(DDM) — Former Attorney-General of the Federation, Abubakar Malami, has accused the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission of attempting to unlawfully evict his family from his Abuja residence without a valid court order.
Malami made the allegation following reports that operatives of the anti-graft agency moved to take over his property located in the Maitama area of the Federal Capital Territory. He described the action as a violation of due process, insisting that the matter is already before a competent court.
According to the former minister, the EFCC’s move disregards ongoing legal proceedings and undermines the rule of law. He maintained that no agency has the authority to enforce property seizure or eviction without obtaining the appropriate judicial approval.
Sources close to Malami revealed that his legal team is preparing to challenge the action in court, arguing that any attempt to take possession of the property while a case is pending amounts to contempt of court. They stressed that due process must be followed to avoid setting a dangerous precedent.
The EFCC had earlier been reported to have initiated steps to recover assets allegedly linked to financial misconduct, with the Maitama property believed to be part of its investigation. However, the commission has yet to publicly clarify whether it secured a court order authorizing the takeover of the residence.
Legal experts have weighed in on the controversy, noting that under Nigerian law, interim or final forfeiture of assets must be backed by a court order. They explained that while anti-corruption agencies have the mandate to investigate and recover assets, such actions must strictly comply with legal procedures to protect constitutional rights.
The situation has generated mixed reactions across the political and legal landscape. Some observers argue that anti-corruption agencies must act decisively in asset recovery cases, while others emphasize that adherence to due process is critical to maintaining public trust in the justice system.
Political analysts also note that the dispute could have broader implications for Nigeria’s anti-corruption efforts, particularly in balancing aggressive enforcement with respect for the rule of law. They warn that any perception of overreach by enforcement agencies could weaken institutional credibility.
Meanwhile, residents of the area reported increased security presence around the property, fueling speculation and public interest in the unfolding situation.
As the controversy deepens, attention is now focused on the courts, where the legality of the EFCC’s actions is expected to be tested. Observers say the outcome could shape future enforcement practices and define the limits of agency powers in asset recovery cases.
and then