Nnamdi Kanu reveals next line of action following court ruling labelling IPOB a terrorist group

DDM News

The leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), Nnamdi Kanu, has vowed to resist the recent ruling of the Court of Appeal in Abuja, which upheld the proscription of IPOB and reaffirmed its designation as a terrorist organization.

Diaspora digital media (DDM) revailed that On Thursday, January 31, 2025, the Abuja Division of the Court of Appeal upheld an earlier order issued by Justice Abdu Kafarati of the Federal High Court, Abuja, affirming IPOB’s proscription.

The ruling reinforced the Federal Government’s stance that the group’s activities pose a threat to national security.

In reaction to the judgment, Kanu expressed his intention to challenge the ruling through legal means, asserting that the decision contradicts the Nigerian Constitution and relevant legal statutes.

He argued that the proscription order was obtained ex parte—meaning it was granted without IPOB being given an opportunity to be heard—contrary to the legal procedures required for such declarations.

Speaking during a routine meeting with his legal team at the Department of State Services (DSS) facility in Abuja, Kanu reiterated his stance on the matter.

His lead counsel, Aloy Ejimakor, later issued a statement outlining their legal position.

Ejimakor described the ruling as “infamous” and assured the public that it would be vigorously contested through both domestic and international legal channels.

“We maintain that the proscription of IPOB violated the principles of fair hearing, as IPOB was neither notified nor given the opportunity to defend itself before the proscription order was issued,” Ejimakor stated.

He also pointed out procedural irregularities in the proscription process, highlighting that:

1. The Federal High Court granted the proscription order via an ex parte application, rather than through a formal hearing before a judge, as required by law.

2. The order was signed by the late Abba Kyari, rather than by former President Muhammadu Buhari, which they argue rendered it legally invalid.

Despite acknowledging these procedural concerns, the Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, citing national security as a justification for overriding constitutional provisions.

Kanu’s legal team has indicated that they will pursue further legal actions, both within Nigerian courts and at the international level, to challenge the legitimacy of the ruling.

In a separate statement, IPOB’s media and publicity secretary echoed Kanu’s position, stating that the ruling would not deter the movement’s quest for self-determination.

He accused the Nigerian government of suppressing legitimate agitation through unlawful means and called on the international community to intervene.

As the legal battle continues, the decision remains a controversial point of debate, drawing reactions from both IPOB supporters and government authorities.

Many analysts believe that the case will further shape discussions on civil rights, legal due process, and national security considerations in Nigeria.

Kanu, who remains in detention, has maintained that IPOB is a peaceful organization seeking a referendum on Biafra’s independence.

His legal team insists that the group’s designation as a terrorist organization is politically motivated and does not align with international legal standards.

With Kanu determined to pursue all available legal avenues, the case is likely to spark further legal and political tensions in the coming months.

Kindly share this story….

Thank you 💕

For Diaspora Digital Media Updates click on Whatsapp, or Telegram. For eyewitness accounts/ reports/ articles, write to: citizenreports@diasporadigitalmedia.com. Follow us on X (Fomerly Twitter) or Facebook