Senator Natasha vows to expose senate president “Akpabio”

DDM News

Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan of Kogi Central has vowed to expose Senate President Godswill Akpabio’s leadership style.

Diaspora digital media (DDM) gathered that she accused Akpabio’s administration of deliberately sidelining her from key legislative engagements.

She claimed that her exclusion was an attempt to obstruct her effectiveness as a senator.

The controversy began with a disagreement over seat reassignment in the Senate chamber.

Natasha viewed this action as a deliberate move to undermine her authority.

She believed it was designed to limit her participation in legislative debates and national decision-making.

According to her, the reassignment was part of a broader effort to weaken her role in the Senate.

She alleged that attempts to restrict her influence had been ongoing for some time.

She insisted that she would no longer remain silent about these issues.

Before joining politics, Natasha was known for her activism and entrepreneurship.

She gained recognition for her advocacy for economic empowerment and good governance.

Her involvement in the steel sector brought her into national discourse.

She played a major role in pushing for the revival of Ajaokuta Steel Company.

Her efforts earned her widespread admiration from stakeholders and the public.

Her political journey gained momentum in 2019 when she contested for Kogi State governor.

She ran under the Social Democratic Party (SDP) despite facing numerous challenges.

During the election, she encountered allegations of electoral malpractice and intimidation.

She remained vocal about the need for transparency in Nigeria’s electoral process.

Despite losing the governorship race, she continued advocating for democratic reforms.

Victory in the Senate and continued struggles

In 2023, Natasha won the Kogi Central senatorial seat under the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP).

Her victory was a major political shift in Kogi Central.

Since assuming office, she has been outspoken on governance and accountability.

She has consistently pushed for reforms within the Senate.

Her strong stance on transparency has made her a target for political opposition.

She has raised concerns about the exclusion of key voices from Senate discussions.

Her advocacy has often led to friction with Senate leadership.

Allegations and counter-allegations

Following the seat reassignment controversy, tensions between Natasha and the Senate leadership intensified.

The Northern Youths Advocacy for Excellence (NOYAD) submitted a petition against her.

The petition was sent to the Senate Committee on Ethics, Privileges, and Public Petitions.

It accused Natasha of financial misconduct and abuse of office.

She was also accused of creating a hostile work environment.

The petition focused on her role in the Senate Committee on Local Content.

Natasha dismissed these allegations as politically motivated.

She insisted that they were attempts to damage her credibility.

She argued that the accusations were aimed at diverting attention from real governance issues.

She called for an open and transparent investigation into the claims.

She insisted that all proceedings should be made public.

“Inasmuch as I have refrained from publicly speaking on the matter, it’s about time I break my silence,” she declared.

Claims of marginalization and political suppression

Beyond the allegations, Natasha has raised concerns about exclusion from Senate activities.

She alleged that she had been sidelined from key international engagements.

She claimed that official assignments were deliberately kept away from her.

According to her, such actions undermine democracy and fair representation.

She maintained that her exclusion was an attempt to weaken her political influence.

She argued that every senator deserves equal opportunities regardless of political affiliations.

Observers believe Natasha faces opposition due to her bold stance on governance reforms.

She has consistently spoken against corruption and inefficiency in government.

Her strong advocacy for transparency has made her unpopular among certain political figures.

She insisted that the Senate should function with integrity and accountability.

Call for legislative transparency

Despite the challenges, Natasha remains committed to her advocacy.

She has called for increased transparency in Senate activities.

She believes secrecy in governance fuels public distrust.

She urged the Senate leadership to ensure fair and open investigations.

She stressed the need for lawmakers to be held accountable.

“We must create a system where leaders are not suppressed for political convenience,” she said.

Her call for transparency has gained support from civil society organizations.

Democracy advocates have echoed her concerns about legislative secrecy.

Many believe her demands could strengthen Nigeria’s democratic institutions.

She insists that lawmakers must prioritize national interests over personal gains.

Political reactions and implications

The controversy surrounding Natasha has sparked various political reactions.

Some lawmakers have expressed support for her position.

They argue that the Senate should encourage inclusivity and fairness.

Others see the situation as an internal power struggle.

Political analysts believe the outcome could affect the Senate’s power balance.

If Natasha’s claims gain traction, they could impact Akpabio’s leadership.

Her allegations could lead to broader discussions on institutional reforms.

She has positioned herself as an advocate for legislative accountability.

Her persistence in exposing political intimidation has drawn public attention.

Her stance has the potential to inspire other lawmakers to challenge undemocratic practices.

What lies ahead?

The Senate leadership is under pressure to address Natasha’s allegations.

Her demand for a public investigation could set a new precedent.

If an independent inquiry is conducted, it could reshape Senate procedures.

For Natasha, this is another chapter in her political journey.

Her career has been marked by resilience and advocacy.

She has consistently challenged the status quo in Nigerian politics.

Whether she succeeds in her quest for transparency remains uncertain.

However, her actions have already started a national conversation.

Her insistence on openness and fairness in governance is gaining traction.

The Nigerian public is watching closely as the Senate navigates this controversy.

Many hope that democratic principles will be upheld in resolving the matter.

For Diaspora Digital Media Updates click on Whatsapp, or Telegram. For eyewitness accounts/ reports/ articles, write to: citizenreports@diasporadigitalmedia.com. Follow us on X (Fomerly Twitter) or Facebook