Connect with us

Africa

UK House of Lords Urges Delay in Ratifying Migration Treaty with Rwanda

Published

on

The House of Lords, the upper house of the British Parliament, has voted to delay the ratification of a migration treaty with Rwanda.

Symbolically, this is opposing the Conservative government’s plan to return some asylum seekers to Rwanda.

On Monday evening, the Lords voted 214 to 171 to postpone the treaty, a crucial element of Prime Minister Rishi Sunak’s efforts to overcome the UK Supreme Court’s block on deportations.

This move signals growing opposition to the contentious plan to return asylum seekers to Rwanda.

Although the Lords’ decision has limited practical impact, as they cannot block an international treaty, it reflects strong opposition.

The government has stated it will not delay the treaty, but ignoring the request could pose challenges in a legal context.

John Kerr, a former diplomat in the Lords, stated that the Rwanda plan is “incompatible with our responsibilities” under international human rights law.

The vote emphasizes the opposition’s strength in the House of Lords, where many members seek to amend the bill.

The Rwandan policy is a key component of Sunak’s pledge to “stop the boats” bringing unauthorized migrants to the UK across the Channel from France.

The deal with Rwanda, struck almost two years ago, aimed to send migrants who reach Britain across the Channel to Rwanda permanently.

Despite Britain paying Rwanda over £240 million under the deal, no one has been sent to the East African country.

Human rights groups criticize the plan as inhumane and unworkable.

The UK Supreme Court ruled in November that the policy was unlawful, leading to a new treaty with Rwanda pledging to strengthen migrant protections.

See also  Nigerian government waives license for cottage, community cinema investors

Sunak’s government argues that the treaty allows the passing of a law declaring Rwanda a safe destination.

If approved by Parliament, this law would enable the government to waive certain provisions of UK human rights law regarding Rwanda-related asylum claims.

The debate in the House of Lords reflects the ongoing controversy surrounding this migration treaty.


For Diaspora Digital Media Updates click on Whatsapp, or Telegram. For eyewitness accounts/ reports/ articles, write to: citizenreports@diasporadigitalmedia.com. Follow us on X (Fomerly Twitter) or Facebook

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest from DDM TV

Latest Updates

Why Netanyahu Agrees to Talks in Qatar Despite Hamas Rift

From Bunker to Mosque: Iran’s Supreme Leader Reemerges as Tensions Mount

After 25 Years In Pakistan, The Real Reason Behind Microsoft Exit

El-Rufai Expresses Regret Over Silence on 2023 Election as Leaked Video Sparks Outrage

Soludo engages Anambra indigenes in US as tour of accountability, inclusive governance continues

PSG Survive Red Card Madness and Musiala Horror to Knock Out Bayern

Deported at Dawn: The Vanishing of Eight Men on the Fourth of July

Why former APC National Chairman, Odigie-Oyegun joined ADC

Akpabio Faces Ouster as Zulum Leads Northern Governors Mass Defection

AMCON puts Silverbird Mall up for sale over unpaid debt

Subscribe to DDM Newsletter for Latest News

Get Notifications from DDM News Yes please No thanks