Connect with us

Analysis

Safeguarding Nigeria’s Democracy:

Reforming Nigeria’s Political Culture Through Party Loyalty and Electoral Discipline

Published

on

Introduction: A Political Culture in Crisis

Nigeria’s democracy faces a major integrity test — the rampant defection of elected politicians from the parties that brought them to power. This trend has severely undermined institutional loyalty, public trust, and long-term political development. The solution? A 20 to 25-year mandatory restriction against party-switching after election under a party platform.

Why Decamping Politicians Threaten Democracy

Party defection reduces elections to a personal race rather than a party-driven ideological mandate. Politicians often decamp not due to conviction but for power access, patronage, and alignment with ruling forces. This instability discourages citizens from trusting political parties, discourages internal party discipline, and weakens democratic culture.

Global Precedents: Laws That Protect Political Mandates

Countries like India have tackled this problem head-on. India’s Anti-Defection Law (1985) disqualifies members who defect without cause. In South Africa, floor-crossing laws have been amended over the years to protect voters’ mandates and ensure party accountability. In the UK, while there’s no law against defection, a strong political culture ensures defectors are expected to resign and seek re-election.

These examples show that stability and voter respect demand clarity in law and loyalty in practice.

What the Nigerian Constitution Says

Section 68(1)(g) of the 1999 Constitution (as amended) disqualifies members of the legislature who defect, except in cases of party division. However, this has been exploited due to vague interpretations. For governors, there are no explicit anti-defection consequences, leaving loopholes for abuse.

The Reform Proposal: 20–25-Year Non-Defection Condition

The Core Idea:

Any politician who contests and wins under a party should be legally restricted from decamping to another party for 20–25 years, whether ruling or opposition.

See also  The Labours of Healing a Nation, by Pat Utomi

Why It Should Apply to Governors Too:

Sitting governors often face intimidation, blackmail, or lure from the ruling party. This proposal shields governors from coercion and allows them to stay loyal to their party and voters without fear or temptation.

Proposed Constitutional Reform Measures

1. Mandatory Oath before election disallowing decamping for 20–25 years.

2. National Assembly Amendment: Enforceable penalties for defection.

3. Political Party Charter Clause: Party constitutions must contain decamping restriction clauses.

4. Independent Electoral Commission Oversight: INEC to monitor and sanction defectors.

Rebutting the Politicians’ Likely Defenses

1. “Violation of Freedom of Association”

Claim: “I have a right to leave a party.”
Response: After being elected on a party platform, your freedom is limited by public duty.

“You are free to associate before the election, but after winning, your loyalty becomes public trust.”

2. “Denial of Political Rights”

Claim: “I’m evolving ideologically.”
Response: You’re not denied participation — just bound to the party that gave you the mandate.

“Voters also have rights. You can resign, not abscond with their mandate.”

3. “Parties Change, Not Just Individuals”

Claim: “My party is now corrupt.”
Response: Step aside, stay neutral, or wait your term. Don’t carry public trust elsewhere.

“Victory belongs to the platform and the candidate, not the individual alone.”

4. “Too Harsh, Too Long”

Claim: “Even criminals get less!”
Response: This is not punishment but protection for democracy.

“Serious nations build institutions beyond ambition. This reform is for generational stability.”

Why This Reform Matters Now

It strengthens party structures and ideology.

See also  Mia Love, first U.S. Republican Congresswoman, dies at 46

It upholds electoral integrity.

It protects voters’ expectations.

It guards governors from political manipulation.

Nigeria must move beyond personalities and build institutions that last. Party loyalty must be non-negotiable once an office is secured. Political maturity demands responsibility, not opportunism.

Conclusion: Institutional Loyalty Over Political Greed

The call for a 20–25-year no-defection policy is not an attack on individual rights but a stand for national democratic growth. This reform must not be optional — it must be enforced across all arms of government, including governors.

With decisive legislative action and active civic support, Nigeria can stop political prostitution and lay the foundation for strong party-based democracy.


For Diaspora Digital Media Updates click on Whatsapp, or Telegram. For eyewitness accounts/ reports/ articles, write to: citizenreports@diasporadigitalmedia.com. Follow us on X (Fomerly Twitter) or Facebook

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest from DDM TV

SELF LEADERSHIP FOR CORPORATE EFFECTIVENESS

Latest Updates

“From Genius to Disgrace?” — John Legend Slams Kanye West’s Downward Spiral

Kremlin renews call for Istanbul talks, no word on Putin-Zelensky meeting

Tinubu’s Sudden Love for the South-East: Politics or Progress?

PKK Kurdish militants agree to disarm, ending long-standing attacks against Turkey

Dr. Mo paints vision of Nigeria 2075: A nation led by merit, not tribe

Wike boasts of unique electoral success, urges PDP to avoid 2023 mistakes

Nigeria on the brink: COPDEM People’s Parliament (CPP) confronts national crisis

European transfer market heats up as major clubs plot summer moves

Ganduje declares PDP heading for extinction, reaffirms loyalty to APC

IPOB declares May 30 lockdown across southeast

Subscribe to DDM Newsletter for Latest News

Get Notifications from DDM News Yes please No thanks