Igbo Corner
Peter Obi’s Final Written Address (5): Amazon witness shatters INEC’s “technical glitch” fable
In continuation of the facts and concise argument on issues for determination before the Presidential Election Petition Court (PEPC) presented by the Labour Party presidential candidate, Mr. Peter Gregory Obi, produces details of the evidence by the Amazon Web Services (AWS) witness countering the alleged temporary failure of communication between the e-transmission system and the IReV Portal of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC).
The witness provided incontrovertible evidence of the Health Status of the Amazon Servers which showed that there was no technological glitch on the day of the election.
In his Final Written Address presented to the Tribunal challenging the 2023 presidential results, Peter Obi stated:
According to Dr. Lawrence Bayode, Deputy Director ICT INEC, in his evidence before the Court “the use of technology is as prescribed by INEC pursuant to the Electoral Act 2022, and Regulations and Guidelines for the Conduct of General Elections 2022. According to PW1:
“Immediately after the election on the 25th of February 2023, polling unit results were uploaded and received by the e-transmission system whilst using the BVAS there was a temporary failure of communication between the e-transmission system and the IReV portal for the Presidential election. In this regard, the e-transmission system returned an HTTP 500 error which is an application error such that the transmitted results though received on the e transmission application hosted on the AWS, the e-transmission could not organize and push the results instantly to the Presidential module on the IReV portal because it could not map the results uploaded for the Presidential election to any State. The AWS CloudTrail logs contain and shows patches deployed to fix the error/technical glitches on the election day.”
However, contrary to the above evidence of alleged temporary failure of communication between the e-transmission system and the IReV Portal, PW7 provided documentary evidence of the Health Status of the Amazon Web Services (AWS) Servers, showing that from the health status of the Server, there was no report of any technological glitch on the day of the election.
It is common ground that the 1st Respondent deployed/utilized the AWS servers for the hosting of its e-transmission Portal as well as the IReV Portal. The Report of the AWS Health Status in the Six Regions where AWS Servers are hosted was admitted in evidence as Exh. PCJ 3 A- F and PCJ 4.
PW7 annexed a copy of her profile/resume to her witness statement on oath, which shows that she is employed by Amazon Web Services Maryland, USA as a Cloud Infrastructure Engineer/Architect from February 2022 to present. There was no evidence before the Court from the 2nd and 3rd Respondents debunking and/or challenging the impressive resume of PW7, which she attached to her witness statement on oath… maintained that her employment verification letter has the name of the corporation and Employee Resource center, and that the employee resource center is the department that handles employment verification and that Exhibit PCJ2 is in the nature of employment verification letters given by AWS to its employees.
The PW7’s confirmation of employment apart from indicating that it was issued by the Employee Resource Center, Amazon.com. Inc. also contain a further statement “if you have any questions, please contact us at 888.892.7180”. Neither the 2nd and 3rd Respondents nor anyone whatsoever including their sole witness made any effort to contact Amazon Resource center at the above given number.
In a futile attempt to justify the alleged excuse of technological glitches, RWI alleged the AWS CloudTrail Logs showed the touted technological glitches and the patches deployed to repair same. RWI admitted under cross examination that, a CloudTrail Log will contain the following features namely: “Event time, Event Source, Event name, AWS Region, Source IP Address, I.A.M (Identity Access Management), User Address.”
In her unchallenged evidence before the Court, PW7 also testified that there is a CloudTrail for every API (Application Programming Interface) action within an AWS account. It is submitted that, a cursory examination of Exh RA6 will show that, it does not meet the requirements of a CloudTrail Log. The above itemized features of a CloudTrail Log as admitted by RWI, are non-existent in Exh RA6.
The Respondents case is that “the said technological glitch was repaired following which the result of the first Presidential election was successfully uploaded on IReV on the 25th of February 2023 (the day of the election)”… that “the alleged technical glitch did not in any way affect the result of the election… that upon resolution of http 500 error, the result which were delayed in the e-transmission were eventually organized and pushed to the IReV Portal… results are available as generated in their original from the polling unit using the BVAS… result of the election as uploaded on the IReV are readable and reflect the lawful scores of all the candidates at the election”.
Contrary to the above evidence, the purported result of the election uploaded/transmitted to the IReV, certified copies of which were issued and given by the 1st Respondent to the Petitioner are made up of blurred/unreadable copies and images, as well inaccessible/blank documents. Even RWI himself, when shown certified copies of these blurred/unreadable documents, admitted/conceded that he was unable to decipher the votes as “the copies are blurred.”
These documents though certified by the 1st Respondent where either manifestly blurred or blank documents, and where purported to be the result of the election in respective polling unit… blurred copies of documents certified by the 1st Respondent as purported Forms EC8A, EC8B, EC40G and EC60E, which were given to the Petitioners as certified copies of the original document in possession of the 1st Respondent.
The above blurred copies cannot by any stretch of imagination be described as the authentic version of the actual Form EC8A containing the records of the figures obtained by the Candidates in the respective polling units, yet INEC certified these blurred copies/images as true copies of what is in their possession… further debunk the unfounded claim/evidence of RW1 that, the hard of Form EC8A in the possession of the 1st Respondent were used to collate the result of the election. If such hard copies as claimed by the RW1 exist, and are in the 1st Respondents possession, the million-dollar question, is why were they not certified and given to the Petitioners instead of certifying the blank, blurred, unreadable and irrelevant images, purporting same to be the certified true copies of the result of the election? The Supreme Court held that if an admitted document is incomplete or is edited, the party to be damnified is the one who ought to have produced the proper/correct/the complete document if he failed to produce the said document in it’s corrects from.
The Respondents neither challenged nor joined issues with the Petitioners on the fact that the result of the election uploaded/transmitted on the IReV in 18,088 polling units were blurred, and this was established by the oral evidence of RWI. Prof. Eric Uwadiegwu Ofoedu), produced a spread sheet of the 18,088 polling units with blurred Forms EC8A, and also gave evidence that “from the IReV Portal, 18,088 polling unit results were blurred”, and also, that “from IReV Portal scores, on Form EC8As of 39, 546 polling units were inaccessible/contain uploads not connected to the election.”
It is respectfully conceded, that though the Court is not bound to accept an expert report, the legal position is also that “they would appear not to have any choice than to do so as long as the expert evidence is unchallenged and un-contradicted as has been the situation in this case”.
The 2nd and 3rd Respondents in page 16 of their written address, and submitted inter alia that “an isolated consideration of two States out of the 36 States of the Federation and the FCT could not ground an empirical analysis of accuracy of the overall results… It is noteworthy that the witness himself admitted under cross examination that the totality of the said polling units both in Rivers and Benue, where he claimed to have considered, would not amount to 18,088 polling units.”
From the purported result of the election in the Form EC8A, it was claimed that Tinubu won the Presidential election in both Rivers and Benue States, and thereby, adding those two States (Rivers and Benue States) to the number of States in the Federation wherein the 2nd Respondent as the Candidate of the 4th Respondent met the Constitutional requirement as provided in Section 134 (2) (b) of the 1999 Constitution as amended, of having not less than one-quarter of votes cast in at least two-thirds of all the States in the Federation.
Clearly, by the unchallenged evidence of PW4 as succinctly explained in the Data Analysis of the Benue State scores and Rivers State scores, the Petitioners lawfully won the election in the two States.
By evidence of PW4 which is supported/corroborated by Report of Data Analysis of the Result from February 25th, 2023 Presidential Election for Benue and Rivers State, it is summited that the evidence was neither challenged nor controverted. It is further submitted that from a proper understanding of the actual summation of the scores obtained by the Petitioners and the 4th Respondent in Rivers and Benue States, clearly show that the Petitioners won the election in both States.
The 2nd and 3rd Respondents, despite the opportunity they had to cross examine PW4, and perhaps, challenge him on his expert evidence, failed to utilize that opportunity to challenge him about his expert analysis based on the blurred copies of the purported results of the election in the affected polling units. It is settled law that “where a party fails to cross examine a witness on a particular matter, the implication is that he accepts the truth of that matter as led in evidence… a party who fails to cross examine a witness will not be entitled to invite the court to disbelief the witness on the evidence he gave.”
We need not make any heavy weather to emphasize the point that even in their final written address, the 2nd and 3rd Respondents as well as the 1st Respondent in its evidence before the Honourable court has not challenged nor denied the authenticity of the evidence.
The 2nd and 3rd Respondents only called as their witness in this case, Senator Michael Opeyemi Bamidele, who testified on 5th July 2023. Apart from his resume which was admitted as Exh. RA26 and other documents showing that the 2nd and yd Respondent we’re qualified to contest the Presidential election, Senator Bamidele as the star witness for the 2nd and yd Respondents, gave no evidence in rebuttal, challenging the expert and other evidence adduced by the Petitioners witnesses.
The porous defence of the 2nd and 3rd Respondents show case contradiction, inconsistency, fiction and unreliability in the evidence of their sole witness, the RW2. The witness who disowns his own document, and who admitted that he has never accessed the IReV, and yet, claimed that he knows its contents.
The duty of Your Lordships, is to put the evidence of the Petitioners’ expert/special witnesses on one side of the imaginary scale, and that of the 2nd and 3rd Respondents sole witness, SW1 (Senator Bamidele) on the other side of the imaginary scale, and then weigh in your judicial minds, whether the Petitioners case of non-compliance with the mandatory requirements of the Electoral Act, Regulations and Guidelines and the Manual for Election Officials has been established.
The Petitioners expert evidence/report of the upload of 18,088 polling unit Forms EC8A, purported to be the result of the election (Form EC8A) in the 18,088 polling units, was neither challenged nor controverted. The blurred copies were not readable nor contain any relevant information including scores of Candidates obtained in the polling unit on the day of the election. RW1 admitted that he could not see/read any figures on the blurred copies of the purported Fonn ECSA shown to him in the open court.
The unchallenged Data Analysis further confirm that, the purported result of the election in the polling unit in Form EC8A in 39,546 polling units were inaccessible on the IReV. In these 39,546 polling units, 23,119,298 registered voters collected their PVCs, whilst 5,532,553 voters were accredited to vote in these polling units. Also, the figure of 23,119,298 and/or 5,532,554 referred to above, are far more than the purported margin of lead in the INEC announced return of the election, for which the election itself ought to be declared as inconclusive, invalid and or null and void.
The self-serving excuse by the 1st Respondent of alleged technological glitch on the day of the election, is not a valid justification for the outright contravention and violation of the Electoral Act, the Regulation and Guidelines, and Manual for Election Officials, all of which prescribe for mandatory upload and transmission of election result in the polling unit, using the BVAS to the IReV, as part of the collation process and to ensure transparent, credible and authentic collation and integrity of the result of the election.
The unchallenged expert evidence of the Petitioners witnesses, including the documentary evidence before the Court, support the Petitioners case, and sufficiently established that, the non-compliance by the 1st Respondent in the circumstances of the instant Petition were not only substantial, but grievously affect the outcome of the Presidential election.
A significant highlight of the expert Data Analysis (Data Report), produced by PW4, is that upon a proper and accurate computation of the result of the election in Rivers and Benue State, using the Forms EC8As uploaded on the IReV, and the certified copies of the Forms EC8As given by the 1st Respondent to the Petitioners, is that the Petitioners won the Presidential election held in Rivers and Benue States.
By this unchallenged development, the number of States wherein the Petitioners won the Presidential election will now be Fourteen States and the PCT, whilst the 2nd to 4th Respondents will thereby, have their number of States allegedly announced for them by the 1st Respondent reduced by two States.
Your Lordships are respectfully urged, to uphold the above submissions and determine that, the non-compliance by the 1st Respondent in the conduct of the Presidential election held on the 25th day of February 2023, substantially affected the result of the Presidential election… in the interest of justice, declare the purported return of Tinubu as the winners of the Presidential election invalid and accordingly nullify the Presidential election held on the 25th day of February 2023.
Read also:
Final Written Address (4): Peter Obi insists Tinubu did not win 25% in FCT
—
©Copyright 2023 News Band
(If you would like to receive CURRENT NEWS updates from News Band on WhatsApp, or Telegram, or wish to send eyewitness accounts/ reports/ articles, write to elstimmy@gmail.com and we will respond instantly. Follow us on twitter @News Band; like our Facebook page: News Band.)
Continue Reading
There’s something about persecution that does two things to a people: it either breaks them, or it makes them beasts of survival.
For centuries the Jews… they were hunted, hated, and humiliated by empires. But they didn’t vanish.
They evolved. They adapted. And today, the Jews are arguably the most powerful tribe in the world economically, intellectually, and politically. Ruthless when necessary.
They are unapologetic about their survival. Now, look at the Igbo. A tribe known for industry, resilience, and brilliance.
A people who just want to live, do business, and thrive. But Nigeria doesn’t want that. Nigeria wants control.
Nigeria wants submission. And the one thing the Igbo have never known how to do is bow. And that’s the real issue.
So what does Nigeria do? It sidelines them. Isolates them. Provokes them. Bombs their villages under the guise of security.
Locks up their agitators. Shuts down their businesses. Mocks their pain. Ignores their history. Prevent them from voting. Play politics with their education. Sponsored bigotry on them.
And then Nigeria pretends to be surprised that there’s growing radicalization in the East?
Let me be clear: The Igbo didn’t start this fire. Nigeria did.
And history, the very same history we keep refusing to learn from, has shown us that when you keep pushing a tribe that knows how to survive, they evolve into something stronger, something unstoppable.
It’s happened before. With the Jews. Europe tried to exterminate them. Instead, they became the backbone of global finance, media, tech, and diplomacy.
You don’t touch a Jew today without consequences. You don’t push them to the wall and expect them to stay quiet.
Now Nigeria is doing the same to the Igbo, pushing, prodding, provoking.
But here’s the warning: when you push an animal to the wall, it doesn’t stay calm. It fights back. It bites. And this time, when it bites, don’t act shocked.
But this isn’t just about the Igbo solely. Nigeria has perfected the art of creating monsters, then acting surprised when they bite.
The Niger Delta? Radicalized. The region was exploited for oil, polluted beyond repair, and ignored until their youths picked up arms.
The Fulani terrorists? Radicalized. Left behind by the same government that claimed to represent them, now manipulated by religion and resentment.
The Almajiri? Radicalized. Abandoned by an elite that used their poverty as a vote bank and then left them to rot.
The Agbero? Radicalized. Uneducated, weaponized, and unleashed as tools of political chaos.
Even the middle class is slowly being radicalized, not with guns, but with hopelessness. That, too, is a ticking time bomb.
A nation cannot continue to marginalize its most brilliant tribe and expect peace.
The Igbo are not docile. They are not quiet. They are not forgetful. They are survivors, and survivors don’t beg for space forever. At some point, they take it.
The Igbo didn’t set out to be radicals. They were made into one by a country that won’t stop seeing their confidence as a threat.
You can’t keep pretending unity means silence. You can’t keep preaching peace while planting injustice.
The Igbo are not asking for too much, they just want to live, build, and grow.
But if you insist on turning their dignity into defiance, their enterprise into enmity, and their survival into sedition, then you are creating a monster.
And if history has taught us anything, it’s this: when a persecuted people decide that survival is no longer enough, when they decide to stop running and start resisting, they don’t just fight back. They win.
Nigeria must understand this: you cannot keep pushing people into a corner and expect submission.
When you back a lion into a wall, don’t expect it to purr. It will roar. It will claw. It will tear through anything standing between it and freedom.
So here’s the final warning, for those who still care to listen: Nigeria is radicalizing the Igbo.
But worse, Nigeria is radicalizing everyone. And it won’t end well.
When the fire spreads, when the rebellion multiplies, when the beast we created begins to fight back, don’t act shocked; no tribe will be left untouched.
Don’t pretend it wasn’t preventable. We all made it happen. You don’t corner a lion and expect peace.
Abolaji Rasaq is a public affairs analyst.
Palpable crisis is brewing in Nnewi over the election of the President General of Uruagu Community in the industrial town of Anambra State, with a business mogul and owner of Organiser Plc., Chief Innocent Okoli, accused of upsetting the apple cart.
The crisis has led to protests and resignation of members of the Board of Trustees (BoT).
One of the resignation letters sighted by News Band was from a legal practitioner, J. N. Obi, Esq.
Barrister Obi, until his resignation served as the Secretary of the Executive Committee and member, Uruagu Board of Trustees.
Tendering his resignation letter, Obi cited brazen violation of the Constitution of Uruagu Nnewi Community Development Union.
The letter was referenced OB/03 /296/2025, dated May 8, 2025, and addressed to His Highness. Obi A. C. Obi (Ogidi IV).
In the letter entitled “Letter of resignation as member, Board of Trustees (B.O. T) Uruagu Nnewi. Obi announced his resignation based on the following reasons:
- Article 8. 9 (a) of the Constitution of Uruagu Nnewi Community Development Union. 2022 (As Amended) states and I quote:
“The Board shall “Ensure the observance of this Constitution”. - Article 14.4 of the Constitution of Uruagu Nnewi Community Development Union 2022 (As Amended) states and I quote:
“Each ward shall submit a list of the Electors In writing to the Secretary General of the Union, one month before any election.
“The submission of the list of the Electors shall be done by the Ward Chairman In consultation with the Ward’s Obi.” - “The election sought to be conducted on Saturday, 10th day of May 2025, did not comply with the above provisious as it was on the Union’s general meeting of the I3th day of April 2025 that the expiration of the tenure of the Executives was announced.”
The legal pratictioner, however, noted that the election to be held on May 10 will not be up to one month.
He, therefore, resigned his membership of B. 0. T for failure to abide by the above provisions of the Constitution as stated above.
On his part, the former President General of Uruagu Nnewi, Chief Ambassador Charles Nwonye, decried series of illegalities in the proposed election championed by Chief Okoli.
He recalled the efforts of past and present stakeholders to ensure that Uruagu Nnewi Community Development Union is recognised as a legal and responsible entity in the state.
He, however, speaking in a voice note obtained by Diaspora Digital Media (DDM), regretted:
“It’s very, very unfortunate that those counsels that instituted Uruagu Development Union are no longer alive.
“They were the ones who were known for speaking out the truth. But at the same time, we will not all keep quiet.
“I, hereby, wish to bring the following to the attention of all Uruagu indigenes, scattered all over Nigeria and in the diaspora that four years ago, a similar thing happened.
“Uruagu Nnewi Constitution was also flagrantly violated four years ago.
“At the end, a lot of stakeholders asked the former Executive Committee to resign and leave en masse.
“The Constitution, however, allowed them to recontest.
“The Executive Committee then honourably resigned and no one of us recontested, ushering in a new Executive Committee.
“They argued that following the election, the Constitution will be amended to correct all the flaws and ensure no such flagrant abused repeats itself.
“They went for the election and what happened there was the same illegality we’re talking about.
“Some of our youths went and connived with mischief makers, disrupted the election and declared the present Executive Committee members winners.
“The youths stood by them in their misguided thoughts that the Executive Committee members enjoy special gains in the office.
“They disrupted the election and ensured that the present crop of Executive Committee members was ushered in.
“The election was heavily flawed and rigged in favour of Eloka Ike and Innocent Okoli, but we let go and left peacefully.
“The new Executive Committee promised to preside for only four years and leave, but we are currently seeing the same illegalities.
“I dare ask: Should Uruagu be known only for illegalities? I thought Ndi Uruagu are smart people?
“I have observed that there are certain individuals who are hell-bent on ensuring that the Uruagu leadership fails.
“They seem bent on destroying all our efforts, acting as agents of chaos and destruction.
“How can one man gather a bunch of Umuezeagu indigenes and take them to the court, claiming that they sued the union to court?
“They deceived the High Court and got a frivolous injunction against Uruagu people, all in the name of election!
“When I got this information, I knew that something was wrong.
“How can someone, after serving a tenure fraught with irregularities, fight his way to a second tenure against the people’s wish?
“I want to make it clear to all the delegates in the so-called election that it will not be possible to make an illegality legal.
“Anyone who casts a vote in that sham election is an agent provocateur, as well as a villain.
“Let it be on record that I denounced the so-called election founded on illegality and fraud and all participants, be it a delegate or participant in any manner is an enemy of the people.”
Chief Okoli and other responsible people of Nnewi leadership could not be reached for comment at the moment of this publication.
More details will follow…
The remains of HRH Eze Stephen Nwabueze Ugorji, Orji Ukwu 1 of Lorji Nwekeukwu Autonomous Community in Aboh Mbaise Local Government Area, will be laid to rest on Thursday, May 22, 2025.
The late Eze Ugorji will be buried in his palace at Orji Ukwu Estate, Lorji, following a Catholic funeral Mass at St. Andrews Catholic Church, Lorji.
News Band was informed that His Excellency the Catholic Bishop of Ahiara Diocese, Bishop Okezuo Nwobi, has been invited to officiate at the ceremony.
Bishop Nwobi, it was learnt, has also accepted the family’s invitation to officiate at the funeral rites of the late grand traditional ruler.
This information was provided to members of the press in Owerri by the Opara Eze (First Son of the Eze), former Commissioner for Homeland Security and Vigilante Affairs, Dr. Ugorji Okechukwu Ugorji.
His Lordship Bishop Okezuo Nwobi, the Catholic Bishop of Ahiara Diocese (Mbaise) and Eze Nwabueze Ugorji’s First Son, Dr. Ugorji Okechukwu Ugorji
“The family is grateful to His Lordship for granting us a rare request to officiate at a funeral on a Thursday,” Dr. Ugorji said.
“Our father will feel honored and appreciated because he was not just a devoted Catholic, he shouldered the building of the St. Andrews Catholic Church at Lorji until his death,” the former commissioner added.
Igbo Corner
EXCLUSIVE: Ngozi Orabueze dissolves Biafra Govt In Exile as Simon Ekpa may spend longer time in prison
Dr. Ngozi Orabueze has abruptly dissolved the Biafra Government In Exile following secret information that his former boss, Simon Ekpa may not be coming out from Finnish detention in a hurry.
News Band reported that Mrs. Orabueze, a former Chief of Staff to Mr Simon Ekpa, the self-acclaimed Prime Minister of Biafra Government In Exile, toppled his principal after he was thrown into prison for promoting violent agitation and terrorism in the Southeast of Nigeria.
Ekpa’s trial is scheduled to start in May 2025.
Ngozi, a former chairperson of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) in Atlanta, United States in a statement on Wednesday, announced the dissolution of Biafra Government In Exile.
She said all assets of the Biafra Republic Government In Exile and it’s affiliates shall be transferred to the secretary of the State of the United States of Biafra.
Orabueze also directed all officers of the former exile government to report to their counterpart with the United States of Biafra for reassignment.
The statement reads, “It is resolved that the Biafra Republic Government In Exile (BRGIE) is hereby dissolved as it’s reason for the existence has been superceded by the November 29, 2024 Declaration of the restoration of the Independent United States of Biafra
“All assets of the Biafra Republic Government In Exile and it’s affiliates(BRGIE corporation ID: D237527271) shall be transferred to the secretary of the State of the United States of Biafra.
“All officers of the former exile government shall report to their counterpart with the United States of Biafra for reassignment. All activities of the Biafra Republic Government In Exile shall cease as of February 15, 2025”.
Meanwhile, an insider source in the movement reliably told News Band that Ngozi decided to dissolve BRGIE after receiving intel that Simon Ekpa might spend longer time in prison.
The source also revealed that the Nigerian government is doing everything within it’s power to nail Simon Ekpa for all his atrocious acts in the SouthEast region.
So, the only way to keep the agitation going in the absence of Ekpa is to dissolve BRGIE.
“Yes, Ngozi Orabueze dissolved the Biafra Republic Government In Exile so as to be fully in charge of the assets belonging to the movement. With the way the Nigerian government is going about the case of Simon Ekpa, he may spend longer time in prison”, the source said.
Moreover, before now, Orabueze has been at war with some arrowheads of the separatist movement who refused to acknowledge her authority.
This however, has led to series of fights, accusation and counter accusations among the agitators.
We celebrate the life of Mrs. Roseline Udu Eze, a devoted wife, mother, grandmother, and pillar of strength.
Her unwavering love, kindness, and selflessness left an indelible mark on all who knew her.
Though we mourn her passing, we take solace in the legacy she leaves behind and the cherished memories we hold. Rest peacefully in the arms of the Lord, dear Roseline.
You will forever be missed.
May her soul rest in perfect peace.
Amen.
-
Featured4 days agoYour Attacks on Peter Obi Are Petty, Stop It! Chekwas Rebukes Soludo
-
News4 days agoTension in Anambra community as senior police officer shoots kinsman dead
Colleagues, others try cover-up; victim's family fights back
-
News7 days agoAnambra South Bye-Election: APC Chief Rescues Deputy Gov Caught In Vote Buying From Angry Youths
By Chuks Collins, Awka
-
News5 days agoNigerian visa applicants must provide 5-yr social media history — US embassy
-
Celebrity/Entertainment23 hours agoHow Nigerian TikToker Geh Geh Made ₦45 Million in One Night
-
Analysis6 days agoSystemic Sabotage: How APC, INEC Colluded To Undermine Amamgbo’s Senatorial Bid
By Arthur Ezechukwu
-
News3 days agoTerrorist Organisation: APC, PDP Members in US, UK, France Risk Deportation
-
Celebrity/Entertainment5 days agoWhy single mothers can’t raise boys into proper men — Jim Iyke
-
News7 days agoBREAKING: Troops arrest Nigeria’s most wanted terror kingpin
-
News2 days agoVandal electrocuted while vandalizing Aba power infrastructure