital steps to achieve energy security.
The warning comes at a time when Nigerians continue to face fluctuations in fuel availability and pump prices.
Industry stakeholders emphasise that sustainable solutions require collaboration between private operators, government agencies, and regional distributors.
With demand projected to grow in the coming years, reliance on a single refinery, no matter how large, is insufficient to meet national consumption patterns.
Marketers called for urgent action to ensure that the downstream sector is resilient, competitive, and capable of serving the country’s growing energy needs.
They stressed that failure to diversify could result in repeated fuel shortages, social inconvenience, and economic strain for both businesses and consumers.
DDM findings indicates that continued investment, policy consistency, and coordinated planning are necessary to stabilise Nigeria’s fuel supply and strengthen the downstream sector for the future.
Diaspora Digital Media (DDM), in partnership with the Digital Assets Management Academy (DAMA), has announced the next edition of its scheduled weekly programme titled Blockchain World 2.0, as part of ongoing efforts to deepen public understanding of blockchain technology and digital asset management.
The upcoming edition of the programme is scheduled to hold on Wednesday, December 24, 2025, and will commence at 11:00am Nigerian time, according to details released by the organisers.
Diaspora Digital Media stated that the session will focus on the topic “Token Locking on DEXs as a Growth Tool: Benefits for Communities, Investors and Projects,” a subject increasingly gaining relevance within the decentralised finance and cryptocurrency ecosystem.
Organisers explained that token locking on decentralised exchanges, commonly referred to as DEXs, has emerged as a key mechanism for improving transparency, enhancing investor confidence, and promoting long-term project sustainability.
They noted that the programme is designed to educate participants on how proper liquidity locking and vesting strategies can protect communities from market manipulation and reduce the risk of sudden project collapses.
The organisers disclosed that the programme will be hosted virtually via Zoom to enable participation from a wide audience within Nigeria and across the diaspora.
Interested participants are expected to join the programme using the official Zoom link:
The Zoom access credentials include Meeting ID: 870 8562 4072 and Passcode: 871871, as provided by the organisers.
In addition to the Zoom session, the programme will be streamed live on the Diaspora Digital Media (DDM) YouTube channel, allowing viewers to follow the discussion in real time without joining the Zoom meeting.
The organisers encouraged members of the public to subscribe to the DDM YouTube channel via https://youtube.com/@ddmtvnews to receive instant notifications whenever the programme goes live.
Diaspora Digital Media noted that the subscription also gives viewers access to previous editions of Blockchain World and other digital governance programmes hosted by the media platform.
Background information shows that Diaspora Digital Media has consistently positioned itself as a platform committed to digital education, civic awareness, and technology-driven public discourse, particularly within African and diaspora communities.
The Digital Assets Management Academy (DAMA), the programme’s co-host, is known for its focus on blockchain education, asset management strategies, and ethical participation in decentralised finance systems.
Analysts say the collaboration between DDM and DAMA reflects a growing effort to promote responsible blockchain adoption in Nigeria, especially amid rising interest in cryptocurrencies and decentralised financial tools.
They add that discussions around token locking have become increasingly important as investors and communities seek protection against fraud, rug pulls, and unregulated project practices.
The organisers further clarified that Blockchain World 2.0 is a weekly programme that runs every Wednesday at the same time, reinforcing consistency for regular participants.
They stressed that despite the festive period, the December 24 edition will hold as scheduled, in line with their commitment to continuous knowledge sharing.
The organisers expressed confidence that the session will provide valuable insights for developers, investors, community managers, and blockchain enthusiasts seeking sustainable growth strategies within decentralised ecosystems.
(DDM) – Governor Dikko Radda of Katsina State has urged Nigerians to stop placing sole responsibility for the country’s worsening economic hardship on state governors, stressing that the Federal Government controls over half of the nation’s federation revenue.
The governor made the clarification while addressing concerns over rising living costs and growing public criticism directed mainly at state governments.
Radda explained that revenue sharing under Nigeria’s federal structure gives the Federal Government approximately 52 per cent of monthly allocations.
He said states and local governments share the remaining percentage, which limits the capacity of governors to independently resolve nationwide economic challenges.
The governor noted that inflation, fuel price increases, and currency instability are largely driven by federal fiscal and monetary policies.
He argued that these policies directly affect food prices, transportation costs, and essential services across the country.
Radda said blaming governors alone ignores the realities of how resources are controlled and distributed in Nigeria.
He emphasized that most states depend almost entirely on monthly federal allocations to function.
According to him, when federal revenues shrink or policies trigger economic shocks, states feel the impact immediately.
The Katsina governor said state governments are often forced to make difficult adjustments to survive.
He explained that payment of salaries, pensions, and basic services consumes a large portion of state allocations.
Radda stated that governors have limited fiscal space to cushion citizens from national economic downturns.
He added that many states are already struggling with debt servicing obligations inherited from previous administrations.
The governor stressed that economic hardship is a collective governance challenge.
He said meaningful solutions require coordinated action between federal and state authorities.
Radda urged Nigerians to direct their frustrations through constructive civic engagement rather than selective blame.
He said public discourse should reflect how power and resources are actually structured in the federation.
The governor acknowledged that citizens are suffering under current economic conditions.
He said state governments are not indifferent to the pain experienced by residents.
Radda noted that Katsina State has introduced targeted interventions to support vulnerable populations.
He mentioned food distribution programmes and small-scale agricultural support as examples.
The governor said such measures are limited by funding constraints.
He reiterated that large-scale economic relief requires federal-level intervention.
Radda explained that policies on fuel subsidy removal, exchange rates, and import controls are decided at the centre.
He said these policies have far-reaching effects beyond the control of individual governors.
The Katsina governor called for patience as reforms unfold.
He argued that economic restructuring often causes temporary hardship before stabilisation.
Radda urged the Federal Government to increase collaboration with states.
He said states should be more involved in policy formulation that directly affects grassroots economies.
The governor also appealed for a review of the revenue allocation formula.
He said the current structure places excessive financial responsibility on the centre.
Radda argued that decentralising resources would empower states to respond more effectively to local needs.
He said stronger fiscal federalism would reduce pressure on the Federal Government.
Political analysts say Radda’s comments reflect growing concerns among governors nationwide.
They note that many state leaders feel unfairly targeted by public anger.
Observers say the hardship debate is reshaping political accountability narratives.
They add that citizens are increasingly demanding transparency at all levels of government.
Radda said accountability must be shared proportionately.
He insisted that governance failures should be assessed based on authority and control.
The governor concluded that Nigeria’s economic recovery depends on honest dialogue.
He said blaming one tier of government will not solve systemic problems.
As hardship persists, calls for collaborative governance are growing louder.
Radda’s remarks highlight the need for balanced public understanding of Nigeria’s fiscal structure.
(DDM) – Governor Lucky Aiyedatiwa of Ondo State has openly declared his support for President Bola Ahmed Tinubu ahead of the 2027 general election.
The Ondo State governor described President Tinubu as irreplaceable, insisting that his leadership remains critical to Nigeria’s future political and economic stability.
Aiyedatiwa made the declaration while addressing party stakeholders and supporters within the state.
He said President Tinubu’s vision and experience place him above all potential contenders for the presidency in 2027.
According to the governor, the ongoing reforms being implemented by the current administration require continuity.
He argued that abandoning the reform process midway could be harmful to national progress.
Aiyedatiwa stated that Tinubu inherited a deeply challenged economy and has taken bold decisions to reposition it.
He said such decisions, though difficult, are necessary for long-term national development.
The governor described Tinubu as a seasoned political strategist with deep understanding of governance.
He noted that Tinubu’s political history shows consistency, resilience, and capacity to manage complex situations.
Aiyedatiwa said the president’s track record as former governor of Lagos State speaks volumes.
He recalled that Lagos experienced significant infrastructural and economic growth under Tinubu’s leadership.
The Ondo governor said those achievements laid the foundation for Lagos’ current status as Nigeria’s economic hub.
According to him, Tinubu’s policies are already yielding results at the federal level.
He cited ongoing fiscal reforms, infrastructure investments, and renewed focus on revenue generation.
Aiyedatiwa argued that Nigeria needs stability rather than political experimentation at this critical time.
He warned that frequent changes in leadership direction could derail national recovery efforts.
The governor said the All Progressives Congress remains united behind President Tinubu.
He added that party leaders across states are mobilising support for the president’s re-election bid.
Aiyedatiwa described Tinubu as the backbone of the APC since its formation.
He said the president played a key role in uniting different political tendencies into a single platform.
According to the governor, that same unifying strength is needed to govern Nigeria effectively.
Aiyedatiwa dismissed claims that the APC lacks alternative leaders.
He said while the party has capable individuals, Tinubu’s current role is unique.
The governor insisted that leadership is about timing as much as competence.
He said Tinubu’s presidency came at a time when Nigeria required tough but visionary leadership.
Aiyedatiwa urged Nigerians to exercise patience with the current administration.
He said economic reforms often come with short-term hardship before long-term benefits emerge.
The governor appealed to party members to remain loyal and focused.
He warned against internal divisions that could weaken the APC ahead of 2027.
Political observers say Aiyedatiwa’s statement reflects growing endorsements within the ruling party.
Several APC governors and leaders have recently voiced support for Tinubu’s second-term ambition.
Analysts note that early endorsements are aimed at consolidating party unity.
They also say such declarations are meant to discourage internal opposition.
The 2027 general election is still more than a year away.
However, political alignments have already begun to take shape.
President Tinubu has not formally declared his intention to seek re-election.
Nevertheless, allies believe his performance will form the basis of his campaign.
Opposition parties have continued to criticise the administration’s economic policies.
They argue that rising living costs have worsened citizens’ hardship.
Supporters of the president, however, insist that reforms are necessary.
They say past economic practices were unsustainable.
Aiyedatiwa said history will judge Tinubu kindly for making hard choices.
He urged Nigerians to look beyond present challenges and focus on long-term gains.
The governor said leadership should be evaluated on courage and direction.
He maintained that Tinubu has shown both qualities.
As political debates intensify, endorsements like Aiyedatiwa’s are expected to continue.
The ruling party appears set to rally around the president.
For now, the Ondo State governor insists that Bola Tinubu remains Nigeria’s best option in 2027.
(DDM) – Troops of the Joint Task Force North East, Operation HADIN KAI, have successfully repelled a coordinated terrorist attack along the Maiduguri–Damboa Main Supply Route in Borno State.
A credible military source disclosed that the attack occurred at about 3:10 pm on Monday, December 22, and was swiftly countered by troops deployed under Operation HADIN KAI.
The source told the News Agency of Nigeria that the terrorists attempted to disrupt military and civilian movement along the strategic route.
The Maiduguri–Damboa Main Supply Route is one of the most critical roads in Borno State.
It serves as a vital link between Maiduguri, the state capital, and several communities in southern Borno.
The road is frequently targeted by insurgents seeking to isolate communities and ambush security forces.
According to the military source, the terrorists launched the attack in a coordinated manner.
They reportedly attempted to overwhelm troops through multiple points along the route.
However, the troops responded with superior firepower and tactical coordination.
The source said the attackers were forced to retreat after sustaining casualties.
Troops were said to have maintained firm control of the area after the encounter.
Security patrols were immediately intensified along the route following the attack.
The military source confirmed that no civilian casualties were recorded during the incident.
He added that normal movement was restored shortly after the operation.
The successful repulsion of the attack was described as a significant boost to ongoing counterinsurgency efforts.
Operation HADIN KAI is the Nigerian military’s flagship operation against Boko Haram and Islamic State West Africa Province, ISWAP, in the North East.
The operation has recorded several gains in recent months through sustained offensives and patrols.
Troops have continued to target terrorist enclaves across Sambisa Forest and the Lake Chad region.
The Maiduguri–Damboa axis has remained a flashpoint due to its strategic importance.
Insurgents have historically used the surrounding terrain to stage ambushes.
In the past, attacks along the route have led to temporary closures and security concerns.
The military has since adopted a more aggressive posture to secure the corridor.
This includes constant patrols, checkpoints, and intelligence-led operations.
Residents and road users have often expressed fear over travelling along the route.
Authorities have repeatedly assured the public of improved security.
The latest development appears to reinforce those assurances.
Military sources said the quick response by troops was aided by actionable intelligence.
They noted that timely information helped prevent the terrorists from achieving their objective.
The Nigerian Armed Forces have emphasized the importance of intelligence cooperation from local communities.
Security agencies have urged residents to continue sharing information on suspicious movements.
The Federal Government has also reiterated its commitment to ending terrorism in the North East.
Despite over a decade of conflict, insurgent groups still carry out sporadic attacks.
These attacks are often aimed at undermining military morale and disrupting daily life.
However, recent military operations have weakened the operational capacity of the groups.
Several terrorists have been neutralised, while others have surrendered.
Rehabilitation and reintegration programmes for repentant insurgents are also ongoing.
Analysts say securing major supply routes is critical to long-term stability.
Such routes support humanitarian operations, trade, and civilian mobility.
They also enable faster deployment of troops and logistics.
The repelled attack underscores the continued threat posed by insurgents.
It also highlights the resilience and readiness of Nigerian troops in the theatre of operations.
Residents of Maiduguri and Damboa have welcomed the military’s response.
Some described the action as reassuring amid lingering security concerns.
Community leaders have called for sustained military presence along the route.
They said consistent security would encourage economic activities to resume fully.
The military has assured that it will not relent in its operations.
Troops remain on high alert to prevent further attacks.
As the dry season intensifies, security agencies expect increased insurgent movements.
They have pledged to stay ahead through proactive measures.
The successful defence of the Maiduguri–Damboa route adds to recent operational successes.
It reinforces the determination of Operation HADIN KAI to deny terrorists freedom of action.
For now, the route remains open and under firm military control.
(DDM) – The Accord Party has announced a nationwide surge in membership following the defection of Osun State Governor, Ademola Adeleke.
The party’s national leadership said the political development has significantly boosted its visibility and appeal ahead of the 2026 general elections.
The National Chairman of the Accord Party made the disclosure while addressing journalists on the party’s growing influence.
He said Adeleke’s defection has triggered renewed interest in the party across several states.
According to him, many politicians and supporters who were previously undecided are now gravitating toward Accord.
The chairman described the influx as organic and driven by public confidence rather than coercion.
He said Governor Adeleke’s political profile has helped reposition the party as a viable alternative.
The Accord Party leader noted that defections often send strong signals within Nigeria’s political space.
He explained that high-profile movements tend to influence grassroots political calculations.
According to him, Adeleke’s popularity, especially in the South-West, has had a ripple effect nationwide.
The chairman said the party has recorded new registrations in Osun, Oyo, Lagos, Ogun, and Ekiti states.
He added that northern and South-South states have also witnessed increased membership inquiries.
The Accord Party leadership said it is strengthening its state structures to accommodate new members.
Officials disclosed that mobilisation teams have been deployed to coordinate the growing interest.
The party said it is committed to internal democracy and inclusive participation.
According to the chairman, the surge reflects public dissatisfaction with dominant political parties.
He said many Nigerians are searching for platforms that prioritise people-centred governance.
The chairman argued that Accord offers a fresh political direction rooted in accountability.
He said the party is positioning itself as a credible force ahead of the 2026 elections.
Governor Ademola Adeleke’s defection has continued to generate political reactions nationwide.
Adeleke, a well-known political figure, has commanded a strong grassroots following.
His political journey has often been associated with populist appeal and mass mobilisation.
Analysts say his defection carries symbolic and strategic implications.
They note that it could reshape political alignments, especially in the South-West.
The Accord Party believes the development validates its long-term growth strategy.
The chairman said the party has patiently built structures despite limited media attention.
He added that recent events have brought Accord into the national spotlight.
According to him, the party is not merely benefiting from a single defection.
He said Accord is attracting professionals, youths, and women seeking political inclusion.
The chairman disclosed that several serving and former lawmakers are in talks with the party.
He, however, declined to mention names, citing ongoing consultations.
The Accord Party said it is focused on building a broad-based coalition.
It stated that the goal is to challenge entrenched political interests democratically.
Nigeria’s political landscape has witnessed frequent defections in recent years.
Such movements are often influenced by internal party crises and power struggles.
Observers say smaller parties sometimes benefit from these shifts.
The Accord Party appears to be capitalising on the moment.
Political commentators note that sustained growth will depend on organisation and discipline.
They warn that managing rapid membership expansion can be challenging.
The party leadership said it is aware of these challenges.
It assured members that clear guidelines and structures are being put in place.
The chairman said the party would not compromise its principles for short-term gains.
He emphasized the importance of ideological clarity.
According to him, Accord stands for social justice, equity, and good governance.
The party said it would soon unveil its strategic roadmap for 2026.
This roadmap, according to officials, will focus on candidate selection and voter engagement.
The leadership also promised transparent primaries at all levels.
Civil society groups have urged emerging parties to maintain accountability.
They argue that credibility is essential to winning public trust.
The Accord Party said it welcomes such scrutiny.
It described public accountability as a strength rather than a threat.
As political realignments continue, attention remains on how the party will consolidate gains.
The impact of Adeleke’s defection is expected to unfold in the coming months.
For now, the Accord Party insists that the momentum signals a new phase in its political journey.
(DDM) – The China Mining Federation of Nigeria has rejected allegations linking Chinese mining companies operating in Nigeria to illegal activities or the financing of terrorism.
The federation described the claims as false, misleading, and capable of damaging diplomatic relations and legitimate business operations within Nigeria’s solid minerals sector.
In a statement released to address growing public concerns, the group insisted that Chinese mining firms in Nigeria operate within the framework of Nigerian laws.
The federation said its member companies are duly registered with relevant government agencies.
It stressed that all legitimate Chinese operators comply with mining regulations, tax obligations, and environmental standards.
According to the federation, allegations of terrorism financing are unfounded and lack credible evidence.
It warned that such claims could discourage foreign investment in Nigeria’s mining industry.
The group noted that Nigeria is actively seeking foreign investors to diversify its economy away from oil.
It argued that spreading unverified accusations undermines this national economic objective.
The federation said Chinese mining companies contribute significantly to local employment.
It added that host communities benefit from infrastructure, social programs, and commercial activities linked to mining operations.
According to the statement, most Chinese firms operate through joint ventures with Nigerian partners.
The group said this structure ensures transparency and local participation in mining projects.
It also emphasized that security challenges in mining areas are a national issue, not the responsibility of one foreign group.
The federation urged authorities to distinguish between illegal miners and licensed operators.
It said illegal mining is a problem involving actors from multiple nationalities.
Blaming one country, the group warned, could distract from effective enforcement strategies.
The allegations emerged amid heightened concern over insecurity in mining regions across Nigeria.
Several mining areas have experienced banditry, kidnappings, and attacks linked to armed groups.
Security agencies have raised alarms over how illegal mining fuels criminal networks.
Proceeds from illicit mining have been linked to arms purchases and logistics for violent groups.
The Federal Government has launched operations to clamp down on illegal mining nationwide.
These operations involve arrests, mine closures, and the revocation of licences.
In some instances, foreign nationals have been apprehended alongside Nigerian collaborators.
This has fuelled public debate about the role of foreign actors in illegal mining.
The China Mining Federation said it supports the government’s crackdown on illegal operations.
It pledged cooperation with Nigerian security agencies and regulatory bodies.
The federation said any member found violating Nigerian laws should face appropriate sanctions.
It stressed that wrongdoing by individuals should not be generalised against an entire nationality.
The group also referenced existing bilateral agreements between Nigeria and China.
It said these agreements promote lawful trade, investment, and mutual respect for sovereignty.
China remains one of Nigeria’s largest trading partners.
Chinese companies are involved in construction, power, telecommunications, and mining sectors.
The mining sector has attracted increased Chinese interest due to Nigeria’s vast untapped mineral resources.
These include gold, lithium, limestone, and rare earth elements.
The Federal Government has identified mining as a key driver of economic growth.
Authorities have pledged to formalise the sector and eliminate illegal activities.
Analysts say foreign investment can help achieve this goal if properly regulated.
They also warn that weak enforcement creates opportunities for criminal exploitation.
Security experts argue that illegal mining thrives where governance is poor.
They say addressing insecurity requires stronger institutions and community engagement.
Civil society groups have called for transparency in mining licences and operations.
They insist that all operators, local or foreign, must be held accountable.
The Chinese trade group said it is open to dialogue with stakeholders.
It called for fact-based discussions rather than sensational accusations.
The federation urged the media to verify claims before publication.
It warned that misinformation can inflame tensions and harm innocent businesses.
As Nigeria intensifies efforts to secure its mining sector, scrutiny of all operators continues.
The denial by the China Mining Federation adds another layer to the ongoing debate.
Observers say resolving the issue will require balanced enforcement, diplomacy, and transparency.
For now, the federation maintains that Chinese miners are partners in development, not sponsors of terror.
(DDM) – The Federal Government has ordered the takedown of social media accounts linked to terrorist groups operating within and outside Nigeria.
The directive forms part of an ongoing collaboration between Nigerian authorities and major social media platforms, including TikTok and Facebook, to curb the use of digital spaces for terrorism-related activities.
Government sources said the affected accounts have been used for propaganda, recruitment, and fundraising by extremist groups.
Officials explained that terrorists increasingly rely on social media to spread ideology and coordinate activities.
The Federal Government said allowing such content to thrive online poses a serious national security risk.
According to authorities, extremist narratives shared on digital platforms can radicalise vulnerable individuals.
Security agencies noted that online propaganda has played a key role in sustaining insurgency and violent extremism.
The government said the takedown order followed intelligence reports linking specific accounts to terror financing.
It stated that some of the accounts were being used to solicit funds under humanitarian pretences.
Officials said the funds raised were allegedly channelled toward violent operations.
The Federal Government stressed that combating terrorism now requires both physical and digital strategies.
It noted that modern terror networks operate seamlessly across borders using online tools.
Authorities said Nigeria cannot afford to ignore the digital dimension of insecurity.
The collaboration with social media companies is part of a broader counterterrorism framework.
Platforms like Facebook and TikTok have reportedly agreed to strengthen content moderation related to Nigeria.
The government said these platforms would act swiftly once accounts are flagged by security agencies.
Officials noted that previous delays in content removal had allowed harmful messages to spread widely.
The takedown initiative is also aimed at disrupting recruitment pipelines.
Security experts say terrorist groups often target youths through emotionally charged online content.
Such content, they said, exploits grievances, poverty, and religious sentiments.
Nigeria has battled various forms of terrorism for over a decade.
Groups such as Boko Haram and ISWAP have carried out deadly attacks in the North-East.
Banditry and extremist-linked violence have also affected parts of the North-West and North-Central regions.
In recent years, authorities observed a shift toward online radicalisation.
This shift intensified as internet access expanded across rural communities.
The Federal Government said digital platforms must not become safe havens for criminals.
Officials stressed that freedom of expression does not extend to incitement or terrorism.
The government assured Nigerians that lawful speech would not be targeted.
It said only accounts linked to violence, extremism, or terror financing would be affected.
Human rights considerations, authorities said, remain part of the process.
The government added that actions would be guided by existing laws and court orders where necessary.
Cybercrime and terrorism laws provide the legal backing for such interventions.
Security agencies said they are also improving their digital intelligence capabilities.
This includes tracking online networks and monitoring suspicious financial transactions.
The government urged citizens to report extremist content encountered online.
It said public cooperation is essential to winning the fight against terrorism.
Officials warned social media users against sharing unverified or extremist materials.
They said sharing such content, even unknowingly, can aid terrorist objectives.
The Federal Government also called on tech companies to invest more in local content moderation.
It argued that understanding local languages and contexts is critical to identifying harmful content.
Analysts say Nigeria’s move reflects a global trend.
Many countries now pressure tech firms to take responsibility for security-related content.
Experts believe effective collaboration could significantly weaken terror networks.
They say cutting off online propaganda reduces recruitment and funding opportunities.
However, analysts also caution that enforcement must be consistent.
They warn that selective action could undermine public trust.
Civil society groups have called for transparency in the takedown process.
They urged the government to publish clear guidelines on what constitutes terrorist content.
The Federal Government said further engagements with stakeholders are planned.
It said national security remains a shared responsibility.
As digital spaces continue to evolve, authorities say counterterrorism strategies must adapt.
The takedown order signals Nigeria’s determination to confront terrorism on all fronts.
(DDM) – The immediate Deputy Speaker of the Edo State House of Assembly, Hon Maria Edeko, has officially defected from the Peoples Democratic Party to the All Progressives Congress.
The lawmaker, who represents Esan North-East II Constituency, confirmed her defection amid growing political realignments in Edo State.
Hon Maria Edeko was Deputy Speaker during the period when the Edo State House of Assembly was dominated by the PDP.
Her tenure as Deputy Speaker coincided with the twilight of the administration of former Governor Godwin Obaseki.
She also served in the early months of the current administration led by Governor Monday Okpebholo.
The defection marks another significant political shift within the Edo State legislature.
Edeko’s move is widely seen as a boost for the ruling APC in the state.
Political observers say her defection could further alter the balance of power within the House of Assembly.
The PDP had maintained dominance in the legislature during the latter years of Obaseki’s administration.
However, recent developments suggest a gradual erosion of that dominance.
Hon Maria Edeko is regarded as a prominent political figure in Esan North-East Local Government Area.
Her political influence extends beyond the legislature into grassroots mobilisation.
Supporters describe her as a seasoned lawmaker with strong constituency ties.
Her decision to leave the PDP has sparked reactions across political circles in Edo State.
Some PDP members expressed disappointment over her departure.
Others described the defection as a betrayal of party loyalty.
However, APC supporters welcomed her with enthusiasm.
They described her move as a validation of the APC-led government in Edo State.
Sources within the APC said her defection was the result of extensive consultations.
They noted that discussions had been ongoing for several weeks before the announcement.
The APC leadership reportedly assured Edeko of inclusion and recognition within the party.
Political analysts say defections often reflect deeper internal challenges within parties.
In Edo State, the PDP has faced internal divisions since the end of Obaseki’s tenure.
Leadership struggles and factional disagreements have continued to weaken party cohesion.
The APC, on the other hand, has been consolidating power following its electoral victory.
Governor Monday Okpebholo’s administration has attracted several politicians from opposition parties.
Observers say this trend could strengthen the APC ahead of future elections.
Defections in Nigerian politics are often influenced by shifting power dynamics.
Lawmakers frequently align with parties they believe offer better political prospects.
Such moves are also driven by access to resources and political relevance.
The Edo State House of Assembly has experienced multiple leadership changes in recent times.
These changes reflect broader political transitions within the state.
Hon Maria Edeko’s defection adds another layer to these transitions.
Background checks show that Esan North-East II constituency has remained politically competitive.
Both major parties have historically enjoyed significant support in the area.
Edeko’s move could therefore influence voter alignment in future elections.
Some constituents have expressed mixed reactions to the development.
While some pledged continued support for her leadership, others questioned her party switch.
Civil society groups have urged lawmakers to prioritise constituents over party interests.
They stressed that defection should not disrupt legislative responsibilities.
Nigeria’s constitution permits lawmakers to defect under certain conditions.
However, frequent defections have continued to raise ethical and political debates.
Critics argue that such moves undermine ideological consistency.
Supporters insist that defections are part of democratic freedom of association.
The PDP leadership in Edo State has yet to issue a detailed response.
Party officials are expected to review the implications of the defection.
The APC has continued to position itself as the dominant political force in the state.
Political analysts say more defections could occur in the coming months.
They attribute this to ongoing political recalibration ahead of future elections.
Hon Maria Edeko has not publicly detailed her reasons for leaving the PDP.
However, close associates say her decision was driven by the need to align with the ruling structure.
They added that she intends to continue serving her constituents effectively.
As Edo State politics evolves, her defection remains a major talking point.
The development underscores the fluid nature of party politics in Nigeria.
For now, attention remains on how the shift will impact legislative activities in the state.
Former Vice President Atiku Abubakar and the Nigerian Bar Association have raised serious concerns over alleged unconstitutional alterations to Nigeria’s recently enacted Tax Reform Acts.
(DDM) – Both Atiku and the NBA described the reported developments as a grave threat to constitutional democracy and the integrity of Nigeria’s legislative process.
They warned that the alleged actions amount to a brazen assault on the rule of law and democratic governance.
Atiku Abubakar, in a strongly worded reaction, accused certain actors of undermining the sanctity of the National Assembly.
He alleged that changes were made to the tax reform laws outside the proper legislative procedure.
According to Atiku, any post-passage alteration of laws without due process is unconstitutional.
He described such actions as dangerous and capable of eroding public trust in democratic institutions.
The former vice president warned that Nigeria’s democracy cannot survive if laws are manipulated after enactment.
He said taxation laws are sensitive and directly affect the economic lives of millions of Nigerians.
Atiku insisted that transparency and strict adherence to constitutional provisions must guide all legislative actions.
The Nigerian Bar Association echoed similar concerns in its intervention.
The NBA said the alleged alterations cast serious doubt on the credibility of the lawmaking process.
In an earlier statement, the NBA warned that the integrity of the National Assembly was being called into question.
The association stressed that legislative procedures are clearly outlined in the Nigerian Constitution.
It said any deviation from those procedures threatens the foundation of constitutional governance.
The NBA described the alleged alterations as unacceptable in a democratic society.
According to the association, laws passed by parliament must reflect exactly what was debated and approved.
It warned that tampering with legislation after passage could amount to legislative fraud.
The NBA said such actions weaken confidence in the separation of powers.
It added that citizens must be able to trust that laws are made transparently and lawfully.
Atiku Abubakar went further to describe the situation as bordering on treason against the Nigerian state.
He argued that undermining the legislative process is an attack on the sovereignty of the people.
He called for the immediate suspension of the disputed Tax Reform Acts.
Atiku said the suspension should remain in place until a thorough investigation is conducted.
He urged the National Assembly to assert its authority and protect its institutional integrity.
The former vice president also called on the judiciary to remain vigilant.
He said the courts have a responsibility to defend the constitution when other institutions falter.
The Tax Reform Acts were recently enacted as part of efforts to overhaul Nigeria’s tax system.
The reforms were presented by the Federal Government as measures to expand the tax base and boost revenue.
Authorities said the laws would modernise tax administration and reduce reliance on oil income.
However, the reforms have been controversial since their passage.
Legal experts have raised questions about transparency and stakeholder engagement.
The NBA said it has received complaints from legal practitioners and concerned citizens.
It noted that uncertainty surrounding the laws could lead to prolonged legal battles.
Such disputes, the association warned, could disrupt tax administration nationwide.
Civil society groups have also expressed concern over the alleged alterations.
They warned that allowing such practices to go unchecked could set a dangerous precedent.
Analysts say the controversy reflects deeper issues of trust in Nigeria’s governance system.
They note that economic hardship has already heightened public sensitivity to taxation issues.
Any perception of illegality, they argue, could fuel resistance and non-compliance.
The Federal Government has yet to issue a detailed response to the allegations.
Officials have maintained that the tax reforms were lawfully enacted.
However, pressure continues to mount for greater transparency.
Observers say a clear explanation from the National Assembly is urgently needed.
They argue that silence could further damage public confidence.
Atiku and the NBA both insist that democratic processes must be protected at all costs.
They warned that Nigeria cannot afford to compromise the rule of law.
As calls for suspension grow louder, the controversy continues to dominate public discourse.
The outcome of the dispute may shape future debates on lawmaking and accountability in Nigeria.
Fuji music legend Otunba Wasiu Ayinde Marshall, popularly known as KWAM 1 or K1 De Ultimate, has formally withdrawn from the race for the Awujale of Ijebuland, effectively bringing an end to his legal challenge against the ongoing selection process for the revered traditional stool.
KWAM 1 filed a notice of discontinuation at the Ogun State High Court on Monday, December 22, 2025, signalling his decision to step away from the contest and discontinue all legal actions related to the succession process.
The notice was submitted by his legal team, led by Dr Wahab Shittu, SAN, thereby closing a case that had attracted significant public attention and stirred debate within Ijebu traditional and cultural circles.
The withdrawal followed a ruling by Hon. Justice A. A. Omoniyi of High Court 3, Ijebu-Ode Judicial Division, who dismissed KWAM 1’s application for an interim injunction.
The application had sought to restrain the Ogun State Governor, Prince Dapo Abiodun, the Fusengbuwa Ruling House, and other parties from continuing with the selection of a new Awujale pending the determination of the substantive suit.
In his ruling, Justice Omoniyi held that the application for interim relief lacked merit.
However, the court allowed the substantive suit to proceed and fixed January 14, 2026, for further hearing.
Despite this opening, KWAM 1 opted to discontinue the case entirely, effectively ending his bid for the throne through judicial intervention.
KWAM 1, who holds the traditional title of Olori Omooba of Ijebuland and hails from the Fidipote Ruling House, had approached the court after the Fusengbuwa Ruling House declared him ineligible to contest for the Awujale stool.
The ruling house maintained that the Fuji icon was not a bona fide member of the Fusengbuwa Ruling House and, therefore, could not seek the throne under its platform.
This declaration generated controversy, given KWAM 1’s prominence as one of Nigeria’s most celebrated musicians and a well-known figure in Ijebu cultural life.
By filing the notice of discontinuation, KWAM 1 appears to have accepted the court’s decision on the interim application and chosen not to pursue the matter further.
The Awujale of Ijebuland remains one of the most influential traditional rulers in Yorubaland, and the process of selecting a new monarch typically attracts keen interest from within and outside Ogun State, reflecting the cultural and historical importance of the stool.
Nairobi County has approved a policy granting female county employees two paid days off per month for menstrual health, without affecting their annual or sick leave.
The move formally recognises menstrual pain as a legitimate workplace health concern.
Supporters praise the policy as progressive and humane, highlighting that it addresses severe cramps, fatigue, migraines, and other symptoms associated with menstruation.
Advocates say it promotes dignity, honesty, and better health outcomes for women in the workplace.
However, the policy has sparked debate. Critics warn it could reinforce negative stereotypes, portray women as less reliable, and potentially affect hiring decisions.
Similar policies exist in countries like Japan, South Korea, and Zambia, but uptake is often limited due to stigma.
Nairobi’s policy places the county in the global spotlight, with observers watching closely to see if it sets a precedent for workplace equality initiatives across Africa.
The Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS) has clarified that Nigeria’s National Identification Number (NIN) will automatically function as the Tax Identification Number (TIN) for individual taxpayers, while Corporate Affairs Commission (CAC) registration numbers will serve as the tax ID for registered businesses.
The clarification was made on Tuesday via FIRS’ official X (formerly Twitter) handle as part of its ongoing public sensitisation campaign on the newly enacted tax laws scheduled to take effect in January 2026.
According to the Service, the new arrangement is provided for under the Nigeria Tax Administration Act (NTAA) and is aimed at simplifying tax administration and improving compliance across the country.
“The Nigeria Tax Administration Act (NTAA), set to take effect in January 2026, mandates the use of a Tax ID for specific transactions,” FIRS stated, noting that the requirement is not entirely new.
The agency explained that the use of tax identification numbers for transactions such as bank account ownership has existed since the Finance Act of 2019, but is now being reinforced and streamlined under the NTAA.
Under the new framework, the FIRS said all previously issued tax identification numbers whether by the FIRS or State Internal Revenue Services will be unified into a single identifier.
“For individuals, your NIN automatically serves as your Tax ID, while for registered companies, your CAC RC number is used,” the Service explained.
“There is no need for a physical card, as the Tax ID is simply a unique number linked directly to your identity.”
According to the FIRS, the unified system is designed to eliminate duplication, reduce tax evasion, and promote fairness by ensuring that all individuals and businesses with taxable income contribute appropriately.
The Service also urged Nigerians to disregard misinformation surrounding the reforms, assuring the public that the updated tax framework is intended to enhance efficiency, transparency and accountability in tax administration.
However, the clarification comes amid growing controversy surrounding the new tax laws.
In recent weeks, allegations of illegal alterations have trailed the Nigerian Tax Administration Act, with critics claiming discrepancies between the bill passed by the National Assembly and the version eventually gazetted.
The Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) has emerged as one of the strongest voices calling for a review of the law. In a statement titled “Tax Reform Acts:
Controversies Cast Doubts on the Sanctity of Nigeria’s Lawmaking Processes,” the association expressed serious concerns about the integrity and transparency of the legislative process.
The statement, signed by NBA President Mazi Afam Osigwe, called for a comprehensive, open and transparent investigation into the circumstances surrounding the enactment of the laws.
“Until these issues are fully examined and resolved, all plans for the implementation should be immediately suspended,” the NBA said.
The association warned that legal and policy uncertainty of this magnitude could unsettle the business environment, erode investor confidence and create unpredictability for individuals and institutions expected to comply with the law.
The NBA urged relevant authorities to act swiftly and responsibly to resolve the controversy in the overriding interest of constitutional order, economic stability and the preservation of the rule of law.
The Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) has called on the Federal Government to immediately suspend the implementation of the recently enacted Tax Reform Acts, citing widespread controversy and serious concerns over the credibility of the legislative process that produced the laws.
In a statement issued on Tuesday, NBA President, Mr Afam Osigwe, said the circumstances surrounding the passage of the tax laws have raised fundamental questions about transparency, integrity and compliance with constitutional procedures in Nigeria’s lawmaking process.
According to Osigwe, legislation with such wide-ranging economic and social implications must emerge from processes that are open, accountable and firmly grounded in constitutional principles.
He warned that any deviation from these standards undermines democratic governance and weakens public trust in state institutions.
“The controversies that have emerged in relation to the recently enacted Tax Reform Acts raise grave concerns about the integrity, transparency and credibility of Nigeria’s legislative process,” the statement read. “
These developments strike at the very heart of constitutional governance and call into question the procedural sanctity that must attend lawmaking in a democratic society.”
The NBA noted that the unresolved disputes surrounding the tax laws have already generated public mistrust and cast doubt on the sanctity of the National Assembly’s legislative procedures.
Osigwe warned that proceeding with the implementation of the laws under such conditions would further erode confidence in democratic institutions.
The association therefore called for a comprehensive, open and transparent investigation to clarify the circumstances under which the Tax Reform Acts were enacted.
According to the NBA, such an inquiry is essential to restore public confidence in both the legislative process and the substance of the reforms themselves.
“Until these issues are fully examined and resolved, all plans for the implementation of the Tax Reform Acts should be immediately suspended,” the association said.
Beyond constitutional concerns, the NBA also warned of the economic consequences of implementing disputed laws. Osigwe noted that legal and policy uncertainty creates instability, unsettles the business environment and discourages both local and foreign investment.
“Legal and policy uncertainty of this magnitude has far-reaching consequences. It erodes investor confidence and creates unpredictability for individuals, businesses and institutions expected to comply with the law,” the statement added.
Describing such uncertainty as incompatible with the rule of law, the NBA urged the Federal Government, the National Assembly and relevant stakeholders to act swiftly and responsibly in the national interest.
“Nigeria’s constitutional democracy demands that laws, especially those with profound economic and social implications, emerge from processes that are transparent, accountable and beyond reproach,” the association warned, stressing that anything less would weaken public trust and the foundations of lawful governance.
United States President Donald Trump has said the US government will either keep or sell crude oil seized from Venezuelan tankers, as Washington intensifies pressure on Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and expands military operations across the Caribbean and Pacific regions.
Speaking to reporters in Florida on Monday, Trump confirmed that both the seized oil and vessels intercepted off Venezuela’s coast would remain under US control.
According to him, the administration is weighing several options regarding the confiscated crude, including selling it on the open market or adding it to the US Strategic Petroleum Reserve.
“We’re going to keep it,” Trump said. “Maybe we will sell it, maybe we will keep it. Maybe we’ll use it in the Strategic Reserves. We’re keeping the ships also.”
The remarks followed recent US military actions that led to the seizure of two oil tankers this month, including one intercepted over the weekend.
The US Coast Guard is also reportedly pursuing a third vessel, which authorities have described as part of a Venezuelan “dark fleet” allegedly used to bypass international sanctions.
Trump suggested that additional seizures were imminent, stating that the ongoing maritime operations were progressing steadily.
“It’s moving along, and we’ll end up getting it,” he said.
The Trump administration has repeatedly accused Venezuela of using oil revenues to fund drug trafficking and organised crime, allegations the Venezuelan government strongly denies. Caracas has described the seizures as acts of “piracy” and a violation of international law.
When asked whether the seizures were intended to force President Maduro out of office, Trump responded ambiguously, saying such pressure could influence Maduro’s decisions but insisting the outcome remained uncertain.
Meanwhile, the US military confirmed that it carried out a strike on a suspected trafficking vessel in international waters in the eastern Pacific on Monday.
The US Southern Command said one person was killed during the operation.
Trump also warned that US enforcement actions would extend beyond maritime routes, threatening severe consequences for suspected traffickers attempting to move drugs over land.
“We’ll be starting the same programme on land,” he said. “If they want to come by land, they’re going to end up having a big problem.”
The US has significantly increased its military presence in the Caribbean and Pacific Seas, reportedly carrying out multiple strikes on alleged Venezuelan drug-smuggling vessels.
These operations have drawn scrutiny from members of Congress, particularly due to the lack of publicly released evidence confirming that the targeted vessels were transporting drugs.
Responding to Trump’s comments, President Maduro said on state television that the US leader should focus on domestic economic and social issues instead of interfering in Venezuela’s affairs.
Since returning to office in January, Trump has doubled the reward for information leading to Maduro’s arrest, designated Venezuela’s government as a foreign terrorist organisation, and ordered a blockade of sanctioned oil tankers entering or leaving the country.
Venezuela has condemned the measures and requested an emergency UN Security Council meeting, scheduled for Tuesday, to discuss what it calls ongoing US aggression
Guinea-Bissau’s junta has requested the “immediate withdrawal” of the 500-strong ECOWAS Stabilisation Support Mission in the country, ESSMGB, in its latest defiance of the regional bloc.
Critics had even accused ECOWAS of treating the coup makers and their alleged mastermind, former President Umaro Sissoco Embalo, with kid gloves.
In an official correspondence dated 22nd December and addressed to the President of the ECOWAS Commission, Dr Omar Touray, the Gen. Horta Inta-A-led junta “…formally request the immediate withdrawal of the ECOWAS security forces deployed to Guinea-Bissau, taking into account the resolutions contained in the Final Communique of the 68th Ordinary Session,” of the ECOWAS leaders.
According to the statement by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, International Cooperation and Communities, the withdrawal of the ECOWAS security forces is so that the “transition process can proceed under the direction of the Transitional Government, with the full participation of all political currents and civil society, ensuring fundamental freedom, the rule of law and due process.”
At their 14 December Summit in Abuja, Nigeria, ECOWAS leaders ratified the suspension of Guinea-Bissau following the military coup of 23 November, which Embalo was believed to have staged in an attempt to avoid an electoral defeat.
Fernando Dias da Costa, who claimed victory in the presidential vote, has taken refuge in the Nigerian embassy in Bissau, while several opposition leaders are still detained by the junta, despite the ECOWAS demand for their release.
Sources close to the junta said some of the detainees would face trial.
The ECOWAS summit had also demanded “a short transition programme,” rejecting the 12-transition announced by the junta, made up mainly of Embalo’s loyalists, including Gen. Inta-A, former head of Presidential Guard, and Prime Minister Ilídio Vieira Té, his Campaign Director during the 23rd November elections.
The junta, which seized power on 26th November, a day before the National Electoral Commission, CNE, was to announce the results of the 23rd Legislative and presidential elections, has dug in, naming a 28-member cabinet as part of efforts to consolidate its hold on power.
Diplomatic sources believe Embalo is pulling the strings from an undisclosed refuge. After the coup, Senegalese authorities arranged his evacuation to Dakar, from where he travelled to Congo-Brazzaville and later to Morocco.
Currently, his wife and close allies are facing alleged charges of smuggling and money laundering in Lisbon, after Portuguese authorities found five million euros in a private plane on which they were travelling.
In 2020, after winning a disputed presidential election, Embalo also demanded the withdrawal of the ECOWAS military mission in Guinea-Bissau, only to request their return in the aftermath of a reported coup attempt against his government in 2022.
His regime has been characterised by a clampdown on opposition, civil society groups and the media, under political instability, including four reported coups, using the excuse of the first two in 2022 and 2023, to suspend the country’s constitution to allow him to rule as a dictator.
In October, just before the 26th November staged putsch, Embalo also used the excuse of a third coup attempt to arrest some officers and opposition figures, who are still in detention.
ECOWAS had also decided to send two delegations led by the Chair of Authority and the regional Committee of Chiefs of Defence Staff.
However, according to diplomatic sources, the Horta Inta-A-led junta, in another act of defiance, turned down the ECOWAS Committee’s request for a visit, but at the same time, received a Senegalese Ministerial delegation in Bissau at the weekend.
In March, Embalo threatened to expel an ECOWAS-United Nations fact-finding Mission to Guinea-Bissau for daring to meet with opposition parties and civil society groups.
As in several other instances of clear violations of ECOWAS protocols and texts, there have been no consequences, and it is believed that Embalo and other regional leaders like him have been emboldened in impunity and authoritarian tendencies, blamed for the resurgence of military incursions into politics in the region.
Five of the 15 ECOWAS member States – Mali, Burkina Faso, Niger, Guinea and Guinea-Bissau – are now ruled by soldiers. Guinea plans a transitional election next week (28 December), while the juntas in Mali, Burkina Faso and Niger have withdrawn their countries from ECOWAS, to form the Alliance of Sahel States, AES.
The Guinea-Bissau junta is said to be toying with the idea of joining the AES group. But observers warn that such a decision could spell doom for the region and, particularly, the “narco-state plagued with political instability, and which depends mainly on financial support from development partners for its annual budget.
Apart from Liberia and Sierra Leone, where ECOWAS ended civil wars, Guinea-Bissau has been a drainpipe to the regional bloc.
According to informed sources, ECOWAS is spending about one million US dollars on the ESSMGB’s monthly personnel costs, excluding the operational expenses. The regional bloc also incurs approximately the same expenses on a similar Mission in The Gambia, thereby owing the troops’ contributing countries more than US$60 million.
From 2012, ECOWAS has supported Guinea-Bissau’s political, socioeconomic and security stabilization, including the electrification of the nation’s capital, Bissau, with millions of dollars, such as the US$500,000 financial support for the 23 November elections.
The implementation of the ECOWAS-led Security Sector Reform in Guinea-Bissau, agreed under the 2016 Conakry Peace Accord, has been stalled by domestic political intolerance and infighting.
Analysts consider the 26th November self-coup as an own goal by Embalo, who apparently underestimated the negative international reactions that would follow.
But by expelling the ECOWAS military force, which has provided him with cover over the past five years, and even contemplating joining the AES nations, with which Guinea-Bissau shares no common borders, smacks of an act of desperation by a dictator consumed in self-ambition without consideration for his country or the more than 400 million citizens of the Community.
ECOWAS has a Herculean task ahead of it.
Embalo has shown his hand, beyond all reasonable doubt.
If his sympathisers among his peers in the region fail to re-examine their consciences and change their ways after the latest developments, then democracy and good governance stand no chance in Africa’s politically restive coup-belt.
Paul Ejime is a Media/Communications Specialist and Global Affairs Analyst.
