ABUJA, NIGERIA — The decision by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to recognise Shehu Gabam as chairman of the Social Democratic Party (SDP) has sparked a renewed leadership crisis within the party.
The development, which emerged on Sunday, April 26, 2026, followed INEC’s reliance on a court order to validate Gabam’s position, a move that has drawn sharp criticism from opposing factions within the SDP.
Party stakeholders who oppose the recognition described the action as illegal and politically motivated, insisting that due process was not followed in determining the party’s leadership structure.
The disagreement has reignited tensions within the SDP, with rival camps laying claim to the party’s leadership and control of its national structure.
Sources within the party disclosed that the crisis has been brewing for some time, with internal disputes over leadership legitimacy and party direction remaining unresolved.
INEC, however, maintains that its actions are guided strictly by court rulings and legal frameworks governing political parties in Nigeria.
The commission’s stance has not calmed tensions, as aggrieved members argue that the recognition could deepen divisions and weaken the party ahead of future elections.
Political analysts warn that prolonged internal crises often undermine party cohesion, reduce public confidence, and affect electoral performance.
They note that smaller parties like the SDP are particularly vulnerable to fragmentation when leadership disputes are not effectively managed.
Supporters of Gabam, on the other hand, insist that the court’s decision provides a clear legal basis for his recognition and should be respected by all party members.
The unfolding situation has also raised concerns about the broader implications for Nigeria’s political landscape, where internal party conflicts frequently lead to defections and realignments.
Observers say the SDP must resolve the crisis quickly to remain competitive and relevant in the evolving political environment.
As tensions continue, the party’s ability to manage internal disagreements and present a united front will be crucial in determining its future trajectory.
