(DDM) – The United States and Iran have presented competing proposals aimed at ending the ongoing conflict in the Middle East, as diplomatic tensions intensify over a possible ceasefire arrangement.
US President Donald Trump reportedly introduced a 15-point peace framework designed to bring an end to the war involving Iran and Israel.
The proposal includes a demand that key Iranian nuclear facilities at Natanz, Isfahan, and Fordow be dismantled as part of any ceasefire agreement.
The plan is said to be part of Washington’s broader strategy to de-escalate hostilities after weeks of escalating military confrontation in the region.
However, Iranian authorities have firmly rejected the proposal, describing it as unacceptable and one-sided.
Tehran also reportedly mocked the ceasefire initiative, questioning its credibility and intentions.
Iran instead presented its own counter-proposal, outlining conditions it says must be met before any agreement can be reached.
Officials in Tehran insist that any diplomatic resolution must respect Iran’s sovereignty and security concerns.
The exchange of proposals highlights deep divisions between both sides over the terms of peace and post-conflict arrangements.
Analysts say the competing demands underscore the difficulty of achieving a near-term ceasefire despite international pressure.
The conflict, which has escalated in recent weeks, continues to draw global concern over its potential to destabilise the wider Middle East region.
Diplomatic observers note that both sides are attempting to shape the narrative of negotiations while maintaining strategic leverage.
The United States has maintained that Iran’s nuclear capabilities remain a central issue in any peace discussion.
Iran, on the other hand, has repeatedly accused Washington and its allies of escalating tensions through military and political pressure.
International stakeholders are calling for restraint and renewed diplomatic engagement to prevent further escalation.
The situation remains fluid, with no confirmed breakthrough reported in ongoing negotiations.
Efforts by mediating countries to bridge the gap between both proposals are expected to continue in the coming days.
The outcome of the diplomatic exchange is likely to shape the next phase of the conflict and regional stability.
