Ibadan – A heated debate has erupted in Oyo State over a proposed amendment to the Council of Obas and Chiefs Law. Specifically, the bill seeks to make the Alaafin of Oyo the permanent chairman, sparking strong reactions. Critics warn that mishandling the issue could trigger major discord, while supporters argue it restores tradition.
The controversy intensified after the Oyo State House of Assembly held a second reading of the bill on May 15, 2025. Notably, the amendment aims to reverse a 2011 change that abolished the Alaafin’s permanent chairmanship under late Governor Adebayo Alao Akala. Currently, leadership rotates among monarchs, but the new bill seeks to reinstate the Alaafin as permanent head.
Additionally, the proposal outlines a clear succession plan. If passed, the Olubadan of Ibadan would preside in the Alaafin’s absence. The amendment states: “The Chairmanship shall be permanent for the Alaafin, Olubadan, and Soun, while deputies follow Schedule II and IA.” This shift has sharply divided stakeholders, fueling tensions across the state.
Ibadan Stakeholders Oppose Proposed Amendment
Meanwhile, Ibadan groups strongly oppose the bill, calling it unfair. Organizations like the Central Council of Ibadan Indigenes (CCII) and Mogajis argue the rotational system ensures equity. In a joint statement, Mogaji Asimiyu Ariori and Mogaji Nurudeen Akinade stressed Ibadan’s historical significance in Yorubaland.
They declared, “Ibadan has never been subordinate to Oyo; we should lead the council permanently.” Furthermore, they warned that passing the bill could provoke unrest. “If lawmakers ignore our objections, they will be held accountable,” they added. Their stance reflects deep-seated resistance to perceived dominance by Oyo.
Support for Reinstating Alaafin’s Position
Conversely, some groups back the amendment. Recently, an Oyo delegation praised Speaker Adebo Ogundoyin for revisiting the law. Reverend Osuolale and Chief Ayeriyina commended the move, calling it overdue. “The Alaafin’s permanent role honors tradition,” they argued. Their support highlights the cultural divide fueling the dispute.
Implications for Oyo State
The debate has reignited tensions among traditional rulers. Proponents believe the amendment reinforces hierarchy, while opponents fear marginalization. As deliberations continue, stakeholders urge caution to prevent further division. Ultimately, the Assembly’s decision will shape traditional governance and community relations in Oyo State.
For now, all eyes remain on lawmakers as they weigh this contentious issue. The outcome could either restore historical precedence or deepen existing rivalries, making careful consideration essential. The state awaits a resolution that balances tradition with fairness.