Connect with us

Analysis

Mayor Griffin Lotson’s Homecoming: When the Water Flows Back to Its Source

By Chris Agbedo

Published

on

Share this:

Water, it is said, always finds its way back to the source. It may travel through rough terrains, meander through valleys, or tumble down rocky slopes, but it never forgets where it began. In many ways, this timeless law of nature captures the poetic rhythm of Griffin Lotson’s remarkable homecoming, a journey that bridges continents, centuries, and consciousness. From the sacred soil of Eri, the cradle of the Igbo race, to the historic hills of Nsukka, the ancestral water has returned to its spring.

In October and November 2025, two great institutions – the ancient throne of His Majesty, Eze Dr. Chukwuemeka Eri (Eze Di Gboo, Ezeora 34th, Eze Akajiovo Igbo), and the modern citadel of learning, the University of Nigeria, Nsukka (UNN) – will stand as twin altars of memory and meaning. Each, in its own way, will celebrate the return of one of Igbo’s long-lost sons – Commissioner Griffin Lotson, Vice Chairman (Emeritus) of the Gullah Geechee Cultural Heritage Corridor Commission, USA, and Mayor Pro Tem of Darien, Georgia. Lotson’s transatlantic journey from Saint Simons Island, Georgia to Obu Gad, Eri, and onward to Princess Alexandra Auditorium, UNN, is not merely ceremonial. It is metaphysical. It is historical. It is restorative. It is, quite literally, the water returning to its ancestral spring.

On Friday, 31 October 2025, under the royal gaze of Eze Akajiovo, the World Eri Festival Symposium unfolded under the deeply reflective theme: “The historical, geographical, anthropological, biblical, and migration as valid foundational social factors in resolving the common human ancestral features between Jewish/Igbo origin and the Igbo of the East and West of the Niger Rivers of Nigeria.” This theme, complex yet evocative, invites us to look at the Igbo story not through the fog of myth but through the clear lenses of evidence and history. In my keynote lecture at the Symposium, I offered what I called “The Five Pillars of Origins” – a synthesis of historical, geographical, anthropological, biblical, and migratory perspectives that illuminate the long arc of the Igbo journey.

The historical pillar draws from archaeological and archival evidence – from Lejja iron smelting industry that dated back to over 2000 BCE and Igbo Ukwu excavations that revealed intricate bronze art predating Europe’s renaissance, to colonial records that confirm early Igbo settlement patterns across the Lower Niger basin. History testifies that Ndigbo are not latecomers to civilization; they are its quiet architects. The geographical pillar explains the natural logic of dispersion. The rivers Niger, Benue, and Cross created both bridges and boundaries, enabling trade, contact, and cultural diffusion. Geography, as always, shaped destiny, determining where communities settled, traded, or migrated in search of survival.

The anthropological pillar brings into focus the living patterns of Igbo social organization, acephalous systems of governance, communal land tenure, and egalitarian kinship structures that mirror democratic traditions long before colonial modernity arrived. The Igbo do not merely inhabit a space; they embody a civilization. The biblical pillar enters where faith and memory converge. Scholars and tradition-bearers have long drawn parallels between the ancient Israelites and the Igbo, from naming conventions to ritual observances. While the scriptures do not serve as historical proof, they offer spiritual resonance, a testimony of shared moral and metaphysical ancestry. And finally, the migration pillar traces the movement of people and ideas across time and space. From the trans-Saharan to the transatlantic, the Igbo story is one of resilience under pressure and identity in motion. The forced migrations of the 16th to 19th centuries scattered Igbo sons and daughters across the New World; yet, even in bondage, they preserved fragments of their ancestral rhythm.

READ ALSO:  Should cryptocurrency be banned in Nigeria?

It is within this historical grid that Griffin Lotson’s homecoming acquires symbolic power. As a descendant of the Gullah Geechee people, those African Americans who preserved deep linguistic and cultural ties to their African origins, Lotson stands today as a living testimony of continuity. The Gullah Geechee Corridor, stretching from North Carolina to Florida, is an open-air museum of African survival. In its folklore, language, and spirituality, one can still hear the echoes of the Niger, the Cross, and the Imo rivers. When Lotson traced his ancestral roots to the Igbo of Southeastern Nigeria, it was as though history itself exhaled; the long-dammed water had found its path home. At Obu Gad, Eze Akajiovo, custodian of the sacred Ovo Eri and the living memory of the progenitor Eri, confered a chieftaincy title upon Lotson. This gesture is more than symbolic hospitality; it is a spiritual restoration, a recognition that history’s broken links can be mended by cultural will and ancestral faith.

If Eri is the spiritual cradle, then Nsukka is the intellectual citadel of Igbo civilization. On Tuesday, 4 November 2025, the Faculty of Arts Distinguished Guest Lecture Series at the Princess Alexandra Auditorium, UNN, will host Griffin Lotson as he delivers his lecture titled: “Nigeria (Igbo) and USA (Gullah Geechee) Cultural Connections.” The lecture will gather distinguished figures – Engr. Kayode Olubumni Ojo, Pro-Chancellor and Chairman of the Governing Council (Special Guest of Honour); Prof. Simon Uchenna Ortuanya, the 16th Vice-Chancellor (Chief Host); Prof. Roseline Ijeoma Okorji, Dean of the Faculty of Arts (Host); and Dr. Nwachukwu Anakwenze, Onowu Regent of Abagana and CEO of Mercy Medical Group, LA (Chairman).

As Principal Investigator of the Pat Ikechukwu Ndukwe Sociolinguistics Laboratory (PINSLAB) Research Group, Directorate of Research, UNN, I am humbled to facilitate this bridge between diaspora scholarship and homeland memory. It is not merely an academic event; it is a pilgrimage of ideas, a scholarly communion between the ancestors and the academy. In a world that often commodifies identity, UNN’s Distinguished Guest Lecture Series reclaims it as a site of dialogue, research, and cultural renewal. It affirms the University’s motto, “To Restore the Dignity of Man,” by restoring the dignity of memory, the kind that links Nsukka’s hills to Eri’s valley, and Nigeria’s present to its diasporic past.

Griffin Lotson’s presence in Nsukka is more than an academic courtesy. It is cultural diplomacy in its purest form, a dialogue between history and destiny. It symbolizes the meeting point between two civilizations scarred by displacement yet united by resilience. The Gullah Geechee and the Igbo share a common ethos – the rhythm of freedom, the defiance of erasure, the insistence on identity. From Igbo Landing on St. Simons Island, where captured ancestors chose death over slavery, to the postcolonial struggles in the Niger Delta and beyond, the same indomitable spirit flows through time. This reconnection also challenges Nigeria’s internal contradictions. For too long, the Igbo have been treated as the rejected stone of the national edifice. Yet, like that very stone, they have become the cornerstone of creative energy, enterprise, and cultural depth. Lotson’s return, and UNN’s embrace, invite the Nigerian nation to rethink its moral geography – to see in the Igbo not a threat, but a treasure.

READ ALSO:  Defection in Nigeria politics, a major set back

The twin events of Eri’s World Cultural Festival and UNN’s Distinguished Guest Lecture mark a convergence of tradition and scholarship – the spiritual and the cerebral wings of Igbo civilization. One speaks through ritual and heritage, the other through research and discourse. Together, they forge a new front in the global conversation about African identity and the politics of memory. The symbolism is profound: At Eri, Lotson reconnects with his roots. At Nsukka, he reconnects with his reason. Between both, the Igbo world reconnects with its redemptive destiny. In this union of the sacred and the scholarly, the water completes its course, flowing homeward to nourish both tradition and intellect. And as it does, it carries a message for Ndigbo everywhere: our unity is not in uniformity but in shared remembrance.

From Eri’s valley to Nsukka’s hills, from Bonny Harbour’s slave camps to St. Simons Island’s shore, we now see the same ancestral rhythm pulsing beneath different skies. History calls; geography answers; anthropology interprets; scripture sanctifies; migration completes the circle. And in that circle stands the human heart, beating with one eternal name: Igbo – Ndigbo – Ndị gboo (the treasured relic of cosmic spark). The water has indeed returned to its source, not as a stream of nostalgia but as a river of renewal. Eri remembers. Nsukka responds. And the world, once more, listens.

But what does it mean, truly, for water to find its source? It is more than the poetry of return. It is the philosophy of becoming — the realization that the past is not a destination left behind but a living compass guiding the future. When Griffin Lotson retraces the arc from St. Simons to Eri and from Eri to Nsukka, he embodies the timeless proverb that the river that forgets its source will dry up before its time. In his footsteps, we find the deeper logic of our own continuity: that memory is not mere remembrance, but responsibility. Every civilization renews itself at the confluence of its memory and imagination. The World Eri Festival reminds us that our myths are not dead relics; they are living archives of human experience, encoded in stories, songs, and sacred spaces. The University of Nigeria Nsukka extends that archive into the realm of ideas — transforming oral heritage into academic dialogue, and ancestral wisdom into intellectual capital. Between Eri’s sacred grove and Nsukka’s academic citadel lies the bridge that connects tradition and modernity, faith and reason, heritage and humanity.

READ ALSO:  The Olukayode Ariwoola memoirs of convenient memory

This homecoming, then, is not only Griffin Lotson’s; it is ours too. It is the return of dignity to memory, of scholarship to ancestry, of language to meaning. It is the reunion of scattered fragments of a once-whole story now retold in harmony. If Eri represents the beginning and Nsukka the becoming, then their meeting in this season signifies renewal, the cyclical truth that what goes around, comes around not in vengeance but in vision. The ancient Igbos believed that what the gods hold in trust cannot be lost to humanity. This, perhaps, is the quiet message of these twin ceremonies. Despite centuries of dislocation, the spark of identity survives the tempest of time. It flickers still in Gullah prayers, in Geechee songs, in the rhythmic idioms of survival and faith. It flickers still in Nsukka’s classrooms, in the scholarly quest to reconnect broken genealogies and reimagine the African self beyond the shadow of colonial epistemologies.

And so, as we stand at this historic confluence, we realize that our story – the Igbo story – is not one of victimhood but of victory; not of endings but of eternal beginnings. The slave ship and the scholar’s podium are separated by centuries, yet they form two ends of the same dialogue between exile and return, between silence and rediscovery. If the valley of Eri represents remembrance, and the hill of Nsukka stands for reflection, then the ocean that lies between them – the Atlantic – becomes a metaphor for resilience. Across that ocean flowed tears, but across it also flows now a renewed fellowship, a rediscovered fraternity of the spirit.

In the end, all roads lead home, and home is not a place on a map but a rhythm in the soul. The water has indeed returned to its source, clearer, deeper, wiser. The circle has closed, not to end the story but to begin a new chapter. And so we may intone again, with reverent confidence: Eri remembers. Nsukka responds. The world listens – and learns. For in the echo of that listening, humanity finds again what it once almost forgot, that we are, all of us, tributaries of one vast river of life, flowing endlessly toward meaning, carrying within us the eternal current of Ndị gboo, the first people, the living memory of mankind.

As we prepare for these two monumental events – the World Eri Festival Symposium, which held successfully on last Friday and the Faculty of Arts Distinguished Guest Lecture Series, which comes up on Tuesday 4 November 2025 – we are reminded that our collective future depends on our ability to remember, reconnect, and reinvent. Griffin Lotson’s return symbolizes a convergence of fragmented histories and a rebirth of pan-Igbo consciousness. May these twin events – one at the cradle of our civilization, the other at the cradle of our intellectual tradition – inspire a new resolve among Ndigbo to stand united, purposeful, and forward-looking. For in tracing our origins, we rediscover our destiny.

Share this:

Analysis

Inside Akwa Ibom, BOI’s 4bn Naira Intervention for Local Businesses

Published

on

By

Share this:

*By Ofonime Honesty

For years, the story of small businesses has been one of resilient hustle hampered by a familiar adversary: access to capital. A struggling tailor with a waiting list of clients cannot afford an industrial machine. A rural farmer watches his business struggle due to his inability to expand and invest in modern tools. Even the tech startup with a brilliant idea operates on little, or zero budget.

This narrative is what the Akwa Ibom State Government and the Bank of Industry (BOI) are aiming to rewrite with a landmark N4 billion intervention fund, one of the most significant private sector injections the state has seen in recent years.

Announced recently, the comprehensive loan scheme for Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) is designed to be more than just a cash disbursement. Its objectives are multi-faceted: create over 5,000 new jobs, stimulate economic growth, boost agricultural productivity, and ultimately enhance household welfare across the state’s communities.

The program represents a deliberate and structured intervention to build the economy from the ground up. Rather than simply giving out loans, the initiative focuses on investing in the businesses that form the backbone of the local economy and equipping them for sustainable growth.

The programme framework outlines clear eligibility criteria aimed at ensuring transparency and impact. To qualify, businesses must be formally registered with the Corporate Affairs Commission (CAC) and have their operational headquarters within Akwa Ibom State.
Applicants must also provide valid means of identification during the application process.

The application process is a four-stage journey designed to vet and prepare applicants. It begins with online submission of business details through the official portal at https://aksgboiloan.akwaibominvest.ng, followed by a rigorous document verification stage where applicants must upload all required supporting documents.

READ ALSO:  ANALYSIS: How Israel and allied defenses intercepted over 300 Iranian missiles and drones

Crucially, successful applicants will not receive funds immediately but will undergo mandatory capacity-building training with the Ibom Leadership and Entrepreneurship Development (Ibom-LED) agency before final approval and disbursement.

This training component serves as the soul of the scheme, building business acumen alongside providing financial capital. The approach aims to ensure businesses thrive long after the loan has been repaid.

For aspiring entrepreneurs dreaming of expanding their operations, the application portal is a gateway to possibilities.

This intervention is a game-changer since MSMEs represent one of largest employers of labour in any developing economy, and injecting N4 billion directly into this sector will definitely create significant ripple effects.

Share this:
Continue Reading

Analysis

Ten instances of misinformation in Nnamdi Kanu’s case (Part 2)

Published

on

Share this:

By Emeka Ugwuonye

6. Did the Court of Appeal decide that Kanu should not be tried for treasonable felony?

ANSWER: Not quite. While the Court of Appeal made a ruling regarding Kanu’s trial, that judgment was subsequently appealed to the Supreme Court, which reversed the Court of Appeal’s decision. As a result, the findings of the Court of Appeal have become irrelevant.

Currently, the law is defined by the judgment of the Supreme Court, which takes precedence over any previous appellate rulings. This means that Kanu can indeed be tried for treasonable felony, as the Supreme Court has upheld the charges against him. In legal terms, the most recent and authoritative ruling is what matters, and at this moment, that ruling supports the continuation of Kanu’s trial for the offenses he faces. It’s essential to recognize that legal outcomes are shaped by the highest court’s decisions, not by earlier judgments that have been overturned.

7. Should the judge have explained to him all these things when he asked the judge that question in court?

ANSWER: No, the judge should not have provided that explanation. Doing so would have amounted to the judge offering the kind of assistance that is typically provided by legal counsel. Nnamdi Kanu made the choice to represent himself, which means he cannot expect the judge to clarify or elaborate on legal matters outside the established rules of the court.

Moreover, Kanu’s question was posed in the context of his challenge to the court’s jurisdiction. This issue will be addressed in the court’s forthcoming judgment, and it would be inappropriate for the court to divulge information that pertains to a decision that has yet to be rendered. Judges must maintain impartiality and adhere to proper judicial protocol. Providing guidance or clarity on legal questions during court proceedings could compromise that impartiality and undermine the integrity of the judicial process.

READ ALSO:  Tinubu and his Oluwole made certificate must be sacked from office

In summary, it is essential for defendants to seek clarification and understanding from their legal counsel rather than from the judge. The legal system is designed to ensure that each party is responsible for navigating it according to established procedures and rules. By choosing to represent himself, Kanu has placed himself in a position where he must rely on his own understanding of the law, and the court must remain neutral, providing a level playing field for all parties involved.

8. What is the implication of Nnamdi Kanu representing himself?

ANSWER: Representing himself is arguably the gravest mistake Nnamdi Kanu could make. While he has the legal right to defend himself, this is a right that no reasonable person should choose to exercise in a complex legal battle. It’s akin to firing your doctor and attempting to perform an appendectomy on yourself—an act fraught with peril and devoid of sound judgment.

Self-representation in legal proceedings can lead to disastrous consequences, as it places the individual at a significant disadvantage. The law is intricate, filled with procedural rules and nuanced arguments that require expert knowledge and experience to navigate effectively. By opting to represent himself, Kanu risks undermining his defense and jeopardizing his position in court.

Furthermore, there appears to be an inclination for Kanu to enjoy the spotlight and assert his voice, but that desire should not override practical legal considerations. The courtroom is not a forum for personal expression but a formal setting where skilled attorneys utilize their expertise to advocate for their clients’ best interests. By eschewing professional legal representation, Kanu not only diminishes his chances for a favorable outcome but also engages in a self-defeating strategy that could have serious ramifications for his case.

READ ALSO:  How NNPC buying 20% of Dangote Refinery could destroy any idea of future competition in the market

In summary, while the choice to represent oneself is protected under the law, it is rarely a wise decision—especially in a high-stakes legal environment like the one Kanu finds himself in. Professional legal representation is crucial for ensuring that rights are upheld and justice is pursued effectively. Ignoring this reality is a significant miscalculation that Kanu may come to regret.

9. What is the implication of him refusing to present his defense?

ANSWER: Initially, I considered the possibility that his decision might be a strategic one. However, it has become clear that this refusal to present a defense is a significant miscalculation. By not offering a defense, Nnamdi Kanu leaves himself completely vulnerable, providing no counterarguments against the allegations and evidence brought forth by the prosecution. As a result, the prosecution has a clear path to victory.

Without any defense to challenge the prosecution’s case, the court is effectively compelled to convict him. The legal principle at play is that the court has already established that the prosecution has presented a prima facie case—which means they have provided sufficient evidence for the case to proceed. Kanu’s failure to defend himself means that he is allowing the prosecution’s arguments to stand unopposed.

This situation puts Kanu at a serious disadvantage and effectively undermines any chance he had of achieving a favorable outcome. When a defendant does not testify or present evidence in their favor, the court is left with only the prosecution’s narrative, increasing the likelihood of a conviction. It is crucial in any legal proceeding for a defendant to engage actively in their defense, as neglecting to do so can lead to a self-inflicted defeat.

READ ALSO:  Avoid immorality so that demons won't contest your miracles – Prophet Ebuka Obi urges Zionites

10. Can Kanu be tried in Nigeria for broadcasts he made outside Nigeria?

ANSWER: Yes, Kanu can indeed be tried in Nigeria for statements made outside the country. The law takes into account the location where the effects of an action occur, rather than where that action was carried out. A person can commit treasonable felonies or incitement from abroad, especially if the incitement has the potential to impact individuals or events in Nigeria.

The crucial factor is where the individuals being incited are located or where the unlawful act is intended to be executed. This principle underlines the legal precedent that holds individuals accountable for their words and actions, regardless of their physical location at the time.

Moreover, the Terrorism Prevention Amendment Act of 2013 was specifically amended to extend its reach beyond Nigeria’s borders, allowing for the prosecution of offenses committed outside the country if they have implications within Nigeria. This means that Kanu’s statements from abroad could fall under the jurisdiction of Nigerian law, especially if they are perceived to incite unlawful activities or threaten national security.

In summary, Kanu’s geographical location does not absolve him from accountability under Nigerian law. He can be prosecuted for his statements made outside Nigeria as long as those statements have consequences within the country. This legal framework emphasizes the importance of holding individuals accountable for their actions, irrespective of where those actions are conducted.

Share this:
Continue Reading

Analysis

Ten instances of misinformation in Nnamdi Kanu’s case (Part one)

Published

on

Nnamdi Kanu
Share this:

By Emeka Ugwuonye

 

There has been so many false information flying around about the case of Nnamadi Kanu. Unfortunately, many people are believing such false claims and are actually relying on them. Hence, I will identify 24 such false claims and debunk them.

1. Was the Terrorism Prevention Amendment Act, 2013 ever repealed?

ANSWER: No, the Terrorism Prevention Amendment Act of 2013 has not been repealed. The Act was an amendment to the original Terrorism (Prevention) Act of 2011 and introduced important changes, including provisions for extra-territorial application of the law and enhancements related to terrorist financing offenses.

2. Did the Nigerian Supreme Court rule that Nnamdi Kanu cannot be tried under the Terrorism Act?

ANSWER: The Nigerian Supreme Court did not explicitly rule that Nnamdi Kanu cannot be tried under the Terrorism Act. In October 2022, the Supreme Court of Nigeria dismissed the appeal filed by Kanu challenging the charge of terrorism against him, stating that his initial issue regarding jurisdiction was not substantiated, and the lower courts had the right to adjudicate the case. The court effectively upheld the earlier decisions that allowed for Kanu’s trial to proceed.

3. Is it true that Nnamdi Kanu is not being tried under a written law as the Constitution requires?

ANSWER: All the seven counts proffered against Nnamdi Kanu in the ongoing trial are based on written laws, principal the Criminal Code Act and the Terrorism Prevention Amendment Act, both of which are written laws.

4. Is it true that Kanu does not know the law under which he was charged?

READ ALSO:  Editorial: Bobi Wine's assassination attempt: A brutal assault on democracy

ANSWER: No, that is not true. Kanu knows the law and sections of the law under which the charges against him were brought. He became aware the moment they handed his charging documents and he read the charges against him. Each count of the charge states what he is alleged to have done wrong, the date and place where he did it and the law which declared his alleged actions to be a crime. Also, during his arraignment, the court official read out the charges to his hearing in open court and he was asked if he understood each charge and he answered Yes before pleading to each charge.

5. What offense exactly did the government of Nigeria accuse Nnamdi Kanu of committing?

ANSWER: The offenses the accused Kanu of committing fall into two groups. The first group is treasonable felony, which basically accuses Kanu of doing certain things with the intention and purpose of intimidating and threatening the officials of government with the purpose of forcing them to change policy – the secession of Biafra. The second group is the defamation of President Buhari. (This is the weakest of all the offences charged).

The third group relates to the terrorism offenses. Here is accused of incitement (the sit-at-home orders). These offenses are well-spelled out in the charging documents.

Share this:
Continue Reading

Latest from DDM TV

LATEST NEWS

FG Bans Use of Indigenous Languages in Schools

Court adjourns trial of dismissed EFCC officer accused of stealing N22m

Nigerian Forest Security Service in Anambra Congratulates Soludo on Re-election

JUST IN: FG Suspends 15% Import Duty on Petrol, Diesel

Tinubu Approves Construction of Two Federal Roads in Ekiti

Senate Denies Impeachment Plot Against Akpabio, Calls Rumour Baseless

Trump Signs Bill, Ends Longest US Govt Shutdown

Inside the Alleged Plot to Manipulate the Vice Chancellorship Race at the University of Uyo <p><span style='color:#808080;font-size:18px;'><i>- Prof. Ndaeyo's Plan B Exposed</i></span></p>

Subscribe to DDM Newsletter for Latest News

Trending

Copyright © 2023 -2024 Diaspora Digital Media (DDM) www.diasporadigitalmedia.com. All Rights Reserved . NOTE: All opinion articles published on Diaspora Digital Media are ENTIRELY those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the publishers.

Soludo Wins Anambra Governorship Election 2025

X
Get Notifications from DDM News Yes please No thanks