(DDM) — Diaspora Digital Media (DDM) has announced a special media interview scheduled for Monday, 23rd March 2026, on its flagship program, the DDM Morning Show. The discussion will focus on a timely and critical question in Nigerian politics: “Peter Obi and the Igbo Elite: Why the Lack of Unified Support?”

The program aims to provide in-depth analysis of the political dynamics surrounding Peter Obi, a prominent national figure, and the role that Igbo elite leaders are playing in shaping electoral alignments and support patterns.

The discussion will delve into issues of political loyalty, strategic positioning, and the social and economic factors influencing elite decision-making in the southeast region.

Two distinguished guests have been invited to provide expert perspectives during the interview. Barr. Emeka Ugwuonye Esq., a legal consultant and CEO of Due Process Advocate International (DPA), will examine the structural and legal dimensions that may affect the alignment and mobilization of political support.

His contributions are expected to shed light on how political frameworks and party structures influence elite endorsements, and the implications of these decisions on broader democratic participation.

Joining him is Amb. Sleek Ukoha, a member of the COPDEM National Executive and Chairperson of Imo State COPDEM. Amb. Ukoha will bring a grassroots and strategic perspective on the political landscape, offering insights into the sociocultural and historical factors that shape elite behavior and support for national figures like Peter Obi.

His discussion will also highlight the challenges and opportunities facing political mobilization within Igbo communities and the importance of unity in achieving electoral objectives.

The program is scheduled to begin at 11:00 a.m. Nigeria Time and will be broadcast live on the DDM TV YouTube channel at https://youtube.com/@ddmtvnews, making it accessible to journalists, political analysts, and the general public. Audiences will have the opportunity to follow the discussion, engage with key ideas, and gain expert insights into the ongoing debates surrounding Peter Obi and the Igbo elite.

Emphasizes the importance of this program as a platform for exploring the intersections of political influence, elite decision-making, and citizen engagement. The media house encourages all interested viewers to tune in to the broadcast, follow the analysis, and engage with the conversation.

This interview underscores DDM’s commitment to fostering informed discourse, promoting transparency, and providing a platform where critical national issues are debated with clarity, accuracy, and in-depth analysis.

By bringing together experienced political analysts and respected community leaders, the program promises to offer a nuanced understanding of the political realities shaping Igbo elite support and the broader implications for Nigeria’s political future.

(DDM) — The struggle for global dominance is no longer fought solely on battlefields, but increasingly in the arena of narratives, where powerful nations shape perception, influence opinion, and control the flow of information.

From Washington to Tel Aviv and Tehran, the contest between the United States, Israel, and Iran has extended beyond missiles and military strategy into a fierce battle for global storytelling supremacy.

This modern “narrative warfare” determines not only how conflicts are perceived internationally but also how alliances are formed and justified.

Historically, global narratives have shaped major turning points in human civilization, including the abolition of the transatlantic slave trade, which was influenced by figures such as William Wilberforce.

Wilberforce and other humanitarian voices helped redefine global moral consciousness, ultimately contributing to the end of one of history’s most brutal economic systems.

Yet, despite its abolition, the scars of the Transatlantic Slave Trade remain deeply embedded across Africa, serving as a reminder of how powerful narratives once justified exploitation and domination.

Today, analysts argue that similar mechanisms are at play, albeit in more sophisticated forms, as nations deploy media, diplomacy, and digital platforms to shape global opinion in their favour.

In the ongoing tensions between Israel and Iran, each side has sought to frame its actions as defensive while portraying the other as an aggressor, creating competing versions of reality for international audiences.

The United States, a key ally of Israel, has also played a central role in shaping global narratives through its diplomatic channels and global media influence.

Experts note that controlling the narrative can be as powerful as controlling territory, as it determines international support, sanctions, and even military intervention.

Social media has further amplified this contest, allowing information—and misinformation—to spread rapidly, often blurring the line between fact and propaganda.

For many African observers, the situation underscores the importance of developing independent voices capable of telling their own stories, free from external influence.

They argue that Africa’s historical experience with narrative manipulation, particularly during colonialism and the slave trade era, highlights the dangers of allowing others to define one’s reality.

As geopolitical tensions continue to rise, the battle for narrative control is expected to intensify, shaping not only how conflicts are understood but also how history will ultimately remember them.

In this evolving global order, the frontlines are no longer defined by geography alone, but by perception, influence, and the power to tell the story first, and most convincingly.

(DDM) — Fresh hostilities have erupted in the Middle East as Israel launched a new wave of airstrikes on Tehran, escalating its ongoing conflict with Iran and heightening fears of a wider regional war.

The latest strikes reportedly targeted infrastructure linked to Iran’s military and missile production capabilities, according to Israeli authorities.

The renewed bombardment marks a continuation of weeks-long hostilities, with both sides engaging in sustained military exchanges across multiple fronts.

In response, Iran has intensified threats against strategic energy installations across the Gulf, warning it could strike power plants, oil facilities, and desalination systems in neighboring countries.

Tehran has also signaled its readiness to expand attacks beyond Israel, potentially targeting interests linked to the United States and its allies in the region.

The conflict has now entered a dangerous phase, with Iran reportedly maintaining pressure around the Strait of Hormuz, a critical route through which a significant portion of the world’s oil supply passes.

Global markets have reacted sharply, with oil prices rising amid fears of prolonged disruption to energy supply chains.

Military analysts warn that continued escalation could trigger a full-scale regional conflict involving Gulf nations, especially if energy infrastructure becomes a primary target.

Reports indicate that Iran has demonstrated its capacity to strike beyond its borders, including the use of missiles and drones against Israeli targets.

The United States has also become increasingly involved, issuing ultimatums and deploying additional military assets to the region, further heightening tensions.

Iranian officials have warned that any direct attack on its critical infrastructure could provoke severe retaliation across the Middle East.

The growing confrontation has already resulted in casualties across affected regions, underscoring the human cost of the conflict.

Security experts say the targeting of energy facilities could have devastating global consequences, potentially triggering one of the worst energy crises in decades.

There are also mounting concerns about the proximity of strikes to sensitive nuclear-related sites, prompting calls from international bodies for restraint and de-escalation.

Despite global appeals, both Israel and Iran appear to be preparing for a sustained confrontation, with military operations expected to continue in the coming weeks.

As tensions rise, the conflict is increasingly being viewed not just as a regional dispute, but as a global security threat with far-reaching economic and geopolitical implications.

(DDM) — The United Kingdom has announced plans to expand its immigration detention capacity as part of efforts to accelerate deportations of undocumented migrants.

The move is linked to a broader policy shift aimed at tightening immigration controls and reducing the backlog of individuals awaiting removal from the country.

Officials say increasing detention space will allow authorities to process and deport migrants more quickly, particularly those who have exhausted legal avenues to remain in the UK.

The policy also forms part of a growing cooperation framework between the UK and Nigeria, with both countries working on agreements to facilitate the repatriation of Nigerian nationals.

Sources indicate that the agreement includes streamlined documentation processes and improved coordination between immigration authorities in both nations.

The development has sparked debate among rights groups, who warn that expanding detention facilities could raise concerns about the treatment and welfare of detainees.

Advocates have called for greater oversight, transparency, and adherence to international human rights standards in the management of detention centres.

UK authorities, however, maintain that the expansion is necessary to ensure an efficient immigration system and to deter irregular migration.

They argue that quicker deportations will help restore public confidence in border control policies and reduce pressure on public resources.

The policy shift comes amid rising political attention on migration issues in the UK, with increasing pressure on the government to demonstrate stricter enforcement measures.

Analysts note that bilateral agreements with countries like Nigeria are critical to the success of deportation policies, as cooperation from origin countries is essential for effective removals.

Meanwhile, some Nigerians in the diaspora have expressed concern about the implications of the agreement, particularly regarding due process and the conditions under which deportations are carried out.

The Nigerian government has yet to release full details of the arrangement, but officials are expected to balance cooperation with the protection of citizens’ rights abroad.

As implementation begins, stakeholders will be closely watching how the expanded detention capacity impacts migration flows and diplomatic relations between both countries.