The Federal Government has announced plans to abolish the HND- degree dichotomy by empowering polytechnics to award degrees, aiming to boost technical and vocational education.
Minister of Education, Dr. Tunji Alausa, disclosed this at a retreat in Abuja, saying the move will end decades of discrimination against polytechnic graduates and elevate institutions.
The reform aligns with President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s Renewed Hope Agenda, prioritizing job creation, industrial growth, and human capital development.
According to the Minister, Polytechnics will gain stronger industry partnerships, funding, and public confidence.
The transition, he said, will be guided by clear standards and quality assurance mechanisms.
Dr. Alausa emphasized innovation, governance, and sustainability, urging polytechnic leaders to prioritize entrepreneurship, research, and industry partnerships.
The government will support polytechnics through policy reforms, infrastructure upgrades, and partnerships, including a special TETFund intervention to upgrade engineering schools.
(DDM) – Former Kaduna State governor, Nasir El-Rufai, has openly challenged Nigeria’s anti-corruption posture, declaring that members of the ruling All Progressives Congress, APC, appear immune from corruption allegations.
Speaking on Thursday in Abuja, El-Rufai delivered the remarks at the 23rd edition of the Daily Trust Dialogue, a high-level policy forum focused on national governance.
(DDM) – The former governor used the platform to warn that Nigeria is drifting dangerously toward selective accountability, where political alignment determines who faces scrutiny and who enjoys protection.
El-Rufai argued that Nigeria practices governance without real accountability, insisting that reforms have concentrated more on structures and procedures than on measurable outcomes.
He stated that while the country conducts elections, establishes agencies, and announces asset recoveries, true accountability in governance remains uneven and politically influenced.
According to El-Rufai, corruption prosecution has become punitive for opposition figures, negotiable for political defectors, and completely invisible for those aligned with power.
He bluntly asserted that APC members are almost never accused of corruption, a perception he said must be urgently confronted if democracy is to survive.
The former governor warned that selective enforcement of anti-corruption laws produces real and damaging consequences for ordinary Nigerians.
He explained that unpaid salaries, abandoned public projects, collapsing infrastructure, and growing public cynicism all stem from the absence of fair and consistent accountability.
El-Rufai stressed that when laws are enforced selectively, deterrence collapses, and when deterrence collapses, public trust evaporates.
He described Nigeria’s current condition as one where citizens no longer believe that justice applies equally to all, regardless of political affiliation.
The former minister emphasized that restoring confidence requires strengthening institutions rather than empowering individuals.
He specifically called for deep judicial reforms to guarantee credible elections and protect the independence of the electoral commission.
El-Rufai insisted that without an impartial judiciary and transparent electoral system, democratic reforms would remain cosmetic and ineffective.
He concluded by urging Nigeria to restore ethical and competent governance, arguing that politics loses its meaning when integrity disappears.
According to him, reform is not only about introducing new policies but also about ending practices that reward impunity and political loyalty over competence.
The dialogue attracted prominent national figures, reflecting the gravity of the issues discussed.
Among the panelists was the Special Adviser to the President on Media and Policy Communication, Sunday Dare, who represented the federal government’s communication perspective.
Also present was Hon. Nnenna Elendu-Ukeje, former Chair of the Foreign Affairs Committee of the 7th and 8th House of Representatives.
Former Senate President Bukola Saraki chaired the event, lending weight to the deliberations with his legislative experience.
Former Oyo State governor, Rashidi Ladoja, attended as the Special Guest of Honour.
Political analysts say El-Rufai’s comments have reignited debate over whether Nigeria’s anti-corruption fight has become a tool of political convenience.
They argue that his remarks resonate with widespread public frustration over perceived double standards in governance.
As the nation approaches another electoral cycle, critics warn that unresolved issues of selective justice could further erode democratic legitimacy.
El-Rufai’s intervention has now placed renewed pressure on the ruling party to confront accusations that accountability in Nigeria depends on who holds power rather than what the law demands.
(DDM) – The impeachment crisis rocking Rivers State took a dramatic turn after the Chief Judge of the state, Justice Chibuzor Simeon Amadi, refused to constitute a seven-member panel to investigate allegations of gross misconduct against Governor Siminalayi Fubara and his deputy.
Justice Amadi firmly halted the process in a formal response to the Speaker of the Rivers State House of Assembly, citing existing court orders that expressly restrain him from setting up such a panel.
The Chief Judge made it clear that the judiciary could not act in violation of subsisting legal directives, regardless of political pressure or legislative urgency.
According to his response, the Rivers Assembly leadership is already entangled in ongoing legal proceedings surrounding the same impeachment dispute.
Justice Amadi further noted that the Speaker of the House has filed an appeal at the Court of Appeal challenging earlier judicial pronouncements linked to the crisis.
He stressed that taking steps to constitute an impeachment panel while an appeal is pending would amount to judicial recklessness and institutional overreach.
The refusal effectively freezes the impeachment process, at least for now, and represents a major setback for lawmakers pushing to remove the governor.
The political tension escalated after 26 members of the Rivers State House of Assembly issued an impeachment notice accusing Governor Fubara of gross misconduct.
The notice followed months of intense political rivalry and a power struggle within the state, widely viewed as a fallout from internal divisions between the executive arm and factions within the legislature.
Governor Fubara, who assumed office amid promises of stability and inclusive governance, has faced persistent opposition from lawmakers loyal to rival political interests.
The Rivers political landscape has remained volatile since the breakdown of relations between the governor and key figures who once controlled the state’s political machinery.
Legal analysts say the Chief Judge’s decision underscores the central role of the judiciary in preventing constitutional abuse during politically motivated impeachment attempts.
They argue that impeachment is a grave constitutional process that must strictly follow the rule of law, not partisan calculations.
Observers also note that Nigerian courts have increasingly intervened in impeachment disputes to curb legislative excesses, especially when due process is threatened.
The Rivers crisis mirrors similar impeachment battles in other states, where courts have stepped in to restrain assemblies accused of acting outside constitutional boundaries.
For Governor Fubara, the decision provides temporary relief but does not end the political storm surrounding his administration.
Analysts warn that the conflict may intensify through legal channels as lawmakers pursue their appeal at the appellate court.
The unfolding events also raise broader questions about the use of impeachment as a political weapon rather than a constitutional safeguard.
As the legal battle continues, attention now shifts to the Court of Appeal, whose eventual ruling could redefine the balance of power in Rivers State.
For now, Justice Amadi’s stance has reinforced judicial independence and delayed what could have become one of the most controversial impeachments in recent Nigerian political history.
A married woman, Ramatu Abbas, has allegedly attacked a 17-year-old girl, identified as Iwasen Terhemba, with a razor blade in Donga Local Government Area of Taraba State, sparking outrage within the community.
Diaspora Digital Media gathered that the incident followed allegations by Abbas that the teenager was having an affair with her husband.
However, investigations indicate that the girl had no relationship with the man and was, in fact, a victim of harassment.
According to community sources, Mr Abbas had repeatedly made advances towards the minor, which she reportedly rejected, citing her age and his marital status.
It was gathered that Ramatu Abbas later became aware of her husband’s actions and allegedly began issuing verbal threats against the girl.
Concerned about her safety, the teenager’s guardian, Jemila Savalla Wanga, reportedly approached Mrs Abbas to explain that her husband had been persistently harassing the minor and urged her to caution him.
Despite the intervention, residents said Mrs Abbas later went to the girl’s residence and attacked her with a razor blade, inflicting injuries on her face.
Witnesses alleged that the attacker also warned the victim and her guardian against reporting the incident to the authorities, insisting that the matter should be “settled at home.”
The incident has triggered widespread anger among residents, with many calling for justice and stronger protection for minors against abuse, harassment and violence.
When contacted, police authorities in Donga LGA confirmed the incident and disclosed that the suspect had already been charged before a magistrate court.
“Yes, we received the case, and from our investigation, the girl has nothing to do with Mr Abbas,” the police said.
“Our findings revealed that Mr Abbas had previously attempted to assault her, but she resisted. The girl is innocent.”
Police further confirmed that Ramatu Abbas has been formally charged, stressing that the case would be prosecuted locally.
“This is not a matter to be transferred to the headquarters. She will be prosecuted here,” the police added.
The victim is currently receiving medical treatment at a nearby clinic, according to the authorities.
Former Vice President Atiku Abubakar has issued a strong call for restraint and unity within the African Democratic Congress (ADC) following escalating online clashes between his supporters and members of the Obidient Movement over the party’s 2027 presidential ticket. The intervention comes amid growing tensions triggered by the recent defection of former Anambra State governor and 2023 Labour Party presidential candidate, Peter Obi, to the ADC, a move that has significantly reshaped Nigeria’s opposition political landscape.
In a pointed message shared on his verified X (formerly Twitter) handle on Tuesday, Atiku warned that personal attacks against party leaders, including himself and Peter Obi, undermine the collective interests of the ADC and weaken the broader opposition coalition seeking to challenge the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC) in the 2027 general election. According to Atiku, the internal hostility brewing among supporters amounts to a destructive “civil war” that ultimately serves the political interests of the APC.
DDM NEWS reports that Atiku’s remarks were a direct response to an X post by political commentator Novie Everest, who accused Atiku’s loyalists of attacking Peter Obi while expecting the former vice president to remain immune from criticism. The post reignited an already heated debate on social media, where fault lines within the opposition coalition have become increasingly visible.
“Atiku’s people want to insult Peter Obi without Atiku getting the heat back. Maybe they feel Atiku deserves respect and Peter Obi does not,” Everest wrote, echoing sentiments that have gained traction among Obi’s supporters since his entry into the ADC.
In his response, Atiku rejected the notion that attacks on any opposition leader could be justified or productive. He stressed that such infighting only strengthens the ruling party, which he described in characteristically blunt language as “urban bandits” determined to preserve what he termed Nigeria’s “satanic status quo.”
“Dear Everest,” Atiku wrote, “anyone who insults Obi or Atiku does not mean well for the leaders, the Coalition ADC and for Nigeria and Nigerians. The only people who benefit from such a civil war are the APC urban bandits who want to maintain the satanic status quo. We are better together.”
The former vice president’s intervention underscores the growing anxiety within opposition ranks as the 2027 election cycle gathers momentum. DDM NEWS observes that while the ADC has emerged as a potential rallying platform for disaffected politicians and voters seeking an alternative to the APC, internal cohesion remains a major test for the party’s credibility and electoral viability.
Peter Obi’s defection from the Labour Party to the ADC in December marked a turning point in opposition politics. Obi, who galvanized millions of young voters and urban professionals during the 2023 presidential election, said his decision was driven by the need to build a broader, more effective coalition capable of addressing Nigeria’s deepening economic crisis, rising insecurity, and widespread public disillusionment with governance.
However, Obi’s arrival in the ADC has also intensified competition for the party’s presidential ticket. His supporters, popularly known as the Obidients, have since mounted sustained pressure on Atiku to step aside and support Obi as the consensus candidate for 2027. They argue that Obi’s performance in 2023, particularly his appeal among youth and first-time voters, positions him as the strongest challenger to the APC.
This campaign has not gone down well with Atiku’s loyalists, many of whom believe the former vice president remains the most experienced and nationally networked figure within the coalition. They argue that Atiku’s long-standing political structure, cross-regional appeal, and prior presidential runs give him a strategic advantage in a high-stakes contest against the APC.
The resulting clash has spilled onto social media, especially X, where supporters from both camps have traded accusations, insults, and political threats. DDM NEWS gathered that the tone of the exchanges has alarmed some ADC leaders, who fear that unchecked hostility could fracture the party before it even conducts its presidential primary.
Political analysts say Atiku’s public call for unity reflects an awareness of the dangers posed by internal discord. While competition is inevitable in a democratic party, they argue that allowing supporter-driven conflicts to spiral out of control could erode public confidence in the ADC as a serious alternative to the ruling party.
Beyond the personalities involved, the controversy highlights a broader challenge confronting Nigeria’s opposition: how to balance ambition, ideology, and coalition-building in a political environment dominated by incumbency power and entrenched interests. DDM NEWS notes that previous opposition efforts have often collapsed under the weight of internal rivalries, leaving the APC to coast to victory.
Atiku’s framing of the conflict as a “civil war” is particularly striking. By warning that such divisions only benefit the APC, he appears to be appealing not just to party loyalty but to a shared sense of urgency among opposition supporters who believe Nigeria cannot afford another cycle of fragmented resistance.
“The question is not Atiku versus Obi,” a senior ADC insider told DDM NEWS on condition of anonymity. “The real question is whether the opposition can stay united long enough to present a credible alternative to Nigerians. If we destroy ourselves from within, the APC doesn’t even need to campaign.”
As debates over the ADC presidential ticket continue, attention is now turning to the party’s internal processes and leadership capacity. Observers say the manner in which the ADC manages its primaries, reconciles competing interests, and enforces discipline among supporters will be critical in determining its prospects for 2027.
For now, Atiku’s message appears aimed at lowering the temperature and reminding supporters that political change requires collaboration rather than confrontation. Whether that appeal will be heeded remains uncertain, especially in an era where social media amplifies division as much as it mobilizes support.
As Nigeria inches closer to another decisive election, DDM NEWS will continue to monitor developments within the ADC and the broader opposition coalition. The battle for unity may ultimately prove just as consequential as the battle at the ballot box.
Obi visits Kugbo furniture market fire victims in Abuja
Former governor of Anambra State, Mr. Peter Obi, on Thursday, visited the Kugbo Furniture Market in Abuja, where a major fire outbreak destroyed parts of the market.
As soon as he arrived at the scene to sympathize with the victims, a large crowd gathered and warmly welcomed him.
His presence brought comfort and hope to the traders and residents of the market.
During the visit, many of the fire victims and residents said that since the incident happened, no politician had come to sympathize with them except Mr. Peter Obi. They expressed gratitude and noted that his visit alone brought healing to their hearts.
After visiting the market, Mr. Peter Obi proceeded to the palace of the District Head (Hakimi) of Kugbo in the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), Abuja, His Royal Highness Alhaji Aliyu Shuaibu Dachi.
The palace is located very close to the affected market. The traditional ruler serves as the District Head of Kugbo, a community within the Abuja Municipal Area Council (AMAC). Mr. Obi was warmly received.
While speaking during the visit, the Head of the Market, Comrade Ike Austin, thanked Mr. Peter Obi for coming to sympathize with the victims despite not living in Abuja.
He noted that Mr. Obi came all the way from Onitsha to be with the affected traders.
Comrade Ebony described Peter Obi as a true leader and stated that he was the candidate they voted for in the 2023 election.
He further assured him of their support ahead of 2027, adding that all they ask is for Mr. Obi to secure the presidential ticket at the party primaries.
In Nigeria, women are strong by necessity. They endure, they adapt, they carry families, communities and entire futures on their backs.
Yet there is a silent disease quietly claiming the lives of thousands of Nigerian women every year not because it is unstoppable, but because it is ignored, misunderstood, or discovered too late.
Cervical cancer is one of the deadliest cancers affecting women in Nigeria today, yet it is also one of the most preventable.
The tragedy is not in the disease alone, but in how many lives it takes simply because awareness, access and early action are lacking.
Why Cervical Cancer Is a Major Nigerian Health Crisis
Cervical cancer develops in the cervix the opening between the uterus and the vagina.
In most cases, it is caused by persistent infection with the human papillomavirus (HPV), a sexually transmitted virus that many women may carry without any symptoms.
In Nigeria, cervical cancer is often diagnosed late.
Many women do not go for routine screening.
Some fear hospitals. Others lack access to healthcare facilities.
For many, cultural silence around reproductive health turns a treatable condition into a death sentence.
By the time symptoms become obvious, the cancer may already be advanced.
The Dangerous Silence of Early Cervical Cancer
One of the most frightening aspects of cervical cancer is how quietly it grows. In its early stages, it rarely causes pain or visible signs.
A woman can look healthy, feel strong, and still be living with early cancer.
When symptoms eventually appear, they may include:
Bleeding after sexual intercourse
Bleeding between menstrual periods or after menopause
Persistent watery or bloody vaginal discharge, sometimes with a strong odor
Pain during sex
As the disease spreads, symptoms may worsen pelvic pain, back pain, leg swelling, difficulty urinating, severe fatigue and unexplained weight loss.
These are not “normal female issues.” They are warning signs.
Who Is Most at Risk in Nigeria?
Every woman with a cervix is at risk, but certain factors increase vulnerability, especially within the Nigerian context:
Lack of regular Pap tests or cervical screening
Persistent HPV infection
Early sexual activity or multiple sexual partners
Poor access to healthcare services
Smoking
Living with HIV or a weakened immune system
Limited health education and cultural stigma around gynecological care
Many Nigerian women diagnosed with cervical cancer never knew they were at risk. That ignorance is deadly.
The Role of HPV and Why Vaccination Matters
HPV is the leading cause of cervical cancer. It spreads through sexual contact and is extremely common.
Most infections clear on their own, but when the virus persists, it can cause cervical cells to turn cancerous over time.
The HPV vaccine can prevent up to 90% of cervical cancer cases. Yet in Nigeria, vaccination rates remain low due to cost, lack of awareness, misinformation and limited availability.
Protecting girls before they become sexually active is one of the most powerful weapons Nigeria has against cervical cancer and it remains dangerously underused.
Why Screening Saves Lives
Cervical cancer does not appear overnight. It develops slowly, often over several years.
This gives doctors a critical window to detect abnormal cells before they become cancer.
A simple Pap test can detect these changes early. When treated at this stage, cervical cancer is highly curable.
Unfortunately, many Nigerian women only seek medical help when the pain becomes unbearable when options are limited and treatment is more expensive, invasive and uncertain.
Treatment and Survival: What Hope Looks Like
When detected early, cervical cancer can be treated successfully through surgery, radiation, chemotherapy, or a combination of these methods.
Many women go on to live long, healthy lives.
In advanced stages, treatment becomes more complex and costly, and survival rates drop sharply.
This is why early detection is not just important it is life-saving.
Access to care remains uneven across Nigeria, but early diagnosis significantly improves outcomes, even in resource-limited settings.
The Emotional and Social Burden on Nigerian Women
Beyond the medical impact, cervical cancer carries a heavy emotional and social burden.
Many women suffer in silence, fearing stigma, abandonment or financial ruin.
Some delay treatment because they worry about fertility, marital pressure or being labeled “sick.”
Others prioritize family needs over their own health a choice that often comes at a devastating cost.
No woman should have to choose between caring for her family and saving her life.
What Women Can Do Now
Cervical cancer is not inevitable. There are clear steps that save lives:
Go for regular cervical screening, even if you feel healthy
Encourage HPV vaccination for girls and young women
Speak openly about reproductive health
Seek medical attention for abnormal bleeding or discharge
Support other women to prioritize their health
Demand better access to women’s healthcare services
Awareness is not enough. Action is everything.
Conclusion
Cervical cancer feeds on silence, fear and neglect. It retreats when women are informed, screened and supported.
This is not a “foreign disease.” It is here. It is affecting Nigerian mothers, daughters, sisters and wives often in the prime of their lives.
Your health is not secondary. It is not shameful. It is not negotiable.
Early screening can save your life. Vaccination can protect the next generation.
And speaking up can break a deadly cycle that has gone on for far too long.
Cervical cancer is preventable. Dying from it should not be Nigerian women’s reality.
A dramatic moment has surfaced online involving popular content creator Peller and international streamer iShowSpeed, after a generous ₦1 million transfer ended in disappointment.
According to reports, Peller sent ₦1 million online after his name was mentioned during iShowSpeed’s stream. The gesture immediately caught Speed’s attention, and he openly acknowledged the transfer, thanking Peller in real time as fans watched. For a brief moment, it seemed like a win and a proud highlight for the Nigerian creator.
However, the excitement didn’t last long. The bank reportedly reversed the transaction, sending the ₦1 million back to Peller’s account. The unexpected reversal turned what was meant to be a celebratory moment into a painful one, leaving many online reacting with sympathy and disbelief.
Social media users have since expressed mixed emotions, with some laughing at the irony while others questioned why the transfer was reversed after it had already been acknowledged publicly. Many described the situation as a classic case of “happiness that didn’t last,” turning joy into instant heartbreak.
The incident has once again highlighted the unpredictable nature of online transactions and how quickly moments of excitement can turn into disappointment, especially when played out in front of thousands of viewers.
For Peller, it was a moment that started with pride and ended with tears, proving that sometimes, even good intentions don’t always go as planned.
High Blood Pressure (HBP), medically known as hypertension, is fast becoming one of Nigeria’s most serious but least discussed public health threats. Health experts warn that the condition is especially dangerous because it often shows no symptoms until it has already caused severe, sometimes irreversible, damage to the body.
Across the country, thousands of Nigerians are living with high blood pressure without knowing it—going about their daily lives while the condition quietly attacks vital organs.
What Is High Blood Pressure?
High blood pressure occurs when the force of blood flowing through the arteries remains consistently higher than normal. Over time, this constant pressure damages blood vessels and places excessive strain on critical organs such as the heart, brain, kidneys, and eyes.
Medical professionals describe hypertension as a “silent killer” because many patients feel perfectly fine, even while serious internal damage is ongoing.
Why It Should Not Be Ignored
When left untreated, high blood pressure can lead to life-threatening complications, including:
Stroke
Heart failure
Kidney disease
Loss of vision
Sudden death
Doctors warn that many cases of sudden collapse or unexplained death are often linked to undiagnosed or poorly managed hypertension.
Common Causes in Nigeria
Several lifestyle and genetic factors contribute to the rising cases of high blood pressure in Nigeria. These include:
Excessive salt consumption, common in many local diets
Chronic stress
Poor sleep habits
Alcohol intake and smoking
Overweight and obesity
Family history of hypertension
Physical inactivity
Warning Signs Often Overlooked
Although most people experience no symptoms, some individuals may notice:
Frequent or persistent headaches
Chest pain
Dizziness
Blurred vision
Shortness of breath
Health experts caution that waiting for symptoms before seeking medical attention can be dangerous.
How to Prevent and Control High Blood Pressure
Medical practitioners advise Nigerians to take proactive steps to prevent or manage hypertension:
Reduce salt intake
Check blood pressure regularly
Engage in physical activity at least three to four times a week
Eat more fruits and vegetables
Manage stress effectively
Avoid smoking and limit alcohol consumption
Take prescribed medications consistently,
High blood pressure is no longer a disease of old age. Increasingly, young adults in their 20s and 30s are being diagnosed with hypertension. Health experts emphasize that knowing your blood pressure numbers and taking early action can save lives.
In a country where many deaths are preventable, regular blood pressure checks could make the difference between life and death.
Rivers State Chief Judge, Simeon Amadi, has refused to set up a judicial panel to investigate Governor Siminalayi Fubara and his deputy, Ngozi Odu, citing a court order that bars him from doing so.
The Rivers State House of Assembly had requested Amadi to constitute a seven-member panel to probe allegations of gross misconduct against Fubara and Odu.
The court order, issued by Justice F.A. Fiberesima, restrained Amadi from receiving, forwarding, or acting on any request to form such a panel.
The Speaker of the Rivers State House of Assembly, Martins Amaewhule, has already filed an appeal against the court orders.
Fresh panic has gripped Kurmin Wali, a quiet Christian-dominated community in Kajuru Local Government Area of southern Kaduna, following a chilling twist in the ongoing saga surrounding the mass abduction of worshippers during Sunday church services. As families await word on the fate of their loved ones, DDM NEWS can authoritatively report that the abductors have placed an unusual and disturbing precondition before ransom negotiations can even begin: the payment of nearly N28.9 million for motorcycles allegedly lost during recent military operations.
The latest attack, which occurred on Sunday, January 18, 2026, marked the second violent assault on Kurmin Wali within a single week. Armed men stormed at least three churches during morning worship, abducting a total of 177 worshippers, including women, children, and the elderly. While 11 victims later escaped, 166 remain in captivity, their fate hanging in the balance as negotiations remain stalled.
Confusion initially trailed reports of the abduction. On Monday, the Kaduna State Government, the state police command, and the Chairman of Kajuru Local Government Area dismissed early accounts of the incident as unverified. However, the Northern Chairman of the Christian Association of Nigeria (CAN), Rev. Joseph Hayab, confirmed the abduction to journalists, triggering public outrage and concern.
By late Tuesday, the Nigeria Police Force officially acknowledged the incident. Force Public Relations Officer, CSP Benjamin Hundeyin, clarified via social media that earlier comments by the Kaduna State Commissioner of Police, CP Muhammad Rabiu, were not a denial but a cautious response pending confirmation from the field, including the identities and number of those affected.
As the dust settled, the true scale of the tragedy became impossible to ignore. DDM NEWS gathered that by Wednesday, Kurmin Wali had become a ghost town. Homes were abandoned, farms lay fallow, schools were shut indefinitely, and fear reigned supreme.
A resident, Linus Abu, told reporters that the community was still reeling from a previous attack on January 11, when suspected armed Fulani militia kidnapped several villagers. According to him, the victims were only released after the community raised and paid N23 million in ransom.
“They called us and told us exactly what to do,” Abu recounted. “Some of our people had to carry the money in sacks and take it deep into the bush. We thought that nightmare was over, but barely a week later, it became worse.”
Unlike the earlier abduction, the current kidnappers have not formally demanded a monetary ransom—at least not yet. Instead, they issued a startling ultimatum: the community must first compensate them for 17 motorcycles, which they claim were lost during recent military offensives.
According to Abu, the abductors pegged the value of each motorcycle at N1.7 million, bringing the total cost to N28.9 million.
“They said we must pay for all the motorcycles before they will even talk about ransom for the people they are holding,” he said.
Confirming this account, the village head of Kurmin Wali, Ishaku Dan’azumi, disclosed during a telephone interview that the bandits contacted a community-appointed negotiator and insisted that the issue of the missing motorcycles must be resolved first.
“They accused our people of stealing some motorcycles and removing parts like carburetors and spark plugs from others,” Dan’azumi said. “They said until all 17 motorcycles are returned or paid for, none of our people will be released.”
Dan’azumi added that no direct cash ransom demand had been made so far, beyond the compensation for the motorcycles. He also revealed that the mass abduction appears to be linked to intensified military operations targeting bandit camps in parts of Kajuru and neighbouring Kauru Local Government Areas.
Fear has since crippled daily life in Kurmin Wali. Residents have fled to neighbouring communities, markets are deserted, and economic activities have ground to a halt.
“There is no farming, no school, nothing,” said Hasan Emman, a local farmer. “Most of us have run away. We are afraid. How can we negotiate when everyone is scattered?”
During a visit to the area, reporters observed locked shops, empty streets, and residents too frightened to speak openly. Families of the abducted worshippers expressed anger and despair, accusing authorities of initially downplaying the incident.
“Our people are suffering in the forest, and they said nothing happened,” one distraught resident told DDM NEWS. “If we don’t cry out, who will help us?”
Church officials and survivors provided harrowing accounts of the coordinated attack. The gunmen, armed with AK-47 rifles, reportedly struck multiple churches simultaneously around 9am, moving with military-like precision.
Yunana Dauji, Secretary of the Cherubim and Seraphim Church in Kurmin Wali, said the attackers surrounded two branches of the church and warned worshippers not to attempt escape.
“They moved us from one church to another, gathering people,” he said. “From our church alone, they took over 50 people.”
The Evangelical Church Winning All was also targeted. Its secretary, Joseph Bawa, said the attackers burst into the sanctuary shouting and immediately began seizing worshippers.
“They gathered us together and marched everyone into the forest,” he said.
Among those abducted was the village head himself. His son, Linus Madami, later confirmed that Dan’azumi managed to escape alongside 10 others, but his two wives and two children remain in captivity.
“In total, 177 people were taken,” Madami said. “I narrowly escaped after struggling with one of the gunmen.”
Some captives escaped during the forced march. According to Bawa, when the abducted group reached a shallow river, a few deliberately slowed down.
“When the gunmen crossed first, those who slowed down ran back because the attackers could not cross quickly,” he explained.
Military sources, speaking to DDM NEWS, confirmed that the attackers were bandits fleeing sustained military offensives in parts of neighbouring Kauru LGA. Troops had reportedly dislodged them from long-established camps around Gabachua, Legede, and the Agwalla mountain and forest corridors.
One source described the abduction as retaliatory.
“They lost logistics, especially motorcycles used for mobility,” the source said. “This abduction was meant to compensate for those losses and spread fear while they fled.”
Although troops were deployed following intelligence reports, the attackers reportedly diverted towards rugged forest belts around the Karamai and Rijana axis, exploiting difficult terrain to evade capture.
Security forces are now on full alert, with ongoing “hot pursuit” and exploitation operations aimed at tracking the criminals and rescuing the abducted worshippers.
Meanwhile, the Commandant of the 2 National Mission Force Brigade, Samaru Kataf, Navy Captain I.T. Akaazua, disclosed that troops have rescued three kidnapped victims, including a child, and destroyed several terrorist camps in Kauru LGA.
“Another operation on Tuesday led to the rescue of three victims,” Akaazua said, adding that fierce gun battles were fought in dense forests where the criminals had terrain advantage.
As anxiety deepens, residents and community leaders are urging the Federal and Kaduna State governments to sustain military pressure, strengthen intelligence gathering, and ensure the safe return of the abducted worshippers.
For now, Kurmin Wali waits—gripped by fear, uncertainty, and the unbearable cost being placed on human freedom.
Nigerian singer Adekunle Gold has shared a rare personal reflection on his personality and approach to life, revealing why he deliberately avoids trouble despite being misunderstood by many.
“I’m not normal, but I like peace. That’s why I avoid trouble at all cost. I don’t want to be near it,” the singer said, offering insight into his calm and reserved nature.
Adekunle Gold’s statement sheds light on his intentional lifestyle choice to stay away from unnecessary drama, conflicts, and chaos, especially in an industry often filled with controversies and public clashes. While he admits to being different, he makes it clear that peace of mind is a priority he refuses to compromise.
Fans have praised the singer for his honesty, noting that his words reflect the maturity and calmness he is known for both on and off the stage. Many also see his statement as a reminder that choosing peace is not a sign of weakness, but a conscious decision to protect one’s mental and emotional well-being.
In a world where noise and conflict often attract attention, Adekunle Gold’s stance stands out as a quiet but powerful message about self-awareness, boundaries, and inner peace.
The Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Commission (FCCPC) has started taking action against Digital Money Lending (DML) operators that failed to meet the January 5 deadline to regularize their dealings with the commission.
According to the Director of Corporate Affairs, Mr. Ondaje Ijagwu, these operators have been removed from the FCCPC’s list of approved digital lenders.
The FCCPC’s Executive Vice Chairman, Mr. Tunji Bello, explained that this move is aimed at promoting discipline, transparency, and consumer confidence in the digital lending space, without disrupting legitimate business activities.
The commission has withdrawn the conditional approval status of non-compliant DML operators and will take further enforcement steps as needed.
Consumers are advised to be cautious when dealing with digital lenders not on the FCCPC’s approved list.
The commission’s register serves as a guide for the public to identify operators that have met regulatory requirements.
The FCCPC has also begun engaging with application hosting platforms and payment service providers to monitor compliance.
Operators provisionally designated as eligible have until April 2026 to regularize their registration under the Digital, Electronic, Online and Non-Traditional Consumer Lending Regulations, 2025 (DEON Regulations).
Simeon Amadi, chief judge of Rivers, has declined to constitute a judicial panel to probe Siminalayi Fubara, governor of the state, citing a court judgement.
The Rivers state house of assembly had asked Amadi to set up a seven-member panel to investigate Fubara and Ngozi Odu, his deputy, over allegations bordering on gross misconduct.
In Nigeria, self-medication has become a deeply ingrained habit. For many people, the first response to illness is not a hospital visit but a quick stop at the pharmacy or chemist. Long queues, waiting times, stress, and the cost of care often discourage people from seeking professional medical help. Instead, many Nigerians turn to past experiences, online searches, or advice from friends to diagnose and treat themselves.
This pattern has become so familiar that common symptoms are quickly labelled. A headache is assumed to be malaria. Weakness is treated with antibiotics. A fever triggers the reuse of a drug that “worked last time.” While this approach may feel convenient, it is also dangerous.
Medical experts warn that not every headache is malaria, and not every fever is caused by an infection. Some symptoms may point to more serious underlying conditions. When individuals guess their illness and treat themselves without proper diagnosis, they risk addressing the wrong problem while the real issue remains unresolved.
Many Nigerians have also experienced a situation where a drug that once worked effectively later seemed to lose its power. In such cases, the immediate assumption is often that the medication is fake. However, in many instances, the real problem is drug resistance.
Drug resistance occurs when antibiotics are used improperly or too frequently without medical guidance. Over time, bacteria adapt and learn how to survive these drugs. As a result, when antibiotics are genuinely needed to treat a serious infection, they may no longer be effective. This growing resistance is one of the most serious consequences of self-medication.
Another widespread misconception is that antibiotics can cure all illnesses. This is false. Antibiotics do not treat malaria and are ineffective against viral infections such as the flu or common cold. Using them for conditions they cannot treat only exposes the body to unnecessary medication and accelerates resistance.
There is also the dangerous habit of stopping antibiotics as soon as symptoms improve. Failing to complete a prescribed course may kill only the weaker bacteria, leaving stronger ones behind. These surviving bacteria can multiply, leading to infections that are more difficult and more expensive to treat.
Self-medication can also mask symptoms. Temporary relief may create the false impression that a problem has been resolved, while the underlying condition continues to worsen. By the time professional medical help is finally sought, the illness may have progressed to a more severe stage.
Beyond resistance and misdiagnosis, antibiotics carry potential side effects. When abused, some can damage the liver, kidneys, or digestive system. Because these drugs are easily accessible, their risks are often underestimated.
While hospital visits can be stressful and the healthcare system can be demanding, the long-term consequences of misusing antibiotics are far more costly. These consequences may include prolonged illness, higher medical bills, and in severe cases, loss of life.
Health professionals advise Nigerians to think twice before purchasing antibiotics without a prescription. Seeking proper medical advice and using antibiotics responsibly is not a sign of weakness—it is a sign of wisdom. Protecting your health today ensures a safer and healthier future.
Popular entertainer Nos Miraj has revealed on the TeeWithTay podcast that he was the originator of the viral game show “Pop the Balloon,” which recently gained massive attention in the United States. According to Miraj, the concept was his idea long before it became widely known overseas.
“I started the ‘Pop the Balloon’ game show before the lady in the US copied it and made it popular,” Miraj stated during the interview. He explained that the reason he couldn’t officially claim ownership of the concept was that he never trademarked the name “Pop the Balloon.”
The revelation has sparked discussions online about originality, intellectual property, and the importance of protecting creative ideas. Many fans expressed support for Miraj, saying it’s frustrating to see someone else gain international recognition for a concept he pioneered.
Miraj’s experience also serves as a cautionary tale for content creators and entrepreneurs. Without proper legal protection, even the most original ideas can be copied and popularized by others, sometimes before the original creator gains the recognition they deserve.
US President Donald Trump has formally signed the charter of his so-called “Board of Peace,” which he has billed as a body for resolving international conflicts, with other founding members in Davos.
“Congratulations President Trump, the charter is now in full force, and the board of peace is now an official international organisation,” White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said at the signing ceremony.
Permanent membership comes with a $1 billion price tag and the composition of the group has proved controversial, with the inclusion of leaders like Russian President Vladimir Putin, who invaded Ukraine four years ago.
Trump said Putin had agreed to join, while the Russian leader said he was still studying the invite.
Other members include Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Hungary’s Viktor Orban, while Pope Leo XVI has also been sent an invitation.
Nigerian media personality Solomon Buchi has come under the spotlight after publicly criticizing popular interviewer Egungun of Lagos. The criticism comes in the wake of Egungun’s widely discussed interview with international streamer iShowSpeed, which many felt lacked depth and substance.
In a scathing statement, Buchi said, “Just because you’re popular for interviewing BBL Snapchat ladies, asking silly questions, and shouting ‘that’s massive,’ doesn’t mean you have the intellectual capacity to conduct a good interview.” He further emphasized that popularity does not equate to professionalism or skill in journalism.
The comment has reignited debates about the quality of online interviews and the responsibility of content creators. While Egungun has a large following due to his humorous and casual interview style, critics argue that such approaches often sacrifice meaningful conversation and fail to extract insightful responses from high-profile guests.
Social media reactions have been mixed. Some users agree with Buchi, praising him for calling out what they see as low-quality content and encouraging better standards in Nigerian media. Others defend Egungun, arguing that his style is meant to entertain rather than conduct serious journalism.
Media experts suggest that the controversy underscores a broader issue in the industry. With the rise of social media influencers doubling as interviewers, the lines between entertainment and professional journalism have blurred. Dr. Ifeoma Nwosu, a media analyst, notes, “Engaging interviews require preparation, critical thinking, and respect for the guest’s expertise. Popularity and a large following do not replace these essential skills.”
The discussion also highlights the growing influence of international content creators like iShowSpeed visiting Nigeria. Analysts say that how Nigerian media personalities handle such interviews can affect the country’s global perception in entertainment and digital media.
As this debate unfolds online, one thing is clear: audiences are increasingly demanding more substance and professionalism from media figures, even those known primarily for entertainment.
United States President Donald Trump has unveiled what may become one of the most controversial diplomatic experiments of his presidency: a self-styled “Board of Peace,” an international body he says is designed to resolve global conflicts and which he has openly suggested could one day replace the United Nations.
The initiative, however, is already exposing deep fault lines in global politics.
While the board has attracted support from several Middle Eastern monarchies, authoritarian leaders, and politically isolated states, it has struggled to gain the confidence of key Western allies.
Critics warn that the structure, leadership, and ambition of the board risk undermining the existing international order rather than strengthening it.
From Gaza Oversight to Global Ambition
The Board of Peace was initially conceived as a narrow mechanism to oversee the demilitarization, reconstruction, and governance of Gaza following Israel’s devastating two-year war.
That original plan received backing from the United Nations Security Council, lending it a degree of international legitimacy.
But the concept has since evolved or expanded far beyond its original mandate.
A draft charter circulated to invited nations now describes the board as a permanent international organization tasked with promoting peace, stability, and governance in conflict-prone regions worldwide. Notably, Gaza is no longer mentioned at all.
Under the proposal, Trump would serve as the board’s chair indefinitely, potentially beyond his second presidential term.
Who Holds the Power
At the top of the structure is Trump himself, overseeing a “founding Executive Board” composed of a small circle of political allies and insiders.
This inner group includes his son-in-law Jared Kushner, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, special envoy Steve Witkoff, and former British Prime Minister Tony Blair.
Below them would sit member states, serving renewable three-year terms. Permanent membership, however, comes at a steep cost: a reported $1 billion fee, ostensibly earmarked for reconstruction efforts in Gaza.
This pay-to-stay model has alarmed diplomats and transparency advocates, who argue it risks turning peacekeeping into a transactional enterprise vulnerable to influence and corruption.
Who Has Signed On
Support for the Board of Peace has come largely from outside Western Europe.
Countries that have accepted invitations include the United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Qatar, Bahrain, Turkey, Pakistan, Morocco, Hungary, Kosovo, Argentina, Paraguay, Indonesia, Vietnam, Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan.
Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has also agreed to participate, despite voicing strong objections to the inclusion of Turkish and Qatari representatives and facing an arrest warrant from the International Criminal Court.
Armenia and Azerbaijan fresh from a U.S.-brokered peace agreement that granted Washington exclusive development access to a key transit corridor have also joined.
Perhaps most controversially, Belarusian leader Alexander Lukashenko, widely described as Europe’s last dictator and a close ally of Russia’s Vladimir Putin, has accepted an invitation.
Trump has also claimed that Putin has agreed in principle to participate, though the Kremlin has yet to formally confirm.
Who Is Holding Back
Several Western nations have declined or expressed serious reservations.
France and Norway have rejected the proposal outright, citing concerns about how the board would coexist with the United Nations.
Italy has raised constitutional questions, while Ireland has said it is still reviewing the invitation.
Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelensky has been blunt, saying it is impossible to imagine sitting at the same table as Russia while Moscow continues its war against Ukraine.
China has confirmed it was invited but has stopped short of committing, reiterating that it remains firmly committed to an international system centered on the United Nations.
Why the Board is Raising Alarm
At the heart of the controversy is Trump’s repeated suggestion that the Board of Peace could replace the UN an institution created 80 years ago to prevent global conflict through collective security.
The board’s charter refers vaguely to “institutions that have too often failed,” a phrase widely interpreted as a thinly veiled critique of the United Nations.
Diplomats fear the initiative could fracture international cooperation, weaken established norms, and concentrate global decision-making power in the hands of a few wealthy or politically aligned states.
UN officials have dismissed the notion that the organization could be supplanted, insisting the UN remains indispensable. Still, the very suggestion underscores a growing tension between unilateral power politics and multilateral governance.
A Test of Global Order
Trump’s Board of Peace reflects a broader worldview: skepticism toward multilateral institutions, preference for deal-making over diplomacy, and belief in strongman leadership as a path to stability.
Supporters see it as a bold alternative to what they view as an ineffective international system.
Critics see it as a dangerous experiment one that risks legitimizing authoritarian actors, monetizing peace, and eroding the fragile architecture that has helped prevent major global conflict for decades.
Whether the Board of Peace becomes a transformative diplomatic forum or a short-lived political spectacle remains uncertain.
What is clear is that it has already sparked a fundamental debate about who governs global peace and on whose terms.
In a world facing multiple overlapping crises, the question is not just whether new institutions are needed, but whether replacing cooperation with concentration of power will bring peace or deepen division.
For now, Trump’s Board of Peace stands less as a solution, and more as a symbol of an international order in transition and under strain
A young woman has sparked conversations online after revealing just how expensive it is to be in a relationship with her in Nedu’s podcast. She openly admitted that love alone is not enough to sustain her lifestyle. “It’s very expensive to be a girl. Love doesn’t pay bills,” she said.
According to her, any man who wants to be with her must be willing to provide $7,000 every week. She explained that financial support is a requirement, not optional, and emphasized that anyone serious about being her partner must be able to meet this standard.
Her bold statement has divided opinions on social media. Some admire her for being upfront and valuing herself, while others argue that such demands make relationships feel transactional rather than emotional.
Experts note that while financial expectations are normal, extreme conditions can create an imbalance. Relationship counselor Dr. Chike Obi explains that financial transparency is important, but placing monetary demands above emotional connection can make a relationship more about money than mutual love and respect.
The discussion also highlights broader issues around lifestyle expectations and financial independence. While some see her stance as empowering and a way to assert her worth, others worry that equating love with money risks turning relationships into business deals instead of genuine partnerships.
This story has become a hot topic because it challenges traditional ideas about love, money, and relationships. It serves as a reminder that in any partnership, emotional support, trust, and respect remain crucial, even when financial considerations are involved.
A social media discussion has sparked intense debate after a woman gave blunt advice to her married friend who has been experiencing neglect in her marriage. According to the advice, the woman’s husband hasn’t been intimated with her for the past six months, leaving her feeling isolated and unappreciated.
“Your so-called husband hasn’t touched you in six months,” the friend said candidly. “At this point, you might as well go out and enjoy yourself with other men, since he’s doing his own too. And let’s not forget you’re the one catering for the family, holding everything together while he’s absent emotionally.”
The advice highlights a growing concern among couples facing emotional disconnect and imbalance in responsibilities. Experts say that prolonged neglect in a marriage, whether physical, emotional, or both, can lead to resentment, frustration, and even the breakdown of the relationship if left unaddressed.
Relationship counselor, Dr. Ifeoma Nwosu, explains, “When one partner consistently neglects intimacy and shared responsibilities, it places an unfair burden on the other. Open communication is vital, but sometimes individuals must prioritize their own happiness and well-being, especially if their partner shows no willingness to change.”
The viral conversation has sparked mixed reactions online. While some applaud the straightforward advice, others caution against seeking fulfillment outside marriage without first attempting reconciliation.
Nevertheless, the core message remains clear: emotional and physical neglect in a marriage is not something to ignore. Individuals must recognize their worth and ensure they are not left feeling invisible in a partnership where they give more than they receive.
The National Agency for Food and Drug Administration and Control (NAFDAC) has commenced full enforcement of the ban on the production and sale of alcoholic beverages in sachets and PET bottles below 200ml, in line with a directive from the Senate aimed at protecting public health.
The Director-General of NAFDAC, Prof. Mojisola Adeyeye, disclosed this on Wednesday during a media parley in Lagos, confirming that the agency had received a formal order from the Senate to proceed with enforcement activities.
According to Adeyeye, the development follows the conclusion of consultations that had earlier led the Federal Government to temporarily suspend implementation of the ban.
“We have already started the enforcement to ban alcohol production in sachets and bottles below 200ml after we received the order from the Senate to proceed,” she said.
Background to the ban
Diaspora Digital Media reported that NAFDAC had announced on November 11, 2025, that it would enforce a total ban on the affected products by December 2025, following a Senate resolution.
However, the implementation was paused after the Federal Government directed regulatory agencies to suspend action pending broader stakeholder consultations.
Adeyeye said those consultations have now been concluded, clearing the way for enforcement.
The NAFDAC boss explained that the decision was driven by concerns over public health, particularly the need to protect children, adolescents and young adults from alcohol abuse.
She noted that alcohol sold in sachets and small containers is cheap, easily accessible and easy to conceal, making it attractive to vulnerable groups.
“NAFDAC is not against alcohol. What we are against is the proliferation of high-alcohol-content products in sachets and small bottles, which make it easy for children to access them,” Adeyeye stated.
Concerns over alcohol strength
Adeyeye revealed that before her tenure, some sachet alcohol products contained between 50 and 90 per cent alcohol, which she described as dangerously high.
She said NAFDAC had directed manufacturers to reduce alcohol content to 30 per cent, a move that was strongly resisted by industry players.
“Manufacturers went directly to the ministry to complain, citing potential job losses and investment risks,” she said.
According to Adeyeye, those objections led the Federal Government at the time to grant producers a five-year grace period, running from December 2018 to January 31, 2024, to restructure their operations.
She stressed that the grace period has long expired, making renewed enforcement unavoidable.
Adeyeye reaffirmed NAFDAC’s commitment to safeguarding public health through strict regulatory oversight, while assuring stakeholders of continued engagement.
She said the agency would remain firm on compliance while ensuring that regulatory actions are guided by public health priorities.
In November 2025, the Senate directed NAFDAC and other regulatory bodies to fully enforce the ban on high-strength alcoholic beverages packaged in sachets.
The directive followed the adoption of a motion sponsored by Senator Asuquo Ekpeyong, calling for an end to further extensions of the phase-out timeline.
Nigerian comedian and content creator Carter Efe has sparked online chatter after taking a jab at fellow influencer Peller over his recent encounter with American streamer iShowSpeed.
According to Carter Efe, Peller reportedly spent a whopping ₦4.8 million just to meet Speed during the latter’s visit to Nigeria. However, Efe claims that despite the huge amount spent, Peller didn’t actually get to interact with the streamer directly the only thing he managed to touch, Carter Efe says, was Speed’s car.
Speaking candidly to fellow creator Enzo, Carter Efe didn’t hold back. He emphasized that influence in the Nigerian streaming scene isn’t measured by money, but by respect and credibility, and boldly stated that “only Kolu and I are the most respected streamers in Nigeria.” The remark has ignited a lively debate among fans and followers about who truly holds clout in the growing Nigerian streaming and content creation space.
Some fans have taken Efe’s comments as playful banter, a humorous jab typical of the entertainment world, while others believe it underscores a genuine rivalry among top streamers, highlighting the competition to maintain relevance and respect in a fast-growing digital industry.
With international stars like iShowSpeed visiting Nigeria and attracting attention from local celebrities, the dynamics of fame and influence are evolving rapidly. Carter Efe’s statement serves as a reminder that in the streaming world, money alone does not guarantee status respect and recognition are earned, not bought.
The Federal Government is set to arraign Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN), Chief Mike Ozekhome, before the Federal Capital Territory High Court, Maitama, over alleged fraud linked to a property in London, United Kingdom.
Barring any last-minute changes, the arraignment will take place on Monday, January 26, 2026, at 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom 4, according to a hearing notice obtained on Wednesday.
Ozekhome is the sole defendant in the case, with the Federal Republic of Nigeria listed as the plaintiff.
The prosecution will be conducted by Osuobeni Akponimisingha, Head of the High Profile Prosecution Department of the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC).
The hearing notice states that the matter will be transferred from the general cause list to the court’s hearing paper for the scheduled date.
It also directs parties seeking adjournment to apply promptly and provide evidence where necessary, while requests to compel witness attendance must be made with reasonable notice.
The ICPC filed a three-count charge against Ozekhome on January 16, 2026. The first count alleges that in August 2021, Ozekhome knowingly received House 79, Randall Avenue, London NW2 7SX, from Mr. Shani Tali, an act the commission claims constitutes a felony under Sections 13 and 24 of the Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Act, 2000.
The second count alleges that Ozekhome, while acting as a legal practitioner and SAN, created a false Nigerian passport bearing the name of Mr. Tali to support a fraudulent ownership claim over the London property, contrary to Sections 363 and 364 of the Penal Code of the FCT.
In the third count, the ICPC alleges that Ozekhome knowingly used the same forged passport to substantiate the property ownership claim, contrary to Section 366 of the Penal Code.
The case followed a petition submitted to the ICPC by Mr. Olanrewaju Suraj, head of the Human and Environmental Development Agenda.
The petition referenced a judgment by a British property tribunal, which allegedly accused Ozekhome and others of conspiring with corrupt Nigerian officials to procure forged identity documents in order to fraudulently claim ownership of the North London property.
The ICPC said it launched its investigation after the UK tribunal’s ruling implicated several individuals in a complex scheme involving fraud and forged documents.
According to Phyna, Speed’s trip was largely centered around Lagos and other popular urban locations, which, while entertaining, barely scratched the surface of Nigeria’s diversity. She jokingly remarked that the streamer should have been taken to Northern Nigeria, where he would have experienced a completely different side of the country from culture and lifestyle to the realities people talk about but rarely show online.
Her comment, however, quickly raised eyebrows after she added that Speed would have been “chilling with dem bandits,” a statement many interpreted as dark humor aimed at the long-standing insecurity challenges in parts of the North. While some fans laughed it off as sarcasm, others criticized the remark, saying it unfairly reinforces negative stereotypes about an entire region.
Supporters of Phyna argued that her comment reflects how social media often sanitizes celebrity visits, showing only the glamorous side of Nigeria while ignoring the complex issues many citizens face daily. They believe her statement was more of a social commentary than a literal suggestion.
On the other hand, critics felt the joke was unnecessary and insensitive, especially given ongoing efforts by locals to promote the North’s rich culture, tourism, hospitality, and history beyond headlines about insecurity.
As expected, the comment has fueled debates online, with Nigerians split between those who see it as harmless banter and those calling for more responsible conversations about regional identity. iShowSpeed himself has not responded to the statement, but the discussion it sparked once again highlights how celebrity visits can open deeper conversations about representation, perception, and the many sides of Nigeria the world rarely sees.
