Malian authorities cut ties with Ukraine over Wagner ambush intel

The Malian government has cut diplomatic relations with Ukraine, on August 4, 2024, following Ukraine’s provision of intelligence to Malian rebels who ambushed Wagner Group forces in July.

Dozens of Russian mercenaries were killed in the ambush, marking their worst known loss in Africa.

The attack was claimed by a Tuareg rebel group in conjunction with Jama’at Nusrat al-Islam wal-Muslimin (JNIM), an al-Qaeda affiliate in the Sahel. 

Known for their occasional cooperation, they appear to have worked together to ambush the Russian convoy.

The government spokesman, Colonel Abdoulaye Maiga delivered a televised statement on August 4, 2024:

“The transitional government of the Republic of Mali condemns the hostility of the authorities of Ukraine…

“Who do not observe that Mali has always called for a peaceful settlement of the crisis between the Russian Federation and Ukraine.” 

Spokesperson for Ukraine’s Security Service (SBU), Andriy Yusov, stated that Kyiv, Ukraine’s capital, had supplied the militants with intelligence for the attack. 

He told Ukrainian television, in late July, that “the rebels received the critical information needed to carry out a successful military operation against Russian war criminals.”

Following the attack, JNIM announced that the “complex ambush” had destroyed the convoy, resulting in the deaths of 50 Russians and several Malian soldiers. 

They further released videos showing several burning vehicles and numerous bodies at the scene.

A spokesman for the Tuareg militant group also confirmed that some Malian troops and Russian fighters were captured during the battle.

Unofficial Russian Telegram channels report that up to 80 Russians were killed. 

If confirmed, this would represent the most significant loss for Russian paramilitaries in years of operations across Africa. 

The Kremlin has relied on proxy forces to counter Western influence in the Sahel and central Africa while supporting unstable regimes.

Relationship between Mali and Ukraine

Historically, the relationship between the two countries have been relatively limited.

This is due to their geographical distance and differing geopolitical interests, resulting in minimal economic and diplomatic engagement.

Mali and Ukraine established diplomatic relations in the early 1990s.

However, these ties were mostly formal, with little substantial interaction beyond basic diplomatic channels.

Neither country had a strong political or economic presence in the other, with no major bilateral agreements or exchanges.

The recent diplomatic severance was due to Malian allegations that Ukraine provided intelligence to rebels, marking a dramatic shift.

This accusation emerged within the broader context of Mali’s shifting foreign policy.

The West African nation has increasingly aligned with Russia while distancing itself from traditional Western partners, including France.

This diplomatic rupture is part of a larger pattern of Mali’s shifting alliances.

Following several coups, Mali’s transitional government has increasingly aligned with Russia for military and economic support.

This alignment has strained relations with Western nations, and the recent breakdown with Ukraine highlights this strategic pivot.

The move reflects Mali’s broader geopolitical reorientation and its complex security situation.

Consequently, the government has sought alternative partnerships to address domestic challenges, particularly those posed by insurgent groups.

Dynamics of Tuareg-JNIM alliance

The Tuareg rebels and JNIM form occasional alliances with shifting dynamics shaped by regional politics and security conditions.

The Tuareg rebels, seeking greater autonomy for Tuareg regions in Mali, have periodically engaged in armed struggle against Malian government.

However, JNIM is an Islamist militant group seeking to establish an Islamic state in the region, based on strict Sharia law.

Despite different ideologies, both groups unite in opposing the Malian government and foreign military presence.

For example, during heightened conflict, they have formed temporary alliances to conduct joint operations against Malian forces or control territory.

These collaborations let both groups leverage strengths, Tuareg rebels offer local knowledge and networks, while JNIM provides military expertise.

The cooperation between these groups is not consistent and can be marred by internal divisions and differing long-term objectives.

These divergent goals can lead to clashes, especially over territorial control or resource management.

Furthermore, Tuareg groups occasionally align with the Malian government or international forces in peace processes, straining relations with JNIM.

The interactions between Tuareg rebels and JNIM illustrate how local and regional actors can form temporary alliances based on shared interests.

However, despite their cooperation, they have fundamentally different long-term goals.

For Diaspora Digital Media Updates click on Whatsapp, or Telegram. For eyewitness accounts/ reports/ articles, write to: citizenreports@diasporadigitalmedia.com. Follow us on X (Fomerly Twitter) or Facebook